ABC News: European-American Civil Rights Activism Is on the Rise
May 22nd, 2012 by Unamused
Good news from ABC: “[White Advocacy] Groups Grow as Racial Tipping Point Changes Demographics” (May 18).
I’ve decided to reprint their article here at the ‘Park, edited for honesty — diversified, if you will.
The number of [European-American advocacy groups and White rights activists] has exploded in recent years in reaction to [increasing anti-White discrimination, violence and hatred in America], and new census figures showing the majority of babies born in 2011 were non-white could fuel [this growing majority racial consciousness], [the leading radical anti-White hate group] warned.
“White [advocacy] groups have been having a meltdown since the census bureau predicted that non-Hispanic whites [sic] would lose the majority by 2050,” said Mark Potok, spokesman for the Southern Poverty Law Center, which [has accumulated hundreds of millions of dollars exaggerating and fabricating hate crimes against non-Whites while ignoring hate crimes against Whites and slandering White rights activists]. “The demographic change in this country is the single most important driver in the growth of [advocacy] groups over the last few years.”
The data released this week revealed a tipping point in the country’s demographic shift. For the first time in the country’s history, more minority children were born than white children, setting the stage for an eventual [White genocide].
The census found that 50.4 percent of births in 2011 were of Hispanic, black, Asian, and other minority children. White babies accounted for 49.5 percent of the country’s newborns.
In addition, more than 49 percent of all children under 5 years old are minorities, the report said.
For white [advocacy] and [civil rights] groups, the data is especially troubling, and made all the more apparent by the fact that a [race-obsessed half-Black socialist] was elected president, Potok said.
“This very real and very significant change is represented in the person of Barack Obama. We’ve of course seen the most remarkable growth in the [White rights] since 2008, precisely coinciding with Obama’s first three years as president,” he said.
According to the SPLC, the number of [race realist] groups increased from 150 to 1,274 during the years of the Obama presidency. There have been more [fabrications of] homegrown domestic terrorism attacks by [race realist] groups than [actual attacks] by international terrorists during his presidency as well, Potok noted.
Marilyn Mayo, [racial profiteer and] co-director of the Anti-Defamation League’s Center on Extremism, said white [advocacy] groups have increased their efforts to recruit and plot based on the changing racial makeup of America.
“I think that what we’re seeing is that [race realist] groups, particularly white [advocacy] groups, are talking a lot about the fact that whites will soon be a [persecuted] minority in this country [which is one of the ADL’s goals], that their goal at all costs is to preserve the white race in civilization [which the ADL is fighting against], which spurs them to recruit more, and have more [appropriate] rhetoric [for the genocide that is sure to follow their minority status],” Mayo said.
Mayo cited two recent plots by [advocacy] groups in Florida and Minnesota that involved stockpiling weapons for [defending themselves and their families against] racially-motivated attacks [by racist non-Whites, especially Blacks,] against other Americans.
“These are just examples of people who [realize] they are at a point where they have to take action because soon whites will lose power and authority and they have to protect the white race from extinction,” she said.
“We’re not saying that patriot militia groups are made up of klansman,” he said, [making a spurious reference] to the [non-existent] Ku Klux Klan. “It’s more diffuse than that. It’s a generalized [realization] that ‘this is not the country my Christian white forefathers built. We’ve got to take this country back.’ It’s not [racial hatred at all], but it is very closely tied to race and the changing look of the country [and the SPLC wants to stop them at all costs].”
The changes in demographic will challenge the political and social landscape of the country [by eliminating democratic opposition to the radical anti-White left], he said. In California, the shift to a non-white majority in 2000 [spells doom for] the Republican Party, which [will never be able to change their racial makeup] to appeal to [racially conscious] non-white voters, he said.
Potok pointed out that more young people than ever before, hovering around 95 percent of young voters, [have succumbed to propaganda campaigns for] interracial relationships and marriage [but just for White women, obviously]. Though the country is [just beginning] a “backlash” against demographic changes, newer generations will come to accept [White extinction], he said.
“The thing I think to understand is that the [race realist] right is not… composed of people who are insane. These are people reacting to real changes in the real world around them [which were engineered by elites like the ADL, the SPLC, and indeed the entire Democratic Party],” Potok said.
I think my version reads much better. What do you think?
Your version is spot on. We Euros should seek own reservations, job quotas equal to our percentage in the population in the future, all the special rights and privileges “minorities” get now. Also let the Hispanics and Asians get involved in helping the African Americans achieve their long delayed rightful place in the sun with Section 8 housing in their neighborhoods not ours.
I haven’t read the original, but your version is truly honest and inspiring. What’s even more interesting is that there are so many parts that you didn’t have to change at all. This is excellent news. My congratulations to everyone who helped make that happen.
But I don’t think Obama is probably a Muslim. Possibly a Muslim, but I’d say it’s more likely he isn’t. He is what we call a dhimmi (pronounced either like the English words “the me”, or just like it is written). In his case it’s literally true, although it’s usually used as a metaphor. A dhimmi is a non-Muslim (technically they must be Christian or Jewish, but Hindus were included for pragmatic reasons) living in a Muslim country, who pays the special tax for non-Muslims, and feels themselves subdued.
By the way, I really think we need to start making a serious appeal to anti-genocide organisations about our situation. But I think we need a coordinated effort. I’m not sure what the best way to go about it would be.
Great edits.
The math is against us.
From the article:
So, if I understand the definition of a militia, there are about 1,300 groups of people with guns who (presumably) practice, and have some level of proficiency with arms and act as a unit? So there’s one of these groups for approximately every 200,000 people in the US. Why the hell do I not know of at least one of these groups I could join?
In related news, jews celebrate: “We have successfully destroyed the only country that’s ever been nice to us! Huzzah!”
Thank you all for the compliments. I’m glad you liked the ‘Park version of this welcome news.
BPWP: You’re right, of course, about Obama and Islam. I knew it was a little off when I wrote it. Pure self-indulgence. Fixed.
Jane, I wish you the best of luck finding and joining your very own super-hateful mega-bigoted right-wing militia group of radioactive space-Hitlers, but given what I know of the SPLC, I suspect that many of those 1,274 groups are duplicates, non-militant/unarmed, or just plain fabricated.
Oscar: In other news, with subterfuge, the Jews pursued a ruse and soon will lose to the darkly-hued while Unamused enjoys a snooze. With kangaroos.
And kazoos.
Huzzah!
PS My first draft had more than a little, shall we say, Jewish questioning — this is, after all, the ADL and SPLC we’re talking about, not to mention the whole mass immigration issue. But I cut it out, because I thought it best to concentrate on the one main issue.
Probably because the Huttaree Militia incident let them know the FBI likes to set them up, so they keep a really low profile.
The comments on the original article are very inspiring.
Indeed they are.
Oh, wow. Yeah. Check those out.
Oscar,
It’s not “the Jews” but some Jews who have helped to bring this state of affairs about. Most are only sympathizer pawns. Seriously, does it matter what the local Jewish dentist thinks about immigration? And how much money does he have to donate to the SPLC or DNC? Some of us don’t even sympathize with their efforts. Considering that the 1965 immigration act became law more than a decade before I was born and that I’ve voted other-than-Democrat in every national election since I have been eligible to vote, there’s not a lot more I can do. Like the dentist, I don’t have megabucks to donate to NumbersUSA.
So are the people actually with us or are “we” just getting better at spamming comments?
I mean yeah that was the whole gist of the article, but sourcing the SPLC is less accurate than making things up while high.
I can tell you that after years of sustained effort I still haven’t managed to be listed as a hate group by the SPLC. It kind of makes me wonder if any of the listed groups are real or what?
I kid but during our ‘Minutemen’ days we knew folks personally who got listed by these asshats and we used to call and congratulate them! And we were disappointed every time we didn’t make the cut.
So here we are, a minority. Does this mean I can go to the EEOC and sue the city and county where I live because their workforce is overwhelmingly black and the city is only 55% black? I should get one of those “black suit” jobs. Would I have to wear a white suit? Would the EEOC say it isn’t possible for blacks to be racist, only whites are racist?
Hey ‘Hitler. My impression is that they’re real people. I even saw JewAmongYou on the first page.
My goodness, there’s now a link to this article at the top of the comments.
Let’s see how long THAT stays up!
You can believe that most, if not all, of those turd world babies being born are at the expense of Whites and in more ways than one.
One article written gooder than the first by a non-professional journalist?
Kitty is confused
The comments on that article are heartening. I love seeing the difference between what the commissars want spoken and what people living in the real world think about things.
things are getting better: 20 years ago we didn’t have comments at the end of the article to let us know we’re not alone in our thinking :) good job interpreting that article (translating from “DWL-ese” into ‘realist’)!
And the comment with the link to Unamusement Park has been removed.
12 ‘Hitler and 15 Unamused:
Almost all MSM articles along these lines read like comments that could be from this blog, many are so bad that I think AR would reject them. That can’t all be organized spamming, simply because it happens too often. The only plausible explanation is that people are waking up.
I love this blog. Thank you, Mr. Unamused.
The ADL has a Hispanic Center – that tells any right thinking person more than enough about that organization.
Janon, oscar seems determined to link all Jews together, as the enemy. Though he is right that America has been better than any other country to the Jews – thanks to Christian tolerance.
Just as there is clearly overlap between Jews and godawful Liberal anti-whites, there appears to be some overlap between White Rights Advocates and anti-semites.
I must say that reading the comments from the original article from ABC is a very satisfying experience. I sense that something has changed in a big way. One didn’t use to see this kind of commenting on these articles. And the comments are pretty high quality for the most part. The public is now pushing back more and more against The Elite Media Monoculture and its agenda and I’m guessing that this includes many people who have not been active in this way before. I take this as a very good sign for the future.
Wow, the comments at the original really are amazing. The ones that could have come from here are very numerous.
AIT/Janon — Sigh. Here we go again.
“Janon, oscar seems determined to link all Jews together”
First of all, no I’m not. Second of all, this sort of claim is a fallacy.
example of fallacious claim: Not all Catholics oppose birth control; therefore, opposition to birth control is not a Catholic position.
You see the problem? If not all Jews think or do X, (and of course they don’t), then I suggest you take it up with the numerous organs and voices of organized Jewry: the ADL, AIPAC, etc etc. And don’t forget the cat’s-paws (ACLU, SPLC etc etc). These groups take an energetic approach to what they view as the interests and positions of those they represent; and like the Catholic Church, or the Mormons or Southern Baptists or labor unions or environmental groups or gay-rights groups or the NRA, or any large group seeking power and influence to advance its particular interests, if its actions are perceived by others to be contrary to their own interests, then criticism and opposition are legitimate approaches in a free society.
“there appears to be some overlap between White Rights Advocates and anti-semites.”
Oh, stop it already. If you think a bit of tepid snark on a political blog that makes a point of wading into the liberal-defined Forbidden Zone is anti-semitism, then you need to adjust your sensors, waaaay down. Sorry to disappoint you but I’m not an anti-semite. Not gonna waste precious time and energy doing a dreary song-and-dance about my bona fides though. Like the word “racism”, “anti-semitism” has a lot of different definitions, depending on who’s using it and what their motives are. More often than not these words are simply used as a type of verbal land-mine, to blow up a conversation before somebody begins actually talking sense. The only technically accurate good-faith usages, in my view, involve unthinking and unreasoning animus based on the perception of a category, rather than thoughts, deeds and consequences. Simply pointing out in a rational manner that party X is taking actions that are against the interest of party Y, does not constitute irrational hatred against party X.
Now where did I put my Cossack sword and my Treblinka guard uniform? Doesn’t matter, I’ll just borrow one from the next white person I see. We all keep them handy, to be ready in a minute, as soon as Father Coughlin gives the signal. Sheesh.
oscar,
OK, what am I supposed to call such generalizations:
In related news, jews celebrate: “We have successfully destroyed the only country that’s ever been nice to us! Huzzah!”
Maybe anti-semitism is the wrong word, so what is the right one?
Feel free to rave on about rabidly Liberal Jews – I hate them too – keeping in mind that we (they? whatever) are something like 3% of population. So there are a lot of rabidly Liberal non-Jews lurking about somewhere.
MARK POTOK HATES US, WHO GIVES A F***?
And from the link above:
‘The comments are better informed and unbiased that the article. The article was a waste of my time.’
“what am I supposed to call such generalizations(?)”
Frankly it’s no great concern of mine what you choose to call them or not call them. I’m not very interested in fighting your pre-planned battle at a place and time and on terms of your choosing. You’re being a lobber of hand-grenades (“rave on”? really?!), not a maker of useful analysis. I’m not going to wrap myself up in your interests, I have interests of my own.
Wow man, picture it: a guy trying to re-frame a discussion on his own terms, and switching the focal point to his own fixations. Never seen that one before. Nosiree Bob.
Did I tell you, btw, that just like Elizabeth Warren, I’m one-zillionth Cherokee? Yep it’s true, and my Indian name is ‘Never Heard of Rhetoric.’
But anyway, here’s a hint about what you can “call it”:
When someone makes a deliberately terse comment that begins with the goofy cliche “in related news” and then follows through with a statement that clearly isn’t actual news, and is so broad it couldn’t be literally true, there exist a few perceptive eyes that would classify that as being structured as a “joke”. Maybe even a satirical sort of joke. Whether or not you actually laugh, though, may depend on independent variables; one of them being your ability to wonder if, as they say, “it’s funny ’cause it’s true.”
Oscar,
You seem determined to seize on words in order to avoid concepts.
So see Unamused’s take here.
Have a nice day.
“You seem determined to seize on words in order to avoid concepts”
Words denote concepts.
Sometimes people don’t grasp that. It isn’t a thing that I can help you with.
there are most likely more militia groups than folks know. A lot of men shoot together, and do tactical shooting, have half formed ideas and dislike BRA. They don’t call themselves that, don’t have web pages etc but in reality they are a militia
Hmm. Who perpetrated the 1965 immigration act?
karen ,
Id say Teddy K,[we will allow in 6000 was his lie!!!!!!!]
LBJ, The Joos, The left.