The Third Law of Black Crime According to Black People
Jan 29th, 2012 by Unamused
Our ongoing series Black Crime According to Black People explores the unique principles that govern how blacks react to black crime, which is very different from how they react to non-black crime and how whites react to any sort of crime.
These should not be confused with Unamusement Park’s Laws of Race and Crime:
- There is no significant bias against black people in the justice system.
- The news media are biased in favor of black people.
- Black people are more criminal than white people.
We emphasize that the Laws of Race and Crime describe and explain the reality of race and crime, whereas the Laws of Black Crime According to Black People describe and explain black people’s reactions to black crime. (To be precise: how the reactions to black crime of a large percentage of black people differ from their reactions to non-black crime and from the reactions of most white people to any sort of crime.)
Last time, we covered the Second Law of Black Crime According to Black People: More to the Story. This law holds that any time a black person commits or is accused of a crime, there must be — can you guess? — more to the story. However horrific the crime and however obvious the black person’s guilt, there simply must be some mitigating factor to justify or at least excuse what happened. The criminal may not be the hero of the story, but he is certainly among the victims — provided he is black.
Today, we unveil the Third Law of Black Crime According to Black People. If you have any examples of this law in action, feel free to leave a comment.
Third Law: Only Victims Are Black
The Only Victims Are Black law holds that (a) the race of a black victim is always relevant, and (b) the race of a black perpetrator is never relevant. When the two clauses of the Third Law are applied in quick succession, the results can be humorous.
We take as an example the shooting death of Shaquille Jones of Brooklyn, as reported by the website Your Black Gossip in “17 Year Old High School Basketball Player In The Wrong Place At The Wrong Time Shot To Death” (Nov. 20, 2011).
Shaquille Jones wasn’t a kid who was expected to die at such an early age. He wasn’t even involved in the situation that got him killed. Being in the wrong place at the wrong time can often lead to a death sentence for young black men in America.
A situation got him killed? He was in the wrong place at the wrong time? It sounds as though he was hit by a bus or struck by lightning, but we already know he was shot to death. A hunting accident, perhaps — but in Brooklyn? And how can situations, times, and places discriminate on the basis of age, sex, and race? How can they preferentially target young black men?
Of course, Shaquille wasn’t shot by a situation or a place and time. He was murdered — gunned down in the street for no good reason — by a gang of black thugs. This is not unusual.
12.6% of Americans are black alone; another 1% are black in combination with some other race (2010 Census). Yet blacks commit the majority of homicides: 50% in 2004, 53% in 2005, 55% in 2006, 54% in 2007, 52% in 2008, 52% in 2009, and 53% in 2010 (FBI Uniform Crime Reporting Program). The black murder rate is consistently about 8 times higher than the white murder rate, meaning blacks are 8 times as likely (700% more likely) to commit murder as whites, on average. From 2004 to 2008, about 84% of their victims were black, while 16% were white and Hispanic.
Now you know. So let’s read on.
Being in the wrong place at the wrong time can often lead to a death sentence for young black men in America. Jones, who lives in Brooklyn, ran into a group of other teenagers who were armed and seeking to settle a fight they’d had with some other young men.
Jones and his friends argued with the armed men, but were not involved in the fight that had the men so upset in the first place.
It doesn’t get any clearer than in these three sentences. The victim and all four perpetrators (not to mention whomever they were arguing with) were (a) young, (b) male, and (c) black. The victim is duly described as (a) young, (b) male, and (c) black. The perpetrators, on the other hand, are described as (a) young and (b) male.
Hmm. Some information appears to have been lost.
The victim isn’t just a person or a young person or a man or even a young man. He’s a young black man, and this is clearly very important to “Your Black Gossip.” Indeed, it is the article’s raison d’être. That’s clause (a) of the Third Law in action: the race of a black victim is always relevant.
Not only is the race of a black victim always relevant, but the race of a white victim is irrelevant at best, and cause for obscene celebration at worst. Most blacks don’t seem to care one bit about the white victims of black crime, despite the little-known fact that blacks commit more violent crime against whites than against other blacks and often delight in harming innocent white people. But that curious attitude is a law for another day.
Meanwhile, Shaquille’s killers are merely young men. That’s clause (b) of the Third Law in action: the race of a black perpetrator is never relevant.
You see, drawing attention to black criminality (while technically not racist, as long as the reporter is black) could lead to “negative stereotypes,” meaning uncomfortable statistical truths about racial minorities.
It could also lead to “racial profiling,” meaning the exact same principle that makes you pet a kitty but run from a tiger.
It could even “reflect on all the good black kids” and “render invisible the young black guys who are strivers and law-abiding,” meaning waaaaaaah blacks are dangerous and those mean wacist white people want to protect themselves and their families waaaaaaah.
Well, some of them want to protect themselves. Not all.

Here is a debate that erupted between two whites about the Sh*t White girls say to Black girls video that went viral on you tube. You can check out more of the discussions here at this link: http://www.clutchmagonline.com/2012/01/not-everyones-laughing-at-shit-white-girls-say-to-black-girls/comment-page-5/#comment-197894
On January 10, 2012 at 4:54 pm, clive said:
“I am going to say up front I don’t understand why some white people were offended by this video. I found it hilarious. Satires of life are great because there are kernels of truth to them, and the girl who produced the video clearly has a great eye for it.
But I do have some issues with the tone and implications of this article. While I get the author’s intent with this article to define privilege as an important factor in determining what constitutes a racist comment, she is missing the forest through the trees. White people do not inherently see black people as beneath them. Establishing that whites have ‘privilege’, as if society has a system in place to keep black people down and white people up, is both antiquated and ludicrous, not to mention self-defeating. Did that used to exist? Yes. But decades of affirmative action and government programs, and most importantly cultural changes, have created a white population that is not anti-black and denigrating towards African-Americans. Instead, it is, simply put, indifferent.”
—
I have to disagree. White privilege is ongoing to this very day, and there could be twenty more Barack Obamas in the White House and that won’t change, because we still live in a Western society which is rooted in white privilege. Do you honestly believe that it takes less than a century to turn around centuries of oppression? Let’s put it this way: around the turn of the century, women were still considered chattel. Sure, our society has come a long way since then, but that doesn’t change the fact that we still have pink collar ghettoes and glass ceilings for women. Why? Because these societal problems have existed for centuries and still exist, and while things are getting better, to proclaim that they’ve magically disappeared all because you no longer see this discrimination, doesn’t mean that those who are the victims of oppression, don’t still see it and experience it every single day.
—
“I know it is difficult to hear, but the only people holding back black people today are black people. Paranoid, imagined attacks from the majority culture and a desire to avoid ‘being white’ have led over the past few decades to the destruction of the African-American family, and mindset that learning and education are traits that should be avoided. The community has (generally) become an entitlement culture that blames everybody else for their problems, and then complains that people are ‘looking down on them’. Well guess what! That is not due to any sort of belief that blacks are ‘inferior’. It is due to a general disgust with what the culture has become: a slew of single parent families, rampant with crime and drug use. Italians, poles, asians, etc have all come to this country and have been discriminated against by the majority culture (at one point WASPs). Yet nobody looks down on them anymore. Why? Because they worked to make themselves something and have earned respect. It’s not racism, it’s realism- it has nothing to do with skin color or ethnicity. I would hire a qualified African-American in two seconds over a white person because I know he/she had to fight through the plantation mentality of his own community to become something, and I want to encourage that, because sadly, that is exception not the norm.”
—
I don’t believe it’s paranoia: it wasn’t that long ago that a radio personality like Don Imus referred to a group of black female athletes as ‘nappy-headed hoes’. Yeah, we sure do live in a “post-racial” America. Right. :P And Don Imus still has a job, it must be nice to be able to revel in white privilege. And what about Pat Buchanan? MSNBC only recently suspended him even though he’s been shilling racist drivel for a very long time, and saying stuff that anyone else would have gotten automatically canned for.
Racism doesn’t have to be something that only happens south of the Mason-Dixon, where Confederate flags fly free and where redneck yokels, neo-Nazi boneheads and Ku Klux Klan members parade around in white sheets. No, racism can be much subtler and more insidious than that, and only someone who has been on the receiving end of it will really notice.
—
“Take for instance what happened in 2010 at a poor inner city school in South Philadelphia. The school was comprised of African-Americans and Vietnamese immigrants; the Vietnamese students were working jobs after school and still getting A’s while the African-American kids were failing out and in fact beating the Vietnamese kids up for being too ‘brainy’. Can anybody say with any credulity that the MAIN reason these students are underperforming is because of the racist ‘establishment’? Or should African-Americans maybe start looking closer to home for the problem?”
—
Apples and oranges. Asian cultures are markedly different from Western culture in such things as emphasis on education, child discipline, families, etc. and of course, immigrant culture is again different because immigrants tend to work much harder than Western workers in large part because of the belief that they _have_ to work harder than those native-born due to discrimination (and they’re probably right). Furthermore, Asian immigrants for the most part know where they are from, in terms of their culture, their nationality, their ethnicity, their country of origin: American blacks have none of these things, because their ancestors were deprived of these things when they were enslaved. They were forbidden their native languages, traditions, cultures, mores, etc.: Everything that creates a kind familial and generational continuity is lost. _That_ is the legacy of black slavery in North America, and in that sense, their unique experience is much more akin to the experience of the Native and aboriginal peoples of North America, who were likewise oppressed, if not enslaved in the strictest sense, the cultural and ethnic genocide perpetrated against them as well as the decimation of their oral histories, their traditions, their languages, their cultures, the very fabric of who they were as a people, in combination with the usurpation of their land, means that they have almost completely lost who they are as a people. Not in the same way white people have forgotten where they came from because it became largely irrelevant and unimportant to them, because should they ever become curious and look into the genealogy, it is but a mouse-click away on various family history websites.
So to compare the Vietnamese immigrant kids to black kids in America isn’t a fair comparison: Sure, Vietnamese boat people experienced a lot of bad things both in Vietnam and after leaving it (horrible things like piracy and sale into sex slavery are but two examples of those who didn’t make it to North America), but there wasn’t an ongoing perpetuation of oppression and cultural genocide: they still know where they came from, even if they had to flee their home country due to war and political instability. Black kids in America today are the broken children of broken families that came from broken families. Just as there are so many social ills within Native reservations, such as extreme poverty, alcoholism, drug addiction, physical and sexual abuse: it would be easy to dismiss these social ills as being the result of some moral deficiency or failure on the part of the First Nations and aboriginal peoples to pull themselves up by the bootstraps. But that would be to ignore what I mentioned above. To be honest, I don’t think any one of any ethnicity, if they had experienced the same sorts of horrors experienced by the Native people or blacks in America, would be doing particularly well right now. I know I wouldn’t, if I lived in perpetual poverty, the descendant of generations of broken families which was the direct result of my ancestors having been enslaved, or been the victims of attempted genocide. And I certainly would be right in being offended if I was then told that instead I just wasn’t being boot-strappy enough. It’s an offensive, simplistic, insensitive and ignorant assessment of a very complex and difficult social problem.
—
“I get that it’s hard to grow up in a black community in this country and excel, or indeed, that it’s awkward to be the only black person in an affluent white community. But for Christ sake stop complaining about institutional racism, and how white people are racist for calling a spade a spade. ‘Microracisms’ only exist because many white people have (unfortunately) also gotten used to the image projected by the black community that blacks don’t do things like get an education or a white collar job. That is not because whites don’t believe that blacks CAN do this, it just surprises them because they see the opposite on a regular basis, because blacks have framed such things as ‘not-black’. As a result, when an African-American does get an education and work in that sort of job, there is an awkwardness because comments that would normally just be matter-of-fact jokes or statements about the difference of one’s appearance get tied to the black person’s community, and triggers the mindset that the white person is being racist. Of course, some comments may overstep the line. But I would say in general what the author is talking about is a paranoid, oversensitive way of framing meaningless comments.”
—
Well, perhaps you could then see that if ‘microracism’ incidents are due to white people having gotten used to the image projected by the black community that blacks don’t want to get an education or a white collar job, you can also see that there might well be a rejection by some members of the black community of things like public education and going for white-collar jobs precisely _because_ there is discrimination in teaching and hiring. Why bother if the playing field isn’t level and the odds are already stacked against them? While that may be defeatist in attitude, it’s a perfectly understandable emotional reaction to the kind of oppression they are facing. If you’ve been told since birth that you’re never going anywhere because of the colour of your skin, that racism has stacked the cards in life against you so that even if you played the game by the rules, you won’t be given the same rewards or respect given someone who is white, wouldn’t that piss you off? I know it would piss me off, and I would naturally want to rebel against that. When you’re followed around by cop cards just because of the colour of your skin, and every store clerk follows you around when you’re trying to buy something, and every teacher you have thinks your legitimate reason for not completing an assignment or doing poorly on a test is some made-up excuse not to do the work, and every job recruiter won’t even look at your resume before throwing it in the trash because you have some ‘stereotypically black’ name, and you too would have more than a small chip on your shoulder regarding race and the society you live in.
These aren’t excuses, this is the daily reality for blacks in America: maybe not for all of them, but for enough of them to make them feel that no matter what they do, they will never get anywhere or never get as much as they should just because of their skin colour. So on the streets, they see shortcuts that will bring them the kind of riches they want and need without having to worry about racism hampering their efforts. Some of them see excelling in sports as their only ticket out of poverty, while others see rap music. Still more see crime. Those are the kinds of options they’re left with the cards they’ve been dealt, and for all that turning to crime is not something that I would personally advocate, I can understand it and certainly while I’ve never been in such dire straits as to have to resort to it, I’ve seen at close hand the kind of desperation that takes hold of those, regardless of race, who are truly impoverished, that they would do whatever they have to to survive another day, even if it means doing something that we lucky people in the middle and upper class would never believe ourselves capable of doing (yet trust me, put anyone in those same circumstances and you’ll reach that point unless you’re incredibly strong, and even then at that).
—
“If there is any sort of condescension from whites/asians to blacks it is because blacks as a culture expect preferential treatment because they are ‘worse off’. That mindset in itself implies one is above the other, and it is self-defeating for blacks. Idealistic white (and asian) graduates can spend years helping kids in the inner city, but the fact of the matter is NOTHING will change unless blacks try to fix their community values and start acting like rolemodels for their children. There would be no racial ‘privilege’ in this country if African-Americans just realized deep-down that they’re as capable as any other race to succeed, and started doing something about it. Articles like this do nothing to fix this problem, and only act as a sounding board for more ‘poor me’ statements that create unwarranted and unecessary indignation at the ‘establishment’. It’s well past the time to bury this immensly stale, 40 year old conversation.”
—
Nice to know that there’s condescension coming from those who have white privilege (and interestingly enough, for all that Asians in North America have also experienced discrimination, they also at times were extended certain aspects of white privilege even while other ethnicities were blatantly racially oppressed). :P
Like I said, if you think societal ills that afflict so many blacks in America (and not just blacks, as the Occupy movement clearly showed) can be fixed in 40-some years to surmount more than a century (and more if you’re counting from the 1560s when slavery was practised in Spanish colonies and came to North America) of discrimination, oppression, of generational destruction of a people, then you have very naive and simplistic notions of how these societal ills come about and are perpetrated and perpetuated within society as a direct result of and continued racial discrimination and oppression by the white majority.
Yes, and blacks have a contempt for law and order.
Barry Soetero has shown a complete disregard for law as his life’s “work” has shown. His history demonstrates it. His draft registration shows fraud, his birth certificate, his social security number, his school attendance here in the US, he has shown no name change papers, no citizen ship proof, he turned in his lawyer’s license, and he has refused to appear in court in Georgia when ordered to do so. So who’s the biggest criminal of them all?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=koHm0HK6bzE
Some town with a 10% population of the 12.5% puts up billboards to warn of the racist 90%.
[Unamused: Good catch.]
Great article. I have a tale that some may consider relavant. Years ago, maybe the early 1990s, I was working in a warehouse as a shipping/receiving clerk. We distributed music CDs. Most of the order processors were recruited from temp agencies and consisted of the lower orders of humanity. It often seemed as if the temp agency van would pull up at the county jail on release day and hire the felons on the spot. I mainly kept a low profile and concentrated on my duties, but at lunch I would sit with a few fellow Whites with a newspaper for a ‘review and comment on the news’ session. All of us, mainly men with one or two women, were conservative in our attitudes toward crime and on a number of occasions expressed openly that we felt certain local criminals should receive a hasty hanging in the town square. On one day a nearby table of the black undertow overheard my big mouth express sastifaction that two ‘gangstas’ with the street names ‘Elevation’ and ‘Scientific’ had been convicted of murder. I quickly noticed a large sheboon staring hard at me from the other table and later was told by a whigger co-worker that I had offended her because one of the killers was her son!
I learned later on that this middle-aged negress was the mother of a large clan of criminals. She was almost a black female Sawny Bean. Ironically the family name is Cancer! I’m not sure how many niglets she pumped out, but the name Cancer would frequently appear in the police blotter-drug dealing, assault, murder, rape-you name it.
In a strange twist, a few months after my faux pas in the break room, I encountered the same Ms. Cancer carrying a clipboard and asking everyone to sign a petition concerning the high crime in her ghetto. It came to pass that one of her daughters was involved in a love triangle between two local gang members( there are two prominent gangs here: the Jungle Junkies and Original Gangsta Killas-retarded of course). Apparently her daughter’s suitors came to blows on the street, a gun was drawn, the gal tried to get between the two bucks, and was promptly shot in the face and killed for her efforts. The death of her daughter suddenly made the old pickaninny a crime fighter! I signed the petition.
This episode, like the time I was involved in a racial melee at a music concert, was part of my racial education. This would have happened sometime before 1997 when I left the warhouse. While working at my current insurance gig , I became friends with the wife of the local assistant district attorny and she was amazed that I knew of this family.
Gee, Lori. Thanks for that.
Unfortunately, it seems none of Clive’s opponent’s know much about race. You can tell by the way they blame blacks’ problems on mythical “white racism,” instead of genetics.
Where to begin? There’s the evolved race differences in intelligence and anti-social personality traits that explain why blacks always underperform, whether in Detroit, Haiti, or Zimbabwe. That’s probably the most important.
Once you understand that, you can appreciate why “anti-racists” and other leftists propound myths like “white privilege,” “systemic racism,” and a “legacy of slavery.” They desperately need to make up excuses for the failings of the lower IQ, higher aggression races: blacks, Hispanics, American Indians, etc.
There is no “white privilege.” Contemporary America privileges non-whites in every way. There is no “systemic racism.” Just affirmative action, racial quotas, and the “disparate impact” doctrine handicapping competent whites and Asians in favor of incompetent NAMs (non-Asian minorities).
And there is no such thing as a “legacy of slavery.” There is no mechanism by which the history of slavery, let alone the liberal mythology of slavery (with its “evil white slavers” and “poor innocent blacks who built this country and didn’t even get paid waaah”), could make blacks such spectacular failures today.
Look, here’s a brief history of slavery. It will sound harsh, but it needs to be said.
African blacks were a bunch of half-naked cannibal savages living in mud huts throwing spears at one another. They had no written language. They had no science or technology or industry. They had no culture in the usual sense of the word. They lived like wild animals. Then a bunch of them, plus a whole lot of white people, were captured and sold as slaves by Arabs and other African blacks, to Arabs and blacks and whites and American Indians.
Eventually, whites got around to freeing their black slaves, which was obviously a huge mistake. Every “racist” prediction about black indolence, incompetence, illegitimacy, criminality, general lack of morals, etc. has come true. This, of course, is why virtually everyone who wanted to free the slaves back in the day also insisted on shipping them all back to Africa: because of exactly what has happened in America since we let loose the blacks on white society.
Still, whites felt that abolishing slavery was the right thing to do. No other race came to that conclusion: not the blacks, not the Arabs, not the American Indians. They were quite happy with their slaves.
Anyway, how did that work out for blacks? Well, look at the descendants of the slaves. Look at “African-Americans.” Compare them to Africans, who are still mostly a bunch of half-naked cannibal savages living in mud huts throwing spears at one another. Slavery was the best thing that ever happened to blacks.
O/T
At the risk of spamming can I remind all British citizens to sign this e-petition: No to 70 million.
At 100,000 signatures the government is supposed to allow a debate on the matter in parliament, its well past that now but the bigger the numbers the louder the message. I realise its a very mild anti-immigration measure, not nearly enough and of course ‘they’ don’t want to do anything, but thats the beauty of the petition, its so mild that no one could object to signing it.
mr. unamused – your comment to Lori would be a great article as is (maybe add a picture or 2:) Lori’s excellent post is interesting — how brainwashed blacks (their brains being smaller but apparently washable) use a 1-time out of context example as proving the existence of a white privilege network (WPN™) keeping blacks down (WPN – what channel is that?) Role models are overrated. If a normal person is told they can’t do something, that may inspire them to rebel & do it. It can be more inspiring to be told you can’t do something. Apparently not for blacks promoting the WPN. they should go back to promoting BET. white privilege: the historic privilege to die fighting for black’s freedom, the privilege to pay taxes for black’s EBT cards, the privilege to be discriminated against thru “affirmative action,” the privilege to be assumed racist for pointing out facts. how about Black Privilege? the privilege to blame all your follies/crimes/failures on some irrelevant issue from the past.
“White privilege is ongoing to this very day, and there could be twenty more Barack Obamas in the White House and that won’t change, because we still live in a Western society which is rooted in white privilege.”
Jesus Christ. Proof positive they’ll NEVER be satisfied. The time to stop giving in to their demands is, therefore, right now.
Thanks for sharing that story, Dutchman, and good points, panjoomby and Brother Anonymous.
A few months back, I was watching one of these “real crime” dramas, or maybe it was one of these “scared straight in jail” shows, can’t remember which. A black woman inmate said this to the camera:
“There was this shooting, someone got kilt, the po-leece arrested me, and I got sent to jail.”
Just like that, huh? You don’t say.
“It’s Hard To See [White] Racism When You’re White.”
Lol at progressives, builders, denizens, feeders and keepers of most of our “institutions” self-flagellating over all the racism that somehow got in there. Who is the target of these billboards but the DWLs that are already repentant anti-racists? Unless it is really intended to stop a few soft-hearted, white dingbats from innocently asking a black girlfriend if they can touch her hair (ONE IS TOO MANY YOU LOVING BIGOT!!!)?
I agree with our proprietor that the term “racism” has become meaningless, but I’m certain that if a fair definition were found, I would probably qualify. That billboard is preposterous to me, like “It’s Hard To See Mathematics When You’re Doing Long Division.” It’s not at all hard for whites who can see at all to see their own racism, rather it’s impossible not to. The suffix -ism implies beliefs and principles, which can’t develop without cognizance of race. I think about race a lot, prefer my own (not because we are superior, or even to say I think we ARE superior, except as a matter of taste (n*ggers taste bad! amiright?)). I’ve developed animus towards certain other races that I consider antagonists of my kith and kin, and often express it crassly on the Internet. So yeah, not so hard to see.
Re: white privilege. Unamusement Park should offer a $50,000 college scholarship to any black high school senior who can prove a 1300 SAT or a 3.5 grade point, AND an absence of any other scholarship potential. Then challenge some Perpetual Grievance Black site to give $50 (or even fitty cent) to whites meeting the same qualifications.
Oh, well, look, the whole idea behind “white privilege” is that it can’t be proven. And it especially can’t be proven via Euro-centric rationality, which is, from their point of view, what got us into the mess in the first place. “White privilege” is the theoretical vehicle by which the spoils system is maintained after discrimination has been formally outlawed in every quantifiable form.
the newspapers know that the writing creates a picture in the readers’ minds. they know that day after day mental images of black males killing hispanic, asian and white victims would make those groups respond with strict enforcement of laws and other potential political actions. this is why the MSM does what it does. not to secure the 90% of the black vote, but to fool and sway the minds of just enough whites (especially the most vulnerable, single white women who vote overwhelmingly democrat).
Speaking of blacks with 1300 SAT scores, I pay attention to certain black intellectuals (as opposed to what I’d call “blackness experts”), and these chimeric notions of white privilege and pervasive institutional racism seem to be a growing source of embarrassment to them — as well they should be. Thomas Sowell, Bill Cosby, and to a lesser extent John McWhorter have been forthright from the get go, but now the likes of Glenn Loury, and even Spike Lee, make public comments of the “I know racism’s tough, but C’MON NIGGAZ” stripe. This is a reversal of qualifier and message from previous statements that were always “I know some of my black brothers are involved in crime and need to straighten out, but DAVID DUKE!”
Besides being cool, manly black dudes bored and disgusted with their most vocal allies among whites, who are revolting, pathetic, self-loathing pussies and faggots, they also have eyes, ears, statistical abilities, and access to the black community. They know who’s holding up their end of the unspoken race relations contract, and who’s not. Their intellectual integrity won’t stretch far enough to cover it up anymore.
For ye to write a story on if you like…
Muslim inbreeding is causing a massive surge in birth defects:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-513388/Minister-Muslim-inbreeding-Britain-causing-massive-surge-birth-defects.html.Phil Woolas, an environment minister, said the culture of arranged marriages between first cousins was the “elephant in the room”. Woolas, a former race relations minister, said: “If you have a child with your cousin the likelihood is there’ll be a genetic problem.” The minister, whose views were supported by medical experts this weekend, said: “The issue we need to debate is first cousin marriages, whereby a lot of arranged marriages are with first cousins, and that produces lots of genetic problems in terms of disability [in children].” http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article3342040.ece
Banned in Holland
The Dutch cabinet wants to ban marriages between cousins and to introduce harsher educational requirements for import brides, PM Jan Peter Balkenende told the Parliament Thursday. http://islamineurope.blogspot.com/2009/09/netherlands-govt-to-ban-cousin.html
Massive burden on health service
Medical research suggests that while British Pakistanis are responsible for 3% of all births, they account for one in three British children born with genetic illnesses. The question to think about is: Could the practice of interbreeding be the key to the success and longevity of Islam? Could it be that the genetic and mental illnesses borne of interbreeding are a factor in the unquestioning nature of the majority of Muslims regarding spirituality? http://jacksachinghead.blogspot.com/2008/12/inbreeding-and-its-effects-on-genetic.html
Successive generations of cousin marriage damage the genes and produce widespread idiocy and insanity – Muslim Healthcare Study
A problem obviously not talked about much in the Muslim world. 1,400 years of inbreeding (think first cousins marrying) have resulted in a significant on-going health problem and degraded gene pool. While this may explain a lot of things with this culture, how will such immigrants and their ways impact our lives and healthcare support costs. Quite a revelation here from a Denmark study where the impact is obvious. This is serious stuff and you should be aware of this research.
Nicolai Sennels is a Danish psychologist who has done extensive research into a little-known problem in the Muslim world: the disastrous results of Muslim inbreeding brought about by the marriage of first-cousins.
This practice, which has been prohibited in the Judeo-Christian tradition since the days of Moses, was sanctioned by Muhammad and has been going on now for 50 generations (1,400 years) in the Muslim world.
This practice of inbreeding will never go away in the Muslim world since Muhammad is the ultimate example and authority on all matters, including marriage.
The massive inbreeding in Muslim culture may well have done virtually irreversible damage to the Muslim gene pool, including extensive damage to its intelligence, sanity, and health.
According to Sennels, close to half of all Muslims in the world are inbred. In Pakistan , the numbers approach 70%. Even in England , more than half of Pakistani immigrants are married to their first cousins, and in Denmark the number of inbred Pakistani immigrants is around 40%.
The numbers are equally devastating in other important Muslim countries: 67% in Saudi Arabia, 64% in Jordan and Kuwait , 63% in Sudan , 60% in Iraq , and 54% in the United Arab Emirates and Qatar .
According to the BBC, this Pakistani, Muslim-inspired inbreeding is thought to explain the probability that a British Pakistani family is more than 13 times as likely to have children with recessive genetic disorders. While Pakistanis are responsible for three percent of the births in the UK , they account for 33% of children with genetic birth defects.
The risk of what are called autosomal recessive disorders such as cystic fibrosis and spinal muscular atrophy is 18 times higher and the risk of death due to malformations is 10 times higher.
Other negative consequences of inbreeding include a 100 percent increase in the risk of stillbirths and a 50% increase in the possibility that a child will die during labor.
Lowered intellectual capacity is another devastating consequence of Muslim marriage patterns. According to Sennels, research shows that children of consanguinous marriages lose 10-16 points off their IQ and that social abilities develop much slower in inbred babies.
The risk of having an IQ lower than 70, the official demarcation for being classified as “retarded,” increases by an astonishing 400 percent among children of cousin marriages.
(Similar effects were seen in the Pharaonic dynasties in ancient Egypt and in the British royal family, where inbreeding was the norm for a significant period of time.)
In Denmark , non-Western immigrants are more than 300 percent more likely to fail the intelligence test required for entrance into the Danish army.
Sennels says that “the ability to enjoy and produce knowledge and abstract thinking is simply lower in the Islamic world.” He points out that the Arab world translates just 330 books every year, about 20% of what Greece alone does.
In the last 1,200 years years of Islam, just 100,000 books have been translated into Arabic, about what Spain does in a single year. Seven out of 10 Turks have never even read a book.
Sennels points out the difficulties this creates for Muslims seeking to succeed in the West. “A lower IQ, together with a religion that denounces critical thinking, surely makes it harder for many Muslims to have success in our high-tech knowledge societies.”
Only nine Muslims have every won the Nobel Prize, and five of those were for the “Peace Prize.” According to Nature magazine, Muslim countries produce just 10 percent of the world average when it comes to scientific research (measured by articles per million inhabitants).
In Denmark , Sennels’ native country, Muslim children are grossly overrepresented among children with special needs. One-third of the budget for Danish schools is consumed by special education, and anywhere from 51% to 70% of retarded children with physical handicaps in Copenhagen have an immigrant background.
Learning ability is severely affected as well. Studies indicated that 64% of school children with Arabic parents are still illiterate after 10 years in the Danish school system. The immigrant drop-out rate in Danish high schools is twice that of the native-born.
Mental illness is also a product. The closer the blood relative, the higher the risk of schizophrenic illness. The increased risk of insanity may explain why more than 40% of the patients in Denmark’s biggest ward for clinically insane criminals have an immigrant background.
The U.S. is not immune. According to Sennels, “One study based on 300,000 Americans shows that the majority of Muslims in the USA have a lower income, are less educated, and have worse jobs than the population as a whole.” Sennels concludes:
There is no doubt that the wide spread tradition of first cousin marriages among Muslims has harmed the gene pool among Muslims. Because Muslims’ religious beliefs prohibit marrying non-Muslims and thus prevents them from adding fresh genetic material to their population, the genetic damage done to their gene pool since their prophet allowed first cousin marriages 1,400 years ago are most likely massive. (This has produced) overwhelming direct and indirect human and societal consequences.
Bottom line: Islam is not simply a benign and morally equivalent alternative to the Judeo-Christian tradition. As Sennels points out, the first and biggest victims of Islam are Muslims. Simple Christian compassion for Muslims and a common-sense desire to protect Western civilization from the ravages of Islam dictate a vigorous opposition to the spread of this dark and dangerous religion. These stark realities must be taken into account when we establish public polices dealing with immigration from Muslim countries and the building of mosques in the U.S.
Let’s hope America wakes up before a blind naivete about the reality of Islam destroys what remains of our Christian culture and our domestic tranquility.
http://www.dogmaticslumbers.com/2010/11/11/muslim-healthcare-study/
New term: Black Reality —– “Blackeality”
BLACKEALITY: The victims are the blacks, perpetrator could be ??
Reality: Most victims are white, most perpetrators are black.
It’s Orwellian logic, truth turned on its head. An upside down cross.
We need to deconstruct BLACKEALITY. This is what this UP blog does.
This Blackeality, has led to a messiah complex amongst the blacks.
Witness “Black Liberation Theology.” This is what was preached by JEREMIAH WHITE, the pastor of BARACK OBAMA.
http://youtu.be/plRkc7_a4EM
This Blackeality has been bought hook, line, and sinker by the masses. It has led to the election of Barack Obama, who was steeped in “Black Liberation Theology”.
Blacks think they are Jesus.: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYF7H_fpc-g&ob=av3e (Kanye West – “Jesus Walks”)
http://youtu.be/zKIKKXm6Mlk (Family Guy – “Black Jesus”)
This messiah complex is a VERY DANGEROUS condition.
BLACKEALITY has led to the “Black Messiah Complex”.
Unfortunately, the ones who believe this Blackeality are the dumb masses. Masses are dumb, and easily manipulated. When they feel persecuted, they can be very violent, and cruel after their ascension to power. So if you are one of “Those Who Can See”, you are unfortunately in the minority, about to be besieged by dumb masses. (http://thosewhocansee.blogspot.com/). DUMBMASSES
I highly recommend the following:
By Gustav Le Bon: “The Crowd”
FULL TEXT:
“http://etext.virginia.edu/toc/modeng/public/BonCrow.html”.
Lori, thanks for posting that. That was actually quite illuminating.
Another interesting discussion! Between Steven and Kratzstone.
[Unamused: Post something substantial, instead of copying and pasting off-topic comments by delusional and/or disingenuous white liberals.]
[Unamused: Lori’s still having trouble with the “post something substantial” rule. Just kidding; she’s actually just using my comments section to preach some retarded white-hating ideology or another. Here are some highlights from whatever comment she was quoting.]
You are absolutely right… most White people (and Black people, unfortunately) are ignorant of this type of systematic racism that has plagued the Black community, particularly since Jim Crow but really, since the start of this country.
[Unamused: I didn’t realize genetic inferiority was a type of “systematic racism” now.]
Not only has the American government and White Supremacist groups STOLEN money from the Black community for at least half a century, they have blocked our wealth and net worth from generating generation to generation
[Unamused: Did you get all that? We has STOLEN money from the black “community.” They had all sorts of money n shit, and we STOLED it. Then we “blocked” their “wealth” and “net worth” from “generating.”]
I’ve read countless stories about African Americans building wealthy cities only to have them burn down by angry jealous Whites (Sweet Auburn Ave, Black Wallstreet, etc,)
[Unamused: Yes, that’s right: blacks have built so many “wealthy cities,” but then angry jealous white people burned them down. That’s actually true… provided you swap black and white.]
Note to White people: until you have acknowledged and address YOUR OWN community, with honesty, about your unearned privileges and about why so many of you have been better off than the majority of struggling POC despite your lazy and evil history… don’t bother coming onto publications like Clutch to tell us what you *think* our problem is
[Unamused: That’s true, genetic superiority is unearned, and we can lead better lives than most Sun People without trying very hard. Let’s all acknowledge it and address our own community with honesty!]
Lori,
I hadn’t the patience to sit through that pablum you quoted before.
It was a reality check to see just what terrifying idiologies we are dealing with in DWLs. I mean the DWL has been clearly brainwashed by the anthropology dept. of a University. Her calling of her opponent’s views “ignorant, offensive, and simplistic” shows us the nearly impenetrable briar of conceit and illogic we are dealing with.
It needs to be figured out SOON, if this type of biological programming the DWL has been subjected to is malicious or misinformed. The pervasive undermining of European/Western civilization is worrying.
This “animal farm type” biological programming might have been promulgated in the USA to undermine the foundations of the country.
We individual liberty supporting race realists could have a genuine, deep enemy on our hands, who is malicious. The acceleration of Cultural Marxism and Political Correctness since the demise of Communist Russia and the rise of China indicates the possibility of deliberate clandestine infiltration of our country by enemies. The proliferation of “gender studies”, “anthropology”, and “Chicano Studies” etc. Depts since the 90’s could indicate a greater degree of enemy agent organization behind the scenes.
There is no way the attitude of the DWL originates in only ignorance, with all the institutional support behind those thoroughly systemized views.
Finally a comment from me and then will be on my way!
[Unamused: Hurray! (Both to the fact that you’ve decided to make a minimal effort, and to the fact that you’re leaving.]
Most whites on this page have one or both of the following experiences with blacks, 1)been harassed, ridiculed, humiliated, put down, beaten up by blacks.
[Unamused: Yeah, blacks really are a bunch of dumb, violent thugs. Oh, you meant something else:]
2)have done something racist towards a blacks/black person and the guilt is eating them alive.
These whites feel so guilty about past injustices that they try to rid this strain on their brains by coming up with an excuse to absolve themselves from any personal responsibility.
[Unamused: Believe me, we don’t feel guilty about our “racism.”]
European Americans have been brought up to believe they have no culture and that other racial groups do but theirs(European Americans) is right, just, and normal.
[Unamused: Yeah, but black culture seems to consist largely of welfare, crack cocaine, rape, murder, cannibalism, and whining about imaginary “white racism.”]
So the concept of socialization may be difficult to get across to many European Americans especially those who have been brought up in segregated white communities(usually upper or middle class and can go a whole year without actually seeing a black person in person.
[Unamused: A whole year?! Lucky! Lori’s definition of “socialization,” by the way: learning to pretend, along with everyone else, that blacks, as a group, are just as good as every other group of people.]
But dang it took me a while to really analyze and comprehend what Dr. Darron Smith meant when he radically stated that “all whites are racists” even today right now in the 21st century.
[Unamused: He meant that he was just another “anti-racist” (meaning anti-white) piece of shit.]
Now that’s a whole other thing. Put it this way it may take another 300 years for us to reach true equality(sooner the better). yea put it that way, to truly do away with the specs of an institution that lasted 400 years, it might take a couple more decades.
[Unamused: It’s worse than that. Your race, with which you identify so completely, is not going to evolve out of its relative failings for thousands and thousands of years, if ever.]
Like I said before the issue is really [Unamused: blah blah blah…]
Of course African Americans should have some form of self-responsibility for their own lives because I think that part of being a human being is having self-responsibility.
[Unamused: No kidding. Blacks should display some form of responsibility. Actually, this might be a reasonable goal.]
Without adequate self-responsibility you cannot live a full life or realize your own potential. I believe that whites have much greater responsibilities (these includes, self, social, cultural, historical,political& economical responsibilities) because they are the ones that are dominantly in positions of affluence, prestige and power.
[Unamused: We do have certain responsibilities with regards to resolving black dysfunction. They come in a variety of calibers.]
Whites just have to realize it and know that all that affluence, prestige, power was inherited for the most part from their white ancestors and doesn’t have much to do with their “hard work” and “determination.”
[Unamused: Yeah, it’s mostly genetic.]
Whites simply have to be more willing, to be welcoming of multiculturalism and openly accept multiculturalism/racial and cultural diversity in their own personal and supposedly professional lives.
[Unamused: Whites simply have to start actually being as racist as the “anti-racists” keep saying they are.]
Sociological statistics state that whites are the most racially segregated group in the US. You will find 100X more all-white, only-whites neighborhoods, schools etc in the US than any other racial group.
[Unamused: Yes, stay the hell away from the black-and-Hispanic undertow, white people.]
Whites need to diversify their lives in order to melt away all these stereotypes and prejudices that they may have of other racial groups. Multiculturalism&diversity is the solution!
[Unamused: Concealed carry is the solution!]
TOODLES!
[Unamused: Don’t come back.]
That thread Lori posted makes for an interesting read. Things I took away from the discussion:
1. The obsession with “white privilege” on the part of blacks. It’s like a huge monstrosity that has its tentacles in every aspect of life, and will probably go on forever. All achievements by white people are seen as due to white privilege, therefore invalid. What infuriates blacks most is that whites are unaware of it;
2. The belief that no white person has a valid perspective on anything black. Only whites who agree with black victimological perspectives are listened to, but even they fall under suspicion if they show signs of being too interested in racial subjects or of verging toward an independent perspective;
3. Even despite this, blacks have endless contempt for liberal whites. The liberal whites think they’re being considerate and helpful toward blacks. The blacks think the liberal whites are condescending, arrogant, and ignorant about “the black experience.” Only blacks have the right to speak about blacks, period.
Conclusion – there is no way a white person can get on the good side of blacks without totally capitulating to them; and even then, they don’t get much besides a pat on the head. Prediction – eventually even the most liberal whites will get sick of this behavior and realize there’s no point kissing up to blacks. A massive lack of interest in blacks on the part of non-blacks will be the logical outcome, since there will be no point talking to blacks about anything.
It was a century and a half ago not half a century that slaves were taken from their black owners without compensation and slavery which is one of the few trades that blacks are good at was banned whereas there are innumerable trades that white people are good at.
If that isn’t wealth and net worth creation banning and white privilege what is?
90404 – thank you for that post. It’s incredible how close they can come to seeing the truth, while not actually seeing it.
This guy Sennels is flat out saying that moslems have evolved over the last 1400 years, and the result of that evolution has been a lower IQ – without ever using the word “evolution” or admitting that it could have a bearing on intelligence.
Actually it’s not that incredible. With Unamused’s indulgence (yes, you did; when I commented that we need a forum so that off-topic ideas can be developed without hijacking a thread, you said “in the absence of a forum, hijack away”), I’d like to relate an experience.
I used to live on 22 acres outside Cape Town. At one end there was a derelict barn. While I was working a contract in England, my sister wrote and told me that she’d been looking around and saw evidence that somebody had been living in the barn.
On my return, I went to check it out, and confirmed what she’d told me. One side of the barn was divided up into farrowing pens for pigs, and in one of them there was a pile of old carpets (mine), and scattered around some personal effects. I noted these and walked on to check the rest of the pens. But I had a strange feeling that there was something else that I wasn’t seeing.
I returned to that pen and couldn’t see anything odd. Yet it was as if all I saw was a jumble, no details. So I took myself mentally by the neck and did a systematic inventory, starting at the furthest corner. OK, there’s a cable reel on end, obviously being used as a table. On it, a candle, and a comb. Next to the reel, on the floor, a boot. Two boots. Leading from the boot, a… leg? Then the corpse came into focus, at my feet. It was pitch black, covered with some kind of fungus or something (the police said that the district surgeon/coroner estimated he’d been there a year). All I saw was a black hole, an absence of light, a place with nothing in it. I’d filed it away as a black plastic garbage bag.
When I told my sister that it had been there when she inspected, she was horrified. She’d had no inkling.
The point is twofold. One, normal, honest people can fail to see what’s right in front of them. If it’s something they don’t want to see, their minds will just filter it out. In some people (like me), this causes an uncomfortable feeling of confusion – I guess that’s cognitive dissonance. Others never know it.
Two, if you point out what they’re blocking out, they will not just believe you; they will see it with their own eyes. The censor fails, and they see what was always there.
That is our mission.
Unamused, et al:
While monitoring the Bike Path Shooting reaction, I came across this case from Muskegon, MI, in which the “victim” happens to share the Reading “victim’s” name. It offers an incredible glimpse of black reaction to black crime conforming to Unamused’s “Laws”:
http://topics.mlive.com/tag/Julius%20Johnson/index.html
Below is what happened at the scene, but the story gets so, so, so much better. Please check the full story archive and see where it goes from there, I won’t spoil it.
____________
Approximately 1:20 a.m.: Muskegon Police Officer Adam Dent pulls over a car, occupied by two people, on Terrace Street just north of Laketon Avenue for making an illegal turn. Julius Johnson is in the front passenger seat. While speaking with the driver, Dent smells marijuana smoke. He returns to his cruiser and radioes Officer Charles Anderson for assistance.
1:28 a.m.: Anderson arrives. Dent asks Johnson to exit the vehicle. Johnson complies and consents to a pat-down search, which uncovers no drugs. Dent then notices a baggy on the ground near Johnson containing suspected crack cocaine. (Cruiser video later shows it had dropped from Johnson. It later tests positive for cocaine.)
1:29:35 a.m.: Johnson takes off running north on Terrace toward Larch Avenue, then east on Larch. Both officers start to pursue, but Anderson yells to Dent to return to stay with the cars.
1:29:45 a.m.: Dent reports the foot pursuit on radio. He then secures the suspected crack and places the driver, suspected of driving with a suspended license, in his cruiser.
According to Anderson’s account to investigators, he chases Johnson — dropping his flashlight at one point so both hands would be free — to a fenced backyard behind the 1700 block of Pine Street, repeatedly yelling for Johnson to stop. Johnson hops the chain-link fence into the yard — wet and muddy from recent rain — then falls. Anderson jumps on him, but his momentum flips the officer over Johnson, with Anderson ending up on the ground against the fence on his back, the much larger Johnson on top of him.
According to Anderson, Johnson punches him in the jaw, and Anderson punches back. Anderson tries to pepper-spray Johnson, who gets the can away and sprays the officer in the face.
1:31:58 a.m.: At this point, Anderson yells into his radio “I need help.” Officers who hear the call say he sounds frantic and distressed. Dent runs in the direction Anderson had run and tries to locate him around Larch and the pitch-dark alley between Pine Street and Terrace. Central Police Dispatch makes several radio calls to Anderson to determine his location and well-being. He does not respond.
According to Anderson, Johnson takes the radio away before Anderson can give out his location and strikes the officer with it in the head two or three times. Anderson grabs his collapsible baton but can’t effectively hit Johnson because of Johnson’s position on top of him. Johnson then grabs the baton away, and Anderson is struck again in the head “with a blunt object,” according to the prosecutor’s report.
With no radio, his vision impaired from pepper spray and his own blood flowing into his eyes, feeling the effects of the repeated strikes to his head, Anderson fears for his life. He tells Johnson he’s going to shoot him. Johnson strikes him again in the head, described by the officer as feeling like a bowling ball dropped on his head. Anderson is dizzy, about to lose consciousness and feels like he is going to die, he tells investigators later.
Anderson is able to reach his firearm and fires it once, thinking he is aiming at Johnson’s torso. Johnson immediately gets off and exclaims, “you shot me,” Anderson says later.
1:32:54 a.m.: Gunshot is heard on neighbor’s videotape, followed immediately by yells of a man in pain (identified as Johnson).
1:33:00 a.m.: Anderson calls Central Dispatch stating he is “behind the house” and “shots fired.” His voice sounds out of breath and distressed.
1:33:16 a.m.: Dent arrives at the scene, a fenced back yard off the alley, and radioes “subject down.”
As other officers arrive on the scene, Anderson is immediately placed in a police car and taken to Mercy Health Partners Hackley Campus. Johnson, an artery severed, receives immediate medical care by police officers until an ambulance crew arrives. Johnson is then taken to Mercy’s Mercy Campus, where he later dies.
I was watching “The First 48 Hours.” A black football player had been murdered, shot and killed. It was discovered that the black football player had won 8,000 dollars at a casino. A black detective investigating the homicide says “it could have been a robbery gone bad.” I am thinking a robbery gone bad? Oh? So there’s good robbery? So how’s that? So how did a good robbery turn into a bad robbery? The victim complained maybe? The victim resisted maybe? Stupid victim. The robber unfortunately had to murder the robbee instead of just robbing him. The victim turned a good robbery into a bad robbery.
When blacks are involved there’s always more to the story.
i recommend just telling blacks that we believe they’re all doing the best they can do, & sadly – how things are now – that’s the best they can do! it makes it worse for them that 1 in 1000 blacks have an IQ over 130 & that high-IQ black is paraded about as a role model – when the rest of them have no chance to learn or achieve that well b/c they simply aren’t that smart. white privilege, my a** – it’s due to their weaker brains – there isn’t any data in the last 100 years that have indicated anything other than they tend to be dumb (overlapping normal curves, black mean a standard deviation below the white mean, etc.)
Oh HAYUULL NAW. Da ‘Gubmint stoled all they monies ‘an sheeit? Someone should make a t-shirt-” Da ‘Gubmint stoled all mah monies ‘an all I got was dis cheese”. Well, except it’s not true.
I do disagree with posters who think there is no other way to get along with blacks other than to sink to their level or placate them-They actually look to Whites to be authority figures, but we’re too busy being politically correct to realize this. As a result, they run amok because they simply don’t have enough intelligent people of their own race to keep them in line.
I worked a job where about 80% of the company was black, including management, and the majority of the “intelligent” blacks preferred whites as managers, because “Niggas be playin like they da oberseer ‘an sheeit”. It’s true, too. I was treated with mostly derference, while my black co workers were treated less decently. They tend to hate their own kind, IMO.
Regarding this quote, history is complex, and it’s impossible to replicate an exact input/output historical situation. However, Russia in the past hundred years has experienced many of the same challenges referenced above. They lived through 2 world wars, a civil war, a bloody revolution, Stalin’s purges, a crummy go-nowhere communist economy, and the repression of their religion and any of its attendant culture. And then they lived through the collapse of the Soviet Union. Twenty million Russians died in World War II, and multiple generations saw their men disappear into the void. Russia has experienced many periods of hyperinflation, famine, and starvation. Also: horrible weather. Prior to the twentieth century, things weren’t a barrel of laughs over there either. Up until the middle of the nineteenth century, your average Russian was a serf – poor, tied to the land, unable to determine his own destiny, owned by his boyar. Alexander II freed the serfs in 1861.
Kaliningrad, Russia is a physically separate oblast from the rest of mainland Russia. It was once Konigsberg, Prussia, and it was heavily bombed and almost entirely destroyed by British in 1945. Two million Germans were evacuated, and then Stalin killed or deported the rest and repopulated the area with Russians selected for this unique opportunity from here and there and anywhere in the Soviet Union.
So, you might say that Kaliningrad Russians have a similar interrupted history. The Bolsheviks destroyed their Orthodox culture and observance, and the war and Stalin destroyed whatever continuity they had left. They were forced to start over among people they didn’t know in an atmosphere of fairly extreme political paranoia.
Now, Kaliningrad has its social problems, and being rebuilt with Soviet postwar cement block construction, it is quite ugly, but “Currently it is one of Russia’s best performing regional economies.” They’ve struggled with increases in crime, disease, prostitution, drugs, and other social problems since the Soviet Union collapsed, but it’s safe to walk down the street, and literacy is about 99%. In the mid-1990’s when I lived there it was very, very safe for the average citizen – nothing at all like Detroit.
Chef Boyhowdy said:
Hi,
It’s interesting that you mention a guy like Glenn Loury. I sometimes listen to bloggingheads and Glenn strikes me as a genuine intellectual, in a way John McWhorter doesn’t at all. I find McWhorter extremely lightweight. Glenn Loury is on the left but he’s pretty much the only black intellectual that you’ll hear say something like (paraphrasing) ” some people based their opposition to the civil rights act of 1964 on states’ rights. I believe that it’s a defensible position that reasonable people could have held, though I happen to disagree with it for such and such reason”. I’ve never heard of or read any black intellectual attach so much importance to being fair and to not gratuitously attribute malice to one’s opponents. He seems genuinely concerned with being truthful. He used to be ( still is ?) a mathematical economist btw.
Not sure about manly and cool, lol, but I’m a black dude. The white friends I have and whom I am close to are pretty much all HBD aware. I have a real hard time with the “allies of people of color” types. By the way I’m not one of those extremely contemptible blacks who hangs out with whites and yet criticize them endlessly and shove their “privilege” in their face etc. A lot of the lefty activist blacks are like that. Their genderqueer/trans/disabled way of life doesn’t allow them to get along with their fellow blacks, so they hang out with white freaks like them but actually hate them (just read any of those womyn of color blogs).
Not me. I side with my White friends. I’m on their side, period.
I don’t see why there shouldn’t be white privilege in white countries anyways. There was slavery in the south but did blacks build the north? No. Did blacks build Canada? No. Did Blacks build Germany? No. It seems to me so easy to reduce that white privilege argument to nothing.
Finally, you just gotta love the casual dismissal of east-asian achievements. So east-asians achieve because whites gave them permission and they succeed because whites want to divide people of colour so they “succeed” asians and keep blacks down. *sigh*
As pastor Manning says, black people have no shame. Add to the list of the list of the shameless the white allies, the Tim Wise’s.
right on – yeah, as if people needed white “permission” to achieve – i maintain being told NOT to do something is an effective motivator, b/c people like to rebel – especially teens (& especially people who have mental age equivalents of teens)
“…A massive lack of interest in blacks on the part of non-blacks will be the logical outcome, since there will be no point talking to blacks about anything…”
Bingo. I’ve been preaching this to whites FOREVER, especially at “conservative” sites that go all reflexive-rayciss on anyone who even discusses black behavior. We don’t need to call names; negotiate; debate (as though that’s possible, I know, I know…); argue; fight (unless circumstances dictate a self defense mode), etc. Just IGNORE the species altogether! Have NOTHING to do with them unless absolutely necessary.
I don’t
This is a key law of black crime as is reinforces the myth with blacks and blind whites that black crime really only targets other blacks. “They are more criminal but they just kill each other”, is a common refrain from whites who fail to see the truth. This law also helps keep many of the blind in the dark about the truth. This is a tool for BRA horribly carried out by the media. The media might have more people fighting for its survival if it had not spent the last 45 years as water carriers for the multicultural marxists.
Even the Moose-limbs hate blacks!
— al Muqaddasi
— al Bukhala
And for all the blacks who think that whites need to shape up and discard their “privilege,” I say this: what if we don’t? What will you do? What will you do if we tell you to take your laughably inflated ego and your sense of entitlement and pound them sideways?
I ask because your current station is untenable, and it’s certainly in your best interest that Caucasians never, ever wake up. If we do wake up, all your arguments will have been expended and found wanting. At that point you will either accept a smack across the snout when you are a bad doggie, or you’ll be sent to the pound (Liberia). Enjoy this while it lasts. You’re coming off that pedestal, one way or the other.
This notion of ‘privilege’ is constantly thrown around by Feminists as well. But no one ever stops to really examine this crap. Besides the fact that I’m white & was certainly never ‘privileged’ growing up lower middle class, ‘privilege’ isn’t a word I have ever used or anyone I would call a friend has ever used. EVER. You either work your ASS off to succeed or you’re brilliant at business, invent something and that’s IT.
Quite frankly the word makes me nauseous because it conjures up images of prissy country club high society fucks & we all know who they are, but most of the time those freaks never contribute more to the world than excrement because they’re spoiled pussies. But even THOSE fuckers- think about this – so their daddy or granddaddy made some fortune doing whatever & so now they’re privileged. OK. So.. who gave their grandfather ‘privileges?’ NO ONE – they created something from NOTHING. See how quickly the idea of ‘privilege’ falls apart? Who gave the privileged privileges & who originally gave those people privileges? Somewhere back there in that line someone worked there ASS off or was genius or whatever and started from SCRATCH. It didn’t just fall from the sky as this retarded blacks or feminists seem to think.
Or they’ll use the word ‘opportunities.’ It’s time we called BULLSHIT on this. They’ll say “oh all the great inventors in history were all white males because blacks & women weren’t given the same ‘OPPOTUUUNITIES.’ That’s not even how invention & genius works- if you’re waiting around for someone to give you the ‘opportunity’ to do something – it’s not going to happen. You just DO IT. Most of the great inventors were either self made or came from poverty or at the very best didn’t have any more advantage than anyone else. And even if you give a pavement ape an ‘opportunity’ he’s just going to fuck it up anyway- think ‘NFL.’
Not to mention the idea of ‘privileged’ is more of a European caste notion anyway that doesn’t have a fucking thing to do with the U.S. or capitalism.
Re: “privilege” and “opportunities” —
This highlights another thing, namely the fact that blacks believe (consciously or not) that they’re totally dependent on whites to GIVE them something. The irony is that blacks believe they’re “stickin’ it to The Man” or “standin’ up for themselves” when they make these demands, whereas in fact they’re merely expressing continued dependence on the white money/power machine in a different way. (This BTW is why I had some respect for the Black Power movement – they didn’t assume unending white indulgence toward blacks.)
A lot of blacks seem to think that everything already exists and can be magically GIVEN by Whitey. For instance, education is perceived as a gift that somebody gives you, rather than something you attain by your own efforts. The same with jobs and promotions. Therefore, if Whitey withholds these goodies, it can only be due to racism.
In a sense, though, they’re right. Whitey does hold the cards ultimately, which is why the real argument about race in America is an argument among whites. (One can also include Asians and the more assimilated Hispanics in this discussion.) If Whitey becomes indifferent to black demands as I’m predicting will eventually happen, what’s the black advancement plan gonna be then?
That could be why this idea of ‘privilege’ is so alien to me & prob to most white males because it’s the idea that you are always dependent on some white male to GIVE you everything. I don’t know about you or anyone else you know who’s white & male , but unless you were born with a silver spoon in your mouth no one’s GIVEN me a fucking thing. Oh, if you’re black you could point out the ‘buddy system’ that a lot whites have I suppose- but all of that comes with a price as well.
Looking at the definition oddly enough there’s no mention of class or status that I expected:
privilege
a right or immunity granted as a peculiar benefit, advantage, or favor : prerogative; especially : such a right or immunity attached specifically to a position or an office
Ah, but look at this:
privileged
not subject to the usual rules or penalties because of some special circumstance;
A special circumstance.. hm, oh you mean like being BLACK? I certainly understand the bizarro mindset of blacks a lot better now. (and the Feminists as well) This is good- so now I’ll be prepared for this crap next time it comes up. If anything, what this all proves is the fact blacks are the ONLY ones not ‘subject to the rules’ and STILL fuck up.
I’ve had white business owners give me ‘opportunities’ – just like the guy I work for now- yea, and since I got this ‘opportunity,’ I’ve had to work my ASS off harder than I think ever worked in my whole life- but it’s all worth it.
I suppose what blacks think of as an ‘opportunity’ is some seat warming government job where they do next to nothing- no quota, zero hard work and just ‘coast’ – but incredibly they always seem to even fuck THAT up if they’re lucky enough to land something like that in the first place.
“HEY! Alright, I’m Mr. CEO of Smith & Smith Laboratories and I’m giving you the ‘privilege’ AND the opportunity to come work in my laboratory. Your starting pay is going to be 65K a year- not too shabby considering you only have a worthless Humanities degree, you stupid fuck. Now get your ass in there and find a cure for cancer!! Oh, and btw, if I don’t see some real results in 6 months- YOU’RE FIRED.”
Reality: “I suppose what blacks think of as an ‘opportunity’ is some seat warming government job where they do next to nothing”
What is ironic about this is, if you listen to black people talk about employment, they’ll always say something like “as a minority I knew I had to be twice as good as a white dude to even be considered for that job.” Whereas the perception from whites is the exact opposite: “I’m twice as good as that black guy, but they hired him thanks to affirmative action!”
Violence within the “African American Community” is deplored by all Blacks. Every single black, from the 70 IQ rapper to the current president, whines about “Black on Black crime” and “Black on Black violence.”
Nevertheless, a Black is more likely to commit a crime against a non-Black than vice versa and the victims are overwhelmingly white.
This isn’t complained about, really. Not by the PC pussies and certainly not by the Blacks. Torture followed up with gang rape and grim death for a non-Black always equals “more to the story.”
You probably know of a couple of these, if you read Unamusement Park. They have things like Massacre and Atrocity and Horror in their names.
See, that is one thing I’d like this site to do. I think when a White kills, he or she just kills. It is exceedingly rare to hear of something like the Newsom Massacre or the Wichita Horror with Whites as the perpetrators and almost old hat to hear about them as the victims.
Joe Morgan was such a bad announcer that a site firejoemorgan was set up in his honor and how did he get the announcing job?
White privilege!
Good gosh ‘unamused’. How right you are! Everything in your comment is exactly the case. Yours is a comment obviously written by someone with a strong knowledge of history. I write not only to praise your knowledge and insight, but to add something. White people must get back to having larger families. They must produce many more white children than they have been since the late 1960s, or our race will fade away. They have a duty not to let this happen. This means passing on to future generations the patrimony they inherited. Our race fell into decadence during the 20th century. This has got to be reversed. We should not let the lower races inherit our world from us – which has been in the process of happening for the last 45 years.
Yes, gotta love Affirmative Action — imagine you’ve just been in an accident & your life is on the line- which hospital would you rather go to… the hospital that makes ‘Diversity’ its priority in employment or the hospital who only hires the most qualified? I’ve actually seen banners in hospitals that proclaim ‘Diversity in Hiring Is Our No. 1 Goal.’
Hey, Unamused… who is that girl with the menu or whatever that is she’s holding in your series of photos who just looks ‘oh so satisfied with herself?’ She cracks me UP! I can’t stop laughing at that photo.
Whenever I hear that a black guy has to work twice as hard as a white guy to get the same job I always think that is saying that he is half as talented.
Perhaps I just hear the statement wrong?
hey Reality. it’s Emma Roberts as the title character in the 2007 Nancy Drew movie. she appears to be holding a folder or file labeled “clues.”
it’s from this:
then I speculate about the sexual habits of a fictional teenage girl detective
NOW YOU KNOW
OH! No wonder- haha. I just knew there could be no way that she could be for real- a real American female -she doesn’t look like a venereal diseased pin cushion. (though she prob is in real life)
Note to White people: until you have acknowledged and address YOUR OWN community, with honesty, about your unearned privileges …
Note to Lori: I happen to like my so-called privileges. In fact, I would be willing to go to war to defend those so-called “privileges.” What are you going to do about that? Cry?
Because you see, Lori, I’ve been in Zimbabwe where white people lost their “privileges” and it’s not pleasant. Not pleasant for those white people who are disenfranchised, terrorized and driven from their homes by black majority rulers.
I have no intention of being similarly disenfranchised in my own country.
The thing is Lori, you can only push people so far. We are seeing increasing numbers of white people — even former liberals — getting fed up with the constant race hustling and guilt tripping and flash mobbing. And I am not even going to begin talking about the Asians and Hispanics who are also getting fed up with your kind of race hustling. Keep it up and you are going to find a backlash exploding and those who espouse your rhetoric are going be very, very much alone. No sane person wants such an explosion, but if you — yes you! — start a war then do not complain if other people finish it.
The whole “privilege” game is a scam.
Every society has dominant groups. And belong to the group brings perks and privileges. That’s the nature of the human social order. So “privilege” is a constant and irremovable part of society.
Privilege, if lost by or given up by, a dominant group does not disappear into egalitarian fairness. It migrates to another group.
People who want Whites, or Males, or English-speakers, or Able-Bodieds, or Natural-Born (cisgendered!) Males and Females, etc. to give up their unearned group privileges do not want to do away with privilege. They want to have their own. To replace the group they hate.
So my advice to any group with enough dominant energy to create unearned group privilege is this: hang on tight. Cause if you let go, someone else will take what you lost.
grerp said: However, Russia in the past hundred years has experienced many of the same challenges referenced above.
Or look at South Korea: a client state of China for centuries; occupied and colonized by the Japanese in the late 19th century to 1945 (during which time much of Korean culture was destroyed); the country’s infrastructure pretty much leveled during the Korean War (Seoul was captured and retaken twice). Yet the Koreans built their country into an industrial and democratic state as well as a technology leader.
Similar with Rhodesia during UDI: under white minority rule, even with sanctions and a guerrilla war, the Rhodesians had a functional economy, could export food, and maintained a generally civil society (at least outside the combat zones). Under black majority rule, Zimbabwe has become a basket case with dictatorship, corruption, economic collapse and the occasional ethnic massacre–all this under Bob Mugabe, idolized by blacks globally as a “liberator.”
We could go down the list, and might even compare post-industrial Detroit with post-industrial Pittsburgh. But no matter how much one does so, the race hustlers will have some new excuse for black dysfunction.
The thing is, too much of the black guilt tripping comes down to this assumption: “Blacks are the most pathetic people on this planet, therefore the rest of the world owes them.”
And that assumption is just plain nuts.
No wonder the backlash is rising.
“Whites simply have to be more willing, to be welcoming of multiculturalism and openly accept multiculturalism/racial and cultural diversity”
This comment is most disturbing.
I, actually, long for an existence without diversity/multiculturalism, and this comes from a White male who grew-up around blacks and browns.
The answer is not more exposure, it’s complete separation.
“White people must get back to having larger families. They must produce many more white children than they have been since the late 1960s, or our race will fade away.”
KA-CHING! I couldn’t agree with you more AND there is a video about this about how the white race both in Europe & the U.S. has NOT been reproducing at replacement levels for quite some time now.. it’s all researched properly & full of statistics & basically shows that the white race is already well on it’s way to extinction.
What the video DOESN’T tell you is.. WHY. This is where you have to connect the dots for yourself – the REST of the story. And no, you can’t blame this one on blacks – although it IS amazing that there is actually SOMETHING that blacks aren’t responsible for fucking up.
No, as this one anthropologist-author I heard was pointing out, in the US & Europe we have for the first time IN HISTORY – EVER- millions and millions of young women of child bearing age (mostly all white) not having children. Why? Because women today have more ‘choices’ as the PC fucks will tell you. Or rather 50 years of Feminism which has resulted in turning our entire population of females into what amounts to public property or more specifically, ROAD WHORES.
Now don’t get me wrong, & think that I’m some preachy ass about morals & chastity – I LOVE whores & sluts. But in a normal society (as in most of human history) they’re only 10% of the female population- not NINETY PERCENT like in American society today. Damn! You can dance around it all you want -call it progressive, call it ‘freedom’ for women, call me ‘regressive’ & all that… that I want to tie women to a stove, fret & scream & slutwalk in the streets, but at the end of the day, that’s what they all are now.. ROAD WHORES. Abortion happy, venerally diseased, fucked everything in their zip code, not wanting the responsibility of children (this greatly interferes with the lifestyle of a road whore you see) & seeing men as redundant & family as nothing.
Yep, hate to say it, but Feminism has done more harm to the white race than 1 BILLION coons could even wet dream about.
First, there is no such thing as a “legacy” or “badge” of slavery.
True. You cannot tell by looking at a black person who is the descendent of a slave and who is the descendent of an evil slave owner.
[…] “Older Women and the Susan G. Komen Abortion Debacle”Unamused – “The Third Law of Black Crime According to Black People“, “Black Alternate History Month: The Extended Remix”Baaltanit – “How […]
As Randall Robinson noted in his book The Debt: What America Owes to Blacks, the U.S. government requested 100 slaves to construct the Capitol in Washington. Masters who agreed to lend their slaves to the government received $5 per month per slave. Subsequently, forced labor helped clear the land for the rest of the District of Columbia.
I love this shit. “What America owes Blacks.” “What Whites owe Jews” (saw this one at Sailer’s the other day). Gotta be kidding me. I suppose this is why they teach negative numbers in school…
The declining white birth rate is much of the problem. As whites reproduce less and also do so older in life, other groups start to move in on them. This is one reason for the mass third world migrations into Europe and North America. Whether the migrations are legal or not, it’s a matter of population pressures. Add to this that too many white people do not want to do such “grunt” work as assembling widgets, changing diapers, or flipping burgers. Better to “hire a Mexican” as the saying now goes.
This is one of the things that finished off white-run South Africa. Whether it was the blacks digging in the mines or the Bantu gardener hoeing the aspidistra , whites allowed themselves to be displaced by the lure of cheap and plentiful labor. White South Africans ended up fatally outnumbered not only in SA as a whole, but even in their own cities. This proved untenable in the long run. Arthur Kemp sums it up:
http://www.volkstaat.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=586:the-lie-of-apartheid&catid=89:apartheid-eng&Itemid=147
Here’s something else to consider: as the white demographic gets older in Europe and North America, while third worlders produce more young people, will the latter start flexing their muscles by increasing their attacks on whites? Look at the black-on-white crime situation in South Africa today. Or the apparent explosion in flash mob wildings in the USA. Or car burnings in Europe. Or the recent riots in Britain. All courtesy of the “youths.”
Nothing unusual about this, of course. The youth of one tribe raids against adjoining tribes in struggles for territory and prestige and control of gene pools. The latter point might be considered–but will not be–by European law enforcement officials who scratch their heads in confusion over the high rates of sexual assault by third worlders against first world females.
The question is: what can be done today to up the birthrates and family formation of first worlders? And then get them to defend their territory and prestige and gene pool?
Californian:
No, I think that it’s [in US] the 1965 Immigration Act. Kevin MacDonald has a 63?-page free download on Jewish policy in [ahem] ‘shaping’ immigration policy.
Californian, are you aware of the real story of Emma Lazarus?
From Thread:
White Privilege = IQ. Take it or leave it.
As opposed to, oh, Nairobi? Whites created, oh, light-bulbs, PCs, cars, etc. etc. etc.
J’adore ton blog!
[…] emotional people much of its deterrent force, especially where the real sympathy of the race was mainly with the criminal rather than with his victim. Another evil was the dreadful necessity of calling on the innocent […]