Unamusement Park

Chuck Thompson has written a remarkable new book, “Better Off without ‘Em: A Northern White Manifesto for Southern Separation Racial Segregation.” As you can see, I’ve taken the liberty of diversifying the title for your amusement.

Here’s a synopsis of the book (suitably diversified, of course):

Lets talk about secession segregation.

Not exactly the most suitable cocktail party conversation starter anywhere in the country, but take that notion deep into the heart of Dixie Detroit and you might find yourself running from the possum-hunting conservatives crack-smoking criminals, trailer-park lifers Thug 4 Life’rs, and prayer warriors welfare queens Chuck Thompson encountered during the two years he spent traveling the American South black America asking the question: Would we be better off without em?

The result is a heavily researched, serious inquiry into national divides which is unabashedly controversial, often uproarious, and always thought-provoking. From a church service in Mobile, Alabama Chicago, Illinois, where the gospel entertainer the Reverend Jeremiah Wright announces “Islam is upon us!” “The government lied about inventing the HIV virus as a means of genocide against people of color!” to a store selling Ku Klux Klan “Civil Rights” movement memorabilia on a quaint little street in South Carolina any American city — Thompson lifts the green velvet drapes on a South race that would seem to belong more to the time of Rhett and Scarlett the Stone Age (or, if we’re being extremely generous: the time of Nat Turner and John Brown) than the dawn of the twenty-first century.

By crunching numbers, interviewing experts, and roaming the not-so-former Confederacy growing ghetto, Thompson — an openly disgruntled liberal white man from the Northwest a once-civilized society — makes a compelling case for southern secession voluntary segregation. What would the new nations look like if Virginia governor Bob McDonnell white-hating, race-baiting demagogue Al Sharpton was elected as the first President Tribal Chieftain of the Confederate States of America United States of Black America? If a southern black electorate was left to fend for itself while the North white America did damage control on an auto industry a civilization decimated by cut-rate, union-defying southern voters low-IQ, tribalist black voters for the last hundred years? If the BCS championship football game were replaced by a North vs. South Whites vs. Blacks Coca Cola/ Starbucks Blood Bowl™? If Florida Hispanics and Jews went to the South blacks and Texas Asians to the North whites in the most complex land-and-population grab in American history since the Treaty of Versailles?

“Better Off without Em” is a deliberately provocative book whose insight, humor, fierce and fearless politics race realism, and sheer nerve will spark a national debate that is perhaps long overdue long, long, long, long, long overdue.

SOP for the MOG, if you will.

The leading race realist/immigration reform website, VDARE, is currently featuring my article on Democrat race-baiting (specifically by State Senator L. Louise Lucas of Portsmouth). Check it out, ‘Park rangers (and hate-kittens).

First we watched with dismay as the EEOC charged Pepsi with black and Hispanic criminality “disproportionately” excluding blacks and Hispanics through a policy of “not hiring workers with arrest records.”

Then we gazed in horror as a federal judge fined the FDNY $129 million with black and Hispanic stupidity “intentional discrimination” for testing the intelligence of its recruits.

Now did you really think we’d seen the worst of government-mandated systematic anti-white discrimination (also known as “equality”) and special privileges for non-whites, American or otherwise (also known as “civil rights”)?

It Gets Worse

Straight from the White House:

On Wednesday, during his remarks at the National Urban League conference in New Orleans, LA, President Obama announced he would sign an Executive Order today to improve outcomes and advance educational opportunities for African Americans.

That’s nice. I’d like to improve outcomes and advance opportunities for European Americans. What do you mean, “das raciss, you so raciss”?

The President has made providing a complete and competitive education for all Americans — from cradle to career — a top priority.

trollolol

In the nearly 60 years since the Brown v. Board of Education decision put America on a path toward equal educational opportunity, America’s educational system has undergone a remarkable transformation. Many African American children who attended substandard, segregated schools in the 1950s

… causing those schools to be substandard in the first place…

have grown up to see their children attend integrated and effective elementary and secondary schools, colleges, and universities

… thereby ruining those once-effective elementary and secondary schools, etc.

Nonetheless, substantial obstacles to equal educational opportunity still remain in America’s educational system.

Um… genetics? [ducks]

African American students lack equal access to [blah blah blah], and they disproportionately experience [blah blah blah].

Ohhhh, I see: you meant made-up fake anti-minority discrimination conspiracy theories blaming mythical white “racists” for everyone else’s failure.

The White House Initiative on Educational Excellence for African Americans, housed within the Department of Education, will work with the Executive Office of the President and Cabinet agencies to identify evidence-based best practices to improve African American student achievement in school and college, and to develop a national network of individuals, organizations, and communities that will share and implement these practices. It will also help ensure that Federal programs and initiatives administered by the Department of Education and other Federal agencies maintain a focus on serving and meeting the educational needs of African Americans.

Such as?

To deliver a complete and competitive education for all African Americans, the Initiative will promote, encourage, and undertake efforts designed to meet several objectives, including:

[...]

Promoting a positive school climate that does not rely on methods that result in disparate use of disciplinary tools, and decreasing the disproportionate number of referrals to special education by addressing root causes of the referrals…

That’s straight from the executive order: “… promoting a positive school climate that does not rely on methods that result in disparate use of disciplinary tools…”

If this doesn’t terrify you, you haven’t been paying attention.

Stating the Unspeakably Obvious

Allow me to state the obvious. (Contrary to popular liberal belief, this is not yet punishable by death in the United States.)

Just as everyone knows that black people are more criminal than white people (remember, all the stereotypes are true), everyone also knows that black students in general are at least an order of magnitude more disruptive and dangerous than white students. (You can figure out for yourself where Hispanics and Asians fit in the hierarchy.)

Moreover, we all know — every single one of us — that the reason black-majority (“segregated”) schools are so bad (“substandard”) is because they’re full of black people. I’ve collected a handful of spectacular examples in my list, Minority Violence at School and College, but there are thousands more; start in the AmRen archives.

Unfortunately, although everyone is at least dimly aware of this hilariously inconvenient truth, most people will not admit it. Some will even go to great lengths to pretend it isn’t so. Those people are liars and they should all be lashed in public. Fifty times, I say — but then I’ve always had a soft heart, full of sunshine and kittehs.

See?

Science: Officially “Racist”

Whence these race differences in antisocial behavior (in schools and everywhere else)? Well, we should — but probably don’t — all know by now that those differences are not entirely due to environment (family, society, culture, etc.). They are due in part to genetic differences between the races. This follows from the basic principles of evolutionary biology: mutation, adaptation, etc.

Human populations isolated from one another for tens of thousands of years in wildly different environments (Sweden vs. Somalia, say) will undoubtedly evolve different distributions of key behavioral traits, like intelligence and aggression.

(For more details, see this post, everything after “Race is ancestral geography” in this post, and everything after “Race” in this post.)

That’s the real reason why these “racial disparities in school discipline” aren’t getting any better. Don’t bother with the PC niceties: “racism,” “discrimination,” “prejudice” — all those made-up fake anti-minority discrimination conspiracy theories blaming mythical white “racists” for everyone else’s failure. (Fuck you, Marxist trash. You don’t get to bash white people for succeeding in life.)

In fact, these disparities are not only not improving, they’re actually getting worse, because no one can address them, or even mention them, without being accused of… well, I think we all know. (Hint: it’s the 21st century version of “Heresy! Burn the witch!”)

Now where does this leave us? As I’ve said before:

Race differences in outcomes exist because of race differences in biology. As a result, even if you treat everybody the same, different races will still perform differently.

And that’s why disparate impact does not imply disparate treatment. (Also something I think I’ve mentioned once or twice before…)

Racial Totalitarianism: Past and Present

So why should you be at least a little terrified by this latest bit of anti-white discrimination out of the most divisive administration since Lincoln? Allan Wall nails it in “Should Schools Have Racial Disciplinary Quotas?” (VDARE).

Should schools have racial disciplinary quotas? For example, if a teacher has a class with 50% white students and 50% black students, should the list of students sent to the office or punished in any way also be 50-50?

That looks like what one of Obama’s recent executive orders would lead to.

(Read more at the Daily Caller and at Nicholas Stix, Uncensored.)

It is indeed what Obama’s executive order will lead to. Allan Wall calls this “the ‘cutting edge’ of racial totalitarianism.” He’s right.

Here’s a partial summary of the current state of racial totalitarianism in America with respect to blacks and whites. (You can add the other races yourself.)

• Blacks are more criminal than whites, so you can’t just hire non-criminals. That would be “racist.”
• Blacks are less intelligent than whites, so you can’t just hire intelligent non-retarded people. That would be super-”racist.”
• Black students are more disruptive than white students, so you can’t just discipline the disruptive students. That would be super-mega-”racist.”

Does anyone really believe it stops here?

Racial Totalitarianism… of THE FUTURE

Imagine reading this at whitehouse.gov:

President Obama Signs New Initiative to Improve Judicial Outcomes for African Americans

Executive Order Establishes the White House Initiative on Justice and Liberty for African Americans

On Wednesday, during his remarks at the National Urban League conference in New Orleans, LA, President Obama announced he would sign an Executive Order today to improve judicial outcomes and advance rehabilitation opportunities for African Americans.

The President has made providing a fair and equitable justice system for all Americans a top priority. The White House Initiative on Justice and Liberty for African Americans will work across Federal agencies and with partners and communities nationwide to produce a more effective continuum of criminal penalties and rehabilitation efforts for African American students.

The White House Initiative on Justice and Liberty for African Americans, housed within the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice, will work with the Executive Office of the President and Cabinet agencies to identify evidence-based best practices to improve African American judicial outcomes, and to develop a national network of individuals, organizations, and communities that will share and implement these practices. It will also help ensure that Federal programs and initiatives administered by the Department of Justice and other Federal agencies maintain a focus on serving and meeting the judicial needs of African Americans.

To deliver a fair and equitable justice system for all African Americans, the Initiative will promote, encourage, and undertake efforts designed to meet several objectives, including:

• Promoting a positive social climate that does not rely on methods that result in disparate use of disciplinary tools (including, but not limited to, arrest, prosecution, and incarceration), and decreasing the disproportionate number of arrests and convictions by addressing root causes of the offenses;
• …

(You can imagine how the rest of it would go.)

Six Months Later…

“Excuse me, Officer. I need to report a home invasion. These three black guys with shotguns just kicked in my door and —”

“Whoa, hey, hold on a minute there, pal. ‘Black guys’? Yeah, I’m gonna need you to leave that out of your statement.”

“… Why?”

“Look, man, don’t make this hard for me. Just this past week we’ve had to book thirty of these… ‘young African-American males’.”

“So?”

“So, that’s… what, 70 percent of all arrests for the station? You get me? YAAMs only make up —”

“YAAMs?”

“Young African-American males only make up, like, six percent of the county. And this week they’re 70 percent of arrests? I’m a white guy, for Chrissakes. Do you know how bad this looks? What happens when the Chief Diversity Officer sees this shit?”

“Um…”

“I gotta turn some of these guys loose. Or lose them. Or something! If I don’t get my YAAM count down before the end of the month, the goddamn ‘Justice and Liberty’ squad is gonna haul me off to a Race-Hate Tribunal. They shoot guys like me, you know — ‘privileged’ white males. Shit, I don’t even have a state-certified Black Best Friend any more.”

“What happened to the last one?”

“Shitavious? Man, you know. The usual usual.”

“Stabbed for his EBT card? Shot in a Kool-Aid dispute?”

“Yup.”

“Which one?”

“Both. Shot and stabbed, buying bulk Kool-Aid with his —”

“Okay, okay, I get it.”

“See, I could make up for that, if I only tripled my Social Circle Diversity Index. You’re not half-Cuban or anything, are you? Because we could go see a notary public right now. I’ll give you fifty bucks to say we met in college and —”

“Sorry, I’m not half anything.”

“Shit. Worth a shot. God, I wish I knew more hot Persian girls.”

“Join the club.”

“Yeah, anyway. Gimme a break, will ya? Now, if a Chinese guy breaks into your house, scares your kids, messes up your wife a little, steals some bonsai trees and shit —”

“Then you’ll be all over it?”

“I’ll bust some heads.”

“What if he’s a Chinese Jew?”

“… Don’t even joke about that shit.”

Far-fetched?

I give it five years.

The Camp of the Saints (1973), by Jean Raspail, is an important book about race, immigration, and the future of white people and Western Civilization. Every reactionary should read it.

Luckily for you, reactionary friends, it is also exciting, suspenseful, funny, and thoroughly entertaining. I finished it in one day.

Think of The Camp of the Saints as a much shorter, much funnier Atlas Shrugged with the economic Marxists (Communists) replaced by racial/cultural Marxists, i.e., “Progressives” (who are also, incidentally, Communists).

And yes, it’s funny. I was laughing out loud by the time Dom Meichior called on Saint Podiatron for his assistance, but the Christening scene — never mind, just read the damn book!

On a scale of one to five kittehs, I give The Camp of the Saints… five kittehs!

So many.

A PDF version may be found here, but you can also purchase it on Amazon.

As you can see, I have changed the look of Unamusement Park, because I just discovered nydwracu’s blog and it’s so f*#$ing sexy, I just had to rip it off.

Muahahahahaaa!

Take that!

Also, his latest post is quite good.

Update: Unamusement Park look reverted, almost immediately, to original.

In January, I reported that the doctrine of diversity was inching ever closer to the Beyond Parody event horizon, as the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission charged Pepsi with black and Hispanic criminality. The settlement cost Pepsi a mere $3 million.

Now John Derbyshire, who has described me as “thoughtful, well-spoken, and highly intelligent” (not handsome? what the heck) and is therefore clearly a WISE MAN INDEED, has brought to my attention the serious yet hilarious story of Judge Nick Garaufis and the New York City Fire Department (FDNY).

Here’s what went down:

• FDNY decides firefighters should be able to perform such cognitively demanding tasks as
  • determining if 9 is a bigger or smaller number than 8,
  • subtracting 18 from 22,
  • finding the word “gloves” in a list of 7 articles of clothing,
  • gauging which is more dangerous when one is standing on a subway track: an approaching subway train, or “rubbish burning in a small garbage can” on a platform somewhere, and
  • not standing in pools of water while handling downed power lines
• FDNY administers two multiple choice tests with 4 answers per question, meaning someone who guesses answers, totally at random, will probably score at least 25% on any given test (remember that score), and has a better than 75% chance of scoring at least 25% on at least one test
• black and Hispanic applicants are unable to outwit a coin toss
• DAS RACISS!!!!!!!
• Judge Nick Garaufis rules FDNY practiced “intentional discrimination” against blacks and Hispanics when it asked them to ascertain
  • whether one should count the number of apartments in one building by checking a different building,
  • whether locking every exit is more dangerous during a fire than “a half-empty bucket of sand in the boiler room,”
  • whether blocking the doors is more dangerous during a fire than “loud music,” and
  • whether it’s okay to use an aluminum ladder more than once before you throw it away
• Judge Garaufis insists he will not implement racial quotas, despite “the city’s misleading and inflammatory statements to the contrary”
• Judge Garaufis promptly rules that two out of every five new firefighters hired must be black and one Hispanic — as opposed to the old, racist system, which required that five out of every five be minimally competent/not retarded (clearly privileging whites)
• Judge Garaufis also decrees FDNY must hire any blacks and Hispanics who scored at least 25% on at least one test, which we emphasize has a better than 75% chance of occurring if you guess randomly on every question
• Judge Garaufis further insists on approximately $129 million in “back pay” for these whiz kids, plus “retroactive seniority” and “a retroactively higher salary,” though his ruling is unclear on whether they get to literally spit in the faces of the real firefighters they now outrank, out-earn, and worst of all command
• Judge Garaufis closes by dribbling happily on the floor of the daycare center as he crams his gullet with fistfuls of delicious paste

Oh, that sweet, sweet paste.

I cannot resist…

I’m sure by now you’ve heard all about ABC’s Chief Investigative Correspondent Brian Ross and his little slip-up regarding the Aurora/Dark Knight/neuroscience shooter (NewsBusters):

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: I want go to Brian Ross here, because Brian, you’ve been investigating the background of Jim Holmes, and you found something that might be significant.

BRIAN ROSS: There’s a Jim Holmes of Aurora, Colorado page on the Colorado Tea Party site, as well talking about him joining the Tea Party last year. Now, we don’t know if this is the same Jim Holmes, but it’s a Jim Holmes of Aurora, Colorado.

It is not, in fact, the same Jim Holmes (see, e.g., The Blaze).

Investigating this, investigating that… general investigation.

Shocking! Well, not really. As Nicholas Stix put it:

To [members of the mainstream media], Tea Partiers are fascist monsters. Thus, it was natural, given the leftwing paranoia, stupidity, and laziness of your typical MSM newsroom that Ross would immediately seek to pin the mass murder on a Tea Party member, and that once he found something that looked promising, he would not bother to confirm or disconfirm it.

Not shocking at all, then. I remained thoroughly unshocked.

But after I had dug a little deeper into this story (a little do-it-yourself Chief Investigative Correspondent-ing), I made a truly shocking discovery: someone by the name of

Brian Ross is a pedophile!

Here is the proof (pe.com):

Explicit photos and text messages to two girls has landed a 37-year-old Mentone man in jail on suspicion of sex-related charges, according to Fontana police and jail records.

Brian John Ross was arrested at 5:35 p.m. Thursday at Sierra and Merrill avenues in Fontana and booked on suspicion of contacting a minor and arranging to meet with a minor via the Internet for the purpose of having sex, jail records show. His bail is $50,000.

On March 13, a 10-year-old Fontana girl received a text message from a man who would later identify himself as a 38-year-old named “Brian,” police said in a written statement.

Brian sent the girl a face shot along with a photo of himself exposed, according to the statement.

“Brian asked (the girl) to send him pictures of herself,” according to the statement.

Similar text messages were sent to the girl’s 13-year-old cousin from Redlands.

Now, I’m certainly not suggesting that

Brian Ross, ABC’s Chief Investigative Correspondent, actually is a pedophile.

I am merely pointing out that someone named

Brian Ross wants to have sex with 10-year-old girls.

This could very well be one of those things “that might be significant” to some other thing. As a matter of fact, it’s highly significant, if you uncover evidence that

Brian Ross, the pedophile who wants to rape little kids, has been visiting your neighborhood!

Let me emphasize that I’m only talking about the hypothetical possibility that

Brian Ross, who really, truly is a child molester, is slinking around your neighborhood, peering in your windows, loitering about the playground, and generally acting highly suspicious in a child-molesty sort of way.

I’m certainly not talking about that other, better-known Brian Ross (who may or may not also pursue sexual relations with juveniles).

Unoriginality Endnote: I was sorely disappointed to learn that Glenn Beck and Free Republic (image) did it first.

There’s a radio interview with, uh, “Richard Smith” over at the Stark Truth with Robert Stark on the Voice of Reason radio network.

Richard Smith is widely known and universally feared as the author of the race realist/ethnonationalist/cat enthusiast/secret Zionist/surrealist website Unamusement Park. He enjoys clam bakes, race wars, and French girls.

That would be moi.

The interview was just released; it’s dated June 25 because that’s when we recorded it. Topics covered include:

1. hate crime hoaxes
2. Project Vanquish
3. white racism is dead, so let’s all stop talking about it
4. European nationalism and moderate versus radical rhetoric
5. miscegenation and “personal rankings of girls by ethnicity”
6. racist game (yeah I said it)

We also talked about European-American civil rights activism on the rise, how awesome white supremacy is, George Zimmerman, minority rape, the SPLC, and some important things I’ve learned from commenters.

By the way, this is the picture of myself I submitted to VoR:

Figure 1: A kitten.

I has a flavor!

on nom nom

Update: Thanks to all the readers who recently made a donation toward the ‘Park. I won’t thank you by name — you’re welcome.

Update 2: Commenter Patrick is a big damn hero.

Olave d’Estienne made an editing suggestion about Unamused’s recent audio interview. I thought that’s easy enough to do. So here’s 26 minutes of Unamused in his own voice with only kittens, for the most part, as visual distractions.

http://youtu.be/pj0gOv0tKkc

Steve Sailer brought this to my attention.

The New York Times just published an unintentionally hilarious article on two mothers from Ann Arbor, Michigan: “Two Classes, Divided by ‘I Do’” (July 14).

Jessica Schairer has so much in common with her boss, Chris Faulkner, that a visitor to the day care center they run might get them confused.

They are both friendly white women from modest Midwestern backgrounds who left for college with conventional hopes of marriage, motherhood and career. They both have children in elementary school. They pass their days in similar ways: juggling toddlers, coaching teachers and swapping small secrets that mark them as friends. They even got tattoos together. Though Ms. Faulkner, as the boss, earns more money, the difference is a gap, not a chasm.

But a friendship that evokes parity by day becomes a study of inequality at night and a testament to the way family structure deepens class divides. Ms. Faulkner is married and living on two paychecks, while Ms. Schairer is raising her children by herself. That gives the Faulkner family a profound advantage in income and nurturing time, and makes their children statistically more likely to finish college, find good jobs and form stable marriages.

Ms. Faulkner goes home to a trim subdivision and weekends crowded with children’s events. Ms. Schairer’s rent consumes more than half her income, and she scrapes by on food stamps.

It goes on to detail all the ways that Jessica Schairer’s life sucks compared to Chris Faulkner’s. And whence this glaring disparity?

[Ms. Schairer] got pregnant during her first year of college, left school and stayed in a troubled relationship that left her with three children when it finally collapsed six years ago. She has had little contact with the children’s father and receives no child support. [...]

“Two incomes would certainly help with the bills,” she said. “But it’s parenting, too. I wish I could say, ‘Call your dad.’ ”

[...]

William Penn University, eight hours away in Iowa, offered a taste of independence and a spot on the basketball team. Her first thought when she got pregnant was “My mother’s going to kill me.” Abortion crossed her mind, but her boyfriend, an African-American student from Arkansas, said they should start a family. They agreed that marriage should wait until they could afford a big reception and a long gown.

[...]

Ms. Schairer has trouble explaining, even to herself, why she stayed so long with a man who she said earned little, berated her often and did no parenting. They lived with family (his and hers) and worked off and on while she hoped things would change. “I wanted him to love me,” she said. She was 25 when the breakup made it official: she was raising three children on her own.

Ms. Schairer did find a new boyfriend of unknown ethnicity.

They dated for a year before he moved in. [...]

The details of what followed are less important than the disappointment the boyfriend left behind. No Legos got built during his six-month stay, and it took a call to the police to get him to go. The children asked about him a few days later but have not mentioned him since.

What about Chris Faulkner?

What most separates them is not the impact of globalization on their wages but a 6-foot-8-inch man named Kevin.

Who happens to be white. Just sayin’.

The couple’s life together has unfolded in to-do-list style. They did not inherit wealth or connections or rise on rare talent. They just did standard things in standard order: high school, college, job, marriage and children. “I don’t think I could have done it any more by the books,” Ms. Faulkner said.

The result is a three-bedroom house, two busy boys and an annual Disney cruise.

[...]

The Faulkners built a house in Livingston County because of the good schools.

Livingston County is 95% white and less than 1% black.

Jeremy Faulkner plays tennis and takes karate. Justin plays soccer and baseball. They both swim and participate in Boy Scouts, including a weeklong summer camp that brings the annual activities bill to about $3,500.

[...]

Two parents also bring two parenting perspectives. Ms. Faulkner does bedtime talks. Mr. Faulkner does math. When Ms. Faulkner’s coaxing failed to persuade Jeremy to try hamburgers, Mr. Faulkner offered to jump in a pool fully clothed if he took a bite — an offer Jeremy found too tempting to refuse.

This story doesn’t really require my commentary. I’m just posting it because I enjoy the hysterical response I get from black guys who take this stuff personally, when all I’m doing is pointing out that no white woman should ever date them.

Seriously, white girls: is that really necessary? Really? We get it, you’re pissed at your dad — fine. But c’mon, black guys? Seriously, cut it out already. Ew.

rawr

Anyway, I guess that’s one more entry for the “Perils of Miscegenation/Why White Women Shouldn’t Date Black Men” list. Huzzah?

Update: Steve Sailer’s Take

[O]ut of the voluminous comments that were either NYT Picks or Readers’ Favorites, very, very few, if any, mentioned that perhaps society ought to try to do a better job of letting young women know that black guys are, statistically speaking, more likely to:

• heedlessly impregnate them
• not marry them
• not support their offspring

Has anybody ever calculated the odds?

Read more at iSteve.

The leading race realist/immigration reform website VDARE is currently featuring one of the many lists that form the core of Project Vanquish.

“‘Good Samaritans’: John Derbyshire Vindicated (Again)” (VDARE.com, July 15) is essentially a short version of my list “Minority Violence Against Good Samaritans.”

I hate to say it, but in editing the list, VDARE introduced a number of typos (missing spaces, extra commas, and the like) and peculiarities, such as the spelling of “Main Stream Media.” Also, the knife attack on a bus in England did not, in fact, occur after Derbyshire’s article was published; it happened in September 2011, and the perpetrators were sentenced in July 2012. Most importantly, my list collects reports of violence of any kind, not just “racial” violence, against Good Samaritans.