Jewish leaders insist: “no, really, all Jews are bad”
Mar 25th, 2012 by Unamused
As the title suggests, the theme of today’s post is: how bad Jews are.
The mood of today’s post is: fine, I hope you’re happy now.
As an aside, I found this article through the Irish Savant. Note that in his discussion of the Jew and his wily ways, the Irish Savant managed to (a) not call for the extermination of anyone and (b) not deny undeniable historical facts — for example, that 9/11 was a black flag operation perpetrated by Freemasons and Lizard Men People from the Earth’s core (obv).
The practice of adhering to these two points is known as “philosemitism.”
Won’t somebody empathize with these newcomers?
From Jewish Week (I’m sure you read it daily, but you might have missed this back in October 2010): “Curve Ball For Jewish Leaders On Immigration.”
One of the rare issues on which nearly all mainstream Jewish organizations agree — and on which they’ve always believed they had the backing of most American Jews — involves how the United States should treat immigrants, including those who are undocumented.
More than a dozen national agencies, including the congregational arms of all four major branches of Judaism, have publicly announced their support for comprehensive immigration reform, which would go beyond an enforcement-only policy to offer unauthorized residents “a path to citizenship.”
In short, as you probably already knew, the American Jewish elite (defined as “a group of persons exercising the major share of authority or influence within a larger group” and including those “mainstream Jewish organizations”) is united in its support of mass immigration, legal or otherwise. Indeed, they want to offer illegal immigrants citizenship rather than, say, deportation at gunpoint.
But this week some Jewish leaders are beginning to wonder if American Jewry’s traditional empathy for all newcomers is now waning.
As if referring to immigrants as “newcomers” who require “empathy” wasn’t proof enough of his bias, the author, Doug Chandler now asserts what was in the first sentence merely a belief among certain Jewish organizations (specifically, by definition, the “mainstream” ones), albeit a long-standing, near-universal belief.
Gee, guys (who aren’t goys), what’s the problem?
Their concern follows the Oct. 12 release of a survey by the American Jewish Committee that asked respondents if they supported or opposed Arizona’s controversial new law on illegal immigration. Fifty-two percent of the 800 respondents said they supported the law, while 46 percent opposed the measure and 2 percent said they weren’t sure.
…
The query was among 29 questions in a survey that focused largely on the Obama administration, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the upcoming midterm elections. But it touched on a subject that has a special resonance for American Jews, confusing and dismaying some Jewish leaders because of the result.
So close. We came so close to a gratuitous Holocaust reference.
Been dismayed and confused for so long it’s not true
“It’s a reminder that Jews are part of America and are influenced by some of the same currents that influence other Americans,” said Jonathan Sarna, a professor of American Jewish history at Brandeis University. At the same time, he noted that the 52-percent figure remains lower than the 65 percent of Americans, overall, who’ve told pollsters they favor the law.
Confused Stoner Jew: You gotta look on the bright side, man: Jews aren’t, like, as bad as you thought, because they don’t all support mass immigration, but they’re still, like, waaaaay bad. And, like, whatever, man. It’s just the currents. Check it out, they’re flowing, man… always flowing…
Unamused: Hey, Confused Stoner Jew?
Confused Stoner Jew: Yeah, man.
Unamused: Get the f*@& out of here.
Confused Stoner Jew: Harsh, man. You’re sending major harsh currents in my direction, man. Hey, do you like Cream?
Unamused: Seriously, get the f%$^ out. What — what the f#&% is this tape doing on the door? Goddamnit, are you hot-boxing the main Hate Laboratory?
Confused Stoner Jew: I had to, man. The gas-tight doors you ordered from, like, the ‘Park Armament Works totally haven’t arrived yet.
Unamused: I am never inviting you back to the Hate Lab, Confused Stoner Jew.
Confused Stoner Jew: Aw, maaaaan —
Unamused: Congratulations, Gratuitous French Girl. You are now Unamusement Park’s official Jew correspondent, as well as its official Getting High and Listening to Acid Rock correspondent. This is in addition to your other responsibilities: being gratuitously French, eating all the croissants, and licking chocolate syrup off of things.
Gratuitous French Girl: Huzzah!
Unamused: You don’t know what any of that means, do you.
Gratuitous French Girl: Mmmm… non. Aucune idée!
Unamused: You are so high right now, aren’t you.
Gratuitous French Girl: Is zere more chocolates? I looove zis chocolate. Hee hee!
Oh good. Our official Jew correspondent, a key figure in 'Park operations, is HIGH AS A KITE.
The words we used confused the Jews
“That one took us by surprise,” said David Harris, AJC’s executive director.
Noting that the result seems “to defy conventional wisdom” about the Jewish commitment to progressive social policy, Harris said he couldn’t explain, but could only guess, why respondents answered as they did.
You may indeed find it difficult, Mr. Harris, to formulate an explanation when you refuse to consider the obvious one: that your “conventional wisdom” about Jewish commitment to mass immigration and other “progressive social policy” is wrong.
“When Americans, including Jews, see the words ‘illegal immigration,’ that helps define their answer,” he said, referring to a term used in the question. “But we don’t have enough data to tease that out, and we didn’t expect it.”
The alternative explanation, then, is that Jews are just as committed to mass immigration as ever (obv), but they were tricked by the survey’s use of the word “illegal” to describe… well, something that is against the law. Presumably the survey should have used a less confusing and ambiguous term like — oh, I don’t know — undocumented immigrants, say. Or better yet, unauthorized residents. No, wait, I’ve got it: newcomers on the path to citizenship.
That would certainly clear up the confusion.
Why the f*@& did you even ask, you f%$^heads?
Another AJC leader close to the issue also seemed taken aback by the result.
“When I first heard about this, my first thought was, ‘Why this question?’” said Ann Schaffer, director of the organization’s Belfer Center for American Pluralism, who wasn’t alone among her colleagues in wondering why the question was asked.
“I don’t know if we know what to make of this,” Schaffer said.
It’s no surprise the American Jewish Committee doesn’t want any questions asked: they’ve already got the only answer they want, so what could they possibly gain?
In other news, Jews still confused
As Harris suggested, one explanation for the result may rest with how the question is worded: “A new law in Arizona gives police the power to ask people they’ve stopped to verify their residency status,” it begins, simply enough. “Supporters say this will help crack down on illegal immigration. Opponents say it could violate civil rights and lead to racial profiling. On balance, do you support or oppose this law?”
“‘Racial profiling’ is not a term that people understand, but they do know that something illegal is wrong,” said Sammie Moshenberg, director of Washington operations for the National Council of Jewish Women. Even those who support comprehensive immigration reform oppose illegal immigration, she added, suggesting that it’s possible to believe in a “path to citizenship” but still tell a pollster that you support the Arizona law.
We are now asked to believe that a majority of Jews are so stupid, they don’t understand the meaning of “racial profiling”; they just see the word “illegal” (attached to “immigration” in this case, but it might as well have been “illegal sunshine and lollipops”) and say, “No thanks.” But don’t worry, they still want to grant citizenship to illegal aliens and all that other good stuff (obv).
On the other hand, it is theoretically possible that most Jews do understand the meaning of “racial profiling” and have either realized that it’s justified, because most illegal immigrants (especially the really bad ones) are identifiably non-white; or realized there’s no way the police could get away with racial profiling (even though there’s absolutely nothing wrong with it), so the law won’t lead to it.
It is even possible that many Jews don’t support “comprehensive immigration reform.” Yes, I know, it’s “progressive social policy” and all, but in this case, we’re “progressing” toward national suicide and civilizational collapse.
Racial stereotypes, like federal judges, are just tools
The law, key portions of which were blocked by a federal judge in July, calls for police officers to check a person’s immigration status while enforcing other laws and requires immigrants to carry documents proving they are authorized to be in the country. The judge agreed with critics who say the law would almost certainly lead to the harassment of citizens and legal immigrants who, because of their accents or the color of their skin, look no different than many of the unauthorized residents.
According to this criminally stupid judge, the police should devote equal attention to men and women (sex profiling is harassment!), equal attention to teenagers and toddlers (age profiling is harassment!), and of course equal attention to middle-class Jewish women in their 60s and ghetto black men in their 20s (race/sex/age/class profiling WAAAAAAAH!).
Many of the respondents to the AJC poll may have been unfamiliar with those details, Moshenberg said, affecting the result even more. The poll, conducted on behalf of AJC by Synovate, a survey-research organization, took place by phone from Aug. 31 to Oct. 5.
The Jewish elite appears to be fully committed to assuring us that yes, Jews really are as bad as their harshest critics say they are. Insofar as they oppose illegal immigration — I mean, the welcome presence of newcomers on the path to citizenship, they must have been bamboozled by fancy nationalist terms like “illegal immigration” and “racial profiling.” If not, they must have been “unfamiliar” with all the “details,” like how the police might enforce our immigration laws even though it’s brown people who insist on breaking them.
Those silly Jews! They were probably high or something (obv).
An almost unbelievably stupid idea
In fact, what looms in the minds of many Americans, including Jews, is that the country’s current system of immigration is broken and in bad need of an overhaul, a factor acknowledged by several Jewish leaders. In light of that, they said, Arizona stands out as a state in which some action is being taken, no matter how wrong or misguided the law might be.
Like others, Moshenberg said she had “faith” that if the question involved comprehensive immigration reform, rather than the Arizona law, most respondents would have sided with the immigrants.
We already know from the second paragraph that the “overhaul” in question, the “comprehensive immigration reform,” goes “beyond an enforcement-only policy to offer unauthorized residents ‘a path to citizenship’.” So here the author assures us that Jews only support Arizona’s law because they so desperately want to grant citizenship to every illegal immigrant that they’ll vote for literally any law, “no matter how wrong or misguided,” as long as it has something to do with immigration. Like maybe it has “immigration” in the title.
Moshenberg should be grateful the AJC poll didn’t ask what the Jews thought about Arizona’s proposed follow-up, the “Comprehensive Immigration Reform/Kill All the Jews” act. The expected 95% Jewish support would have left them even more dismayed and confused.
This is what I imagine Moshenberg’s face would look like:
:’(
Steinlight stands alone
All that is nonsense to Stephen Steinlight, the lone figure who has advocated an anti-immigration stance in talks to Jewish groups and in the op-ed pages of Jewish newspapers.
“What we’ve found is a gigantic gulf between the pulpit and the pew [on the issue], and this is true of every religion in America, including Jews,” said Steinlight, a senior policy analyst at the Center for Immigration Studies and a former staff member at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum and AJC. “Not only is it a slam dunk that Americans don’t support illegal immigration or amnesty, but Jews are no different.”
What, I’m supposed to believe that not every Jew supports unrestricted non-white immigration into every white-majority nation? Yeah right. Sounds like more philosemitism to me.
Friggin’ Steinlight. What a Jew.
We survived
Well, we’re done. Look on the bright side: at least we weren’t subjected to any gratuitous Holocaust references.
[Phil Wolgin of the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society] believes that Jews have a special responsibility to treat immigrants fairly.
“A lot of people talk about biblical commandments to welcome the stranger,” he said. “For me, it’s more pragmatic, connected to what Jews have experienced through history. We’re not that far away from the Holocaust and not far away from the kinds of issues that made most Jews refugees.”
Well, shit.
Oh heavens, they even dragged out the old “the system is broken” routine.
Yes, it’s broken. But who broke it?
Oh, right, that would be Latinos.
You know what is the first thing you do when you learn a big, heavy, complicated machine is broken? You turn it off!
You. Turn. It. Off.
I think we should end all immigration and tell all the sending countries, Sorry, but the Mexicans already stole all your slots. Forever. Talk to them about it.
Latinos didn’t break the system. The Latinos wouldn’t be here if there was nothing for them when they got here.
Who broke it? Greedy business people (who wanted to undercut American wages) and the operators of the welfare state (who wanted an ever-growing client class and the jobs and votes they guarantee). This is why both the Democratic Party and the US Chamber of Commerce are both gung-ho pro-immigration and pro-amnesty.
You’d think the negative attitude of the fastest growing racial demographic group towards Jews would be the cause of some reservations amongst the Jewish elite about marginalizing the most philo-semitic demographic group, though I guess not enough for them to switch sides in the policy debate over immigration. It is forever the blond-hair blue-eyed Nazi’s that animate the nightmares of Abe Foxman and his cohorts.
That was actually mentioned in the article, B.B. — the antisemitism among
HispanicsMestizos, I mean. I cut it out because it was inessential and I didn’t have anything to say about it.Here’s a bit:
Good way to get their attention: “Continued immigration will reduce our political power and hurt Israel!”
They dismiss it because 2nd generation Hispanics are more philo-semitic, though I wonder to what extent that will continue as they have become a larger demographic group and there is no longer as much of an incentive for them to acculturate to non-Hispanic political norms as more of them will live in homogeneously Hispanic neighborhoods.
I love starting the day with a hilarious unamusementpark post :)
hey dudes. so, this is totally your chance to, like, get high and talk about jews
that “Defamation” movie was excellent. Finkelstein was great saying the holocaust gets wrapped around a club to beat people over the head with. Even more great: how HOT those Jewish high school students were (& smart). I’m referring only to those age 18 & older, of course. Please, more gratuitous Jewish hotties (age 18 & over:)
How are the Jews any more reprehensible than the average, liberal, bleeding-heart nutter?
Seems like you’re reaching. For people who harp on, on the importance of IQ, you lot sure love to detest the Jews, more specifically the ones often seen in the west– the Ashkenazi Jews. Who, as I’m sure you’re aware, have an average IQ one standard deviation above that of whites.
It really all just boils down to jealousy and an inferiority complex. You are detracting from a group who have garnered an immense amount of influence relative to their small size and have disproportionately contributed to society, yet they are somehow unworthy of being deemed a superior group? Again, jealousy.
I’ll take Shelle at her word that her IQ is higher than mine. So I expect that her math SATs make up for her TOTAL FUCKING LACK of reading comprehension; in which case, I wonder why she’s roaming the Park instead of solving the Navier-Stokes conjecture.
I really don’t hate jews very much, but I attribute this to the fact that I just don’t know many. Perhaps I should take the time to get to know some better so that I might hate them more???
Can I just tell you up front that I totally fell for today’s post by Confused Stoner Jew? Clicked on it and everything.
Shelle: What article were you reading?
Let me rephrase the question in a way you will understand.
Shelle: What, article were you, you reading?
No need to be mean. Yet.
Gratuitous Jewish girls you want, panjoomby? Oy vey.
Olave, I do these things specifically to fool you.
I wish you luck meeting Jews to hate, alexamenos. Try the SPLC and the New York Times.
Shelle: It should be uncontroversial that a Jewish person doing X is exactly as bad as a non-Jewish person doing X for any given bad thing X.
However, this does not address the issue of who is in fact doing X. For example, according to the article (in Jewish Week), approximately 100% of the American Jewish elite is doing various bad things with regard to immigration — bad from my point of view, that is. This is consistent with their high intelligence.
Furthermore, the elite was dismayed and confused to discover that a majority of Jews are not on the same page. Thus, Jewish “leaders” have stereotyped Jews in a negative way — again, negative from my point of view. The leaders themselves see this “traditional empathy for all newcomers” as a positive thing.
I fail to see how my take on the matter could be construed as anti-Jewish.
shelle says:
Shelle,
I don’t see any contradiction in acknowledging the obvious intellectual superiority of the jews and at the same time not being happy about some of the consequences of that superiority.
I can acknowledge that my neighbour is better at managing money and at raising his kids than I am. Does that mean that my neighbour has the “right” to raise my kids and manage my money and that my refusal to allow that is just petty jealousy? It’d be smart for me to learn from my neighbor, but i don’t need him to actually take over my household.
You can’t see how the routine display of extreme contempt for the white gentile christian culture, on the part of highly visible jews in the media and academia, plays a part in some (very few!) white gentiles not trusting the jews in charge to act in the best interest of that white gentile majority?
Jews are superior to the rest of humanity when it comes to intellectual firepower. No doubt about it. It does not follow that jews “deserve” to rule us all however they see fit.
I think the real problem comes down to this: Liberalism.
Liberalism and all of its sub forms. Would you like me to list its sub-forms? I’d love to, but I’d barely scratch the surface and even if I could do that there’d still be all the hyphenated denominations of each sub-form.
My best guess is that the list of crazy is about as varied as there were individuals who occupied wall street.
Why would Jews support the invasion of millions of quasi-socialist Catholics into the U.S.? Read the fable of the scorpion and the frog. They just can’t help themselves when it comes to harming what’s left of WASP America, even if it ends up killing them. (They didn’t let bubbie and zaydee in the country club, the bastards!!!) On the other hand, they might be simply trying to kiss mestizo tuchus since the brown horde already surrounds one of their most valuable possessions, Hollyweird.
Unamused – I’ve become a little more jaundiced in my attitute since I penned that post you referenced. You see, just about everywhere in Europe it’s Jews who are pushing the mass immigration agenda. Now it’s even moved to my own country with our first Jewish Justice Minster opening the floodgates to Irish citixenship. What rubs salt in the wounds is that most of those people fight tooth and nail to keep Israel ethnically pure.
Unamusement,
You are one hell of a funny guy (err, person). I will buy you dinner and a porn show any time, any place, even if you DO like cats and French girls.
OT, perhaps relevant:
Student shot and killed in Jackson University (Starkville, MS) residence hall identified as John Sanderson. No race given.
http://www.wtok.com/home/headlines/144143615.html
Perps are given as “3 males” (no color given) fleeing the scene in a BLUE Crown Victoria.
This Reuters report gives the description of the perps as 3 BLACK males.
http://news.yahoo.com/student-shot-dead-mississippi-state-university-054223724.html
More e-racing.
Shelle,
Here is Reason 1 (of 10,000) why I am not happy with Jews:
Ask any American high school student how many Jews were killed in WWII or what Auchwitz was.
Instant pride in knowledge and generally warm feeling all around for being such a caring person, as they easily answer the questions.
Now ask them how many Americans were killed in WWII or about the Cabanatuan or Palawan incidents — blank stare — not a clue.
Every big American city has a Haulocaust memorial museum. Pages about the Haulocaust fill our school textbooks. There are no American museums honoring the torture and murder and medical experiments on Americans in the various prisoner of war camps.
Why do American school children learn about Jewish history in Europe instead of the history of their own people?
OK, you say: “Because it is the worst example.” No, it was not. The Commies killed maybe 20 million Ukranians, and a great many of the commassars organizing the killing were Jewish. Likewise, Mao killed up to 50 million Chinese. Why not have Ukranian and Chinese Memorial Museums in all American cities? Who controls America’s media. Who controls the message?
“The words we used confused the Jews.”
I love that line. But I just know you stole it from Dr. Seuss. hehe
“Gratuitous Jewish girls you want, panjoomby? Oy vey.”
My wife is Jewish but she doesn’t know it. I swear it’s true. And I’m not going to tell her, either. haha
I think I should get stoned and re-read this post. But seriously, I wish there were some way to change the minds of those Jewish elites, or depose them from their lofty positions of power.
Congratulations on the first step to full awareness of the foibles of those on the other extreme end of the IQ spectrum. Always knew you were too honest to let such an interesting subject go completely.
(The next step is reading and posting on My Posting Career regularly. Add in all the halfies and quarterlies who recently joined us and there’s like 4 or 5 Jews there, not to mention those who have to work with them daily.)
“…the “Comprehensive Immigration Reform/Kill All the Jews” act. The expected 95% Jewish support would have left them even more dismayed and confused.”
Actually, it was the AJC and B’nai B’rith (ADL) elite that called for the “Comprehensive Immigration Reform/Kill All the Jews” act before the House committee on Immigration in April 1939. Specifically Rabi Wise and Max J. Kohler on their behalf. The latter objected to proposed legislation to accept Jewish refugees, saying “I think that is a salutory thing, but our plea is on behalf of non-laborers and some exceptional persons… I oppose special legislation for their [German refugees] benefit.”
Only the Jewish Labor Committee and some other working class or minor Jewish organisations wanted to accept Jewish refugees from Europe during the Holocaust.
“Shelle: It should be uncontroversial that a Jewish person doing X is exactly as bad as a non-Jewish person doing X for any given bad thing X.”
Only in theory. In practice a non-Jewish person doing X can be criticised, but a Jewish person doing X can’t, which makes the Jewish people doing X more dangerous. The same is true, to a lesser extent, of black people. You’re better off with a corrupt white leader than a corrupt black leader, because you can criticise the corrupt white leader. Such is the nature of Political Correctness.
“The mood of today’s post is: fine, I hope you’re happy now.”
Not really happy bro, I know it’s a tough pill to swallow. Just because there’s a “Jewish problem” doesn’t mean everyone supports a “final solution”
This is SOOOOO outrageous:
Jewish leaders insist: “no, really, all Jews are bad”
I think every religious denomination has leaders that are pro immigration. Even those with very conservative congregations. I don’t understand it.
Unamused: Thanks for providing information that the Jews are not a monolith of stupid Liberalism.
I am an American of Ashkenazi Jewish decent. I am a “recovering Liberal”, but at my most leftist, I always was opposed to illegal immigration, amnesty, and “comprehensive reform”.
Your dissection of the Jewish elites dismay that they aren’t so elite was hilarious.
Separately, Zimriel said:
I’ll take Shelle at her word that her IQ is higher than mine. So I expect that her math SATs make up for her TOTAL FUCKING LACK of reading comprehension;
LOL!
That was beautiful, stoner-jews are such a menace to civilization: What happens when you get a really smart person really confused, and then they act on those confused thoughts? Allowance for mass immigration.
The University system takes otherwise smart kids, and confuses people. The student Jews of Harvard certainly get their otherwise smart brains filled with the utmost confusion by the Elite Jews.
http://www.whitenationalism.com/div/Diversity.html
The question is, why would the Jewish community go against a system that benefits them?
It’s time for a Jewish revolt against the false Pharisees who have taken hold of the temple.
Congratulations on having the “Irish” Savant comment. He is an honorable Irish patriot, that may yet play a role in the unfolding history of Ireland. History is not inevitable, it requires good people like him to right the ship.
this means more pictures of hot Israeli females? Awesome!
…unless they’re leftists/uber-culturally-correct-creatures, like the hot blond in Craig Bodecker’s excellent “A Conversation about Race” http://www.nclnow.org/?page_id=9
somehow the hotties think the nice thing to do is uphold the politically correct orthodoxy, but nice does not = right.
It’s time for a Jewish revolt against the false Pharisees who have taken hold of the temple.
JewAmongYou is doing that…
Personally, I have a quick-n-dirty litmus test to tell a Zionist apart from a Neocon: ask about apartheid.
If they whine about how what Israel does is totes different from apartheid, they’re the guys Mangan keeps warning us about. Direct them to “The Unspoken Alliance” in Amazon.
If they say, “hellz yeah, we helped out South Africa; and if you have a problem with that, you’re welcome to book a flight to Johannesburg and see why” then the next round of Manischewitz is on me.
panjoomby: You might find this of interest:
IDF Women
IDF = Israeli Defense Forces
I can’t guarantee that they’re not Liberals, but at least they like guns. :)
This issue used to bother me a lot. A few years back I lobbied David Kelsey (aka The Kvetcher) to set up an anti-immigration discussion group with Steinlight, Diana West, and Ilana Mercer. I even called it the Gompers Forum after that great immigration-limiting Jewish unionist of yesteryear.
Nothing seems to have come of it. Except that Unamused intercepted the message (or sent one of his faerie maidens to do it for him!) and decided to write this post on that basis.
WASP, I am near the Muse Of Tolerance regularly [Bev Hills].
I have yet to go in! I read they have not even a wall for the American
Natives [Remember 70 million of them perished].
Speaking of 70 million I read that’s how many Mao may have killed.
Political Prisoners = 30? million.
Great Leap Starvations = 30 million
Funding Viet, Tibet and Cambodian = 10? million.
It really all just boils down to jealousy and an inferiority complex. You are detracting from a group who have garnered an immense amount of influence relative to their small size and have disproportionately contributed to society, yet they are somehow unworthy of being deemed a superior group? Again, jealousy.
Who follows whom around wherever they go on the planet and who wails the loudest whenever they’re prohibited from being somewhere where the former group went.
In other words, who needs who? Jealousy of a group that is so utterly dependent on their hosts by their own admissions? It is to laugh.
The essence of the American historical development has been the emergence of Jewish power. This was first manifested in the systematic transfer of goods to Jews (via trading), then the concentration of the abstract power to command goods (money) to Jews, then the concentration of the future power to command goods (through debt) to Jews, then the concentration of the promise of the future power to command goods (via leveraging of debt) to Jews, and so on.
This is of course not unique to contemporary America, and describes the essential interaction of Jews with non-Jews throughout all of history.
Jews have thus been highly unpopular and expelled from every civilized society in which they have settled over the past 3,000 years.
Your discussion confirms the fact that Jews favor mass immigration significantly more than do all other Americans, which entirely unsurprising, considering their long enmity for Europeans and Christians.
Jews have been the avant-garde of every pro-black and pro-immigration organization in American history. The existence of isolated anti-immigration Jews is an anomaly.
Defeating the Africans and the fanatical pro-African mindset that rules us today starts with defeating organized Jewry and ending support for Israel. Only then will European Americans again have enough political autonomy to deal with the negro problem.
Unamused – Is it possible to split the black on white rape data off so that we can see what the true white on white rape rate is? I ask since a recent study was released that said 20% of all black women had been sexually assaulted and 18.5% of white women had been sexually assaulted. I know this includes the very broad measure of sexual ‘assault’, but I wondered what the white female rate would look like if the black on white rape numbers were backed out. I found it hard to believe that black & white women have the same victimization rates, but then realized interracial rape would skew numbers. The study excused the variance away by saying black women were more likely to report it than cover it up. There is no limit to liberal rationalization.
Albinus, yes BUT why dont people in greater numbers see the hands of the Puppeteer?
The hands at work for ‘immigration reform’ and ‘hate crime legislation’ etc.
Reinstate Stephanie Eisner! She was fired from the University of Texas student newspaper for her cartoon mocking the biased media coverage of the Zimmerman/Martin affair.
http://www.change.org/petitions/daily-texan-newspaper-reinstate-stephanie-eisner
[...] – “Trayvon Martin: From the Mouths of Babes”Unamused – “Jewish Leaders Insist: “No, Really, All Jews Are Bad””Ryu – “Read Between the Lines: Iraqi Woman in California“, “A Review [...]
Don’t be a buzzkill, dude.
Here’s what’s bugs me about the wing of the race realist movement which makes criticism of “The Jews” a primary objective: right now in America there is a real chance to turn around public perception regarding the Trayvon-Zimmerman incident. If race realists had some kind of organization in place, even just a virtual one on the Internet, they could spin this incident around to expose the complicity of the race hustlers, the liberal media, and even the White House in stirring up anti-white hysteria.
Instead, we see inordinate amounts of effort being expended blaming “The Jews” for everything. As has been pointed out elsewhere, this debate goes into an endless downward spiral which accomplishes absolutely nothing.
Now imagine if just a fraction of that effort were to be expended in exposing the real events of the Trayvon incident. Or setting up a legal defense fund for Mr. Zimmerman. Or working with gun rights groups to create an alliance of mutual interests (since you can sure as shooting expect this incident to be used as a means to attack concealed carry and stand your ground laws).
But nope.
Too many race realists are expending their time and energy debating how many members of the Bolshvik secret police attended synagogue a century ago!
One thing the left understands is the value of organization. Like legal defense groups (ACLU, MALDEF). Like agitprop fronts (La Raza, NAACP). This is why they can exploit incidents like this. And it is also why the right in general fails to get anywhere. No organization means no mobilization of public support. Which is suicide for any political movement.
Let me backtrack here slightly and note that there has been some race realist effort to push the facts of the Trayvon-Zimmerman incident, such as PK’s articles over at SBPDL. And this has paid off since people are being awakened, and the media is apparently having to respond to the internet insurgent campaign.
But dang it, it’s not enough! How about taking all this energy which is now being devoted to arguing over “The Jews” and instead use it to support Mr. Zimmerman? How about if race realists try to win a battle in the real world instead of an ideological debate?
“(They didn’t let bubbie and zaydee in the country club, the bastards!!!)”
Then those damned Jews went and built their OWN country clubs, rather then run sniveling to the government or burning down their own neighborhoods. The NERVE!
best comment seen today (paraphrased):
if diversity is so great, how come the government has to use force to implement it? it’s worth the government being a bully?
Who, as I’m sure you’re aware, have an average IQ one standard deviation above that of whites.
1. Ashkenazi mean IQ (approximately 106) is less than 1/2 standard deviation above the White mean (100). (Higher estimates count only Ashkenazis in America, and ignore the rest of the global Ashkenazi population).
2. Comparing apples to apples, say, Episcopalians to Ashkenazis, Ashkenazis lose (I forget the exact number for Episcopalians, but it’s higher than 106).
3. Comparing Jews (rather than Ashkenazis) to other groups sounds a note even less triumphal.
It really all just boils down to jealousy and an inferiority complex. You are detracting from a group who have garnered an immense amount of influence relative to their small size and have disproportionately contributed to society, yet they are somehow unworthy of being deemed a superior group? Again, jealousy.
Jews seem to have quite the inferiority complex, IMO. I think it stems from the fact that they’re far better off in countries peopled by European stock than they are in their own (exhibit A: mean Ashkenazi IQ in America is around 108; mean Ashkenazi IQ in Israel is around 103).
As for “disproportionately contributed to society,” well, I’m all for enumerating Jewish contributions to European-descended societies. But accounting involves black AND red ink. Screeching about envy (not jealousy) and inferiority complexes whenever someone pulls out the red pen isn’t going to change the facts. It may obscure them, but it won’t change them.
Comparing apples to apples, say, Episcopalians to Ashkenazis, Ashkenazis lose (I forget the exact number for Episcopalians, but it’s higher than 106).
Yeah; but assuming you read Moldbug, Episcopalians are even worse! … well, Moldbug or LaRouche.
Yeah; but assuming you read Moldbug, Episcopalians are even worse! … well, Moldbug or LaRouche.
I’m an Episcopalian (well, raised one); find me the Jewish Svigor and Moldbug has a point.
Svigor says: “I think it stems from the fact that they’re far better off in countries peopled by European stock than they are in their own”.
This reminded me of an article I came across a while back, about Israelis moving to Berlin. Here is a snippet: “The contrast between affordable, peaceful Berlin and what Naman calls “ugly Israel” — a country with a “market mentality” where people are “loud, crass and always willing to cut corners” — is also appealing to people like him, he says.”
Those Jews, such anti-Semites!
The Jews are not nearly as Smart as they want you to believe! One standard deviation above Whites? HAHAHAHAHAHA!
Who gives the tests? Jews. Who writes the tests? Jews.
Who are the biggest Liars in the World? Jews.
[Unamused: No, and you're an idiot.]
[deleted]
“Who are the biggest Liars in the World?”
Interesting question. I haven’t seen studies on that topic directly. But personality tests do often measure lying, as a kind of error checking system to make sure people aren’t just trying to make themself look good. And black people score much higher on lying than white people in these tests. That may only reflect lying about their personality though, and might not be generalisable.
Right. The ugly way of phrasing it is, “vampires don’t live off of other vampires.”
The Liberal Jewish Eunuch. Another Jew arguing against the false Pharisees.
the friendly grizzly
My parents didn’t get in the country club, either. Can I join the Jewish one? ha ha I’m just teasing ya. But, seriously, I don’t know a lot about country clubs. I figure some of the more exclusive ones were… well… exclusive. But I also figure some Jews would have formed their own exclusive clubs regardless. And I figure neither you nor me could get into either of them! LOL! But you’d probably get into both of them before I would.
Country clubs are boring anyway. I’d rather join one of those old-school smoking clubs with paneled walls, where you smoke pipes and discuss Gibbon.
By the way, here’s some more spam fo yo azz: Derb at Taki’s causes heads to explode. More skulls then went blooey on Twitter. The NRO guys are going to fire him… not that I give a shit, given NRO’s worthlessness these days.
Such is the state of the Right, my ninjas.
Destructure: Warren Buffet [is the ole goat still alive and still USA s
richest ole goat?] did what he could to see Omahas Club was opened to jews.
His Ex wife works for integration / civil rights.
I consider Planned Parenthood to be murderous….Buffet funds or will leave his $ to it.
Destructure..jews are smart but we are smarter!!!
Hey, Mister. I’m not paying you to go two weeks between posts. Okay, I’m not paying you at all. But still…
@Zimriel
I saw that piece. I agree with every word. The proper response to his critics is a middle finger. The proper response to the editor of the NR for not showing them his middle finger is a middle finger. Okay. So maybe we don’t need guys running around throwing hand grenades. But that piece wasn’t over the top. The lefties just didn’t like it. And I’ve already prescribed the proper response to them.
@90404
I wouldn’t say that. The two richest men in the world are gentiles and they’ve both set up trusts to leave the bulk of their estates to… well… marxist bullshit. I haven’t seen any jews dumb enough to do that.
You’ve been hors de combat for nearly two weeks now. Many of us have anxiously awaited your contribution to L’Affair Zimmerman. If it’s something beyond your control that’s keeping you silent, I pray for some resolution. Otherwise, give us a sign at least.
Destructure, are you referring to Gates/Buffet?
A Hindu spent a BILLION building himself a house he may not even live in!
Zimriel, Taki is down. Sabotaged?
I did check yr link. Gee Nehasi Coates doesnt like us.
90404
Zimriel link was messed up. This is Derb’s article at Taki.
The Talk: Nonblack Version
Laidley! My apartment is completely full of very chubby kitties and I can’t get to the computer! HALP
oh no now they’re in the sink
Sorry about the broken link, I meant to link to some porn.
If you are looking for subject matter, perhaps this little item where National Review fired John Derbyshire apparently for his race views. See here: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/295514/parting-ways-rich-lowry
The Jews are not nearly as Smart as they want you to believe! One standard deviation above Whites? HAHAHAHAHAHA!
Who gives the tests? Jews. Who writes the tests? Jews.
Who are the biggest Liars in the World? Jews.
The Whites are not nearly as Smart as they want you to believe as everything they use was invented by blacks as black history month taught us! One standard deviation above African-Americans like Trayvon Martin for example who would not hurt a fly? HAHAHAHAHAHA!
Who gives the tests? Whites. Who writes the tests? Whites.
Who are the biggest Liars in the World? Whites.
I knew a university educated chick who truly believed this so it must be true as she was university educated and she learned this at university where smart people goon to be smarter.
I’ve been running some trololo on SPLC’s site.
Background: Jake England is being tagged as “white”, although he’s Cherokee. Now, I must point out here, that first – his alleged accomplice Alvin Watts *is* white and second – I don’t condone random acts of murder.
I’m objecting to the media’s rush to say it’s all due to White Privilege and White Supremacy; that is, to an evil innate to whites (only). That opinion is, itself, racist. Watts and England were motivated purely by hatred of blacks; for that purpose, they were willing to cross the Indian / White divide. That’s still awful, but it’s not our fault.
So here’s my last comment:
We’ll see if SPLC posts it.
The middle paragraph, on reflection, should have been kept to a separate post. Ah well, I’m not perfect
Thanks Z for post 72.
NPR did the predictable, fawning interviews today, ‘LIVE FROM TULSA’
No mention that the lead killer is Native Red. One more chance to
do the ‘whites kill Blacks’ narrative. [Remember White Latino Zimmerman?].
Im so tired of the lies on Public radio. KCRW ian Masters was saying
‘Stand yr Ground’ cost [cute cuddly]Treyvon his life. Gees, what a liar.
the shooting was either Murder or Justifiable Homicide / Self Defense that had nada to do with Standing Ground.
Another clueless idiot who blames everything on “structural inequality”.
http://www.thenation.com/blog/167290/who-cares-about-john-derbyshire