Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the 'John Derbyshire Was Right' Category

The leading race realist/immigration reform website VDARE is currently featuring one of the many lists that form the core of Project Vanquish. “‘Good Samaritans’: John Derbyshire Vindicated (Again)” (VDARE.com, July 15) is essentially a short version of my list “Minority Violence Against Good Samaritans.” I hate to say it, but in editing the list, VDARE […]

Read Full Post »

Today, Unamusement Park embarks on a new project to promote white racial consciousness (white separatism, positive white identity, etc.) and bring racial realism to the ignorant masses. This project has the awesome code name Vanquish (fuck yeah). As always, boring details and useless theorizing will follow. Here’s everything you need to know: the essentials of […]

Read Full Post »

All right, you all know why we’re here: Derbyshire’s infamous “The Talk: Nonblack Version,” item 10h. (10h) Do not act the Good Samaritan to blacks in apparent distress, e.g., on the highway. As this series lurches forward, bear in mind that I am not looking up stories of Black people attacking Good Samaritans. I’m looking […]

Read Full Post »

Our new series John Derbyshire Was Right (part 1, part 2) continues to accumulate evidence to support the titular proposition. So far we’ve emphasized item 10h from Derbyshire’s infamous “The Talk: Nonblack Version,” because of the extra-hysterical response it provoked from leftists and “mainstream conservatives” (also leftists). (10) [W]hile always attentive to the particular qualities […]

Read Full Post »

Last time on John Derbyshire Was Right, we focused on item 10h from Derbyshire’s infamous “The Talk: Nonblack Version”: (10) [W]hile always attentive to the particular qualities of individuals, on the many occasions where you have nothing to guide you but knowledge of those mean differences, use statistical common sense: (10h) Do not act the […]

Read Full Post »

Item 10h from John Derbyshire’s infamous “The Talk: Nonblack Version” (which is the reason he no longer writes for the long-declining, increasingly irrelevant “conservative” magazine National Review): (10) [W]hile always attentive to the particular qualities of individuals, on the many occasions where you have nothing to guide you but knowledge of those mean differences, use […]

Read Full Post »