The Second Law of Black Crime According to Black People
Jan 19th, 2012 by Unamused
Our ongoing series Black Crime According to Black People explores the unique principles that govern how blacks react to black crime, which is very different from how they react to non-black crime and how whites react to any sort of crime.
These should not be confused with Unamusement Park’s Laws of Race and Crime:
- There is no significant bias against black people in the justice system.
- The news media are biased in favor of black people.
- Black people are more criminal than white people.
We emphasize that the Laws of Race and Crime describe and explain the reality of race and crime, whereas the Laws of Black Crime According to Black People describe and explain black people’s reactions to black crime. (To be precise: how the reactions to black crime of a large percentage of black people differ from their reactions to non-black crime and from the reactions of most white people to any sort of crime.)
Last time, we covered the First Law of Black Crime According to Black People: Police Be Racis’. This law holds that the entire justice system — police, prosecutors, judges, juries and all — is hopelessly, utterly biased against all black people, even though that makes absolutely no sense.
Today, we present the Second Law of Black Crime According to Black People. (It too makes absolutely no sense.) If you have any examples of the second law in action, feel free to leave a comment.
Second Law: More to the Story
The More to the Story law holds that any time a black person commits or is accused of a crime, there must be — can you guess? — more to the story. However horrific the crime and however obvious the black person’s guilt, there simply must be some mitigating factor — some missing piece of evidence, some fresh perspective — to justify or at least excuse what happened. The criminal may not be the hero of the story, but he is certainly among the victims — provided he is black.
It is not necessary to actually provide such a mitigating factor, even (perhaps especially) if its existence is implausible or indeed inconceivable to the rational mind. Still, it may be helpful to fabricate one.
We take as an example the murder of Hester Scott, a black veteran of the Chicago Police Department, by her adopted grandson, Keshawn Perkins, also black (Daily Mail, Nov. 7, 2011).
A veteran police officer, 55, was beaten and stabbed to death by her 15-year-old grandson after she came home to find he had skipped school, prosecutors said.
Keshawn Perkins was so incensed at being shouted out by Hester Scott, who was on the Chicago force for 25 years, that he ‘hit her with the lamp until she shut up’ then stabbed her repeatedly with two kitchen knives, it is alleged.
The ninth grade student, who had been adopted by his grandmother, wrapped her dead body in a blanket and dumped her in a backyard sewer trap before fleeing with her purse, a court was told.
We may observe the Second Law in action at MediaTakeout.com (link not recommended). Here are a few comments from their article on the murder.
Theres another side to this story i can feel it!
At this point, we should recall the passages I highlighted in that Daily Mail article: “beaten and stabbed to death by her 15-year-old grandson… so incensed at being shouted out [for skipping school]… ‘hit her with the lamp until she shut up’ then stabbed her repeatedly with two kitchen knives… wrapped her dead body in a blanket and dumped her in a backyard sewer trap before fleeing with her purse.”
That comment again:
Theres another side to this story i can feel it!
Can you feel it too?
yall need to take this post down, unless yall are willing to post the entire story
It’s always more to a story than what is initially reported to the public
people focus on how ‘grateful’ the orphan should be for being taken in
If by gratitude the commenter means not beating her with a lamp and stabbing her with a couple of kitchen knives until she dies, then robbing her corpse before dumping it in a sewer, then yes, I think the orphan should have exhibited more gratitude toward his adoptive grandmother. But maybe I’m focusing too much on the beating/stabbing/corpse-robbing/sewer-dumping angle.
Is only 1 side to the store who knows history between 2 people we should stop getting into we know the facts
“Since I broke up with Stacy, all our friends are taking her side, but they don’t know the facts. They haven’t heard my side of the story. You need to understand the history between two people, y’know?”
“Tell me about it. I stole my grandmother’s purse, which sounds bad, right?”
“Right…”
“See, but you don’t know the history between us.”
“Okay, I guess I can see —”
“Oh, and I beat her head in with a lamp, stabbed her a whole bunch of times and pushed her down a sewer trap. I should have probably led with that… Still, couldn’t be helped. History and stuff, y’know? Hey, is Stacy seeing anyone now?”
Just one more:
but while yall talkin do yall kno she was a cop that abused him nd broke his arm nd gave him black eyes no yall dnt yall dnt care at all what yall say aint no black child finna jus up nd kill somebody 4 getting yelled at nd yall kno dat if more people did research on him they would have known that yall dnt kno what yall talkin bout he was a good kid nd nice lookin they wanna get 1 of his bad pics man yall can quit it like 4 real every child go threw sum no matta what it is.. she used 2 beat him 4 no reason he was terrified of her until he couldnt take no more. THE THINGS BLACK PEOPLE SAY IS JUS SHAMEFUL REAL TALK
Allow me to translate.
But while you all talking do you all know she was a cop that abused him and broke his arm and gave him black eyes?
PO Scott was cleared of those charges by DCFS investigators.
No. You all don’t. You all don’t care at all what you all say. Ain’t no black child gonna just up and kill somebody for getting yelled at and you all know that.
I assure you, we all do not “know that,” and until quite recently, neither did anyone else.
If more people did research on him they would have known that you all don’t know what you all are talking about. He was a good kid and nice looking. They want to get one of his bad pictures.
More on that later.
Man, you all can quit it. Like, for real, every child go through some no matter what it is. She used to beat him for no reason. He was terrified of her until he couldn’t take no more. THE THINGS BLACK PEOPLE SAY IS JUST SHAMEFUL. REAL TALK.
Again, it is not necessary to actually provide the supposed mitigating factor, but it may be helpful to fabricate one, as in the sad case of Hester Scott and Keshawn Perkins. Either way, one thing is certain: when the perpetrator’s black, there’s always More to the Story.
And that’s the Second Law of Black Crime According to Black People.
Two very good and true articles—thanks! I work around middle class blacks and I hear these types of excuses for bad behavior all of the time.
He wuz a good ked.
He was gonna turn hes life round.
He bea good atalete.
He gona be a rap star.
He loved hes keds, and he visited dem and hes babby mommas all de time.
The system be beatin hem down.
You raciss.
Black people live in a bubble of idiocy. Common sense, logic and reason cannot permeate it; violence, incompetence, and child-like entitlement behavior rule the day in this bubble.
Blacks are seemingly oblivious to this, blissfully “ignit,” if you will.
Let’s say there IS that other side to the story that we racist bastards don’t know about. Does that imply that they DID know the other side? Seems so. What did they do as a community about it? Nothing. Mind yalls bidness!
The ignorance, idiocy, and lack of evolutionary progress is strong with these black folks.
What is being said here is that black people have a distinct racial identity and are possessed of a near-religious belief that people of their own race can do no wrong.
White people, by contrast, do not have any such racial identity and do not exhibit any such biases. Centuries of European conflict, as well as the modern phenomena of white guilt and atomized individuals within society, are proof of this.
I do not think this applies to black people in Africa. While we do see strong tribal associations there, there is also a lot of inter-tribal conflicts and atrocities. I conjecture that the second law of crime according to black people is not genetic and is instead a quirk of black American culture, possibly as a response to the attempts to stamp out any existing cultural identities from imported slaves.
regardless of whether they were the predator or a random black was the predator, the rationalizations and excuses start the moment they know the person accused of anything wrong has a dark complexion. the only evil they know of is evil racism from the evil white folks.
It’s that darn legacy of slavery again!
Seriously, I doubt that’s the source. But I do ultimately blame white people.
Ever since the civil rights movement set them free — free of the constraints imposed on civilized people by civilized (white) society, that is — blacks have been told a pack of lies by disingenuous white liberals. Now they believe a bunch of crazy shit, especially about the importance of their own “blackness” (racial identity) and about white/police/government/systemic/institutional/whatever racism.
The people making excuses for the psychotic grandson are idiots. Apparently he falsely accused her of abuse so the Chicago police immediately took her gun away from her just based on the mere accusation. The screwed her by leaving her case unresolved for years. So she couldn’t defend herself when he came after her. Her druggie daughter had four kids, including this one, which she was taking care of at the time of her death.
Sounded like his mammy…..”he beez a good keeid, he din do nuffin” and the classic “He beez opprest”
Police be racis’ in London 2. They stop the black man 5 times as often as the white man but the black man be 11 times more likely to commit crime.
It be whitey fault and sheet.
“A veteran police officer, 55, was beaten and stabbed to death by her 15-year-old grandson after she came home to find he had skipped school, prosecutors said.”
this teaches us three lessons.
#1) 15 year old negros are still feral and dangerous. even to their own kin
#2) negros do not appreciate those who care for them or show gratitude to them. even when it’s kin
#3) chicks shouldn’t be cops.
You really need to read “The New Jim Crow” by Michelle Alexander . It proves that the American jusice system is biased and has declared war on black males. I dare you to read it and refute it.
[Unamused: No, the American justice system is not biased. We proved that in an appendix to the first law of black crime according to black people. That includes the so-called “War on Drugs” that Ms. Alexander is so obsessed with. We also recently demonstrated that violent crime arrests are biased in favor of blacks. So I really couldn’t care less about the anti-white propaganda of some deluded black “civil rights advocate.”]
Really great article and very true.
Anon 7:49, the “racism” excuse is thrown around by any and all black groups that have contact with Western peoples because “racism” is a Western word. When they learn that it has power, even the uncolonised groups will use it to excuse their lack of successes.
Ha, I saw this second law of black crime in action last night.
A Ethiopian man was trying to get the restaurant to pay for his taxi because he was too drunk. He had wandered in drunk, and stood around and yelled.
A Ethiopian friend came to defend him, saying there was “mo to the story”, that this drunk Ethiopian needed money to get to the hospital. He was yelling and an uncooperative, hostile way.
That friend then yelled “you guys are racist” before leaving.
1.”Yall raciss” Check
2. “mo to the story” check
Sometimes the “mo to the story” comes before “yall raciss”. The “yall raciss” occurs after the authority figure fails to except the pitiful excuses of the “mo to the story” part.
As much as I like to hope that this pattern can be put down to the negroid stupidity, I would like to float the idea that this is a pattern that is sprung from the black leaders.
Negros in newspapers across the nation repeat the same dull and worn excuses nearly verbatim. It is my belief that the negroid population is counseled to use either White Guilt or White sense of fairness to obscure negroid criminality, to lessen the impact as much as possible and to cover for their criminality. Whether these excuses stem from the pulpit or are passed by word of mouth, every single site from the New York Times to Youtube shows the same verbal pattern. Further, there seems to be a sense of “fashion” about these utterances. For a few months, the negroids like to threaten “I bet you would never say shuch stuff to a black man’s face” or “You just come down to da hood and talk like dat and me and my homies be beating you down.” Then that phrase will fade to another canned response like: “He didn’t do nuffings” or “Da racist popo gots it all wrong”. Lately, the negroids seem to be jumping in saying that they know the perpetrator and we need to wait till the facts get out.
Sadly, when we ship them back to Africa, the Newspapers will be less amusing.
You really need to read “The New Jim Crow” by Michelle Alexander . It proves that the American jusice system is biased and has declared war on black males.
What do you mean by the “justice system?” Do you believe that the USA has only one justice system? And that this system is centrally being directed to persecute black men? Please state the facts which would support this assertion.
In reality, there are many justice systems: federal, state, local, special districts, and so forth. Not to mention both criminal and civil courts. Many of these systems are dominated by liberals and/or blacks. Do you believe that a city like New Orleans, with a heavily black police department, is going to be arresting blacks more than whites for the same crimes? What of the US Department of Justice, under AG Holder–has he ordered law enforcement to crack down on blacks, or prosecutors to drop cases against white people, or judges to hand out heavier sentences to blacks who are convicted?
Are you aware of the criminal justice statistics which demonstrate that blacks have violent crime rates several times that of whites? And if these statistics are wrong, then do you have alternative numbers? Here’s one of many DOJ sites on this:
http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/homicide/race.cfm
Scroll down to the bottom and you will note that black-on-white murder rates are several times higher than white-on-black. And overall, blacks commit at least half the murders in the USA. This is a number which is very difficult to cook, because you have a definite victim, and murder cases have a very high clearance rate.
To deny this, one would have to claim that either:
* Innocent blacks are being railroaded for murders committed by whites.
or:
* There are whites committing murders whose existence is covered up by the criminal justice system.
We also see policies such as mandatory minimum sentences and zero tolerance throughout much of the USA, especially in drug law enforcement. These were, in part, put in place because black leaders were complaining that white defendants were getting more lenient sentences for drug crimes. If you remove discretion from the system and then end up with blacks “over-represented” in prison, that would indicate that blacks are indeed committing a disproportionate share of crime.
Another thing: there is a demonstrated correlation between illegitimacy and criminal activity (at least those crimes which show up for UCR purposes). Black illegitimacy is over 70%, and in the inner cities, often approaching 90%. Have you stopped to consider that maybe if blacks were to adopt white mating-marriage patterns, their crime rates would drop as well as their incarceration levels?
Well, I can go on, but let me ask you a question: if it is demonstrable that blacks commit a vastly higher share of crime — especially violent crime — than the relative numbers of blacks in the population, would you be willing to reconsider your position on this issue?
Here is the typical ‘mo to the story’ crime from my neck of the woods:
http://wnyt.com/article/stories/s2436224.shtml
Nah-Cream (yes, that’s his real name!) was stopped by two cops and was compelled by the legacy of slavery to pull a gun on the police. The 19 year-old parolee died in a hail of gunfire. Now the groids are up-in-arms over it, but the weather has been too cold for rioting.
Hey Unamused, I seen this over at Larry Austers blog and thought that for sure you would love to get a look at it.
The copyright protection for the 11th edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica (1910) was recently lifted. Volume 19, page 344 begins the entry for the “Negro”.
It’s very interesting to read what the intellectuals from 100 years ago have to say, and it’s no surprise that their observations ring just as true today as they did then.
This link will take you to Volume 19, choose read online to the left then choose page 344 by mousing over the pages to the right, and audio read is optional in the upper right hand corner, enjoy!
http://www.archive.org/details/encyclopaediabri19chisrich
i just wrote a post about that you silly
Interwebz iz a big place
Now now unamused
you silly
lol Oops! Shuda looked down, sorries ;)
“He was a good kid”
Foreshadowing the third law of black crime according to black people…
Had a “more to the story” experience earlier this week.
A home invasion took place down the block from my house, one black burglar killed himself following a shootout with police.
My mother claimed that the police probably killed the guy and covered it up.
Worse part is some people would be pissed if the burglar was killed by officers, even though the family were being held hostage with guns.
Yep, very familiar with these “laws.” A local gangbanger who was shot and killed has been made out in the media to be a fricking saint. The family had no shame in admitting that this unemployed “man” had 2 women simultaneously pregnant but also insisted he had “turned his life around.” It is so predictable. And of course the news comments are filled with retards eulogizing their “homey.”
[…] the law distant and difficult to reach; but, above all, the Negro population have appeared inclined to condone the fact of mere […]