Unamusement Park

James Trible and Jeanne Brauhar-Trible of Missouri are White, and they live in a 93% White neighborhood, in a 91% White census tract, in an 85% White suburb (Blue Springs) of a 55% White, 30% Black, 10% Hispanic city (Kansas City).

They are also extraordinarily peeved at having discovered that some people, some awful racist White people (from the same race as Hitler!) — specifically, the Council of Conservative Citizens, better known as “radioactive super-Hitlers from space” — prefer to live around other White people.

Openly prefer to live around other White people, I mean.

From KCTV 5: “Couple angered over controversial literature handed out in neighborhood” (April 25, 2012).

A small paper wrapped in plastic and left in driveways in Blue Springs has angered one couple who received it.

A flyer wrapped around the paper titled “Immigration or Invasion?” states, “non-whites are turning America into a third-world slum … Let’s send them home now.”

“This is not how I feel about things,” said Jeanne Brauhar-Trible.

Brauhar-Trible said she lives in a racially diverse neighborhood and felt both offended and embarrassed about the tone of the publication.

Run that by me one more time?

Embarrassed I can understand, but you’re offended because that’s not how you feel about things, you in your “racially diverse neighborhood”? Look, just because your husband watches the occasional NBA game and you thought you saw a Black person at night one time (don’t worry, it was just a shadow) doesn’t mean your neighborhood qualifies as “racially diverse.”

[CofCC CEO Gordon] Baum used several juxtapositions to make his point.

“Look at Rwanda and look at Switzerland,” he said. “Duh. It’s pretty obvious who’s thriving. Do you want to go to Canada or go to Mexico? One doesn’t have to be an Einstein to figure this out.”

Hee hee hee. Indeed one doesn’t.

Incidentally, Blue Springs is ranked 49th on CNN Money’s list of America’s best small cities. The list is, of course, dominated by overwhelmingly White cities (for obvious reasons).

What’s up in Kansas City?

Well, let’s see…

In March 2012 (VDARE), two Black 16-year-olds set a 13-year-old White boy on fire, stating: “This is what you deserve. You get what you deserve, white boy” (NY Daily News). This was merely “the horrible culmination of continual racial harassment her son had to endure at East High”: “Other white students also report a pattern of racial harassment at the high school at the hands of their peers — and, shockingly, their teachers” (American Thinker).

In June 2011 (CofCC), a local high school ended Wednesday classes early, prompting 25–30 Black teens/home invaders/domestic terrorists/hypothetical male descendants of Obama to embark upon a celebratory rampage against Whites in the neighborhood, until an “eccentric” (White) veteran with a rifle stopped them (non-fatally, I’m sorry to report).

And between 1985 and 1997, a deluded federal judge, believing that Blacks (as a whole) are somehow not innately less intelligent than Whites, took partial control of the Kansas City school district, ordering “the state and district to spend nearly $2 billion [of primarily White taxpayer money] over the next 12 years to build new schools, integrate classrooms, and bring student test scores up to national norms” (CATO Institute).

So how did that turn out?

Kansas City spent as much as $11,700 per pupil — more money per pupil, on a cost of living adjusted basis, than any other of the 280 largest districts in the country. The money bought higher teachers’ salaries, 15 new schools, and such amenities as an Olympic-sized swimming pool with an underwater viewing room, television and animation studios, a robotics lab, a 25-acre wildlife sanctuary, a zoo, a model United Nations with simultaneous translation capability, and field trips to Mexico and Senegal. The student-teacher ratio was 12 or 13 to 1, the lowest of any major school district in the country.

The results were dismal. Test scores did not rise; the black-white gap did not diminish; and there was less, not greater, integration.

Why? Simple: genetics.

Deal with it.

I’ll make this as simple as possible: White America is under attack by mobs of racist Blacks. Tell your friends. And buy a gun.

Last night, yet another savage Black mob attacked innocent Whites just for the fun of it, this time in Newark, NJ (“Group of 10 or 15 ‘thugs’ rob and beat 5 people following Prudential Center concert, cops say,” Star-Ledger, May 9).

A roving band of [Black] teenagers assaulted five [presumably White] people as they left a sold-out concert at Newark’s Prudential Center Saturday night, leaving one man unconscious and another with a fractured eye socket during a two-minute crime spree, according to police officials and incident reports.

…

When it was all over, three [presumably White] teenagers and two [presumably White] adults had been beaten and robbed along Broad Street between Market and Lafayette Streets, according to the police reports. One victim, a 23-year-old [presumably White] Pennsylvania man, suffered a fractured eye socket and needed 12 stitches to close wounds to his lip and eyebrow, the reports said.

The same group [of Blacks] attacked a [presumably White] father and son from Morris County, stealing their cell phones and the older man’s wallet. The [Black] teens cornered the 14-year-old boy and repeatedly punched and kicked him, the reports said. A cab driver and parking attendant intervened and helped the boy, who then discovered his father unconscious and bleeding nearby, according to the reports.

…

[Police Director Samuel] DeMaio said all three robberies were likely committed by the same group of [Black] teenagers. Police did recover a video of the attack [which they won't release, because it would prove that the perpetrators were all (obviously) Black, and their victims were all (presumably) White], which shows the [Black] teens racing along Broad Street throwing fists and feet.

“It’s a group [of Blacks] that’s moving very rapidly, they come through, they’re hitting, taking stuff, continuing on and running,” he said.

The scene was apparently so out of control that commanders at the 3rd Precinct issued a “citywide alert” for assistance, according to the reports.

How about a nationwide alert?

Police Director: “the main focus was to assault them”

As usual, the rampaging Blacks were motivated by a simple desire to harm innocent White people, and they seemed to be enjoying themselves immensely (“Newark police: Violence may have been chief motivation in brutal Prudential Center assaults,” Star-Ledger, May 9).

The band of teenagers who mauled five people leaving a sold-out Prudential Center concert Saturday night were “laughing” during the brutal assaults, and may have set out to injure people rather than rob them, Newark police officials said this morning.

…

“I think the taking of the cell phones was secondary. I think the main focus was to assault them,” [Police Director Samuel] DeMaio said. “Some of the kids were laughing through the assaults.”

When, I wonder, will White-hating, diversity-worshiping liberal filth (like Alex Pareene, Leonard Pitts Jr., and of course Tim Wise) stop lying about Black poverty, unemployment, and lack of education being responsible for any part of Black criminality?

We already know that this is not the case, because you can control for those factors — that is, if you happen to be interested in the truth, rather than making sure no one knows anything about race and crime.

Brace yourself for a double dose of distilled racial realism. The truth is, poverty, unemployment, lack of education, and criminality all have a common cause: being a stupid, violent thug. The reason we can’t say that is because there are racial differences in the frequency of being a stupid, violent thug. The reason we can’t fix that is because it probably has a significant genetic component.

I eagerly await, but do not expect, any evidence to the contrary.

City spokeswoman: “an isolated… incident”

Don’t worry: just like in Baltimore, this was just an isolated incident… according to someone whose job it is to make the city look good at any cost.

The cost, by the way, is measured in (White) victims of (Black) violent crime.

“What occurred after the Red Hot Chili Peppers concert was an isolated and unfortunate incident,” said city spokeswoman Anne Torres. “The city continues to provide police protection around the arena that goes above and beyond what is practiced at other arenas across the country, and still stands as one of the best guarded facilities in the city.”

Racial diversity in America, while certainly unfortunate, is not “an isolated incident.” As Those Who Can See has pointed out, the problem has been with us for a long time.

“Feel safe when you come to Newark,” [DeMaio] said. “Feel safe when you come to the arena.”

Feel safe in Newark: the risk of Black mob violence is no greater here than in any other major American city!™ (See below.)

A trend of isolated incidents

Compare, if you will, recent, serious, racially motivated Black-on-White mob violence in other major American cities:

1. Milwaukee, WI (July and August 2011): “set out to injure people”/targeted Whites/laughing (confirmed)
2. Des Moines, IA (August 2010): “set out to injure people”/targeted Whites
3. Denver, CO (late 2009): “set out to injure people”/targeted Whites
4. Philadelphia, PA (continuously, 2009 to present; e.g., March 2010): “set out to injure people”/targeted Whites/laughing (confirmed)
5. Kansas City, MO (April 2010): “set out to injure people”/targeted Whites
6. Chicago, IL (May–June, 2011): “set out to injure people”/targeted Whites
7. Columbia, SC (June 2011): “set out to injure people”/targeted Whites
8. Cincinnati, OH (April 2001): “set out to injure people”/targeted Whites
9. Minneapolis and St. Paul, MN (continuously for two years; e.g., March 2012): “set out to injure people”/targeted Whites
10. St. Louis, MO (continuously from 2010 to present; e.g., May 2012): “set out to injure people”/targeted Whites/laughing (confirmed)
11. Norfolk, VA (April 2012): “set out to injure people”/targeted Whites
12. etc.

Obviously there are tens of thousands of other recent cases of serious Black-on-White violence (just in America, mind you), thousands of them racially motivated, hundreds of them involving mobs (e.g., in Las Vegas, NV and Deltona, FL and probably Santa Cruz, CA). But the list above should be enough to get you started.

It should go without saying that there is no ongoing epidemic serious, racially motivated White-on-Black violence (mob or otherwise), nor has there ever been in this country. (Yes, that includes every lynching in history.)

What can I say? Reality has a racial bias.

Our past, our present, our future: in “Remembering the 2001 Cincinnati Riots” (May 5), the Council of Conservative Citizens (who, as we all know, are basically radioactive super-Hitlers from space) reprints “What Really Happened in the Riots the Media Dared Not Report” (Citizens’ Informer, 2001) by the inimitable Kyle Rogers.

There is also a video BUT it does not have a cat or a guinea pig like this one does.

Don’t forget our ongoing series “Please Kill Yourself, Alex Pareene” and “Tim Wise Is a Fat, Stupid Hamster”!

The last time we checked in with Leonard Pitts Jr., winner of the 2004 Affirmative Action Pulitzer Prize for Being a Black Man Who Can Write in Complete Sentences, he was squawking about non-existent police bias.

Allow me to summarize my rebuttal.

Leonard Pitts Jr. is either an idiot or a liar

Attention, Leonard Pitts Jr.:

Your little collection of undocumented anecdotes about those mean ol’ waycist White police beating on your poor innocent brothas are not statistically significant, and you’re either an idiot or a liar for pretending they are.

There is no racial bias in federal death sentences, and you’re either an idiot or a liar for claiming there is.

More generally, I have already demonstrated quite elegantly that there is no police bias against Blacks (the First Law of Race and Crime), most recently by comparing arrest rates to offending rates (2004–2008), and you’re either an idiot or a liar for pretending there is.

Upon reading my rebuttal, Leonard Pitts Jr. immediately retracted his lies and idiocy, and we all lived happily ever — oh, wait.

Okay, now you’re definitely lying

Leonard Pitts is back to his usual squawking in “Trayvon Martin: What if George Zimmerman had been black?” (Baltimore Sun, May 6), making it abundantly clear that he is less interested in the truth than in making sure no one knows anything about race and crime.

I don’t know why those are his priorities. Really, I don’t. I just know that they are.

You remember Trayvon Martin, don’t you? The “No Limit Nigga” that got his dumb ass shot to death by concerned citizen George Zimmerman? Yeah, that guy.

So what’s on your mind, Leonard?

Given the way white supremacists and other Zimmerman supporters have exaggerated and manufactured evidence to paint Mr. Zimmerman’s unarmed 17-year-old victim, Trayvon Martin, as a thug who somehow deserved shooting…

Firstly, you don’t have to be a “White supremacist” to notice Black failure (at everything, ever). No offense. Really. I wouldn’t need to put it so bluntly if Leonard Pitts Jr. didn’t insist on lying about it, but I don’t have a lot of options here.

Secondly, fun-loving Alt Right bloggers have amply demonstrated that only the No Limit Nigga’s Black supremacist supporters are exaggerating and manufacturing evidence (see here, here, here, here, and many other places). So where’s your evidence, Leonard Pitts Jr.? Name one thing that “White supremacists” have exaggerated or manufactured. Never mind, just shut the f*ck up.

Thirdly, most importantly, and most obviously, Trayvon Martin was a thug who deserved shooting. If he wasn’t, then I would say he wasn’t, and I would be happy he wasn’t. But reality has a racial bias.

The pertinent fact is that Mr. Zimmerman found Trayvon suspicious because, as he told the 911 dispatcher, the boy was walking slowly and looking around. That might be the behavior of a boy who was turned around in an unfamiliar neighborhood.

No, no, Trayvon was just a criminal, a thug, a low-life, a No Limit Nigga — take your pick.

Or of a boy enjoying a cellphone conversation with a girl and not overly eager to return to where his sweet nothings might be overheard by his dad.

I seriously doubt Trayvon was even cognitively capable of romantic love, which is a highly complex emotional response, but on the other hand it’s quite possible that Leonard Pitts Jr.’s definition of “sweet nothings” includes

Hahaha Hoe u got USED fa yo loose ass p*ssy.! Tighten up.! #Literally

and maybe

#youthetype of b*tch that give up your p*ssy for free and think its cool #p*ssyaintfree #fb

and even

I got game for you young hoes, don’t grow to be a dumm hoe

and probably

I’ll beat the pu**sy up up up up up up up up up up up up up up up up up up up up up up up up up”

and obviously

I’ll slap a girl if she said suck my toes wtf, she must be giving some great dome for some sh*t like that òÕ òÕ òÕ

and so on. Anyway, shut the f*ck up, Leonard Pitts Jr.

That no such alternate possibilities seem to have occurred to Mr. Zimmerman for even an instant suggests the degree to which we as a people have grown comfortable with the belief that black is crime and crime is black.

Be aware that, statistically speaking, yes, black (and to a lesser extent brown) is crime, and crime is black (etc.).

Indeed, the dirty little secret of the Martin killing is that Mr. Zimmerman could easily have been black. True, a black Zimmerman probably would not have been sent home by prosecutors who declined to press charges – whiteness still has its privileges — but otherwise, yes. It is entirely possible.

There is no such thing as “White privilege,” and any bias in the media and justice system favors Blacks over Whites.

Why else do you think black folk flinch when the mug shot goes up on television, hoping the face will not be brown — as if we bore some communal responsibility for the suspect’s misdeeds?

Communal responsibility aside, Leonard, in general, if they’re flinching, it’s because they fear the perfectly justified racial profiling that should follow but sometimes, thanks to the efforts of liars like you, Leonard Pitts Jr., doesn’t, which endangers innocent people, especially White people (classic example and another, from way back). That is why I have concluded that the world would be a better place if you, Leonard Pitts Jr., were to become yet another victim of “misdeeds” by a darkly hued “suspect.”

Fingers crossed.

Plus, Blacks are, in general, so f*cking obsessed with racial solidarity that they celebrate Black criminals as role models (but hold up the occasional White criminal as proof that all Whites are evil, while reveling in Black-on-White violence). So that’s another reason they might be flinching.

Why else do you think so much of our music is a song of violence and crime?

Because yours is a (relatively) violent and criminal race. Again, no offense. I wouldn’t need to state it so plainly if Leonard Pitts Jr. didn’t insist on lying about it, so shut the f*ck up, Leonard, and stop forcing me to say offensive things.

Why else, when I ask an auditorium full of black kids how frequently the individual who murders a white person is black, do they figure it at 75 percent? Why else are they shocked to hear it’s only 13?

I dunno, because Blacks are constantly committing horrible racially motivated violent crime against random Whites, and those kids probably think it’s hilarious?

By the way, why are you only using statistics that make it seem like Black-on-White murder isn’t a big deal? Never mind, just shut the f*ck up and kill yourself.

Here are some other statistics for you: from 2004–2008, Blacks committed about 53% of all homicides. They were therefore 8 times as likely as Whites and Hispanics to commit homicide. They also committed about 70% of interracial homicide, making them 16 times as likely as Whites and Hispanics to commit interracial homicide.

Also note that over 99.5% of serious violent crime (that is, excluding simple assaults) is not homicide: virtually all of it is robbery, rape, or aggravated assault. For those crimes, the interracial crime rate gaps are much, much bigger, and in general cannot be accounted for by the greater number of potential White and Hispanic victims, nor by the higher overall crime rates of Blacks as compared to Whites and Hispanics; see here.

At some subterranean level, we — African-Americans — still believe the garbage of innate criminality we have so assiduously been fed and struggle with hating ourselves, as America long ago taught us to do.

I challenge Leonard Pitts Jr. to provide a single piece of evidence against my hypothesis, which is based on sound evolutionary principles, that people of African descent are innately — i.e., genetically — more criminal — i.e., more likely to display criminal behavior — than people of European descent. (Believing this to be true, I nevertheless have no problem judging individuals as… well, individuals.) Where’s your evidence, Leonard? Shut the f*ck up and go back to your subterranean level.

This is why I grow impatient with those — black, white and otherwise — who think the salient social issue here is George Zimmerman’s character. … It is, rather, that ours is a nation so obscenely comfortable in conflating black with crime that a civilian carrying no badge of authority nevertheless feels it his right to require that an American boy walking lawfully upon a public street justify his presence there.

Violent crime in America: it’s a black-and-brown thing.

To make this about Mr. Zimmerman is to absolve the rest of us for maintaining a society that, in ways both overt and covert, still makes criminality a function of skin. Trayvon Martin was killed by a stereotype.

Stereotypes are statistical truths, so stereotyping is rational and therefore good.

Furthermore, race is not skin color; it’s genetic. Criminality is, at least in part, a function of genes. Furthermore, race differences in criminality don’t go away after you control for socioeconomic factors including poverty, unemployment, and lack of education; see here. And that is why we (meaning sane and honest people) are justified in concluding that the relatively high criminality of Blacks (compared to Whites) is, at least in part, a function of race.

And finally, just please shut the f*ck up, Leonard Pitts Jr.

Why are we here? What is the purpose of la Park d’Unamusement?

F*ck if I know. Just somewhere to upload pictures of kitties in a sink, I guess. And chubby sea otters. And gratuitous French girls. And slutty forest faeries.

Yes, I do enjoy a nice slutty forest faerie.

Anyway, if you must know, the purpose of la Park d’Unamusement is

1. to help you talk about race
2. because we want people to wake up
3. to the color of crime,
4. especially racially motivated violence against Whites
5. (and general hatred of White people,
6. not mention the a**holes and cretins who propagate said hatred),
7. including the ongoing epidemic of Black-on-White mob violence,
8. so that people can defend themselves
9. and stop being afraid of being called “racist”
10. just because they notice human biodiversity.

That’s it. That’s all. The rest is inessential.

I don’t care to save the whales, I don’t care if the market fails. I don’t care to end the Fed, I don’t care if Goober’s dead. I don’t care why the Confederates lost, I don’t care about the Holocaust. I don’t care about banning porn, I don’t care where Obama was born. I don’t care for peace and quiet, I don’t care about your paleo diet. I don’t care about school prayer, I don’t care if divorce law’s unfair, I don’t care if you don’t care, and I don’t care if — look out, a bear!

It’s right over there.

Amongst the pears.

bears are there, amongst the pears, so beware... corsairs

Gratuitous French Girl: Un éclair!

Unamused: Don’t encourage her, she’s been in the wine ever since Hollande won.

Gratuitous French Girl: Allons enfants de la patrie — hic! — le jour de gloire est arrivé — hic! — contre nous de la tyrannie — hic! —

Unamused: Okay, mon petit soldat. Bedtime.

Gratuitous French Girl: It is not my bedtime! I am ze — hic! — de les… croissants. I ‘ave USURPED you, you silly — hic! — pear. Ze croissants must flow! Flow, I say! Tra la — hic! — la!

Euh… so tired. Hic!

Unamused: Hush now. Here is your favorite toy otter. See? In his little Waffen SS uniform?

Gratuitous French Girl: … mmmmm… ze otters… ils mangent mes croissants… ah, les croissants… comme je t’aime… zzzzzzz…

Thus ends the glorious reign of the Queen of Croissants: not with a bang, but with… um, an otter, I suppose.

I ‘ave returned! And ze loyalty of mes nouveaux amis, Blanco and Kitty Alley and per’aps even Monsieur Rational, will NOT go unrewarded in ze glorious reign of…

ZE QUEEN OF CROISSANTS! Huzzah!

Whereas ze traitor Pouvoir Noir Pouvoir Blanc shall be chopped up into little tiny bits and fed to ze shark.

Huzzah!

I remain ze Queen of Croissants!

Do not be confused, you sillies, by ze recent postings of zis pretender to ze throne, zis so-called Unamusé!

Do not t’ink for une minute zat ‘e may have sneakily sneaked out of ‘is prison cell by seducing ze slutty, slutty guards. Zey are not nearly as slutty as you ‘ave been led to believe. Zey would not go all ze way with me until ze second date!

I mean, euh… not’ing… hmmm.

Tra la la!

Ignore ze rumors zat ‘e ‘as per’aps eluded ze wild crocodiddle — crocodilli — crocadoo — um, ze t’ings zat are like ze alligators only more pointy in ze snout, and ze other assorted dangerous wildlifes lurking about in ze basement.

Certainly do not t’ink zat ‘e ‘as managed to ‘ack into the ‘ate Laboratory’s mainframe to upload ‘is silly-posts about ze urchins or ze Derb or whatever ‘e is on about zese days. Non non non, all of zose posts magnifique were ze creation of none other zan MOI, la Fille Francaise Gratuite!

And now… more news… DE FRANCE! Huzzah! Et huzzah encore!

“French polls: Sarkozy calls for tougher immigration laws” (30 Avril, 2012):

French President Nicolas Sarkozy called for tougher borders and a stronger national identity on Sunday and accused the left of petty slander as he struggled to catch up with his Socialist rival a week before a presidential runoff.

Sarkozy, who lags his centre-left challenger Francois Hollande by 10 points in opinion polls for the May 6 vote, hammered home a message aimed at the nearly one-in-five far-right voters whose support he needs to win a second term.

In a speech in the southern city of Toulouse, which was shaken in March when an Islamic gunman went on a shooting rampage, the conservative Sarkozy used the word “border” dozens of times as he stressed that love of one’s country should not be confused with “dangerous nationalist ideology”.

“Without borders there is no nation, there is no Republic, there is no civilisation,” Sarkozy told some 10,000 supporters. “We are not superior to others but we are different,” he said.

Bah. We ARE super-duper-superior to all ze other peoples! We are LE FRANCE!

Hollande took the moral high ground when he addressed some 22,000 Socialist voters at a simultaneous rally in Paris, saying he would not stoop to using such vote-garnering tactics.

“I want victory, but not at any price, not at the price of caricature and lies,” he said. “I want to win over the men and women who are angry, a hundred times yes, but compromise myself? A thousand times no.”

But you are a Communist piece-of-poo! Your entire life, it is a caricature and lies! You cannot stoop, you stoopid little man, when you are ze swamp monster lurking below ze surface of ze bog, bloop bloop!

Monsieur Auster writes:

[B]ased on this campaign video for French Socialist candidate François Hollande, with music provided by U.S. rappers, you’d think that 70 percent of the population of France is black. And they are not “assimilated” blacks. Indeed, the two main impressions the video conveys are the overwhelming blackness of France (which is of course fictitious but makes the French believe that they have no choice but to surrender to that ocean of nonwhiteness), and the overwhelming edginess, disorderliness, and non-Western quality of the blacks in France.

And in the midst of all this in-your-face blackness, there keeps popping up a milquetoast of a man named François Hollande, who is presented as the blacks’ tribune. He is their champion because he will lead the way to the blackification of France.

This is the French Socialist Party’s vision of their country.

Boo! Booooo!

Booooooooooooooooooooooooooo.

Yawn. Okay, it is sleepytime pour moi, tra la la. A bientôt!

Frequent ‘Park contributor Doug1 knows. I’ve quite liberally edited/rewritten his work, so any factual or grammatical errors are mine, and I would appreciate readers pointing them out so I can fix them. According to the author, you are free to reprint this with attribution.

Unamused:

Since you don’t like to talk up White accomplishments, allow me.

White people — White men, in fact — created the modern world, from soup to nuts. The Japanese did some tweaking, but that’s the best any other race has managed to do.

In 1450, a White man invented the first mass-production printing press, which unlike the Chinese attempts (not capable of mass production) had an immediate transformative effect: the mass circulation of affordable books, pamphlets, and journals right across Western and Central Europe. White men created science as we know it: as a unified, systematic study of nature — a staggering accomplishment made possible by Gutenberg’s printing press. For use in their scientific investigations, White men developed advanced mathematics, not to mention the first precision timepieces.

White men carried out the industrial revolution, a turning point in history that led to unprecedented improvements in the living standards of the masses of ordinary people — the so-called “99 percent.” White men invented the steam engine and used it to develop industrial mass production and the first locomotive. They invented the diesel engine and used it to develop the diesel locomotive and passenger and freight ships made of steel. They invented the internal combustion engine and used it to develop the automobile.

White men were the first to drill for petroleum and refine it into fuel — gasoline and kerosene and diesel and jet fuel — not to mention all its other uses, like plastics and asphalt (used any today?) and the fertilizers and pesticides that modern agriculture depends on.

White men invented the telegraph and created the first high speed, long range communications systems, spanning continents and soon the globe. They invented the telephone, wireless radio, and television. They invented photography and motion pictures; record players and video cameras. They invented electric generators, electric motors, and electric lights, based on a theory of electricity due entirely to White men.

White men invented the airplane and the jet airplane. They created rockets and used them to launch satellites into Earth’s orbit. Those satellites gave us instantaneous global communication, global weather and climate monitoring, unprecedented surveying ability, and a Global Positioning System free for every man and woman of every race and nation to use — with a receiver invented by White men, of course.

White men have traveled hundreds of thousands of miles through space to the Moon, and back safely to Earth, in rockets invented by White men, using guidance and communications systems designed and built by White men, based on science and mathematics created by White men. They have explored the other planets of our solar system and discovered the origins of our world and our universe, using telescopes and spacecraft they designed and built, and they have freely shared that knowledge with all mankind.

White men invented the transistor, the computer, and the Internet. They invented solar power, wind power, and nuclear power. They developed scientific medicine — the only kind that works — and discovered virtually every effective treatment, vaccination, and cure, from penicillin to radiation therapy. They created modern mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy, anthropology, and archaeology.

In fact, it is difficult to think of anything of great significance in the modern world that wasn’t created by White men. (For the record, and not to bash any other race, nearly all the supposed Black inventions are myths, like gas masks, traffic lights, blood banks, and peanut butter.)

The most beautiful art, the most sublime music, was created by White men, from ancient Greece to the Middle Ages to the Renaissance and beyond. (No, rap music doesn’t count.)

White men invented democracy and created the first democratic republics. They didn’t invent slavery, obviously, but they were the first to abolish it. They were also the first to ban torture as a form of criminal punishment. With the founding of the United Nations, White men led the world to the first-ever international agreement prohibiting aggressive war, a prohibition enforced by White men. White men developed the entire concept of human rights, and have always led the world in safeguarding those rights.

As I think I mentioned, White men gave us the scientific revolution, then the industrial revolution, which rivals the agricultural revolution in its transformational power. For the first time in history, humanity can escape Malthusian misery and mass death, and the populations of entire countries can live safe, comfortable lives, thanks to the work of White men.

I could go on.

Maybe the world should designate one day out of the year to give thanks to White men and all the wonderful things they have done for the benefit of all humanity.

Yeah, like that would ever happen!

And check out this comment by Panther II.

All right, you all know why we’re here: Derbyshire’s infamous “The Talk: Nonblack Version,” item 10h.

(10h) Do not act the Good Samaritan to blacks in apparent distress, e.g., on the highway.

As this series lurches forward, bear in mind that I am not looking up stories of Black people attacking Good Samaritans. I’m looking up stories of people attacking Good Samaritans.

Not why Derbyshire was right

Our next story, from January of this year, is actually not a reason not to “act the Good Samaritan to blacks in apparent distress.” It’s just a story that needs to be told, about a man who was murdered in front of his kids, at seven o’clock in the morning, in his peaceful little neighborhood, while trying to save a woman from a violent criminal.

A story about human lives, and why some are worth more than others.

Mike Ainsworth: deserved to live.

From the Algiers Point neighborhood (67% White, 25% Black) in New Orleans (67% Black, 27% White): “Loved ones and neighbors mourn loss of murdered Good Samaritan” (January 25, 2012, with video).

Bill Ainsworth describes his brother, Mike [White], as a loving father — a man who often put others first.

“He was a really good person all the way around,” Ainsworth said. “(He was) a Christian, helped anybody in any way possible.”

Wednesday, that selflessness cost 44-year-old Harry “Mike” Ainsworth his life, as he rushed to the aid of a woman [presumably White] who was being carjacked.

Police said the attacker managed to get inside the woman’s car, and, when Ainsworth jumped onto the hood of the vehicle to intervene, the suspect opened fire.

It all happened with Mike’s two sons looking on.

…

It’s a loss for the entire Algiers Point neighborhood, where Ainsworth was well-known as a construction worker, a great friend and an all-around nice guy.

“Always happy, hard working man, always had his two children with him, a very doting father. You saw the man, you saw the two boys. It’s just horrible. Horrible,” said neighbor Amy Duplessis. “Out of anybody it could’ve happened to, for it to happen to a man like that, it’s just devastating.”

…

Family members said Ainsworth leaves behind his two boys, his girlfriend, who is also the boys’ mother, and a daughter who lives in Florida.

“They loved their dad and their dad loved them. That was his world, his family,” said an emotional Bill Ainsworth. “I don’t know what I’m gonna do without him.”

So who was behind this “carjacking gone wrong” — at seven o’clock on a Wednesday morning, in this “usually safe neighborhood” (WWL)?

A month later, they caught the guy: 17-year-old Kendall Harrison (“Suspect arrested in murder of Algiers Good Samaritan”, February 28, 2012, with video).

Kandell Harrison: worth exactly 0.0% of a Mike Ainsworth.

Police have arrested a suspect in the murder of Harry “Mike” Ainsworth who was killed in January when he attempted to stop a carjacking in Algiers Point.

Police arrested a 17-year-old suspect, Kendall Harrison [Black, obviously], announced Superintendent Ronal Serpas. Harrison will booked on a first-degree murder charge.

…

Serpas said Harrison was taken into custody without incident. He credited several tips from citizens in the apprehension of Harrison, saying that some of the tips identified Harrison by name. DNA was also used to link Harrison to the incident, according to Serpas.

…

Ainsworth’s murder capped a particularly bloody month in New Orleans and sparked outrage and an outpouring of support from residents, as the brazen, daylight murder became of a symbol of the escalation in violence throughout the city.

The count so far:

• assault and carjacking of a young woman by two 14-year-old Black girls “in apparent distress”
• carjacking and robbery at gunpoint of a young couple by a Black male “in apparent distress”
• robbery at gunpoint of a middle-aged man by a Black male “in apparent distress”
• murder by stomping of an elderly man by a Black couple “in apparent distress”
• murder by stabbing of a middle-aged man by a young Black woman “in apparent distress”
• murder by shooting of a White father of three trying to save a woman in (actual) distress, the perpetrator of both those crimes being the same 17-year-old Black male

On second thought, I’m pretty sure leftist scum (and, frankly, more than a few Black people) would actually consider carjacking a sign of “apparent distress” on the part of the perpetrator, as long as he or she was Black.

Did I say “perpetrator”? I meant to say “poor innocent victim of institutional racism and White privilege.” Then by leftist logic (not to mention Black racialist reasoning), Mike Ainsworth, the Good Samaritan, would actually be the bad guy in this story.

What a wacky world we live in.

Our new series John Derbyshire Was Right (part 1, part 2) continues to accumulate evidence to support the titular proposition.

So far we’ve emphasized item 10h from Derbyshire’s infamous “The Talk: Nonblack Version,” because of the extra-hysterical response it provoked from leftists and “mainstream conservatives” (also leftists).

(10) [W]hile always attentive to the particular qualities of individuals, on the many occasions where you have nothing to guide you but knowledge of those mean differences, use statistical common sense:

(10h) Do not act the Good Samaritan to blacks in apparent distress, e.g., on the highway.

Gawker, as expected, wins the Unamusement Park Award for the Most Hysterical Denunciation of John Derbyshire’s Common Sense Advice for their “reporting” in “Racist John Derbyshire Writes Most Racist Article Possible, Pegged to Trayvon Martin Case” (filed under “Horrible People”):

Derbyshire’s “talk” is a bullet-point list of every racist thought he’s ever had about how dumb and dangerous black people are. Come, bear witness to the hideous monstrosity that is John Derbyshire’s deeply racist mind:

…

I’m not saying white people should accost John Derbyshire and shoot him with guns in his white neighborhood, then refuse to assist him when he lies in a state of “apparent distress,” until he dies. Just that it’d be ironic.

Please kill yourself, Maureen O’Connor. (And Alex Pareene. Kill yourself too.)

Why Derbyshire was right

So why should you think extra carefully before you “act the Good Samaritan to blacks in apparent distress”? Here are three good reasons.

First, you might get robbed at gunpoint. From Gaston County, North Carolina: “Good Samaritan attempts to help man with car trouble, gets robbed” (December 2, 2011).

A Gaston County man who was attempting to be a Good Samaritan ended up getting robbed after someone pulled a gun on him.

According to police, 40-year-old Tim Ferrell was walking out of the JCPenney store at Eastridge Mall when he saw a man who appeared to be having car trouble and asked if he needed help.

That’s when police say the man lifted his shirt to show a gun stuck in the waist of his pants and demanded money from Ferrell.

The man then stole Ferrell’s wallet, watch and wedding ring.

The suspect was described as a black male, 6-foot-3, stocky-build, 240 pounds, clean shaven and was wearing a hoodie and jeans.

Second, you might get stomped to death by a couple having an argument about incest. From New York City: Derbyshire’s own example, “Couple arraigned on charges they stomped an elderly man to death amid domestic dispute” (April 24, 2011).

A pair of lovebirds facing life as jailbirds were arraigned Sunday on charges they capped a boozy date by stomping a would-be good Samaritan to death in the street.

Quintin Guerrero, 61, was killed when he rushed to aid one of his accused attackers, Tosheba Alford [Black], 20, after she jumped out of a moving cab in front of his Bronx house to escape a beating from her boyfriend [also Black], Alford’s mother, Queen Smith, said.

…

[Smith] told reporters her daughter called her from the cab when Major started hitting her, accusing her of having an incestuous relationship with her brother.

Smith said her daughter jumped out of the moving cab, hurting her leg. She limped over and sat down on Guerrero’s front stoop, prompting the victim to come out of his house and check on her.

As Guerrero was asking Alford if she was hurt, Major jumped out of the cab, pummeled Guerrero to the ground and kicked him repeatedly, Alford told her mother.

Third, you might get stabbed to death… by a woman… over five dollars (and possibly some donuts). From Seattle, Washington: “Prosecutors: Fatal stabbing suspect asked for help, then money” (April 3, 2012).

Police say a woman accused of fatally stabbing a man outside a North Seattle Krispy Kreme doughnut shop Monday was trying to rob the victim.

Karen R. Latham [Black], 23, was ordered held on $1 million bail at her first court appearance Tuesday. Latham appeared visibly shaken and cried throughout the hearing without saying a word.

Latham told detectives she had just left a friend’s motor home in the 13500 block of Aurora Ave. N. and flagged down a car, according to court documents. She asked the driver, 54-year-old Zerabruk Hebtemariam, for a ride to a Jack in the Box located 10 blocks south. The fast food restaurant shares a parking lot with the doughnut shop.

Once they arrived, Latham asked Hebtemariam for money. The victim gave her $5 but Latham, unsatisfied, asked for more, prosecutors said.

When Hebtemariam refused, Latham pulled out a knife and again asked for more money, according to investigators. Hebtemariam again refused and tried to open the passenger door to push Latham out. She then stabbed him in the chest, according to prosecutors.

Latham walked off as Hebtemariam yelled that he had been stabbed.

The count so far: six would-be Good Samaritans who suffered violent crime, including two murders, at the hands of a total of seven Black people “in apparent distress.”

• assault and carjacking of a young woman by two 14-year-old Black girls
• carjacking and robbery at gunpoint of a young couple by a Black male
• robbery at gunpoint of a middle-aged man by a Black male
• murder by stomping of an elderly man by a Black couple
• murder by stabbing of a middle-aged man by a young Black woman

John Derbyshire was right: “while always attentive to the particular qualities of individuals, on the many occasions where you have nothing to guide you but knowledge of those mean differences, use statistical common sense.” So for your own sake, whatever your race, think hard before you “act the Good Samaritan to blacks in apparent distress.”

So much for Whitopia.

Black mob violence is on the rise in famously White (and, not coincidentally, famously nice) Portland, Oregon: 76% White, 6% Black.

April 27: Black mob attacks White couple, raids store

Via the Council of Conservative Citizens: On Friday, April 27 (with video), a mob of up to 25 Black people — various ages and both sexes, but all Black — chased a White couple into a Southeast Portland store, attacked them, attacked at least two employees, and (of course) robbed the place.

A man and woman were being chased by 15 to 20 people when they fled into the store, in the 12100 block of E Burnside Street, just after 11 p.m., according to Portland Police Sgt. Pete Simpson.

“As the woman was asking the clerk to call 911, the group ran into the store and took alcohol, candy and food from the shelves,” Simpson said. “Employees described having multiple altercations with the group inside the store.”

One witness, Will Hogan, seems to find the attack pretty funny. Guess his race.

The store manager, Prakash Thap, claims the White woman called the violent thugs “niggers,” which as everyone knows is literally the worst thing one person can do to another, and I’m trying so hard to be appropriately outraged, but I can’t help thinking: hahahahaha, good for her!

Yes, the nationwide trend of fearless, racist Black mob violence and looting has started up in earnest in once-safe Portland, Oregon — or, as Portland Police Sergeant Pete Simpson puts it:

It concerns the police that these things are going from simple thefts to robberies and assaults, and they’re certainly scaring the heck out of people working at the stores.

Gosh, whatever will we do?

April 13: violent Black mob on MAX train

The April 27 mob apparently took a MAX train to get to their targets. Is this a trend?

On Friday, April 13, a gang of 15 to 20 young Black men — or, as KATU News likes to say, a “daring pack of kids” — got on another MAX train, made themselves as obnoxious as possible, then assaulted a 57-year-old man (almost certainly White) who made the mistake of asking them to quiet down.

Which is nicer, and more realistic, than asking them to stop being useless, obnoxious, brainless cretins.

April 13: Black mob attacks clothing store

On the same day as the train attack (with video), another mischievous band of youngsters — by which I mean another mob of Black male teenagers, 10 this time — looted a Portland clothing store. The police haven’t tracked down any of the perpetrators: they “were all wearing hats and hoodies with their faces covered.”

April 7: Black mob loots gas station

On Saturday, April 7 (with video), some roguish troupe of whippersnappers — what a racist would call a mob of 16 young Black men — looted a Portland gas station, returning to throw things at the clerk before he chased them off with a baseball bat.

Portland police are now making progress tracking down the kids, saying this latest theft is the first time they’ve seen a mob so open and so fearless.

I guess the Portland police haven’t been reading Unamusement Park.

The last two years

Black mob violence in Portland goes back at least two years, according to KATU News (April 10, 2012):

This isn’t the first time a mob of kids has done this. Late last year, several kids [U: oh, those rascally kids...] from George Middle School rushed City Foods market in North Portland and stole several items. One block away and one year earlier, police said the clerk at 7-Eleven in Portland got in a fist fight with the kids [U: ... always up to something!] when they tried it.

Young, Black, male: it’s a discrimination trifecta!

All the stereotypes are true. Men are more dangerous than women. Teenagers are more dangerous than toddlers or the elderly. And yes, Blacks are more dangerous than Whites.

It’s not rocket science. It’s certainly not “racism” (whatever that means). It’s simple statistics, illustrated above.