Feeds:
Posts
Comments

The End

It’s been a long time,

Now I’m coming back home.

Lennon/McCartney

All good things must come to an end. All racis’ things, too. And that includes Unamusement Park. Alas, with much left undone.

The website will stay up until hosting expires in about two years, just in case you think anything I’ve written is worth saving. Use it as you like.

Why? Well, I’ve been bashing my head against a wall for a few years now, trying to knock down a little piece of it, but all I’ve got is a headache.

Wishing you the best of luck in all the years to come.

Not Guilty

I’ve got sunshine on a cloudy day

When it’s cold outside, I’ve got the month of May

I guess you’d say

What can make me feel this way?

Well, there’s a spot of sunshine on a cloudy day.

And we still are.

And we still are.

Now for the riots

(But don’t worry: they’re only Mexicans.)

So I see “immigration” is in the news again. A lot. Really a lot. Enough, even, to rouse me from my lengthy slumber (yawn). So excuse me if I seem like a sleepy kitteh. I’m actually still in my pajamas, here at Central Hate Command (CENT-HAT-COM), but the Gratuitous French Girl is making coffee (French roast, naturally, in her delightful Iron Cross-print nightie), so I’ll soon be up to speed, or at the very least fully conscious.

‘Immigration bill to bring in at least 33 million people, says group’ (The Daily Caller):

The pending Senate immigration [sic] bill would bring a minimum of 33 million people into the country during its first decade of operation, according to an analysis by NumbersUSA, a group that wants to slow the current immigration [sic] rate.

By 2024, the inflow would include an estimated 9.2 million illegal immigrants [sic], plus 2.5 million illegals [sic] who arrived as children — dubbed ‘Dreamers’ — plus roughly 3.4 million company-sponsored employees with university degrees, said the unreleased analysis.

The majority of the inflow, or roughly 17 million people, would consist of family members of illegals, recent immigrants [sic] and of company-sponsored workers, according to the NumbersUSA analysis provided to The Daily Caller.

I actually don’t have a problem with immigration, because immigration per se isn’t a problem. By all means, let in the Germans, the French, the Afrikaners and the Dutch. Particularly the Afrikaners.

No, my problem is entirely with colonization, i.e., — and I must be comically blunt here, because someone’s got to say it, — millions of Third World non-whites invading formerly white countries and bringing all their Third World problems with them, problems which include their present and future children, because human behavioral traits like intelligence and criminality are heritable. That, plus the fact that we’re calling colonization “immigration” (and have apparently forgotten what “Orwellian” means). Both of these things are problematic indeed.

Still, there may be a silver lining of sorts. ‘Immigration reform could be bonanza for Democrats’ (Politico):

The immigration proposal pending in Congress would transform the nation’s political landscape for a generation or more — pumping as many as 11 million new Hispanic voters into the electorate a decade from now in ways that, if current trends hold, would produce an electoral bonanza for Democrats and cripple Republican prospects in many states they now win easily.

Beneath the philosophical [lololol — but seriously, the rope for all of them] debates about amnesty and border security, there are brass-tacks partisan calculations driving the thinking of lawmakers in both parties over comprehensive immigration reform, which in its current form offers a pathway to citizenship — and full voting rights — for a group of undocumented residents that roughly equals the population of Ohio, the nation’s seventh-largest state.

When America’s Red Staters, the so-called country class, understand that the Republican Party, which has so thoroughly and repeatedly betrayed them, is finally and forever dead, there will be room in American politics for something better.

Could it be this? Or this? Or maybe even this? Who knows!

Whatever it is, don’t call it a Revolution. Call it a Reaction.

Radish, home of the thief-kitty and possibly the fascist ferret, has a new issue celebrating Black Alternate History Month. I demand that NO ONE read it here.

Radish has a new issue on Jean Raspail’s prophetic novel The Camp of the Saints. I suggest NO ONE read it here, because they are thief-kitties.

As you may be aware, one year ago, I announced that Unamusement Park would cease to exist in its current format — that it would switch to a print publication by the awesome name of Radish.

Today, I am horrified to report that someone, some SECRET ORGANIZATION, possibly in collusion with a sneaky kitty, has stoled’ed my awesome idea (which I only failed to act on for 361 days because I was busy with a thing and then another thing), and taken it and put it here where I cannot retrieve it.

Why, oh why is this happening to me???

This THIEFERY is so discouraging that I just may have to quit blogging. I suppose you will have to visit this THIEF’s website from now on. I hope you are happy, UNKNOWN THIEF-KITTY ORGANIZATION. You have stoled’ed my dreams, and probably nom’ed them, like so many Treats.

BAD THIEF-KITTY

Race and education are in the news again. No, not the nationwide racial violence and general mayhem caused by non-Asian minority (NAM) students. Just another made-up conspiracy theory blaming mythical white “racists” for everyone else’s failure.

From the Washington Post:

The disproportionately low number of black and Latino students admitted to Fairfax County’s prestigious Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology — long a subject of debate — has triggered a federal civil rights complaint.

[…]

The complaint alleges that black and Latino students, as well as students with disabilities, are being shut out of Thomas Jefferson long before they apply in eighth grade because of Fairfax County Public Schools’ systematic failure to identify them for gifted education programs that begin in elementary school.

[…]

Together, black and Latino students account for about 4 percent of the 480 students admitted to next year’s freshman class at Thomas Jefferson, or TJ. The two groups make up 32 percent of the county’s student population.

[…]

The complaint also faults the TJ admissions process itself for putting some students at a disadvantage.

One example, the complaint says, is the “student information sheet” used to assess a teen’s motivation and commitment to math and science education. A question asks students to “Describe in detail your most important out-of-school or after-school activity or interest.”

“For many black and Latino students, especially those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds,” the complaint says, “their most significant after school activity may well be babysitting their younger siblings while their parents work.”

Sure, they could be “babysitting their younger siblings while their parents work.” Or selling drugs while their parents collect welfare checks. Or vice versa. Or whatever.

Interestingly, the complaint chose not to emphasize (and the Post chose not to even mention) that Asians make up 20 percent of the county’s student population, but 64.2 percent of next year’s freshman class at TJ.

Indeed, Jared Taylor has calculated (from the figures cited in the complaint) that “whites are 4.8 times more likely than Hispanics to be admitted to TJ, and are 4.2 times more likely than blacks. Asians, however, are 5.4 times more likely than whites to be admitted” — bringing the standard “white privilege” narrative to a screeching halt. Those pesky Asians!

Of course, the complaint — filed with the Department of Education by the Fairfax chapter of the NAACP (National Association of We’re Black So Give Us Free Goodies or We’ll Burn Your Cities Down) and the “Coalition of The Silence,” a bizarrely named “advocacy group led by former county school board member Tina Hone” — is nothing more than the usual NAM griping based on what I call the fundamental fallacy of race relations (which happens to also be a typically insane Supreme Court ruling): that “disparate impact” (i.e., that NAMs fail, always and everywhere) somehow implies “disparate treatment” (i.e., white people are evil, die white man die, quick steal his shoes).

The reasoning is invalid because, of course, contrary to Marxist theory, the races of man were not created equal. Of course, if white people were allowed to notice that, white guilt would fade away and the handouts would dry up. It is therefore essential to our radical, anti-white elites that reality be ruled inadmissible and facts reclassified as “hate speech” on the compelling grounds of das racis’, you racis’, e’rybody racis’ all up in he’e:

“Look at any study of giftedness. It is equally distributed across humanity. God did not change that rule when he got to Fairfax County,” says former school board member Tina Hone.

To which one can only reply: Just how f*&%$#@ stupid are you, Miss Hone? One really would like to know.

Because if one actually took this fruitcake’s advice and looked at any study of giftedness, any study at all (e.g., Chuck’s illuminating graph from Gifted Child Quarterly), one would discover that high intelligence is about as far from being “equally distributed across humanity” as a crackhead is from winning a Fields Medal — though of course one cannot discount the possibility of a Nobel Peace Prize.

As the reader is no doubt well aware (zzz), race differences in intelligence guarantee that in any large population (e.g., the school-age children of Fairfax County), above any given threshold of intelligence (e.g., giftedness, often defined as an IQ of 130), there will be proportionally more Asians than whites, and more whites than either Hispanics or blacks. This hate-fact — the existence of so-called IQ gaps — is not in dispute (indeed, it is perfectly obvious from the state of our planet, now and at any other point in recorded history), and neither is our ability to reliably measure intelligence with IQ tests.

But as I say, in the interests of maintaining the “diversity racket” (i.e., free goodies for whiny minorities set to an endless chorus of kill whitey and take his stuff yo), such hateful hatred must be ushered into the gas chambers of political correctness.

I’m sorry, that was offensive. I meant to say the alleged gas chambers.

Since the perpetrators of that never-ending scam (“reparations,” “affirmative action,” “Civil Rights,” “End Apartheid,” etc., etc.), namely the cultural Marxists (or Progressives as they’ve styled themselves of late), are in charge of the government, the media, and the education system (three sides to the same polygon), egalitarian nonsense of the Tina Hone “Look at Any Study!!!” school is ubiquitous in all three.

Choosing an example at random, iGifted School, the well staffed “Online Debate & Math Club For Gifted Students,” declares:

Modern research indicates that the gifted are equally distributed among all races, sexes and economic segments of society.

At once, without so much as a glance at the “modern research,” we know this is wrong. “All economic segments of society”? If intelligence is heritable at all (it’s quite heritable, as every parent ought to know) and correlates at all with income (it correlates quite well with both income and educational attainment, as every college graduate ought to know), then giftedness will not be equally distributed “among all economic segments of society,” which indeed it isn’t. It is also, of course, not “equally distributed among all races.”

The National Opportunity to Learn Campaign proclaims:

Identification of gifted and talented students is comparative within similar age groups, experience and environments, that is, every group of students — rich, poor, Black, White, those with highly educated parents, those whose parents are not highly educated — should have approximately equal proportions of gifted and talented students.

“Identification… is comparative”? I’m fairly certain that doesn’t actually mean anything. I have already noted that “those with highly educated parents” will have a higher proportion of gifted students than “those whose parents are not highly educated” — whether they “should” or not — because intelligence is heritable and correlates with educational attainment.

TeachingExpertise.com insists:

Ability is evenly distributed within the population; achievement is not.

“Progressives” don’t just believe demonstrably false claims — like giftedness is equally distributed across humanity, let alone any study will show you that giftedness is equally distributed across humanity — that can be debunked in under a minute by anyone with a working Internet connection. They have actually built their entire belief system/political ideology/mass psychosis upon that stinking heap of garbage. The Left has made axioms of fairy tales.

Dick Kantenberger (“Education, Giftedness, Gifted and Talented Education, Senior Issues”) hallucinates (together with EducationNews.org):

it has been known for over 200 years that potential giftedness is equally distributed among all races and cultures.

I must admit I was unable to imagine how even a Marxist education theorist (redundant, I know) could convince himself that this particular falsehood “has been known for over 200 years,” until I read this by the same author:

If we do not want to believe what Thomas Jefferson wrote about this (see part 2) in 1772, the modern research indicates that the gifted are equally distributed among all races, sexes and economic segments of society.

Oh, I see. It is because “we do not want to believe what Thomas Jefferson” — a WHITE MAN who had SLAVES and HATED WOMEN and is from THE SAME RACE AS HITLER — wrote about giftedness (?) in 1772, which was indeed over 200 years ago.

I leave it to the reader to wade through “Race, Class, and Whiteness in Gifted and Talented Identification: A Case Study” (Berkeley Review of Education), by far the most sophisticated and therefore infuriating and depressing example I have found of a stupid theory about smart kids. It so takes for granted its impossible assumptions about race and intelligence, it doesn’t bother even to state them.

No, on second thought, I take that back: a brief excerpt should suffice for even the most masochistic of readers.

Our critique of these practices is based on Cheryl Harris’ (1993) argument that in the American legal system, and broadly in the culture, “whiteness” is a form of property that perpetuates inequality […] dating back to the ownership of persons as slaves and the usurpation of Native American land rights. […]

Harris (1993) argues that because of their “racial and cultural otherness,” Native Americans and blacks were unable to assert rights in land and their very selves (p. 1721). […]

Returning to the origin of white property rights, Harris (1993) points out that whites profited from the labor of slaves and the use of land that was not theirs. Similarly, a disproportionate number of white students identified as “gifted” claim educational opportunities mandated by law and paid for by state funds.

Translation: “Die, white man. Just f*&%$#@ die” (Harris, 1993).

Appendix

It is worth pointing out that nine years ago, on the basis of racist white supremacist Nazi trickery, also known as statistics, a law professor, Lloyd Cohen, “filed a federal civil rights complaint alleging racial discrimination in admissions”:

Cohen contended that it was white students who were losing out, the deck stacked against them as the school system sought to boost black enrollment at the high-flying school.

[…]

Cohen’s complaint was distilled from a long article he wrote in 2003 for the Albany Law Review, in which he used statistical tools and other information to analyze TJ admissions decisions made in 2002.

That year, 11 black students made it into a pool of about 800 semifinalists based on the strength of their grades and scores on a math admissions test. Ten of them — including some who scored lower than white students who were rejected — were admitted after teacher recommendations and essays were considered.

According to Cohen’s analysis, black students were substantially more likely to be admitted than white students with similar credentials. Hispanic and Asian students also had an advantage over their white counterparts, he wrote, although a smaller one.

“The true purpose of the current admissions regime is to engage in invidious racial discrimination,” Cohen wrote.

Well, never mind that. Don’t you know there are white students profiting from the labors of gifted black slaves and stealing all the land from genius Indians?

… Or something.

They call me Nazi, and I’m proud about it.
They call me racist, and I shout it out loud.
I’m proud of my race, I’m proud of my land.
White brothers and sisters, come on, raise your hand:
We’re an 88 rock ‘n’ roll band.

Landser, “88 Rock ‘n’ Roll Band”

Don’t take the title of this post seriously. Certainly don’t take the song seriously! I am a moderate, tolerant, cuddly sort of Republican — a compassionate reactionary, if you will. Open borders! Equal rights! I love immigrants. I hate slavery. I’m even a card-carrying member of the Minority Outright Operation of the Libertarian Youth, which is devoted to increasing libertarian awareness in the minority community. (We’re also known as the MOOLYs.)

Have all the SPLC spies gone yet? Is the Tolerance Enforcement Squad out of earshot? All right, Hate Commandos, let’s get back to work.

Anyway, the esteemed Republican brain trust would like our attention, Steve Sailer reports. They have mine — for the next ten minutes, that is. I feel that’s more than enough time to absorb, dissect, insult, and ultimately discard their ideas.

“Get Rid of the Radicals,” suggests Norman J. Ornstein.

[T]he party needs to abandon the tribal approach of the past four years — “if President Obama and Democrats are for it, we are against it (even if we were for it yesterday).”

Let’s send Norman J. Ornstein to Zimbabwe so he can observe first-hand the real “tribal approach” to politics. Hell, send him to Chicago.

“Enough With the Immigrant Bashing,” sighs Linda Chavez.

[T]he Republican Party’s hostile rhetoric and obstructionist position on comprehensive immigration reform has soured Hispanics on the G.O.P. Some in the Republican leadership and among conservative opinion leaders now seem willing to entertain the notion of comprehensive reform, which includes granting legal status to most of the 11 million illegal immigrants already here. But it will take genuine action on this issue, as well as discouraging the party’s base from continued illegal immigrant bashing, before more Hispanics will consider voting Republican anytime soon.

In “Don’t Ignore Social Conservatives,” Richard Land pleads for “immigration reform” (i.e., capitulation to foreign invasion) as well.

While the G.O.P. needs to expand its base by embracing immigration reform and finding younger candidates and spokespersons, especially young women to make the pro-life case, they must not moderate their social conservative message. If the G.O.P. found it hard to win with their current base, imagine how excruciatingly difficult, if not impossible, it would be for them to try and win without that base.

Don’t be stupid, Republicans — well, don’t be stupider than usual. Clearly, the solution to your recent, meaningless defeat involves creating upwards of 11,000,000 new lifelong Democrats. Anything less than comprehensive immigration reform would be bashing those poor helpless illegal immigrants — I mean, undocumented workers — I mean, uh, newcomers on the path to citizenship.

Don’t worry, you get to keep your weary, uninspired, hopeless, dwindling “base.”

“Stop Turning Off Women,” moans Tracey Schmitt.

Republicans need to do a better job of showing compassion and concern for the problems women face in their everyday lives.

Well, if you want to turn a woman on (to your political party, I mean, obviously), you could offer her unconditional emotional support for the problems she faces in her everyday life. Problems like — oh I don’t know, let’s say it’s how all the politician guys she meets are jerks who never call her after she votes them into her “office” for a “term” or two. However, in my admittedly limited experience, which largely involves a certain gratuitously French girl, it’s more effective to get a couple drinks in her, inform her that you’re a proud fascist, and go straight for the dance-floor make-out. Either that, or stuff her full of croissants and wine. Then again, I don’t try to meet girls chicks strong, independent women like Tracey Schmitt.

“Win Over Blacks Via the Military,” demands Kiron K. Skinner, which is what I’ve been saying for years: we need to use the military to triumph over the blacks.

Wait, what?

The U.S. military continues to be the pathway to a stable future for millions of Americans, including African-Americans, who have fought in every American war and now comprise 16.9 percent of the armed forces. African-American women are enlisting at the rate of twice their percentage of the population.

I see. We use the blacks to wipe out the Arabs. How… delicious. Can we deploy the Mexicans to take out the Jews? But who would be left to fight the Chinese?

“Stay Firm on Fiscal Responsibility,” declares Matt Kibbe. IMPORTANT ISSUES AHEAD

Clearly anyone wanting to capture the Republican nomination for 2016 should realize that they will need a bold fiscal conservative economic vision to win supporters of the Tea Party community that started coming together in 2008 after George W. Bush introduced the TARP program.

The strength of this community, bound by a set of values, is everything. The key to future races is this community. It is the only asset that outlasts the last election results and it certainly outlasts the wall-to-wall barrage of television ads that cost hundreds of millions of dollars, with little to show for it the day after.

Try the ‘Park version:

The strength of this [race], bound by [blood, not to mention] a set of values, is everything. The key to future [community] is this [race]. It is the only asset that outlasts [democracy].

Aww yeah.

Today, violent racial paramilitaries occupy every major city in America and much of Europe. Their pastimes include: doing drugs, selling drugs, cashing welfare checks, voting Democrat, beating up random white people and stealing their shoes, stealing their cars, stealing their phones, stealing everything else that isn’t nailed down, rape, obesity, having lots of babies and outsourcing their education, care and feeding to well-intentioned white people, being loud, crying “racist,” hating white people, and throwing trash all over the place.

You may have heard of these “no-go zones,” like this and this and this and this and this and these and these and about a hundred billion other reports.

A real country would send in the army to wipe them out and clean it up. But America is a joke country. So are Britain, France, Germany, and Sweden, of course. A funny joke, I admit, but a practical joke. Played on the white majority.

Yes, I said “the army.” This is not a job for police. Police are supposed to deal with the occasional citizen who commits a crime, not put down insurgencies and stop foreign invasions. The army is supposed to do those things, not “bring democracy” to shithole sandpiles in the Middle East.

The police are militarizing, it’s true, but they’re still bound by rules even more ludicrously strict than the military’s — rules that could only pacify a white populace. Thus, as a simple consequence of anarcho-tyranny, all that shiny new hardware will ultimately be brought to bear on the white lower and middle classes.

If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a white person’s face. Forever.

I know I joke around quite a bit here at the ‘Park, but let’s get serious. Whoever you are, whatever you believe, you have to admit: the Nazis knew how to deal with this.

Cute ferret!

cute ferret

“Official Positions” is the ‘Park’s never-ending series of pronouncements on OFFICIAL ‘PARK DOCTRINE, to which all ‘Park rangers/hate-kittens must subscribe on pain of EXCOMMUNICATION.

What does one say when one is accused of being a big ol’ racis’? Only the truth, ladies and gentlemen. Only the truth.

  • “I’m not racist. Racism is a crime, and crime is something Jamaicans and Mexicans do.” (H/T)
  • “I’m not racist. I just believe there are important racial differences in how urgently some people need to be sterilized.”
  • “I’m not racist. I just believe there are important racial differences in how much I want to ship your black ass back to Ooga-Booga land.”
  • “I’m not racist. I just have a perfectly normal, natural preference for people who don’t have slanty eyes and big lips and greasy hair and gross-looking skin and bones through their noses and eat tacos all the time.”
  • “I’m not racist. I have friends from all different races, even though some of them smell really bad and are always stealing my stuff, like the Gypsies.”
  • “I’m not racist. Some of my best friends are niggers.”
  • “I’m not racist. I believe there’s only one race: the human race.

    And Chinese aren’t included.”

  • “I’m not racist. I believe there’s only one race:

    The Aryan race.”

  • “Hey, if wanting to gas all the Jews to death in concentration camps makes me some kind of ‘racist’, then gee, I guess I’m a biiiiiiig ‘racist’.”
  • “Yeah, well, they called Hitler racist, too.”

“Official Positions” is the ‘Park’s never-ending series of pronouncements on OFFICIAL ‘PARK DOCTRINE, to which all ‘Park rangers/hate-kittens must subscribe on pain of EXCOMMUNICATION.

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »