De Facto White Separatists Get Super Angry Over Slightly More Explicit White Separatism
May 10th, 2012 by Unamused
James Trible and Jeanne Brauhar-Trible of Missouri are White, and they live in a 93% White neighborhood, in a 91% White census tract, in an 85% White suburb (Blue Springs) of a 55% White, 30% Black, 10% Hispanic city (Kansas City).
They are also extraordinarily peeved at having discovered that some people, some awful racist White people (from the same race as Hitler!) — specifically, the Council of Conservative Citizens, better known as “radioactive super-Hitlers from space” — prefer to live around other White people.
Openly prefer to live around other White people, I mean.
From KCTV 5: “Couple angered over controversial literature handed out in neighborhood” (April 25, 2012).
A small paper wrapped in plastic and left in driveways in Blue Springs has angered one couple who received it.
A flyer wrapped around the paper titled “Immigration or Invasion?” states, “non-whites are turning America into a third-world slum … Let’s send them home now.”
“This is not how I feel about things,” said Jeanne Brauhar-Trible.
Brauhar-Trible said she lives in a racially diverse neighborhood and felt both offended and embarrassed about the tone of the publication.
Run that by me one more time?
Embarrassed I can understand, but you’re offended because that’s not how you feel about things, you in your “racially diverse neighborhood”? Look, just because your husband watches the occasional NBA game and you thought you saw a Black person at night one time (don’t worry, it was just a shadow) doesn’t mean your neighborhood qualifies as “racially diverse.”
[CofCC CEO Gordon] Baum used several juxtapositions to make his point.
“Look at Rwanda and look at Switzerland,” he said. “Duh. It’s pretty obvious who’s thriving. Do you want to go to Canada or go to Mexico? One doesn’t have to be an Einstein to figure this out.”
Hee hee hee. Indeed one doesn’t.
What’s up in Kansas City?
Well, let’s see…
In March 2012 (VDARE), two Black 16-year-olds set a 13-year-old White boy on fire, stating: “This is what you deserve. You get what you deserve, white boy” (NY Daily News). This was merely “the horrible culmination of continual racial harassment her son had to endure at East High”: “Other white students also report a pattern of racial harassment at the high school at the hands of their peers — and, shockingly, their teachers” (American Thinker).
In June 2011 (CofCC), a local high school ended Wednesday classes early, prompting 25–30 Black teens/home invaders/domestic terrorists/hypothetical male descendants of Obama to embark upon a celebratory rampage against Whites in the neighborhood, until an “eccentric” (White) veteran with a rifle stopped them (non-fatally, I’m sorry to report).
And between 1985 and 1997, a deluded federal judge, believing that Blacks (as a whole) are somehow not innately less intelligent than Whites, took partial control of the Kansas City school district, ordering “the state and district to spend nearly $2 billion [of primarily White taxpayer money] over the next 12 years to build new schools, integrate classrooms, and bring student test scores up to national norms” (CATO Institute).
So how did that turn out?
Kansas City spent as much as $11,700 per pupil — more money per pupil, on a cost of living adjusted basis, than any other of the 280 largest districts in the country. The money bought higher teachers’ salaries, 15 new schools, and such amenities as an Olympic-sized swimming pool with an underwater viewing room, television and animation studios, a robotics lab, a 25-acre wildlife sanctuary, a zoo, a model United Nations with simultaneous translation capability, and field trips to Mexico and Senegal. The student-teacher ratio was 12 or 13 to 1, the lowest of any major school district in the country.
The results were dismal. Test scores did not rise; the black-white gap did not diminish; and there was less, not greater, integration.
Why? Simple: genetics.
Deal with it.