But Is It True? Steve Sailer Is a Time Traveling Plagiarist
Jan 5th, 2012 by Unamused
Steve Sailer is a time traveling plagiarist. See above.
Doubtless this will come as a shock to some of you.
“Steve Sailer?” I hear you asking. “Traveling through time?” Yes. Yes he did. To plagiarize me.
“But… with time travel?” I think you’re losing sight of the real issue here, which is his blatant —
“I didn’t even know we had the technology. When was it invented? How is it done? Does it involve tachyons in some way? Don’t spare me the details; I read Scientific American.” Look, the point I am trying to make is that he —
“Hang on. You said you could hear me asking about Steve Sailer, the time traveling plagiarist.” I did? When?
“Just now. How can you hear me if — oh my God, you’re inside the chimney!”
But I digress
So you’ve decided to talk about race, and so far, it’s going really well.
You’re right in the middle of explaining, with the aid of some examples, just how unbelievably biased the Southern Poverty Law Center is against white people:
- how they don’t think ten to fifteen black men brutally beating a white man for dating a black woman qualifies as a hate crime, even if they do slightly break his jaw and damage his brain a touch as well
- how they recorded Denver’s worst racially motivated crime spree, resulting in 38 arrests, as a single “legal development,” because the victims were white and the perpetrators black
- how they invented a racially motivated white-on-black assault, then counted it twice, once for the incident and again for the sentencing — oh no, no “legal development” there!
- how they sometimes mysteriously choose to omit the race of the victims and perpetrators when the hate crime doesn’t fit their fantastical narrative of eeevil whites and poor, helpless, innocent minowities
- how they consider hours of racially motivated torture an act of “vandalism,” as long as the victim is white
- how they couldn’t be bothered to report on 30 to 40 blacks roaming the Iowa State Fairgrounds attacking whites at random in an event the perpetrators called “Beat Whitey Night” (try this one with the races reversed)
- how they also couldn’t muster any interest in a racist rampage by blacks at the Wisconsin State Fair last August, instead devoting their attention to a mistrial in the case against a suspected “white supremacist” — as if merely believing white people are better (and why would they ever think that?) is a horrific crime
- and so on
So you’re talking about that when all of a sudden, some “anti-racist” (which is just code for anti-white, anyway) whimpers, “You’re a racist!” Obviously, you don’t give a flying fuck what this mewling imbecile thinks of you, and you’re confident he’ll be among the first against the wall when the revolution comes, but you feel you it owe to your audience to respond. So what do you do?
Employ a race realist jiu-jitsu strike! Yes, you’re damn fucking right that’s a thing now, you bastard.
I don’t know if it’s “racist” or not. I just want to know if it’s true.
Here’s another version, emphasizing the difference between identifying “racism” and identifying truth.
I don’t know what “racist” means anymore. So I’ve gone back to asking if things are true or not.
That, at least, was my idea. Imagine my shock and horror when I discovered that Steve Sailer had already used this line — my line — as early as 1997!
There is only one logical explanation
Steve Sailer is, as I believe I’ve mentioned before, a time traveling plagiarist. He traveled forward in time to steal my idea at some point shortly after writing his excellent article on interracial marriage, “Is Love Colorblind” (June 14, 1997), then returned to his own time — where he belongs — to “invent” it “first.”
You see, there was this email to Sailer from a concerned reader, which begins by quoting the aforementioned article:
“This allows cruder measures — like the size of his muscles — to return to prominence.” This is a blatantly racist statement, and simultaneously labels women who marry these men as stupid, and sexually perverted.
Sailer responds:
I long ago got bored with the endless debates over whether or not a particular statement is “racist,” since I have enough trouble trying to figure out whether a statement is true or false, and that seems to be slightly more important.
The only silver lining on this drab, gray cloud of retroactive unoriginality (non-novelty? anti-ingenuity?) is the fact that Steve Sailer has employed my race realist jiu-jitsu strike so effectively and so early on. He continues:
So, let’s inquire about the truthfulness of my statements. If they are true, but you still consider them racist, well, you can blame God or natural selection or whatever you want. Of course, shooting the messenger has always been an emotionally satisfying (if merely short-term) alternative to dealing with reality.
Well now. That’s actually an excellent addendum. I almost wish I’d thought of it myself.
Almost.
I suppose I can forgive you, Mr. Sailer, for your temporal tomfoolery, your… chronological capering. Say, could I have a look at that time machine contraption of yours? How did you say you control it again?
So if I wanted to travel to, say, June 13, 1997…
I wonder if Steve Sailer will let me borrow his time machine? I’d like to go back in time and pay abe lincoln a visit…..
Plagiarism ain’t so bad. Didn’t good ole Reverent Michael King Ph. D do the same?
I don’t agree with him about everything, but Sailer is pretty good.
Sailer is indeed pretty darn good.
Don’t you know that criticizing MLK is racist, Dianne Abbot? Shame. Shame!
“Don’t you know that criticizing MLK is racist, Dianne Abbot?”
I don’t know if calling MLK a plagiarist is racist or not, I just want to know if it’s true. Oh wait, it is.
[Unamused: Jolly good show.]
Don’t feel bad. Sailer has traveled back in time to beat me to the punch on a couple of great phrases, too. But I think you’re mistaken when you say it’s Sailer’s time machine. It’s really John Stossel’s. I swear it seems like every time I come up with a brilliant idea and I go to research it that Stossel has already done a story on it.
The cult of multiculturalism, BRA, equality etc. There is an unrepairable and dangerous divide that logic and truth have no bearing on. Colonel Jessep is right.
We better start figuring out how we are to survive and what that means. Places like Rhodesia and South Africa are not anomalies. This Alice in Wonderland onslaught will never stop in a civil manner specifically because the truth is not a factor in the cult.
The Southern Poverty Law Center is a subversive group. Just what is a southern poverty law center? It is run by jews and is one of the richest groups in this country and just like Stephen Bloom, a journalism professor at Iowa, they hate White people. That is all it exists for, to destroy white people. Communist all.
It’s happened to me too. Sometimes I get the impression that everything important that needs to be said about race has already been said by Sailer. It ain’t fair I tell you!
Time travel must have been secretly invented in the 19th Century. As soon as I acquire some insight into black inferiority that I believe is new and original, I discover that some explorer, savant, or scientist from the mid-to-late 19th Century has stolen my idea.
Let me change that. I think time travel was invented in ancient Egypt. Pharaoh Sesostris erected a column around 1840 BC that read in part: