Unamusement Park

I hereby declare that the last day of each month shall be Commenter Appreciation Day at Unamusement Park! Huzzah!

As a bonus, with this post, the 23rd of the month, May 2012 replaces April 2011 as Unamusement Park’s most productive month ever. Double huzzah!

In celebration, I’ve prepared some delicious pancakes and brought in the official Commenter Appreciation Cat to entertain you. I sure hope he doesn’t — oh no!

Unamusement Park’s official Commenter Appreciation Cat is eating all the delicious Commenter Appreciation Pancakes I prepared specially for you! Oh, the humanity! I am sorely disappointed, as you must be too.

Anyway, I am proud to present the recipients of the Commenter Appreciation Awards for May 2012.

Excellence in Shooting Black Thugs

The winner is… 10mm AUTO!

This is a very dangerous development. Men (and women) with little training will often rush into a situation to assist what they think is a rescue that is actually a putup job. The less training you have, the more you tend to rely on your equipment rather than thinking ahead. Three seconds of thought, three steps to the flank and drawing your weapon first can save your life surer than body armor. Remember be ready to FIRE! In this case, be ready to protect the crime scene because the “victim/Accomplice” will try to dispose of gun or other evidence and try to muddy the timeline with screams of Racism (and Sheet).

They are preying on our White desire to help and our inexperience with criminal situations to draw us in for the kill. You can’t expect everyone to become crime experts just as you can’t expect everyone who carry’s a gun to become an expert pistol shot.

The best idea I can come up with is that if it is a negroid altercation, don’t involve yourself. Just don’t, especially if you have wife or kids with you. Your responsibilities are to important to get caught up in a typical negroid “domestic dispute” or incident that may have the design of taking you down. If there is a White involved, that helps a little, but never turn you back on a groid, male or female. Notice that most of the lures used women to appeal to our sense of Chivalry. Be certain you have worked out in your mind if you can shoot a woman, because if she draws a knife or a gun to either avenge her dead mate or because she wants to take down a White, you will have about 1 second to figure it out.

Further, patterns like this in one city do not rise out of nothing. From the killings in California especially San Francisco in the 1970′s (See the book: “Zebra” by Howard) to the Monfort killings in Seattle last year, negros get “inspired” by a particular leader and follow his advice. I would not be surprised if there was not a Nation of Islam mosque in New Orleans whose leaders preach to use the Whites desire to “help” to lure them in. This is a lure, make no mistake. They are fishing for us as sure as if we were salmon.

Excellence in White People Are Awesome

The winner is… Panther II!

A few comments based on my professional background, life experience, reading and a handful of previous posts. Unfortunately, I cannot remember where I read one of the thoughts I will pass on, so I can’t give attribution.

I am a chemical engineer by profession. I work for one of the larger independent engineering and construction contractors on the Gulf Coast. My background is mathematical modeling and process development. I work on a process design team that is responsible for designing projects totaling more than $1 billion over the last six and a half years. In a down economy.

My team is interdisciplinary, with chemical, mechanical, electrical and civil engineers directing the work of a large number of piping, electrical and structural designers. My portion of it, Process Engineering, is responsible for defining the overall project scope, equipment requirements and control needs. There have typically always been about 6-8 of us. For the first three years or so, all were white males. Three years ago we swapped out and added on very talented Hispanic male, one white female and one Asian female. A year later, all three of them moved on to other projects and we picked up two additional white male replacements. Within the last six months, we have added another Asian female and a white female to the mix. The core direction of the team has remained white male.

The mechanical engineering team has two white females. The balance are male. The civil engineering team has a white male lead and two white females. The electrical engineering team has a white female lead, two white males, one Hispanic male and one Hispanic female. Project management, scheduling and project controls are all white, with the exception of one Indian male (dot rather than feathers). The design team has less than half a dozen minorities of all types and a half a dozen or so females.

When you move out to the field where the construction takes place, the percentages skew drastically. I would guess that the projects I am currently supporting and designing probably have half or less whites, with 3/4 of the balance being Hispanic and the remainder black. The percentage of females of all races is far less than what we’ve got in the office, including secretarial staff. Why?

Irrespective of what Moron.org (MoveOn) and the occupy movement might claim, the 99% don’t count for crap. The people out in the field might actually “build” the units we design, but I and my colleagues are the ones who “create” them. You can easily replace hands that turn wrenches or run welders. Not that they aren’t talented in their own right or necessary in society. It’s just that it’s far harder to replace the minds who push the envelope and answer the what-if questions. The 99% doesn’t win the war. It’s the 1% that figures out how to win it. I like to go out in the plants that I’ve designed while construction is ongoing and look around. Walking up to the equipment I’ve designed, I develop a bond with it. I know that it’s going to do and there’s a spiritual, creative connection with it. The 99% never feel that and never will because I think that many of them are incapable of understanding it. Most of them see problems throughout the day that have to be resolved that are headaches, nothing more. I see an enemy that must be defeated and my brain never shuts down until I have found a path around or through something that is blocking my progress. My wife has told me that I have had conversations with myself in my sleep on more than one occasion as my mind is still trying to solve a problem that won’t come easily. It’s probably no coincidence that my father was born and raised in Liverpool, England.

Others have posted regarding the White, European connection, but I think have missed one critical point. Prior to the introduction of Judaism and the refinement by Christianity, mankind had minimal interest in the world around him. The Gods were capricious and could do whatever they wanted. Therefore, there was minimal interest in figuring out how to do things beyond what was necessary for your immediate survival. The Judeo-Christian ethic introduced a God who was bound by laws. Granted, some of them are far beyond our understanding, but the idea of a God who had to obey the rules opened up scientific inquiry and progress. Once you know God will not change the rules on you, you have an incentive to understand the rules in order to make your life better. It’s one of the fatal flaws of Islam. In Islam, Allah is not bound, so he can change the rules anytime he wants. The God of the Old and New Testament will not suddenly change the laws of gravity or motion, so it’s in your interest to understand them to the best of your ability.

It’s not just that the ideas and objects mentioned were discovered or created by White Europeans that matters. It’s that they were discovered or created by White European Christians. My own experience living in Europe and Asia, coupled with travel around the world has led me to the inescapable conclusion that, up to a logical limit, the further north and west you go in Europe, the greater the concentration of innovation and discovery. I consider the U.S. as an outgrowth of this shift. It is also my experience that the more fully a country went through the pain and tribulation of Reformation, the more they developed the outlook necessary for creativity.

The Germans we lived among ten years ago tended to be anything but curious. We once told our neighbors that we were going to do something on some weekend. I don’t remember what it was and it really doesn’t matter. We were told that it was forbidden. We asked why. No one knew. It was just forbidden. No attempt to understand.

Further north and west, I spent a lot of time working with Dutch and Belgians. Very open to new ideas and willing to try just about anything. Many of them knew three or four languages. I don’t think it coincidental that the Pilgrims sought refuge there. My year spent living in England convinced me that the English are in second place as the most adaptable people in the world after Americans and are tied with Aussies and New Zealanders and just ahead of Canadians. Having a stiff upper lip does wonders for one’s ability to confront the world and defeat it. Whining about it as most of the world today is wont to do does little more than put you into a state of permanent lethargy.

I have also found in many parts of the world, that curiosity is something that seems to be crushed on an almost global scale. Except in Europe. Saudi Arabians have no curiosity whatsoever. Most Middle Easterners are not far behind. I once overheard a story told by a colleague about a Kuwaiti man with a pregnant daughter who was smuggled to the U.S. for a rare procedure to cure her condition. The man wasn’t surprised at all that the procedure was to be done in a maternity ward and never questioned. When I mentioned that I wasn’t surprised based on my interactions with people from that part of the world, he was offended because his wife was Kuwaiti. Not being at all curious and not wanting to push the envelope will never result in a people making the world a better place. Again, the people who have been willing to push back the darkness, fight and die have predominately been Jewish or White Europeans.

Another thing that is also critical is the “man against the horde.” At key points in history, there have been circumstances where one man confronting the “wisdom” of thousands has pressed his point home, proven the masses wrong and changed the world (As an aside, Barack Obama is not the one). In the last couple thousand years, you’ve got the Greek philosophers, Christ himself, Copernicus, Columbus, Pasteur, the Founding Fathers, Einstein, etc. What do they have in common (other than the Greeks and Christ)? They are predominately White, European Males; with a handful of White European Females and a small handful of other ethnicities thrown in.

What the “99%” don’t understand is that the world is never changed for the better by the 99%. Just look at the French Revolution. Give the construction hands in the field the tools I have at my disposal and they will never come close to creating what we do on a daily basis. The only time things change for the better is when the European Judeo-Christian ethic leads and when the 1% are in the forefront. I can’t count the number of countries I’ve lived or traveled in, but I can tell you that the only places I ever felt comfortable were ones that were either in northwestern Europe, or had strong northwestern Europe colonial or cultural backgrounds.

England and the Netherlands in particular have a history of former colonies around the world that are reasonably functioning democracies and societies. When countries such as Zimbabwe or South Africa turn away from the underpinnings provided them by White Europeans, they turn into basket cases. If you look at the countries that have high long-term prosperity and stability you come up with the U.S. Canada, England, Australia, New Zealand, France, Germany, Norway, Belgium, the Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Switzerland, South Korea, Japan, and to a lesser extend India, the smaller countries in Europe with the rest of the world far behind. The current economic powerhouse of China appears to have the seeds of its own destruction built into its foundation. The inescapable conclusion is that exposure and adherence to the ideas that flow out of the Judeo-Christian ethic as manifested in predominately northwest Europe are the single most important factor in determining whether a country will rise or fall. I think it not surprising that the U.S. is corkscrewing into the ground at exactly the same rate that we turn our backs on our God and our Heritage.

Excellence in Being a Famous Racis’

The winner is… Kathy Shaidle of Five Feet of Fury!

Know how you’re supposed to stay away from MLK Blvd?

It just got worse.

And (you knew this already) Rich Lowry owes Derb an apology…

http://takimag.com/article/the_curse_of_king_martin_kathy_shaidle#axzz1uFfhk91Q

Excellence in Tumultuous Gatherings of Negroes

The winner is… M.G. of Those Who Can See!

Our past, our present, our future:

Our very distant past, too. For history buffs, this week I took a walk down memory lane through the police blotters of yesteryear. Let’s not just remember ten years ago, but a hundred years ago as well:

Seaford, Delaware, July 1909:

Negroes who live in and around Bridgeville attempted to take the town last night. . . . About 10 o’clock at night the Negroes began firing among themselves, and Bridgeville being without police protection, was at the mercy of their revolvers, which were being fired in rapid succession. The town seemed to be alive with brawling blacks, and several fights were started in different parts of the town.

At the railroad station a large crowd collected and fired shots in every direction. At a colored church another crowd got together, firing desperately among themselves. The citizens being utterly helpless stayed in their houses behind locked doors.

(Baltimore Weekly Herald, July 8)

There’s nothing new under the sun…

And again:

One-stop shopping for all one’s flash mob needs! Thank you, Unamusement, for putting this together. It is bookmarked and shall no doubt come in handy.

I share with your fine readers this historical anecdote, passed along by W.E.B. DuBois, as a reminder of what our colonial forefathers did about such disturbances:

‘In 1693, July 11, the Governor and Council [of Pennsylvania] approved an ordinance, “Upon the Request of some of the members of Council, that an order be made by the Court of Quarter Sessions for the Countie of Philadelphia, the 4th July instant, against the tumultuous gatherings of the Negroes of the towne of Philadelphia, on the first dayes of the weeke, ordering the Constables of Philadelphia, or anie other person whatsoever, to have power to take up Negroes, male or female, whom they should find gadding abroad on the said first dayes of the weeke, without a ticket from their Mr. or Mrs., or not in their Company, to carry them to gaole [jail], there to remain that night, and that without meat or drink, and to Cause them to be publickly whipt next morning with 39 Lashes, well Laid on, on their bare backs, for which their said Mr. or Mrs. should pay 15d. to the whipper.”‘

The only ones ‘publickly whipt’ today are those who point out the tumultuousness of the Negroes… Perhaps there is a middle ground to be found?

Excellent in Comparing Minorities to Kitties

The winner is… Black Power White Power of the Seattle Stranger supremacist shenanigans!

“There is also a video BUT it does not have a cat or a guinea pig like this one does.”

No, but they have a common theme. Race or species mixing is a scary and dangerous idea. Guinea Pigs and Cats have very different personalities and instincts. One is a calm passive creature that wouldn’t hurt a fly, and the other is a killing machine that loves to attack small harmless creatures. Superficial similarities, wishful thinking, and apparent coexistence for a short time can not overcome thousands of years of separate evolution, no matter how good it may make us feel to try.

Excellence in Miscegenation Sucks

The winner is… hell_is_like_newark!

Lived with a woman (just sharing an apartment.. not a GF) many years ago in college. She was very typical of a lot of young women I knew around that time:

Very liberal
Lots of lefty friends
Vegan / vegetarian
Grew up without a father or anything close to a father figure in her life.

Anyway.. her liberalism did not extend to black women. She would physically recoil in horror whenever ghetto-like black girls would walk past. She finally told me why: In high school she dated a black guy (it was the ‘in’ thing to do). A group of black girls retaliated by beating her so badly that she needed skin grafts. This was a Mila Kunis sized girl, so it wouldn’t have taken much to physically overwhelm her. She had something like 1/2 dozen big fat black chicks jump her at once.

Excellence in Purchasing, Stealing, Breeding, or Otherwise Obtaining One or More Kitties

The winner is… my word, it’s a tie between xthred and Dr_Demento!

I got two kittehs today!

I know your luv for lolcats, so I thought I’d share some:
I currently have a pair of male ‘mini-me’s and a blond tiger ‘mini-me’.
All two months old. And yes I am male.

Excellence in Critical Chimpout Theory

The winner is… Olave d’Estienne of Pluralism and Clarity!

The last couple of posts pose extremely troubling questions. I’m inclined to say that this sort of behavior is derived from clan violence. What happens when a group of people evolved to fight clan-on-clan and ethnicity-on-ethnicity are alone among their own clan? They fight other members of their clan, but in a subtle enough way that the big man who runs the clan doesn’t crack down on them. The big man’s goal is to constantly turn the violent energy outward so it helps the clan and hurts other clans.

But what happens when the clan structure goes away? A lot of boys are still poised to become big men, but there are no proper structures (like informal but well-known boundaries) to limit the frequency of clan-on-clan violence. A lot of the violence has to be underground because if it is too obvious, the authorities will (eventually) round you up and take some of your foot soldiers off the streets.

America is a very, very weird place. Black violence is not consistently high from epoch to epoch. Seriously, consider it for a second. The reason Blacks were allowed to live on this continent in the 18th Century is because they were cowed by the paramilitary power of White people. This does not just apply to slaves or just to slave states. Whites in free states would not stand for mass Black violence either. They would have hanged the murderers, pilloried the violent, and driven out their families.

This consistent, dominant, predictable level of force cowed the Black population to the point where they started to seem harmless. In a state where a White gentleman could have a hot nail driven through his tongue for uttering a blasphemy, what do you think would happen to a Black man who offered (even consensual) sex to a White woman?

We’re talking about a group of people with no interest in monogamy or in obeying any ethical principle for its own sake, who also constantly talk about “respect”. Do not be fooled. “Respect” (or perhaps, “respeck”) is just a bad translation. When used by the Black underclass it does not mean “honoring the principles of civilization which cause us to take into account community interests and channel conflict into lawful resolution”.

It means “recognition of an informal paramilitary chain of command”. They are mad that the authorities don’t pay them enough protection money. The New Black Panther Party is vastly and incomparably more arrogant then La Cosa Nostra.

So you’re saying it’s all part of the New Black Panther mindset? But then what about their killing each other? Is this to ‘rise through the ranks’ of this New Black Panther movement? – Reality

It isn’t chosen by a cerebral process; it is nature controlling the actions of a life form. Also, I didn’t mean to make it sound like the NBPP is a big deal, per se. It’s just that, fighting and killing is one of the few ways young males can rise through the ranks that they care about, in almost any primitive society.

European civilization channeled an unheard-of degree of young-male energy into apprenticeships, soldiering, exploration, and construction. This required (a) exposure to the true wealth of civilization–information, project, and the ability to keep some of the prestige and wealth you generate by working for yourself–and (b) the ability to improve.

In the Soviet Union, most people other than physicists, musicians, and ballet dancers lacked (a), so they concentrated most of the efforts into either getting drunk or trying to rise through the ranks of violent Communist organizations. In the United States today, and everywhere in the world for most of history, Congoids and most mulattos lack (b). So they concentrate on violence to try to rise through the ranks and get access to fertile females.

There are no separate ethnic groups of descendants of slaves. They have no organizing principle. There are gang wars, but plenty of non-gang-affiliated blacks show tremendous explosive violence. It’s just the way they are wired.

One some level, all people may be wired that way but Eurasians take to civilization like ducks to water. For centuries, a Japanese person who was surly to a Samurai would lose his head. The rest of Eurasia likewise, if not to the same degree.

(Ha ha, I love “quoting Reality”.)

Imagine a white person doing this — we would automatically assume he was completely psychotic/insane. Jeffrey Dahmer/Charles Manson — all the most notorious white serial killers as well and all the sickest white criminals in history — you would be hard pressed to even find one of them through research that was THAT psychotic to kill someone just for bumping into them on the street. – Reallity

Okay, good point. We’re getting somewhere and I’ll try not to be too lush.

What is psychosis, what is insanity? It’s failure to respond to civilizing influences. Just believing the earth is flat doesn’t get you shunned. Failing to bathe does. Totally different types of weirdness. Whites have long assumed that a person will not spill blood over a trifle. Stories of Scotsmen pulling dirks over slighted honor are “man-bites-dog”. Insanity refers to the sort of oddness that civilization can’t wash away; humans aren’t made in factories. Nature is an artist not a scientist.

When Whites met a group of people different from them in an obvious, undeniable way, for many, the first impulse was to treat Congoid and Capoid people as a different species. Technically inaccurate but a reasonable assumption. The reason we don’t treat Manson and Bundy and Dahmer as a different species is that they’re not a group.

We’ve essentially been race norming when we think about Blacks, and we’ve been doing it for centuries. Political correctness is ancient.

So someone could argue, “they’re just looking for an excuse to murder someone.” But no, that still doesn’t work, because if every Groid was just sitting around waiting to murder someone then eventually they would get impatient and just go ahead and kill someone at random -which some do of course, but more often than not you read the morning news, “Groid kills man because he cut in line.”

The primitive mind responds to signals about respect and territory that are lost on the civilized man. Why did that chimpanzee tear that woman’s face off? Because he didn’t like her. Blacks are not typically brooders and planners. They don’t dream up some freakish killing scenario and go act out their fantasies. They are impulsive.

Nature created signals, body language etc., to show members of the same group when other members were simmering and ready to explode. Gorillas never even have to fight; any gorilla or anthropology grad student knows when the silverback is mad. By the same token, Blacks know when other Blacks are spoiling. It doesn’t prevent fights, partly because Blacks don’t care about the future and partly because the overestimate their own fighting ability.

Whites want to avoid fights, but start out naïve since we’re not raised from birth in constant hand-to-hand combat with our peers. We’ve been told not to hit since about when we were able to lift anything you could hit anyone with. We’re completely outclassed in spontaneous, informal-group violence, just as Blacks are completely outclassed in warfare.

Excellence in Fixing Liberals’ Brains

The winner is… oh my gosh, it’s Black Power White Power again!

If you want to fix a liberal’s brain, there are some tactics worth mentioning…

1. Try to have someone to back you up. One person disagreeing with the mainstream always sounds like a crackpot. But two people, saying the same thing, sound reasonable. Ideally you want your backup person to appear as independent as possible, and to seem like a neutral person who just happened to be there, and who’s just coming around to your way of thinking. You don’t want too many people though because you don’t want the liberal to feel under attack.

2. If you are successful, your arguments will take weeks or months to sink in. You won’t be there to see it when they actually realise you are right. At the time, it will seem like you are having no effect. But there will be a nagging doubt inside the liberal’s head that may eventually sink in.

3. Try to talk to them in real life, where people feel bad about being mean, rather than online where they love being mean. And try to stop it from turning into a debate. It needs to be a friendly discussion if you want them to listen. Ideally, you want to gain their trust and friendship first.

4. Remember the liberal’s goals, and try to pose what you are saying as useful information to help achieve those goals. Don’t try to force your goals on them. Eventually, once they realise the facts, their goals will change to be more like yours. But to start with, they want to help black people, muslims, women, poor people, etc. You need to seem like that’s what you want too. For example, black people starving to death in Zimbabwe or South Africa because black people are not qualified to rule, is something liberals can care about. Muslim women being oppressed is something else liberals can care about.

5. Remember that liberals often have very low morale. They think WE control the entire system and THEY are tiny little ants fighting a hopeless battle against a giant, even when it’s the other way around. If you can’t be bothered to fight them with arguments, or trying to get them to listen, you can always just reduce their morale. Liberal activist organisations have a very high turnover rate. If you see liberals out campaigning, abusing them (even mildly) will make them give up much sooner. Just saying “get a job” or “get a haircut” or something to them will make a huge difference to their morale, and make them less likely to keep campaigning the next day. I know it’s hard to be mean to people in real life, but it needs to be done if you want to lower their morale.

6. Don’t try rationality on most black people. An IQ of 85 is not enough to understand logic or reason. Instead you need to show any nearby white people what the black person truly believes. You need to bait the black person into saying something outrageous that will shock white people. Jared Taylor explains this tactic well.

7. Don’t try rationality on lesbians, etc. Identity politics is stronger than any arguments. Straight white men are the best target for conversion or morale lowering.

8. Contradictions in liberal ideology, such as liberals supporting far-right intolerant Islamism, are great targets to start converting a liberal.

Excellence in Celebrating Black Alternate History

The winner is… Probably the next Hitler!

But WWII couldn’t have been won without the Tuskegee Airmen destroying Hitler’s army of genetically engineered Aryan super villains, their cybernetic dinosaurs, and their Antarctic UFOs.

Excellence in Being the Dr. Seuss of Racis’ness

The winner is… oscar the grinch!

Let’s not forget those:
Racist cows giving racist milk,
Racist goats and their racist ilk,
Racist apples and racist cherries,
Racist pie made from racist blueberries,
Racist hash goes with racist eggs,
Drink your racist coffee to its racist dregs,
Racist this and racist that,
Aretha is racist when she racistly sings scat,
Racists think Gaelic music is involved with the blues,
Racists don’t know the best ‘Murrican poet is Langston Hughes,
Racists are bothered by Saint Al Sharpton,
Racists can never say Gimme Dat Harp, son.
Damn ole racists think Water Ain’t Wet,
And it’s racist to think What You See Is What You Get.

marvelous

Excellence in Feeding Me Delicious Racis’ Cupcakes

The winner is… birddog!

You’ve been working way too hard lately. Why don’t you sit back, relax, and enjoy a moist, tender, hate-filled racist cupcake. You’ve earned it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-7vpabBoLM

nom

Excellence in Feline Confusion

The winner is… Kitty Alley!

Blacks are goodier afleets because they is goodier athletes because of their race which is a social construct but you cannot say that they isn’t as smart as white people as they have an average IQ of 85 compared to whites 100. Kitty is confused.

And again:

One article written gooder than the first by a non-professional journalist?

Kitty is confused

Excellence in Practical White Supremacy

The winner is… good Lord, it’s oscar the grinch again!

“was when I was an anti-racism activist. ”

Not that it matters, but somehow I’ve never understood this. I’m always reading at these sorts of sites, people who say ‘I used to be a liberal, I used to be an anti-racist, I used to be pro-black/anti-white/pro-whatever, until I changed my mind…’ and those sorts of things, and I never quite get it. Are there that many people raised in that high a level of abstraction and extremism and gibberish?

Personally, I had a practical upbringing and a fairly practical education, and as a result I was never either an “anti-racist” nor a “white supremacist”. I don’t have elaborate theories about these sorts of things, my view as a white person has generally been:
a) as a matter of practical observation, no matter the cause or explanation, it is a simple fact 9 times out of 10 that it is bad for me if there are a lot of non-white people around and only a few white people;
b) on the other hand, for some unknown reason it is good for me if there are a lot of white people around and not too many non-white people;
c) so B is somehow better than A for me personally, with no real need to examine why;
d) so I should support policies that are conducive to B and oppose policies that are conducice to A, and
e) I don’t need to explain my preferences to anybody,
f) especially when the default setting has generally been B but suddenly a bunch of foreign strangers show up and try to change it to A without giving me a good explanation of how A is better for me, when it quite obviously is not.

It may be that these energetic foreign strangers need to be energetically persuaded to go away and stop agitating for A. And it may be that curiously shaped bits of metal will be necessary to persuade them.

Excellence in Racis’ Eggs

The winner is… AnalogMan!

Oscar, re “… when I was an anti-racism activist. ”

I find this encouraging. I also see a lot of these comments. I never see anybody saying “I used to be a racist, but then I saw the light”. It’s a one-way street. What has been seen, cannot be unseen.

However it is a fact that most people have to travel this road, because as children they are brainwashed to believe the opposite.

I’m South African. Last Christmas I visited my daughter in America. One day she told me that she was volunteering at her child’s school, and that they were going to do “the egg lesson”. She explained that they would take two hens’ eggs, one white and one brown, and break them, then show the kids that the eggs were eggsactly the same under the shell.

I was horrified. I said, “How can you tell them that? You’re lying to the kids. The eggs may look the same to a child’s naked eye, but genetically they’re very different. If you hatched those eggs, you’d get two different-looking birds. You might as well break a duck’s egg and a chicken’s egg and prove to them that a duck is the same as a chicken, only bigger.”

She just never thought of it that way. And that’s the problem. Apathy. Unthinking acceptance of what we are spoonfed. That’s why so many people have to make that journey to race realism. Praise be, they never go back.

Excellence in the Black Experience

The winner is… Ray Scissom!

I too used to frequent Baltimore, mostly inner harbor and fells point. After my last trip to take my four year old son to the aquarium, I’ll probably never go back. From the black panhandlers to the black mobs of “youths” standing around with no real purpose other than to intimidate tourists to the welfare queens and their brood of unruly little future felons pushing their way through the aquarium, it’s definitely a problem.

It’s a black problem entirely. Even without committing crimes, these people are walking blight that make any area they congregate at less fun, more dangerous and just generally unpleasant. You can call me whatever you want for pointing out the truth, but you’ll never call me “the victim” because I won’t go back. I’m not looking for “run-ins” when I take my kids out to see the world, and the very suggestion that we should just deal with these situations or that it’s racist to mention the obvious problem of black crime or the general shitty contribution they’re making to our society is absurd. If you truly believe that there is not an epidemic of black crime, you’re either delusional, black or both.

Excellence in Jew-Related Backhanded Compliments

The winner is… SFG!

OK, you know, I used to think Jewish control of Broadway was just ethnic nepotism, but this stuff’s pretty good!

(this stuff)

Excellence in Giving “the Talk” (Non-Black Version)

The winner is… Zenster!

Jane: … what scares me is the spontaneous and unpredictable violence they increasingly commit.

And well it should. I’m confident that a close analysis of historical Black crime over the last several decades would show a three-stage escalation:

1. Crimes of opportunity: garage poaching, mugging, shoplifting and other forms of ordinary assault or property theft.

2. Violent crime: Rape (outside of relationships) and physical assaults with ever decreasing provocation, if any. Pistol whippings become an increasingly frequent component of muggings. More importantly, aggravated circumstances or serious physical injury without any other motive starts to be the norm. Above all else, there is a noticeable shift away from the previous opportunism and over to predatory behavior.

3. Vicious brutality: Gang rapes, the Knoxville horror, setting people on fire, Flash Mob beatings, extended torture … the list is as endless as Blacks are inventive in their criminality. There is a move beyond predatory behavior into totally random assaults that just as often include an unprecedented level of savagery. Even more disturbing is how it seems as though there is no upper limit to the barbarity that Blacks are willing to indulge in.

This final category of trends represents a disturbing shift towards de facto genocide against Whites. “Ethnic cleansing” is too demure a term for it to adequately encompass the way that Whites are being driven from their urban and suburban neighborhoods into the refuge of outlying exurbs; the financial strain of which has put the important milestones of marriage, home purchase and starting a family even further out of reach for young White couples. This, in turn, only exacerbates the issue of White demographic displacement by minorities in general.

Even more alarming is how most Whites would blanch at the mere thought of violence that Blacks are committing, without hesitation, on an increasingly common basis. Eyes being gouged out, disfigurement, brief but intense attacks―like Knockout King with its single roundhouse punch to the temporal lobe region―which have a much higher chance of inflicting permanent physical disability or brain injury, that all point to the presence of even a single Black person being an unacceptable risk.

All of this―not just drives―but literally demands a level of racism towards Blacks that, for the last several decades, every last stitch of social programming has sought to vilify and condemn in no uncertain terms.

How do you predict when and where it’s going to occur?

The key to maintaining personal safety is situational awareness. However mean or prejudiced it sounds, if there are any Black people around you―even just one―then be on your guard . Be especially alert for cues related to clothing, posture, demeanor and non-verbal communication. One easy rule of thumb is to stay out of grasp (i.e., arm’s length) of whichever Black person happens to be around you, especially if you are a woman. If you live in an area with a dense Black population (redundant, I know), do your errands, exercise or other activities just after daybreak when the environs are least peopled by Blacks. If necessary, when shopping, use the extra gasoline or pay slightly higher prices and travel out to perimeter supermarkets and stores not served by mass transit where Blacks are less likely to shop.

I hope that this helps.

Dear Commenters: We Hereby Appreciate You!

To all those commenters I missed: rest assured, you too are appreciated.

Here, have a slightly sticky pancake.