John Derbyshire’s latest thought-crime against humanity is up at VDARE.com: “Who Are We? — The ‘Dissident Right’?” (May 10).

Derbyshire’s “racism” (meaning clear and honest thinking on issues of race) is on full display: besides the standard “racist” content (e.g., insufficient hatred of White people, failure to identify conservatism with pure evil, etc.), the article features the following much-quoted passage — a slap in the face and a kick in the crotch to “anti-racists” (meaning anti-White racists) everywhere.

The enemies of conservatism are eager to supply their own nomenclature. “White Supremacist” seems to be their current favorite. It is meant maliciously, of course, to bring up images of fire-hoses, attack dogs, pick handles, and segregated lunch counters — to imply that conservatives, especially non-mainstream conservatives, are cruel people with dark thoughts.

Leaving aside the intended malice, I actually think “White Supremacist” is not bad semantically. White supremacy, in the sense of a society in which key decisions are made by white Europeans, is one of the better arrangements History has come up with. There have of course been some blots on the record, but I don’t see how it can be denied that net-net, white Europeans have made a better job of running fair and stable societies than has any other group.

Even non-whites acknowledge this in unguarded moments: this Zimbabwean blogger, for example, or the American high school student in this exchange with his teacher:

One day I asked the bored, black faces staring back at me: “What would happen if all the white people in America disappeared tomorrow?”

“We screwed,” a young, pitch-black boy screamed back. The rest of the blacks laughed. [A White Teacher Speaks Out, American Renaissance, July 2009]

Non-white supremacy is after all the rule over much of the world, from entire continental spaces like sub-Saharan Africa to individual black-run or mestizo-run municipalities in the U.S.A. I see no great floods into these places by refugees desperate to escape the horrors of white supremacy.

What are we to make of this?

Reasonable people: “well, duh”

Remember how it is that we break a liberal’s brain: “for many fundamental liberal beliefs, there are conservative counterarguments so clear, so compelling, so commonsensical that they leave leftists and their allies speechless.”

In this instance, the fundamental liberal belief is that White supremacy is evil. Obviously, unquestionably, tautologically evil. Supremely evil, in fact (according to every right-thinking moral relativist). It is the greatest evil the world has ever known — no, the greatest evil any possible world could ever know! Even to contemplate moving the supremely evil notion of “White” “supremacy” down a rung or two in the hierarchy of evil (say, just above #7: opposition to gay marriage) is to commit a hate crime of Hitlerian proportions.

The conservative counterargument: point out how well White supremacy works in practice.

Let’s look at Derbyshire’s argument in greater detail. There are three main points.

1. Overall, historically, White supremacy (“a society in which key decisions are made by white Europeans”) has worked out relatively well.
2. Many non-Whites will acknowledge this, if only implicitly (in their migration patterns, for instance — see below).
3. Non-White supremacy, which is in practice the only alternative to White supremacy, is uniformly horrible when it is Blacks or Mestizos (“Hispanics”) who are left in charge; Asians are a mixed bag. For proof, just look at who is migrating where.

You can’t really dispute any of these fundamental points — well, you can, but you’ll have to resort to lies, hopelessly faulty reasoning, or both.

For instance, you might point to one example of a less-than-ideal White supremacist society, or even a really lousy one, like Nazi Germany, while of course ignoring the words “overall” and “relatively.”

You might point to some non-Whites who have allegedly suffered in some way under a White supremacist regime, again ignoring those two crucial words: “overall” and “relatively.”

You might even claim that you really like the way Blacks and Mestizos run their countries and will be emigrating any second now. (We really wish you would.)

But you’ll probably just scream “RACIST!”

Liberals: “ow, my brain”

You see, liberals who wish to avoid terminal brain-breakage are left with four basic responses:

1. get really angry,
2. be really sarcastic,
3. more-or-less literally attack your opponents (in Derbyshire’s case, they already got him fired from National Review), and
4. try to preempt them by getting to the debate first and letting everyone know they can just go home because your opponents are big ol’ racists so there’s no need to listen to anything they have to say.

For example, watch the heads explode over at the New York Observer, in “John Derbyshire Thinks White Supremacy is Pretty Great, Historically Speaking” (May 14). Let’s skim the boilerplate.

… blatantly racist… subtly racist… anti-immigration… Southern Poverty Law Center… “hate group.”

Off to a good start: no actual content, but she did use the word “racist” a lot. Now let’s get into the snark.

But over at VDare, Mr. Derbyshire used his inaugural column to clarify some misconceptions. Mainly, that the term “White Supremacist” gets a really bad rap!

Well, yes, the term “White supremacist” does in fact get a really bad rap — the very article in which the apparently sarcastic sentence appears, for instance.

And who are we to argue with History, really?

Well, yes, the last few centuries, at the very least, clearly show the superiority of those societies “in which key decisions are made by white Europeans.”

(Coincidentally, the argument that White Supremacists get a bad name directly conflicts with his previous essay on how stereotypes are “essential life tools.”)

Well, that doesn’t make a whole lot of sense, because it’s not at all obvious what “directly conflicts” with what and how it does so, and this seems like the sort of thing you should explain in your article, maybe just a little, but hey, you’ve preemptively dismissed the value of stereotypes, so I guess I won’t look into the matter any further.

White Power Bob will be so thrilled to hear…

Haha! White Power Bob! That evokes images of poor White people! Fuck those losers! Hahaha!

(Obviously, economically disadvantaged People of Color are awesome.)

… that all intended malice aside, a pure European bloodline is just factually superior to any other race or ethnicity.

Well… okay, uh, now we appear to be getting into some weird stuff that the author concocted on her own specifically to sound ridiculous. Does it, though?

Does it really?

Given the heritability of human behavioral traits like intelligence and conscientiousness, and given the overall superiority of European-run societies (England vs. Ethiopia, Canada vs. Congo, Holland vs. Haiti, Germany vs. Gabon), which is likely due in part to the distribution of those traits within and between the major population groups (“races”), I expect that “a pure European bloodline” would plausibly be “just factually superior to any other race or ethnicity.”

Oh, wait, I did that wrong. I was supposed to burn a cross and get a swastika tattooed on my forehead so everyone can identify the stoopid racist, right?

Surely a few oopsies like Hitler not winning World War II can’t erase all the evidence that white Europeans should run all of society, right?

A guest appearance by robotic intergalactic space-Hitler? Who could have guessed. That guy is always up to something!

For me, the two most amusing things about this line are the fact that it took White men, from White societies, dedicated to White values, armed with White technology to defeat Hitler, which means this cannot possibly be an argument against White supremacy (see, that’s how you show that something “directly contradicts” something else); and secondly, the author’s convenient omission of what I’m sure is a really long list of societies (past or present) run by Blacks or Mestizos that would have stood any chance of defeating Germany under Hitler, or indeed defeating Luxembourg under Dupong, or maybe just some that aren’t totally shitty places to live.

More liberals: “brain not work so good no more”

More head explosions occur at the Atlantic Wire, in the badly edited “Racism for Dollars: John Derbyshire Turns White Supremacist Pitchman” (May 14).

Allow me to distill the essence of this article for you:

1. White supremacy is obviously, unquestionably, tautologically bad
2. some people with different opinions are soliciting donations
3. DAS RACISS

It is nothing more than an attack — a financial one — on John Derbyshire and VDARE.com: make sure you don’t give these racists any money, especially the racist with cancer, or they’ll just spend it on more racism and you’ll be a racist too! (Aside: my eyes just sort of skip over the word “racist” now.)

If you don’t believe me, here’s the article (emphasis mine).

John Derbyshire’s first column VDARE after being fired from the National Review — besides one dedicated to thanking generous readers — includes a defense of WHITE SUPREMACISM. It doesn’t seem like a coincidence that one of Derbyshire’s most EXPLICITLY RACIST ESSAYS is packaged with a very explicit request for donations. It seems Derbyshire has discovered one of the benefits of turning off lots of mainstream readers by writing a RACIST ESSAY about advising his kids to avoid black people is that it earns the loyalty of a smaller number of RACIST READERS who will pay money for more RACIST STUFF… BLATANTLY RACIST STUFF… pandering to RACISTS… RACIST NEWSLETTERS…

Did you get all that?

Racist essays, racist authors, racist websites, racist readers; racist posters, racist pamphlets, racist flyers, racist leaflets; racist countries, racist states, racist manors and estates; racist counties, racist towns, racist neighborhoods abound (and let us not forget racist backyard barbecues in racist neighborhoods, racist barbecues in racist locations other than backyards, delicious meats grilled slowly through racist methods other than racist barbecuing, and general racist food products considered independently of the slow racist grilling of delicious racist meats in racist backyards — but I digress); racist flowers, racist trees, racist birds, racist bees, racist clouds, racist seas (oh look, a racist shooting star!); racist people, racist things, racist burgers, racist wings; racist teachers at racist schools, who enforce the racist rules; racist cops and racist laws, racist cats with racist paws; racist every kind of stuff — okay, I think you’ve had enough.

Unamusement Park: the Dr. Seuss of racism.

At a time when mass Islamic immigration is transforming the Western character of the continent, self-government has been taken away and transferred to an increasingly autocratic European Union and unemployment is skyrocketing in southern Europe, supposed conservatives have taken the suicidal position of lining up with the very bankers, bureaucrats and financiers that created the crisis. The European people have taken to the streets, rising against the disaster their unelected left-wing masters in Brussels have imposed on them. Incredibly, the so-called right wing rides to the rescue of the Establishment, working to stamp down the populist uprising instead of leading it.

Well, that makes sense.

Being members of the respectable right, of Conservatism Inc., we all know that “Europe” — consisting as it does of arbitrary lines drawn on a map by racist, sexist, conservative White men who had slaves and killed Jews and beat women with sticks, oooh I hate them so much — does not have any sort of unique “character” besides the obvious (racist, sexist, etc., oooh I still hate them so much), and neither does “Western” “civilization,” about which, obviously, nothing good can possibly be said.

Of course, other people (who aren’t from the same race as Hitler, especially the really dark ones and the ones who occasionally decapitate journalists) get to have character, culture, history, ethnicity — race, even. You see, being non-White, theirs are necessarily rich, vibrant, diverse cultures (etc.), which we should all celebrate.

I SAID CELEBRATE GOD DAMN YOU

But anyway, “European” “culture” is just something the Nazis made up to justify killing six hundred million Jews or whatever, and if you don’t agree — well, you’re a racist, obviously, and furthermore, if you say you believe in “European” “culture” and “Western” “civilization,” you need to list all the people, places and things, all the values, ideas and beliefs, and all the animals, minerals and (especially) vegetables that have ever been a part of “European” “culture” or “Western” “civilization” at any point in history, in one hundred words or less, in the next ten seconds.

Can’t do it, can you? No, indeed.

Game, set and match, you mechanized Nazi war-dinosaur.

Let us now take our medication and return (but briefly) to sanity for the conclusion of Kevin “Robotic Intergalactic Space-Hitler” DeAnna’s article:

The respectable European center-right has been all but wiped out. The future of European conservatism doesn’t belong to those who want to tinker with European Union’s bureaucratic monstrosity, but the right opposition waiting to collapse the whole rotten edifice. In Hungary, Denmark, Austria, Switzerland and in the other suppressed nations of the EUSSR, new parties are challenging the tired establishment of the so-called center-right.

Now, even in the heart of Western Europe, this new force is taking its rightful place. In France, Marine Le Pen and her reformed Front National are the real victors now that Sarkozy’s phony conservatism is discredited. With a record showing in this past election, the FN is ready to take its deserved position as the only real opposition in France.

…

The system is breaking down, and the only answer the Europeans have is the newly emerging authentic right represented by Le Pen, Wilders and others. Insofar as Europe has a future, it belongs to an authentic conservatism that defends national independence and cultural identity.

Like I said, the system is broken beyond repair. Cultural Marxism reigns supreme. The only solution is to tear it down and start over.

Chicago, IL is 32% White, 33% Black, 29% Hispanic, and 5.5% Asian. That is, other than a small Asian minority, the city is almost evenly split between Whites, Blacks, and Hispanics. What I’d like to know is: who’s committing all the crime?

The Chicago Tribune knows: “Mugs in the news” is their collection of arrest photos from the Chicago area. Yes, that’s the Chicago “You’re Racist for Noticing that Gangs of Black People Have Been Attacking Random White People All over the City for over a Week Now” Tribune.

I am not particularly surprised that the Tribune chose to advertise “Mugs in the news” with arrest photos of a White woman who filed a false police report (number 9 below) and a White man who apparently committed the crime of “Missing tennis racket” (I don’t know either).

Anyway, I looked at the first two dozen mugshots. This is what I found, with nothing left out. Because I’m raciss, I’ve decided to highlight all the perpetrators who are neither White nor East Asian. Because I’m super-raciss, I’ve decided to highlight all the crimes of violence as well, plus a case — three, actually — of sexual exploitation of a child (number 14 below).

See if you notice any patterns. Remember: besides a small Asian minority (5.5%), Chicago is almost evenly split between Whites, Blacks, and Hispanics.

1. A 23-year-old Black male stabbed a woman multiple times in the neck, killing her, in a “domestic-related attack”. The charge is first-degree murder.
2. A 43-year-old Black male, who “has been arrested more than 40 times since 1986 on various charges including, battery, forgery, DUI, and drug possession charges,” had a female acquaintance meet him at a motel. When she refused his “sexual advances,” “he began punching her in the face and then continued to beat and sexually assault [rape] the woman for ‘a few hours’… The woman eventually lost consciousness, officials said.” The charge is aggravated battery and aggravated criminal sexual assault.
3. A 22-year-old Black female “threw a puppy off her third-floor balcony, breaking its leg, then laughed about it in front of arresting officers.” One of the responding officers has adopted the dog. The charge is aggravated cruelty to animals, a felony. Yeah, I’m counting that as a violent crime.
4. A middle-aged White couple from Peoria, convicted of fraud for a million-dollar Ponzi scheme, were arrested in rural Arizona and will be extradited to Illinois. The charges are money laundering and conspiracy to commit bank and mail fraud.
5. A young Hispanic male met two women at a nightclub, shot one to death, and kidnapped and raped the second. The charges are murder and aggravated criminal sexual assault. At some point during the night, he picked up a second young Hispanic male, who is also being charged with murder.
6. An 18-year-old Black male started shooting randomly into a crowd for no apparent reason, “wounding five people before fleeing directly into the hands of officers”: a 16-year-old, an 18-year-old, and three 21-year-olds. The charge is aggravated discharge of a gun, which doesn’t quite cover it.
7. A 28-year-old gang-affiliated Black male shot another man multiple times, killing him, after arguing with the victim on the phone “about the price of drugs and about [the victim] sleeping with [the arrestee's] girlfriend.” The charge is first-degree murder.
8. A 47-year-old Asian male, Rajat Prakash (you figure it out), has been charged with aggravated criminal sexual abuse for locking a female patient in his SUV and engaging in some “inappropriate touching” when he was supposed to be discussing her medical information. This was “about three days after he was accused in a separate inappropriate touching incident,” also involving a female patient, for which he has been charged with misdemeanor battery.
9. Something for the men’s rights activists: A 22-year-old White woman has been charged with felony disorderly conduct for falsely accusing a male acquaintance of raping her.
10. A 46-year-old White man has been charged with “terrorism/making a false threat” and disorderly conduct for “making 911 calls threatening massacres at Frankfort and New Lenox high schools” because “he enjoyed watching the police response,” on one occasion even timing the police with a stop watch.
11. A 16-year-old Black male has been charged with armed robbery for stealing cell phones from three other teenagers, including a classmate, while armed with a f***ing shotgun.
12. A 35-year-old Black man “under guard at a hospital punched a police officer and ran naked two blocks to a car dealership, where he was turned away and finally caught by police.” His initial arrest was for buying heroin. The charges are aggravated battery to a police officer and escape from a peace officer.
13. Two White Notre Dame football players have been charged with various misdemeanors, including one count of battery, for being drunk assholes after police broke up a “loud party” off campus. (I’m surprised Alex Pareene isn’t all over this. Hey, maybe he finally killed himself!)
14. A 24-year-old Hispanic male has been charged with three counts of sexual exploitation of a child and public indecency because he “on four different occasions watched through open windows females inside his neighbor’s home in the Summerhill subdivision while exposing and fondling himself.” Three of the incidents involved girls under 17.
15. An Hispanic male has been charged with felony aggravated DUI and misdemeanor DUI charges “following a crash that seriously injured a Chicago police sergeant.” He was also “issued several tickets, including criminal damage to government property, failing to reduce his speed, driving on a suspended license and disobeying a traffic signal.”
16. A 29-year-old Asian female, Christine Ahn, has been charged with felony aggravated driving while under the influence resulting in death for a fatal car crash last Christmas Eve.
17. A 62-year-old White male has been charged with possession of cannabis with intent to deliver and cannabis trafficking “after being arrested near Elgin with $250,000 worth of high-grade marijuana.”
18. A 24-year-old Black male “grabbed money and lottery tickets from a 65-year-old woman as she sat on a sidewalk bench.” The arrestee “told detectives that he needed the money to pay his cell phone bill.” The charge is felony robbery.
19. A 24-year-old Black female stabbed her boyfriend to death for cheating on her. At her bond hearing, her pastor called her “an upstanding young woman,” the female version of he was a good kid. The charge is first-degree murder.
20. A 22-year-old Black male “already on probation for a cocaine conviction was arrested again on Monday for carrying more than a dozen small bags containing the drug into a drug-treatment facility at the Cook County Jail.” The charge is bringing contraband into a penal institution.
21. A 28-year-old Black woman “tried to cash in on the record $656 million Mega Millions jackpot with a ticket she bought online eight minutes after the winning numbers were drawn.” The charges are wire fraud, attempted theft and forgery.

The obvious lesson, which no one in the world should need to be told, is this: if you don’t want to become a victim of violent crime in Chicago (or anywhere else, for that matter), then pay extra attention to Blacks, Hispanics, and those Middle Eastern types, because they’re the ones who do it.

Like, all of it.

As I’ve said before, stereotypes are nothing more than statistical truths, and that includes racial stereotypes. As a result, racial stereotyping — known as “profiling,” and considered extra bad, when it involves criminals — is in fact rational and therefore good.

So profile with pride!

And I’m not talking about hot Persian girls.

A lengthy excerpt:

The BBC, The Guardian, the Crown Prosecution Service, the Child Protection Agency, the Politically Correct Police Service: I accuse you and the entire liberal establishment of deliberately covering up the multiple rapes and ruined lives of countless vulnerable young girls because of your utterly immoral and obscene attitude toward your own people, and your cowardly appeasement of a religious and political ideology that sanctions the violation of non-Muslim females.

… [R]eality confirms the overwhelming culture of these paedophile rapists to be Islamic, and the overwhelming race of the majority of the victims to be indigenous British girls.

And this is not just a one-off case. It’s not only in Britain where this sort of thing happens, because the multiple gang rapes of indigenous girls by Muslims is replicated in every country where Muslims co-exist with non-Muslims:

1. There is a rape epidemic in Oslo. The vast majority of the perpetrators are Muslim, the vast majority of the victims are Norwegian Girls.
2. There is a rape epidemic in Malmö. The vast majority of the perpetrators are Muslim, the vast majority of the victims are Swedish girls.
3. There is a rape epidemic in Copenhagen. The vast majority of the perpetrators are Muslim, the vast majority of the victims are Danish girls.
4. There is a rape epidemic in Sydney. The vast majority of the perpetrators are Muslims, the vast majority of the victims are Australian girls.

…

Thirteen separate towns and cities have been identified in Britain where this has been happening, and it now turns out the authorities have known about it since the early 1990s. In other words hundreds, possibly thousands of vulnerable and under-age British girls have been raped and both physically and psychologically damaged for life, with at least two taking their own lives, because the liberal/left refuse to accept the reality of Islam.

What is worse, even when the whole disgusting issue is dragged into the limelight, they still refuse to recognise that Islam is a supremacist ideology. …

On BBC Radio 4 this morning John Humphrey’s suggested that by identifying the rapists as Pakistani Muslims rather than just Asians was to give ammunition to the right-wing. …

Years of indoctrination by the liberal left have produced policemen with no sense of their duty to protect the most vulnerable in society. … The British police are now more than just a disgrace, they are a stain on the history of this country.

The left-wing Politically Correct indoctrination that has enabled these shameful events means one thing and one thing only: By deliberately ignoring crimes against humanity and subsequently seeking to disguise these crimes, the liberal/left have lost their very own humanity, along with their morals and their souls.

If they had any basic common decency they would be ashamed of themselves, but I don’t think they are. Despite facilitating genuine evil and wickedness their prime concern now is to hang on to their jobs and seek to halt the rise of what they term the “right wing” — you know, those nasty people labelled racist — when they drew attention to Muslim gang rape over a decade ago.

But they cannot stop us. We are rising only because the public are awakening to the results of all that the liberal left stand for. There is good and evil in this world and the liberal left is evil. Betraying your country via mass immigration and Multiculturalism is bad enough, but to betray, and to continue to betray your own children is simply a step beyond the comprehension of all decent people, and no amount of liberal/left propaganda and evasion can alter this one simple fact. For the first time in a very long time I feel deeply ashamed to be part of a country that you, the liberal left, have produced.

Quite right. It is up to the people of Europe now, meaning of course the real people of Europe — the native Europeans — the White Europeans. If you were expecting Europe’s respectable “right wing” to rescue the continent, think again. More on that next time, but my essential point is still this:

The system is broken beyond repair. Cultural Marxism reigns supreme. The only solution is to tear it down and start over.

No, I don’t mean the Muslim child rape gang that targeted White girls in Britain in celebration of a Muslim holiday a few years back. I’m talking about a completely different set of Muslim child rape gangs targeting White girls in Britain.

I know, it’s difficult to keep track of racial diversity’s bountiful blessings.

From the Daily Mail of May 10: “Asian grooming gang detectives hunt for FORTY more men who may have had sex with underage girls.” (See also the Telegraph of the same day: “Asian sex gang ‘were acting within cultural norms’.”)

Note that Asian is code for Muslim in Europe, just like daring pack of kids is code for Black mob in the United States. I’ve diversified these excerpts for you.

Detectives who brought down a child sex grooming ring are poised to make more arrests – as the hunt continues for more than 40 other suspected members of the gang.

Nine [Muslim] men were yesterday jailed for a total of 77 years for raping and abusing up to 47 girls – some as young as 13 – after plying them with alcohol and luring them to takeaways.

…

The trial heard that the men – who are all from Pakistan, apart from one who is from Afghanistan – groomed and ‘shared’ the young white girls because they were vulnerable.

But… but… diversity is our greatest strength! How could importing millions of lovely peaceful Muslims into Europe have gone wrong? I’m not sure, but I strongly suspect that evil racist White people (redundant, I know; I could have just said “White people”), spawned as they are from the same race as Hitler, are at the bottom of it.

Assistant Chief Constable Steve Heywood, of Greater Manchester Police said: ‘It is not a racial issue. This is about adults preying on vulnerable young children. It just happens that in this particular area and time the demographics were that these were [Muslim] men.’

“In this particular area and time” — meaning anywhere in Europe, at any point since the continent collectively lost its wits after the Second World War and started admitting Arabs and Africans in droves.

Take note: it’s not a “racial issue” when the victims are White and the perpetrators are not, nor will it ever be. Do not fantasize about the political class, the elites, eventually coming around to our way of thinking (i.e., sanity). The system is broken beyond repair. Cultural Marxism reigns supreme. The only solution is to tear it down and start over.

Greater Manchester Police investigated a complaint by a 15-year-old victim that she had been raped in 2008, but prosecutors opted not to press charges and the abuse continued.

Of course they didn’t. Of course it did. That’s because the system is broken beyond repair, cultural Marxism reigns supreme, and the only solution is to tear it down and start over.

Mr Yousaf [defense attorney] also rounded on Merseyside Police, accusing them of failing to do enough to protect lawyers involved in the case.

They were subjected to intimidation and even violence from far-Right protesters outside Liverpool Crown Court, causing two barristers to withdraw early in the three-month trial.

Good. The so-called “far Right” is slowly approaching normal, healthy levels of ethno-patriotism and xenophobia. This is necessary because (and I think I’ve mentioned this once or twice before) the system is broken beyond repair, cultural Marxism reigns supreme, and the only solution is to tear it down and start over.

If anyone has a better idea, I’d like to hear it.

That’s brain, mind you, not head. We’re not “anti”-fascists, for God’s sake.

I have observed that for many fundamental liberal beliefs, there are conservative counterarguments so clear, so compelling, so commonsensical that they leave leftists and their allies speechless. You’ll recognize them, of course, by the reactions they provoke; rage, for instance.

Here’s my classic example: an interview with Jared Taylor (of American Renaissance) on BET. Taylor explains why the police are justified in using racial profiling. It’s the same reason they’re justified in using sex and age profiling: because the stereotypes are true.

“The unfortunate fact is,” he says, “that Blacks, on a per capita basis, commit more crime than Whites or Hispanics or Asians, and it’s for that reason that the police are justified in paying more attention to them.”

Clear, compelling and commonsensical. There’s no getting around it. So here comes the rage.

Taylor’s opponent (the one who can string together a complete sentence), a scowling Black “civil rights” attorney and obvious ally of the left, is so mad he can hardly speak. It’s “insulting to every African-American”! He’s going to be “stopped, automatically” on the street because he’s Black!

Now, amidst all this scowling and shouting, he does take one brief stab at actually debating the proposition:

You’re not taking into consideration the unfaircriminaljusticesystem! Do we have a racistcriminaljusticesystem in this country, sir?

Yes or no?

Oh, please.

When Taylor debunks the myth that arrests (etc.) are racially biased, the lawyer really loses it.

This is insulting! I’m out here in the trenches right now, a civil rights attorney for the last thirteen years, and to hear this man sit here and be an apologist is insulting to me! I HATE this show! It’s ridiculous that you sit there and say that! I am gonna leave, because you are insulting and you have hurt Black people by these comments like this! You should come up to Los Angeles: there’s discrimination, there’s Rodney King, there’s riots, there’s unfair treatment because a person is Black, and you sit there in your chair, [unintelligible] defending it! You’re [unintelligible]. You’re ridiculous.

Très amusant. But rage is only one element of the liberal response to brain-breaking conservative counterarguments. I’ve identified a total of four.

1. Rage: See above.
2. Snark: Ever hear this? “Wow. Just… wow.” Ah, sarcasm: the sound made by younger leftists — feminists especially — when you disprove something you’re not supposed to question.
3. Attack: Why bother debating when you can have your opponents fired? And the way things are going, soon it’ll be: why bother debating when you can have your opponents jailed for “hate speech”?
4. Preemption: When liberals bring up the argument themselves, it shows they recognize its appeal and have been forced to make a preemptive straw-man strike. (But expect rage, snark and attack for good measure.)

We’ll talk about the other three later.

An armed robbery occurred at an apartment building under construction at 434 Allied Road in Gaithersburg — next to the Hidden Creek community — at around 9 p.m. on Tuesday, April 24. Three men threatened the victim with a weapon and obtained property. The first suspects [sic] is described as a black male 18 to 21 years old, 5’6” to 5’8” tall and wearing a black sweatshirt with white writing. The second suspect is described as a black male 18 to 21 years old, 5’5” to 5’8” tall and with a thin build. The third suspect is described as an Hispanic male, 18 to 21 years old, 5’6” to 5’8” tall.

No kidding.

A strong-arm robbery occurred in the parking lot of Lakeforest mall in Gaithersburg on Wednesday, around 6:45 p.m. on April 25. Two males assaulted the victim and obtained property. The first suspect is described as a black male, 18 to 20 years old, 5’9” to 5’11” tall, 170 pounds with short hair. The second suspect is described as a black male, 18 to 20 years old, 5’10” to 6’ tall, 160 pounds with dreadlocks.

How… surprising.

A residential burglary occurred in the 18300 block of Streamside Drive, Gaithersburg around 11:10 a.m. on Friday, April 27. Forced entry; nothing taken. The first suspect is described as an Hispanic male, 16 to 18 years old, 5’8” to 5’9” tall, 140 to 150 pounds, and black hair in a ponytail. The second suspect is described as an Hispanic male, 18 to 20 years old, 5’2” to 5’4” tall, 120 to 130 pounds, and short black hair.

Uh huh.

The other suspects’ races are not provided, but check out some of these names:

An aggravated assault occurred in the 10100 block of Ridgeline Drive in Montgomery Village just after 8 p.m. on Thursday, April 26. The suspect was assaulted and threatened with a weapon. Police arrested Charvon Williams, 30, of the 20000 block of Dunstable Ct in Germantown. He is charged with two counts of attempted first-degree murder, two counts of conspiracy to commit attempted first-degree murder, two counts of first-degree assault, two counts of conspiracy to commit first-degree assault, and one count of second-degree assault. Williams was released April 30 after posting a $25,000 bond and faces a preliminary hearing May 25 in Montgomery County District Court.

Charvon is, of course, a stereotypically Black (male) name. Here’s another.

An aggravated assault between known parties occurred on Saturday, April 28 in the 9300 block of Jarrett Court, in North Village. Police arrested Brantley Myers, 34, of the 200 block of N. Wayne St. in Arlington. He is charged with two counts of first-degree assault, two counts of second-degree assault and two counts of reckless endangerment. Myers was released after posting $60,000 bond, and has a preliminary hearing June 1 in Montgomery County District Court

I estimate that 80–100% of violent stranger crime in Montgomery County, MD (49% White, 17% Black, 17% Hispanic, 14% Asian) is committed by Blacks and Hispanics. But then again, I’m a “racist.”

Still, I thought you should be aware, in case you’re ever in Maryland and don’t want to get assaulted, robbed, raped or murdered.

Racial profiling: the only rational option

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again:

1. Men are more dangerous than women.
2. Teenagers are more dangerous than toddlers. Or the elderly.
3. Blacks and Hispanics are more dangerous than Whites and Asians.

Stereotypes are nothing more than statistical truths, and that includes racial stereotypes. As a result, stereotyping (called “profiling” when the police do it) is rational and therefore good, and that includes racial stereotyping (and police racial profiling) as well.

(None of these links give me money.)

Recently read

1. Gedaliah Braun, “Racism, Guilt and Self-Deceit”

   Basically a collection of anecdotes about life in post-colonial Africa, especially South Africa; specifically, how Black Africans feel about their past, present and future. Also contains philosophical musings on the nature of racism, guilt and self-deceit. Informative and entertaining, hilariously raciss, but quite poorly edited. I recommend it anyway.

2. Ilana Mercer, “Into the Cannibal’s Pot”

   Lessons for America from Post-Apartheid South Africa. Just what it sounds like. All about how bad things got in South Africa after Mandela (the mass-murdering Marxist) came to power. A little too gung ho for Israel, and it shoehorns in a few too many disclaimers about how awful and raciss that awful raciss Apartheid system was (possibly at the publisher’s request). Still, I recommend it.

Now reading

1. Patrick J. Buchanan, “Suicide of a Superpower“

   Will America Survive to 2025? I’ve already read three of Buchanan’s last four books (“The Death of the West,” “Where the Right Went Wrong,” and “Day of Reckoning”), and I enjoyed them all. This one is just as good. I can’t understand why Chapter 4, “The End of White America,” is so controversial. It’s pretty mild stuff — as far as a big ol’ raciss is concerned.

2. Tom Wolfe, “The Bonfire of the Vanities”

   I can’t believe we’re allowed to like this book. Don’t the Powers That Be realize how raciss it is? It’s all about race: Whites, Blacks and Jews fighting it out in New York City. Cops, lawyers, thugs, reporters, millionaires and race hustlers — it’s all quite funny and amazingly prescient.

   I suspect Patrick Bateman of “American Psycho” was inspired by Sherman McCoy of “Bonfire.”

3. H.G. Wells, “The Time Machine”

   Wells imagined a future in which the human race split into two subspecies: savage, subterranean Morlocks and the pathologically peaceful Eloi on whom they prey. There’s an excellent reason some people (raciss people, that is) on the New Right characterize modern Whites, those designated victims of minority mischief, mayhem and murder, as “Eloi” (see here and here).

   Anyway, it’s short, it’s free, and it’s a classic.

Soon to read

1. Lothrop Stoddard, “The Rising Tide of Color Against White World-Supremacy”

   At the end of the First World War, the author (a famous raciss White person — redundant, I know) predicted Japan’s rise to power and war with America, a second major war in Europe, the collapse of the Western empires (e.g., Britain giving up its colonies), and the rise of Islam as a threat to the West. Smart cookie.

   Free for Kindle. I like cookies.

2. Winfield H. Collins, “The Truth about Lynching and the Negro in the South”

   In Which the Author Pleads That the South Be Made Safe for the White Race. Way back in 1918, Collins already perceived that the left (that is, the North) was fabricating an alternative history of raciss-ness in the South. This was his response.

   Practically free.

3. W.G. Sebald, “On the Natural History of Destruction”

   “Sebald’s final work, which roused many Germans to anger, investigates the consequences of the huge civilian loss Germany endured during World War II.” I understand this book is raciss because it fails to blame the Germans, meaning all Germans (you know, the Bad Guys™?), for forcing America and Britain and the Soviet Union (you know, the Good Guys™?) to massacre them at the end of the Second World War.

Yeah, you heard me: I’m opposed to miscegenation and I think Persian girls are hot. Whatever. We’re from the same major population group anyway.

And what a sexy major population group it is.

This is a hot Persian girl.

Anyway, so what are some of the many, many, many reasons why White women (yay) shouldn’t date Black men (eww)?

1. Spousal homicide!

According to the American Journal of Public Health: “Femicide, the homicide of women, is the leading cause of death in the United States among young African American women aged 15 to 45 years and the seventh leading cause of premature death among women overall” (Campbell et al. (2003), “Risk Factors for Femicide in Abusive Relationships: Results From a Multisite Case Control Study,” 93:7:1089–1097). Of course, virtually all of those Black women were murdered by Black men.

According to the American Journal of Public Health, White women are 12.4 times as likely to be murdered by a Black husband than a White husband (Mercy and Saltzman (1989), “Fatal Violence among Spouses in the United States, 1976–85″ 79:5:595–599). (For that matter, White men are 21.4 times as likely to be murdered by a Black wife than a White wife.) The highest risk of death by femicide is incurred by White women married to Black men.

Wheeeee

This is also a hot Persian girl.

On the basis of this data, we can safely conclude that Black men are much more likely than White men to abuse women in a variety of ways besides murdering them.

We could also skip the data and just look at the CofCC’s miscegenation horror show.

Seriously, just look at the miscegenation horror show.

2a. Sexually transmitted diseases!

According to the CDC, in 2009, the rate of chlamydia among American Blacks was 8.7 times higher than the rate among Whites; the rate of gonorrhea, 20.5 times higher; and the rate of syphilis, 9.1 times higher (www.cdc.gov).

Furthermore, Black men who identify as heterosexual were 15 times as likely as heterosexual White men to be diagnosed with HIV; they were also more likely to go undiagnosed. As a result, since most Black women end up dating Black men while most White women have the good sense to avoid them, Black women were more than 20 times as likely as White women to be diagnosed with HIV.

Wheeeee

Definitely a hot Persian girl.

2b. MORE sexually transmitted diseases!

According to the American Journal of Men’s Health: “Recent data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention demonstrate that 1 in 16 Black men in the United States will be infected with HIV in their lifetime. Furthermore, the long-standing HIV disparity in Black communities is actually increasing for Black men. … heterosexual risk for HIV among Black men is a major concern for Black communities and is likely additional evidence among growing indications of a generalized epidemic in low-income and urban Black communities” (Raj and Bowleg (2011), “Heterosexual Risk for HIV Among Black Men in the United States: A Call to Action Against a Neglected Crisis in Black Communities,” 20:10:1–4).

The same article reports that the rate of HIV among Black men in the United States is almost four times higher than the overall male rate; the rate of chlamydia, more than four times higher; the rate of gonorrhea, six times higher; and the rate of syphilis, six times higher. As a result (since, again, most Black women end up dating Black men while most White women have the good sense to avoid miscegenation), the rate of HIV among Black women in the United States is almost five times higher than the overall female rate; the rate of chlamydia, 3.5 times higher; the rate of gonorrhea, over five times higher; and the rate of syphilis, almost six times higher.

Although Blacks represent 12% of the U.S. population, Black males represent 49% of syphilis cases, 53% of chlamydia cases, and 73% of gonorrhea cases among males, based on 2009 CDC (2010b) surveillance reports. Similar disparities are observed for Black females (CDC, 2010b). Additionally, 40% of Blacks as compared with 20% of Whites are herpes positive, and among 40- to 49-year-olds, 60% of Blacks are herpes positive (CDC, 2010b).

Basically, if you just excluded Black men from your dating pool, you’d be half as likely to get syphilis, half as likely to get chlamydia, one fourth as likely to get gonorrhea, and unless you enjoy used hypodermic needles, you could just forget about getting AIDS or getting stabbed/strangled/shot/your head bashed in for no good reason. You’d also be super classy.

Wheeeee

She is (a) hot, (b) Persian, and (c) a girl.

HIV also affects Blacks at younger ages. Blacks between 20 and 24 years old have the highest rates of HIV. By comparison, the highest rates of HIV occur among Whites and Latinos in the 25- to 49-year age group (CDC, 2010a). Overall, these epidemiologic data point to the heavy burden STIs place on Black communities and the likely role they play in increasing heterosexual risk for HIV among Black men, as well as in lowering age of infection, and thus increasing opportunity for lifetime transmission, within Black communities.

You don’t want to partake in an increased heterosexual risk for HIV or an increased opportunity for lifetime transmission, now do you? No you don’t!

3. Depression! And general dissatisfaction!

According to the Sociological Quarterly, “nonblack individuals with black partners have significantly more depressive symptoms and less relationship satisfaction than their counterparts with nonblack partners, regardless of respondent race and whether the nonblack partner is the same versus a different race from the respondent” (Kroeger and Williams (2011), “Consequences of black exceptionalism? Interracial unions with blacks, depressive symptoms, and relationship satisfaction,” 52:3:400–420).

Speaks for itself, really. No one likes to be a sad kitteh.

4. Your kids would probably be dumb!

Regression to the mean, baby.

I covered this pretty well in my other anti-miscegenation post, “Why white women shouldn’t date black men,” so I’ll just refer you to that.

All I’m saying is if for some unfathomable reason you insist on dating them, at least don’t have kids with them. I mean, for God’s sake, let’s be reasonable.

Why oh why do you do these things you do?

All of this makes me wonder: why, exactly, are the mainstream media — which is to say, the anti-White media — devoting so much time and energy to making White women have sex with Black men?

Seriously, why are they doing that? Because they’re definitely doing it. I don’t want to be the one who has to point this out to you, but I guess I have to: they are definitely trying really hard to make White women have sex with Black men. This is not debatable. But why?

Why oh why are they doing that?

Huh? Wha? Who? (Jew?)

I would never think to do that. I’m quite sure I’ve never said to myself, “You know what would make the world better? If more people of this race were having sex with more people of that race. I shall embark upon a televised campaign of misinformation in order to achieve my goal!” Who thinks like that?

Because you would have to think like that to come up with this ridiculousness.

1. This TV commercial was designed to promote miscegenation, especially between White women and Black men.
2. This one was designed specifically to make White women more likely to date Black men. Why?
3. I’m pretty damn sure this one is supposed to achieve the same thing.
4. Oh, this one is definitely trying to make White women date Black men.
5. This ridiculous image speaks for itself. Who came up with this?
6. What the hell is this?
7. Or this?
8. Huh?
9. What the…?
10. Oh, come on.
11. Cream cheese? Are you fucking kidding me?
12. What the fuck is THIS shit?

Just… what… the fuck…

Give me another hot fucking Persian girl, for crying out loud.

There we go.

(Some of the above may even be true.)

Breaking News: Violence, Gunfire, Events Make Shoppers Not Be Alive Anymore

Events occurred in the neighbourhood of White Oaks, Michigan last week, when a jolly squad of mischief-making troubadours came upon a Whole Foods at 9:18pm on Tuesday of last week and allegedly caused eighteen shoppers to no longer be alive.

According to testimony by the one surviving shopper, who managed to conceal herself behind an upright display of locally-sourced quinoa bread, the trio of mischief-makers brandished firearms as they made their way into the store, secured the exits, and ordered the shoppers to fall to their knees in a line, calling them childish names throughout.

The silly teens then slowly went from one shopper to the next, demanding apologies for the brutal, unprovoked, cold-blooded murder of Trayvon Martin, pictured below, by George Zimmerman, a privileged white male who is white.

The apologies were apparently not sincere enough for the impish rascals, as they ended the spectacle by executing each of the alleged victims with a double-tap to the base of the skull.

The puckish rapscallions then fled the store, but they were apprehended later that night after having immediately uploaded pictures and videos to their Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and WorldStarHipHop accounts.

Police Chief and Michigan Law Enforcement Diversity Coordinator Martin Freeman issued a statement yesterday morning:

“It is deeply inopportune that these victims were allegedly caused to no longer be alive by the regrettable and unacceptable actions of this gaggle of fun-loving runabouts. I wish to extend my condolences to the victims and their families, for the great inconvenience these events have surely caused.”

“These are good kids,” he continued, “and perhaps the real tragedy is that they got wrapped up in something as seedy as this. We all do stupid things when we’re young, but the difference is that they’re going to have to deal with it for the rest of their lives, even after they get out of prison in four years. My heart goes out to the alleged victims, but I hope they remember they’re not the only ones this tragedy has affected.”

President Barack Obama postponed a last-minute negotiation with Hu Jintao and Vladimir Putin, in which he had hoped to mediate the escalating nuclear showdown between the two superpowers that now seems likely to incinerate the planet and render it uninhabitable by multicellular life, to weigh in on the case:

“As we have seen in the past, there will be some who will see this great tragedy as an opportunity to rabble-rouse, to tap into people’s emotions, to play the political games of fear and hatred. Trayvon, De’Andre, and Sparckle are no different from any other loyal crew of goofy adolescents in this country, lighting off firecrackers behind the general store and stealing the bras from the girls camp across the lake. We must come together as a nation to condemn their thoughtless misdemeanours, and mourn the untimely deaths of the eighteen souls who were simply in the wrong place at the wrong time.”

A legal defense fund has been set up for the three ittle wittle boys, aged 28, 24 and 19, by the families of the Whole Foods shoppers caught in the crossfire.

“[Shooting victim] Seymour was a kind, charitable, understanding man,” said his wife Ava Smith, when asked to comment on her generous support of the defense fund. “He knows what kind of conditions these poor kids grew up in. He always wanted to see people coming together, rather than being driven apart. Donating our live savings to this defense fund is the best way I know of honouring his memory.”

Jason Kennedy, whose pregnant wife was also among the victims, is another major contributor to the defense fund: “Well, we’re Christians,” he said, “and I’m pretty sure that means we’re supposed to immediately and automatically forgive everyone for absolutely anything they do, no matter what.”

President Obama has also pledged to match all donations with a special disbursement of funds from the Department of Justice.

The Whole Foods location on Springbank avenue will reopen for business tomorrow morning.