The First Law of Black Crime According to Black People
Dec 21st, 2011 by Unamused
Celebrating eleven months (minus one day) of Unamusement Park.
Regular readers are no doubt familiar with Unamusement Park’s Laws of Race and Crime.
- There is no significant bias against black people in the justice system.
- The news media are biased in favor of black people (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, etc.).
- Black people are more criminal than white people.
Pretty straightforward.
But not everyone agrees with our racist tricks, by which we mean our empirical evidence and rigorous arguments. In our experience, black people are particularly likely to dissent — so likely, in fact, that the Laws of Race and Crime can be considered stuff black people don’t like. Indeed, it often seems that black people (in general) react to black crime according to a unique set of principles, very different from those that govern how black people react to non-black crime and how white people react to black crime. However, no one has ever made these principles explicit.
Until now.
Top race-realism researchers, operating out of Unamusement Park’s (recently rebuilt) main Hate Laboratory and using extensive data on black people collected by a particularly intrepid crack squad of research assistants, have finally distilled the Laws of Black Crime According to Black People: the general principles that govern how black people react to black crime.
Although they have never before been made explicit, these laws, which we’ll be explaining over the next few weeks (government surveillance permitting), will likely hold few surprises for the average Unamusement Park reader, who is both exceptionally intelligent and startlingly sexy. Still, I went to the trouble of typing them up, so as long as you’re here, you might as well read them. Maybe, just maybe, you can even participate in cutting-edge race realism research! (By which I mean: do my research for me!)
Today, we consider the First Law of Black Crime According to Black People. If you have any examples of the First Law in action, feel free to leave a comment. Otherwise, I’ll just add some examples of my own over the holiday.
First Law: Police Be Racis’
The Police Be Racis’ law should be familiar to every American, though probably not by that name. This law holds that the entire justice system — police, prosecutors, judges, juries, and all — is hopelessly, utterly biased against all black people, even though that makes absolutely no sense.
Indeed, our First Law of Black Crime According to Black People appears to contradict our First Law of Race and Crime — that there is no significant bias against blacks in the justice system — but we emphasize that the latter describes and explains the reality of race and crime, whereas the former describes and explains black people’s reactions to black crime. The reality of race and crime is not the subject of this post, but the outline of an argument establishing the First Law of Race and Crime is included as an appendix.
As an application of the Police Be Racis’ law, black people (among other sorts of people) can dismiss all statistics on race and crime — even when the statistics are based on victim reports, not police reports or arrests. Black people have also used the First Law to justify blatant jury bias, as in the Knoxville Horror case.
Here’s a particularly absurd example: “Stop Racist Police Terror!” was a leaflet distributed by the League for the Revolutionary Party in the wake of the police shooting of Sean Bell, and appeared in the Marxist/socialist newsletter Proletarian Revolution. Although we do not know the race of the author, the leaflet provides an excellent example of the Police Be Racis’ law in action: when one white cop and four black and Hispanic cops shoot a black man, it is a sure sign of police racism.
Some apologists for the police are trying to say that it was not an issue of race because four of the five cops who took part in the shooting were Black and Latino themselves. But on the one hand, the officer who fired 31 of the 50 shots was white…
Presumably, if the white officer had only fired 10 of the shots, the leaflet would have been entitled “Not to Worry, There Is No Racist Police Terror!”
… on the other, this wasn’t the first time that Black cops have been used against their own people.
Are there no limits to the power of police racism? It can even force black cops to shoot black people.
The real point, of course, is who the police target. It was young Black men in a working-class club who were attacked, in stark contrast to what happens in upscale clubs frequented mainly by whites.
That’s because young people are more criminal than old people, men are more criminal than women, the working class is more criminal than the upper class, and black people are more criminal than white people.
Remember: this is (apparently) audience participation day at Unamusement Park! Do you know of any other examples of the Police Be Racis’ law in action? If so, let us know! (Because we’re lazy!)
Appendix: Establishing the First Law of Race and Crime
Here’s how we know there’s no significant bias against black people in the justice system.
- Comparing criminal victimization data from the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) to arrest data from the FBI consistently shows that “the police are arresting people of different races at essentially the same rates at which the public is being victimized by them” (“Race, Crime, and Violence”). This was true in 1997 (“The Color of Crime”), it was true from 2001–2003 (“The Color of Crime,” expanded second edition), and it was still true in 2008 (my flyer). In particular, blacks are arrested more often than whites because they commit crimes more often than whites.
- After adjusting for victimization rates, a white criminal is generally more likely than a black criminal to be arrested for the same crime (“Race and the Probability of Arrest”):
the odds of arrest for white offenders is approximately 22% higher for robbery, 13% higher for aggravated assault, and 9% higher for simple assault than they are for black offenders. An offender’s race plays no noteworthy role in the likelihood of arrest for the crime of forcible rape. These findings suggest that the disproportionately high arrest rate for black citizens is most likely attributable to differential involvement in reported crime rather than to racially biased law enforcement practices.
Again, we see that blacks are arrested more often than whites because they commit crime more often than whites.
- If there were systemic police racism, we would expect to see larger arrest rate gaps for crimes where the police have more discretion in making an arrest, such as liquor law violations, drunkenness, and vandalism (“Police Bias? Says Who?”):
The police have a lot of discretion over whether to make an arrest in the case of non-violent crimes, such as violation of liquor laws. Unlike murder or rape, there is not a great deal of public pressure to make arrests, and the police can walk away from crime if they want to. Presumably, a “racist” officer would see a drunk on the street and make an arrest only if the drunk were black.
In fact, we observe the opposite. For example, in 2008, blacks were less likely than whites to be arrested for liquor law violations, only 1.2 times as likely to be arrested for drunkenness, and only 1.9 times as likely to be arrested for vandalism, but 3.1 times as likely to be arrested for aggravated assault, 2.9 times as likely for forcible rape, 7.8 times as likely for robbery, and 6.0 times as likely for murder (my flyer).
- According to BJS and FBI data, Asians are consistently arrested at lower rates than whites. In fact, gambling is the only crime for which Asians are arrested at a higher rate than whites. Again, this is the opposite of what we would expect if systemic racial discrimination existed in the justice system.
- So-called “hate crimes” with a supposed racial motive are punished more severely than identical crimes without a racial motive (“The Great Hate Crimes Hoax”):
Hate crime laws require that the courts search for certain motives and add extra penalties if they find them. Therefore, if you punch a man in the nose because he took your parking spot or because he was unbearably ugly or because you just felt like punching someone that day, you are guilty of assault. If you say “nigger” and punch a black man you are guilty of a hate crime and are punished more severely.
Once again, this is the opposite of what we would expect if systemic racial discrimination existed in the justice system.
- Popular evidence for systemic racial discrimination in the justice system falls apart on closer examination. Capital punishment provides one example. In 2000, a US Justice Department study was said to reveal a “racial bias” in federal death penalty cases (“US Justice Department figures reveal racial bias in federal death sentences”).
The next year, however, a Justice Department review “concluded there is no evidence of racial bias in the application of capital punishment” (“Justice Study Finds No Racial Bias”). What the Justice Department really meant was that capital punishment is racially biased against whites:
“Our analysis has confirmed that black and Hispanic defendants were less likely at each stage of the department’s review process to be subjected to the death penalty than white defendants,” [Attorney General John Ashcroft] said.
This racial bias went unremarked — more evidence that any systemic racial discrimination in the justice system is against whites.
- Drug crime provides another example of easily refuted popular evidence against the first law of race and crime. It is often claimed that blacks are less likely than whites to use drugs, although they are much more likely to be arrested on drug charges (“Police Bias? Says Who?”). For example, the conservative black commentator Armstrong Williams said (“The Media’s Bias Against Black Men in America”):
According to the federal Centers for Disease Control, a white adolescent male is four times more likely than his African-American classmate to be a regular cocaine user. Whites are 66 percent of 18- to 25-year-olds, and yet they are 70 percent of drug users in that age group. Blacks are 13.5 percent of persons in that age group and only 13 percent of young adult drug users, while Hispanics are nearly 15 percent of that age group, but yet comprise only 12 percent of drug users 18-25.
We do not dispute that blacks are more likely to be arrested on drug charges. However, the claim that they are less likely than whites to use drugs is generally (necessarily) based on self-reported drug use. Williams’ example was cocaine; according to the Office of Applied Studies (OAS) of the US Department of Health and Human Services, blacks “significantly underreport” cocaine use, which has “important implications [for] racial/ethnic comparisons” (“National Household Survey on Drug Abuse: Main Findings”).
In spite of blacks’ significant under-reporting of drug use, a 2009 report by the OAS put the overall rate of illicit drug use (all drugs, all ages, both sexes) at 10.1 percent for blacks and 8.2 percent for whites (“Results from the 2008 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings”). It is possible that Williams browsed different combinations of drugs and age groups until he found a pair (cocaine, 18–25) that favored black men over white men.
Furthermore, we have at our disposal a much better indicator of serious drug use — i.e., not marijuana (“Police Bias? Says Who?”):
The Department of Health and Human Services keeps statistics on people admitted to emergency rooms because of drug overdoses. Blacks are admitted at 6.67 times the white rate for heroin and morphine, and no less than 10.5 times the white rate for cocaine (Hispanics are admitted at two to three times the white rate). What better evidence could there be that people of different races are using drugs at markedly different rates, and that the police are simply doing their job?
Finally, FBI arrest data — which, again, agree with BJS criminal victimization data — show that blacks are much more likely to commit drug-related violent crime, including robbery, assault, and murder.
- Race differences in felony conviction rates and felony sentence lengths are misleading. When we control for just two factors, prior criminal record and the severity of a crime within a given category, these differences largely disappear (“The Color of Crime,” expanded second edition). Controlling for criminal background, felony conviction rates are actually unbiased toward Hispanics and slightly biased in favor of blacks, while felony sentence lengths are slightly biased against blacks but slightly biased in favor of Hispanics.
Furthermore, prosecutors
dismiss charges against 30 percent of adults arrested on felony charges. Racial bias at this stage could make a big difference in who goes to jail, but here, too, bias is hard to find. Marvin D. Free, Jr., a University of Wisconsin criminologist, reviewed 24 studies on prosecutor decisions, published between 1979 and 2001. Twelve used data collected in 1980 and after; all of them controlled for offense seriousness and prior record. Of these 12 studies, eight found no racial bias. Two found bias against non-whites, but two found bias against whites. Scholarship therefore leaves little basis for claims of unfair treatment.
Just a little critical thinking turns supposed evidence for system racial discrimination in the courts into rather convincing evidence against it.
- There are endless examples of the justice system systematically discriminating against whites in favor of blacks, Hispanics, and Asians.
To choose just one: although the police are justified in paying more attention to blacks and Hispanics than whites, when they do so, judges have thrown out evidence that would otherwise have convicted black and Hispanic criminals (“‘Race bias’ could free alleged drug dealer”).
- Heather Mac Donald provides more evidence of so-called “reverse” (meaning anti-white or pro-minority) racism in her book, “Are Cops Racist?” I must admit, I don’t actually own the book (yes, the thoroughness of my race-realism research has suffered recently), but here are three examples from a review by Ivan R. Dee:
- In 1997, Vice President Al Gore put an airline passenger profiling system into place that deliberately ignored any notice of a passenger’s nationality, ethnicity, gender, or religion — major predictors of Anti-American Islamic terrorism. Had a more rational system been in place on 9/11, some for the terrorists may have been apprehended.
- The FBI ignored an agent’s call to investigate Arabs training in American flight schools in the months before 9/11 — not surprisingly, since such an investigation would have subjected the Bureau to a firestorm of criticism for “racial profiling.”
- Some police departments have rejected the FBI’s request for assistance in locating expired visaholders for fear of being accused of singling out Arabs.
So there you go.
Numbers be racist because black man did not invent them.
Crime should be expressed through poetry such as my great effort.
Blacks good.
Whites bad.
Now you understand the built in racism of the Police?
This is why I am unamused (no pun intended) by these “Scared Straight” reality shows. We’re supposed to believe that real jail inmates are imploring juvenile f-ups not to go down the same f-ed up path they did when they decided to f-around and f-up their own lives. “Don’t make the same mistakes I did,” yadda yadda.
Have you ever heard of a contrite jail or prison inmate? Usually, we’re all innocent. The cops got the wrong guy because we sorta look alike. The cops are racist, a white dude really did it. I got a bad lawyer. The damned jury thought I looked guilty because I was black. Not enough blacks on the jury that convicted me. The cops planted the drugs/guns on me. I’m a political prisoner.
[Unamused: Good points. I'd never considered the "Scared Straight" angle.]
The “debate” over the first law of black crime (if it can indeed be called a debate) is exemplified by the books named “The Color of Crime”: there are actually two such books:
One of them was written by a black woman, and attempts to show that police are racist against black people. It is for sale here:
http://www.amazon.com/Color-Crime-Protectionism-Harassment-Macroaggressions/dp/0814775322
The other book is written by a white man, and attempts to show that police are at the very least not racist against black people (and may in fact be discriminating in favor of black people). It can be downloaded for free here:
http://www.colorofcrime.com/colorofcrime2005.html
[Unamused: Hilarious contrast. The latter, by the New Century Foundation/Jared Taylor, is by far the best source for race and crime information, but our flyer is pretty good too, though.]
[deleted: off-topic, but thank you for the feedback]
My favorite is when news broke about Casey Anthony black people on Twitter immediately compared it to Michael Vick. “So Casey Anthony goes free for killing her child but Michael Vick goes to prison for killing dogs.”
It’s hard to argue with that kind of stupidity.
It’s not just race buddy. If you would follow up with me and check out that data set that I gmailed you about, you would see that the crime/IQ/etc difference shows up within Blacks, between color groups.
[Unamused: On it.]
But what does this have to do with Jews?
(ducks and runs)
Unamused! I shake my fist at the monitor.
Damn you and your racist trickery!
[deleted: off-topic, but thank you for the feedback]
Unamused:
You forgot the extracurricular enhancement to this post. So I’ll fill in.
http://icanhascheezburger.com/2011/12/22/funny-pictures-gifs-morning-with-kitten/
[unamused: kitties!]
Diversity is the most important thing in America. It trumps security every time. Better to have a bunch of dead Americans than to single out a threat coming from a non-white.
To the liberal PCers, statistics are only relevant when they show whites looking bad, and these same stats are racist when it shows that blacks commit more crime, have lower IQs, etc.
[Unamused: Quite perceptive. Hope you keep writing your blog.]
by the way
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
unamused@unamusementpark.com
That would seem to be a natural contact point. Is there a better one? I don’t see any listed on here.
[Unamused: My email address is unamusementpark (at) gmail (dot) com.]
[deleted: off-topic]
A great post! Your scholarship is impressive too.
I found your link on this blog:
“Black Racism and Race Hatred of Non Blacks”
http://blackracismandracehatred.blogspot.com/
[Unamused: Why thank you, and thank you for sharing that link.]
YOU DIDN’T THANK ME FOR MY FUCKING FEEDBACK.
[Unamused: My mistake. Thank you for your feedback. I will be checking your blog over the holiday to see how the, er, debate, shall we say, progresses.]
Rule one can further be bolstered by the following:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/tribnation/chi-when-race-is-mentioned-in-the-chicago-tribune-20110610,0,136289.story
As you can probably discern from the url, this piece is about the Chicago Tribune admitting censorship of race (Read: Black) when it comes to reporting their crimes.
Another:
http://www.wvwnews.net/story.php?id=10509
The TV show Cops and additional newspapers are listed at this link that admit to having a racial bias (again, read: black) when reporting crime.
Merry Christmas.
The worst thing is that SWPL white activists buy into this and legitimize the belief that the police are racist. This creates not only distrust in the black community of the police who still have to serve and protect them, but creates a default position in gullible whites who are potential jurors or victims that the police are framing this poor black kid. Blacks will never change their minds about it when they have an overeducated white know it all supporting their ridiculous claims.
It might not be powerful enough for a law, but possibly a side effect, but convicted black killers are the innocent victims of accidental gun fire at far higher rates than other groups.
[Unamused: Very good points.
One of the later laws may address that particular side effect. (I don't remember what the other laws are at the moment.)]
Glad to see a return to Race REALISM in Unamused’s blog.
The stats don’t lie, only misinterpretations of those statistics by people who either a.) have no idea what they’re doing or b.) an agenda.
Most of the time these days it’s B.
The media has it out for Whites (and more specifically males, even more specifically heterosexuals, and especially the working/middle classes), and does everything it can to hide and excuse away the problems with and/or misfortunes of, blacks. If the media can’t do that get ready for the blame Whitey game or the sympathy/guilt trip.
[Unamused: We do our best.]
EMD,
When I saw that Tribune article, it inspired me to write a seven-part series (one of my favorites) on race, crime, and the media in Chicago. Start with “Chicago under attack by packs of wild blacks; Tribune: you’re racist for noticing.”
EMD’s second article is highly recommended.
the mentality of black crime: yo, it be too hard to remember any law(s)! e(x)specially when you wants air jordans right now. in the standard-issue black brain future does not exist, the only thing that’s real is what you want right now. just keepin’ it real.
Do you know of any other examples of the “police be racis’” law in action?
This merits a much long response, but I did want to fire off a quick one: consider how in Europe the police have arrested people such as Geert Wilder, David Irving, Bridget Bardot (yes, her), and even Emma West for “hate crimes.” So do we see in Europe that the police are “anti-racist,” with the implication that anti-racism is a form of repression.
Emma West was arrested after a few newspapers ran the footage and various politicians asked for people to turn her into police even though such footage may not be used for evidence as established when a muslim was featured on youtube attacking another man on the London Underground.
I am unaware of the race of the muslim man (with the footage being removed for some reason) so this gets categorized under sectarian for the time being.
Do you mean like my pleasant and friendly young Black neighbor who explained to me, with no apparent irony, that since Black folks couldn’t get jobs they “had” to sell drugs and thus when da polis arrest them it be racism?
Like that?
[...] Makes a Stand, Then Disappoints”Unamused – “The Jewish Question“, “The First Law of Black Crime According to Black People”Simon Rierdon – “Why the “War on Drugs” is Wrong at the Least, Part [...]
Thanks for the handy appendix debunking the “Po-leece be raciss” paradigm. Sometimes when arguing with a DWL I know I’m right, but don’t have the statistical details in mind to backup my statements. Posts like this are helpful in demolishing the ‘arguments’ from the pathetic other side.
Willowfield…gosh
and they push for sharia here in usa…bit by tiny bit
You’re welcome, Dutchman. We’re here to help… by explaining why all your “racist” thoughts, beliefs and instincts are spot on.
Yes, Indy realist, just like that. Ugh.
I’m surprised a full-on race war hasn’t broken out in the UK yet, Willowfield: blacks, Muslims and the Crown versus whites.
I spent 6 months living in the UK in 2011. Even then, I thought their laws were over the top, but so did many of the 20-somethings I met. In the same year, they released the two boys who brutally murdered and sodomized a toddler while arresting a grade schooler for saying ‘stupid paki’ after he was pulled out of a fight with a Pakistani. It always stuck in my mind the juxtaposition of what was criminal. The college kids cringed at the thought of a fellow student being one of those murderers, but they also were extremely careful not to speak out against ‘asylum seekers’ for fear of trouble with the law and school. Their political leaders are completely divorced from mainstream values. “Enoch was Right” should be a street art propaganda theme.
Sadly, this is somewhat present in the US where people are jailed for spanking their kids or ticketed for not wearing a helmet while riding a bike while a rapist or murderer can plea down a crime to get less than 10 years in jail. I doubt it will get as extreme, as the problem with the UK (and Europe) has always been the heavy Marxism-Socialism influence. Yes we have it here in academia, but nowhere near as ferocious or organized as in Europe. Plus, we have rednecks. The difference with America thankfully is the federal set up and division of powers. The difference between Massachusetts and Texas is large enough to almost count as different nations.
If you want to read how the American media smear factory has only one note, read the Playboy article from 30 years ago on the Hunt brothers who tried to corner the silver market. It reads the exact same as the smears of the Koch brothers today. Only difference are the specific terms they use (arch-conservative was a favorite then).
One thing that is lost in all of the Detroit commentary is that in the 1950s, Detroit was not only the auto capital of the world but the technological envy of the world. It truly was a shining city of what engineering, manufacturing and the cooperation of labor & capital could do. It created a sprawling metropolis of all classes with low barriers of entry for anyone with a thirst for work and aptitude. It took one party Democrat rule and blacks less than 50 years to destroy it.
Thank you Unamused for not only your hard work but the forum to type these things. I find the comments here & at SBPDL are great places for the exchange of ideas. Sorry for the long comment. Happy New Year all!
thanks mr27
pat buchanan’s written about liberals and the courts anti-family/pro-infanticide stance
Regarding the WN blame game referenced in prior posts and briefly in comment above, one point worth really thinking about deeply is that WE have done this to OURSELVES. This wasn’t imposed by outside forces.
That’s the thing with America. We can almost immediately fire our government.
Who is to blame? In terms of numbers, it’s clearly the evangelical churches followed by catholic and then other Protestant churches. These organizations have ALL taken explicitly overt anti-white policies and actions.
Import a hundred thousand Somalians directly to America’s heartland? Secret cabal in middle east doing that? Or is it our own home grown religionists?
Why haven’t “we the people” voted ourselves a government that reflects our heritage and our posterity? Maybe we have.
The failings are ENTIRELY within US folks. And excuses like “they brainwashed us” are contemptible. If we are not strong enough to avoid suicide by “brainwashing” then perhaps we deserve to lie on History’s garbage heap of failed evolutionary strategies.
“We can almost immediately fire our government”
Oh, are you naive! By the time a candidate gets close to any major office he’s been carefully vetted to make sure he’ll do nothing that will upset the Program, particularly its most important part, the displacement and ultimately the destruction of white America and the people who made it. Look at the grief Ron Paul is getting for the very mild remarks in his news letter 20 years ago. You get to vote for only the candidates they let you vote for. Who would you vote for if you wanted to stop mass immigration, for example? This phony voting takes place in an atmosphere of no free press, and that alone makes our “democracy” illegitimate. No negative opinions on immigration are really allowed in the media, it’s not surprising that it never becomes an issue.
“In terms of numbers, it’s clearly the evangelical churches followed by catholic and then other Protestant churches. These organizations have ALL taken explicitly overt anti-white policies and actions.
Import a hundred thousand Somalians directly to America’s heartland? Secret cabal in middle east doing that? Or is it our own home grown religionists?”
But this you allow, Unamused. You’re doing what you accuse SWPLs of doing, ignoring minority foibles and reserving blame strictly for whites.
Huh? Who? What am I doing now?
Anyway, strictly speaking, Stan Mute is identifying whites as the ultimate cause of our grief, whereas the various foibles of assorted minorities constitute the proximate cause; that is, minorities keep causing problems, but the reason they’re here to cause problems is because SOMEONE voted for it [glares at white America].
With all due respect, Unamused, I believe that “The first law of black crime according to black people” is “The white man’s laws do not apply to us!”
Keep up the great work!
With best (belated) Christmas and New Year’s wishes,
John:
All politics is local. If whites cared about their dispossession they would PACK local government meetings, county meetings, regional meetings, etc. But have the good folks of Wisconsin done or said a thing against “Beat Whitey Night” at the State Fair? They have retreated to their suburban homes, turned on THE GAME and swilled more cheap beer. They wear the colors of their invaders and dispossessors while ignoring the death throes of their culture and posterity. OF COURSE there is no national debate on race or immigration (or even culture despite pretendings from Faux News and other “conservatives”) when there is no debate within the small local groups.
I wrote that the destroyers COULD be voted out almost immediately and they COULD. You responded that they WON’T due to the lack of alternatives presented but how is that different from running right back to the “blame others” position that simply results in despair, apathy, and inaction? As long as we are in the impenetrable and inescapable grip of these “others” we cannot think or act for ourselves? If we are truly that weak and easily controlled then again, I ask, why bother trying to save this? Survival is not for the timid. Hiding is an evolutionary strategy that only works well for snails.
And my ultimate point, thank you Unamused for getting it, is that the Christians are a FAR bigger problem for survival of white people than any other group religious or otherwise. I read some more this morning on the immense problems caused by 30,000 Sudanese refugees in Omaha (yes – Nebraska) brought to the heartland of America directly from an African war zone by none other than the Lutherans. Now where are the SF-type white advocate sites railing against the Lutheran conspiracies? From where I sit, I don’t care a lot about who said what or to whom or why. Those words don’t rape my daughters or kill my sons. But those tens of thousands of “refugees” are waging a REAL war against me every day. I can (and do) ignore the idiotic words and turn off the media. I can NOT ignore my child coming home in a bag or the inescapable conclusion that in 50 years my grandchildren will have it a hundred times worse.
How do you get from “my TV set says ‘diversity is sublime’” to “let’s bring tens or hundreds of thousands of third world stone age straw hut living hunter gatherers and put them in direct competition for resources with our fat unmotivated children whose idea of conflict is playing World of Warcraft on the Xbox”? Again, are we too dumb to reject what “my TV told me”? And if we are, why should we care?
Again, the blame for this must fall squarely on those who really did it. And to absolve their guilt by saying “the others” TRICKED US into doing it is the weakest most pathetic cop out I can imagine.
Stan Mute
Get out of here Stix! This is MY groundbreaking race realist research! … Oh fine. [adds a sixth law] I hope you’re happy now.
PS merry Christmas and a happy new year. ^_^
Nice job Stan Mute.
+1 for Stan Mute. I’m late to the thread, so I hope he sees this.
30,000 SUDANESE IN NEBRASKA?…….brought by the LUTHERANS?!!
I didn’t know that. Well, I guess I can cross Nebraska off my retirement list.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=84LrmXXgSFs