Milwaukee, South Carolina, and America’s new lynch mobs
Aug 10th, 2011 by Unamused
The Milwaukee County Sheriff’s Department has released 911 audio from the mass lynching of innocent whites by racist blacks on August 4, opening night at the Wisconsin State Fair. Hear it at Today’s TMJ4, in “Authorities release 911 tapes of State Fair mob attacks.”
Caller: “We’re outside State Fair and there’s a white guy getting beaten up by about 100 black people.”
Dispatcher: “Where?”
Caller: “84th Street right by the Pettit Center.”
Callers: “It’s like a fricking riot out there. They’re jumping on our cars and everything.” “There’s 300 black people.” “There’s, like, a riot.” “You better get some cops down here by State Fair Park.” “There’s about 200 kids out here beating guys up.”
…
Caller: “My mom just got attacked by a black mob, and her eye is, like, bleeding.”
Dispatcher: “Where are you?”
After a lot of confusion, caller: “We’re on 84th and the freeway.”
(A woman is repeatedly screaming in the background.)
Caller: “She’s bleeding a lot.”
…
Caller: “My wife comes home with a fricking black eye, and you guys ain’t doin’ (expletive) about it?”
When the 911 dispatcher asks if she needs medical, attention, he responds, “You need to get the (expletive) riot squad over there and haul them off to jail.”
…
Caller: “My friend just got hit in the face. They opened the car door and hit her in the face. They pounded her car.”
…
At least seven police officers were injured amid the chaos, and we are now hearing some of the cries for help as fights broke out and property was damaged.
And check out the comments at the Blaze, on “Hear the Chilling 911 Calls From the ‘Racially-Motivated’ Mob Violence in Wis.,” which reports that “the suspects are being described as African Americans and the victims are reportedly Hispanic and Caucasian” (of course).
Mass lynching?
Yes, a mass lynching — battery by mob — like the Carter Strange beating on a grand scale. That’s what I’m going to call this sort of behavior from now on.
Of course, “this sort of behavior” — lynching — is to be expected from blacks (at least, by the informed readers of Unamusement Park), for three reasons:
- blacks are much more criminal than whites, in Wisconsin or elsewhere
- blacks have been told for decades that the source of all their problems is either whites in general or “racists” in particular (even when that clearly makes no sense at all), the latter meaning rational whites, or sometimes actually all whites; see, for example, this 2002 article in the Guardian, in which the black author (you know, some people just deserve to get their houses burned down in a riot) notes that (a) “of course” all whites are racist, and (b) no non-white can ever be racist
- blacks know that the mainstream media (like the Chicago Tribune, cleveland.com, and the Baltimore Sun), as well as so-called “anti-racists” (actually just anti-white) like the SPLC, can be relied upon censor, ignore, or at worst — as in the case of the State Fair mass lynching — greatly understate any openly anti-white behavior by blacks (as to do otherwise would leave them vulnerable to charges of “racism”)
Timeline
The West Allis Police Department has constructed a timeline based on those 911 calls, according to FOX6. Note that in constructing said timeline, the police (presumably to serve and protect… someone) have scrubbed the calls of all reference to race, so you won’t see a whole bunch of black dudes f****** jumped on me, I’m bleeding all over (actual call) anywhere. However, FOX6 does confirm that “[t]he suspects have been described as African Americans” and “[t]he victims were either Caucasian or [so-called] Hispanic.”
Black people being racist? Violently racist?! But that’s not the story we want to report! Better throw in a white guy reminiscing about lots and lots of unspecified and unsubstantiated but supposedly really, really bad racist beatings he was involved in, more than twenty years ago. That’s relevant as heck. Here’s the “anti-racism” hustler himself — don’t believe a goddamn word of it:
Arno Michaels understands all too well the hate driven mob mentality as a former leader of Milwaukee’s white power movement more than 20 years ago. He says, “When I was that age I made these kids look like Boy Scouts. I routinely attacked people, because of the color of their skin.”
Blacks lynch too much, so let’s scrap the lynching law
I have one further, irresistible, enormous remark on the Carter Strange case.
Four of his eight assailants were charged with second-degree assault and battery by mob, the latter officially known as “lynching” (a reasonable-enough definition of the term) until January 11, 2010, when the South Carolina Sentencing Reform Commission voted to rename it “assault and battery by a mob” and “soften consequences for situations in which no one was killed or seriously injured in an attack by two or more people on a single victim” (Christian Science Monitor).
Why did they feel the need to rename the crime? Too many blacks were lynching people, but “everyone knows” that lynching is just something whites do, so enforcing the law or even referring to the crime as “lynching” is racist. That is neither an exaggeration nor a misrepresentation.
This is what passes for justice these days: social “justice,” meaning laws written and enforced only for the benefit of designated victim groups — like blacks, for instance. Blacks, as “everyone knows,” are the constant victims of — well, every conceivable form of oppression, from poverty to drug addiction, from tougher sentencing to state-sponsored mass-murder by lethal viruses! (That’s how 62 percent of American blacks view HIV/AIDS, according to the Washington Post (June 25, 2000), and it’s about as ignorant as the “oppression” theories of poverty, drug addiction, and sentencing.) And if you can’t actually find any examples of this oppression, this “systemic, societal, institutional, omnipresent, and epistemologically embedded phenomenon that pervades every vestige of our reality,” well… that doesn’t prove that white racism is dead. No, of course not — it just proves how high up the white man’s conspiracy goes.
According to the Christian Science Monitor, the panel of lawmakers ostensibly voted to change the law “because prosecutors had abused it to put bar-fight participants in prison for up to 20 years,” but
the real issue ran even deeper, a key lawmaker acknowledges: For decades, the law has been used to address African-American gang activity, with over half of all lynching charges and convictions being levied against blacks.
Another, more accurate way of putting it would be that over half of all lynchings in South Carolina are committed by blacks, since we know that the justice system is not biased against them.
The South Carolina Sentencing Reform Commission voted Monday to rename the law “assault and battery by a mob” and to soften consequences for situations in which no one was killed or seriously injured in an attack by two or more people on a single victim.
Remember that they’re doing all this — changing the name and softening the consequences — because black people are committing too many lynchings.
The emotional and historical power of the word “lynching” – especially in the Deep South, where the majority of lynchings happened – has long been seen by critics as especially cruel when applied to instances in which black men are arrested.
It’s now considered “especially cruel” to say the word “lynching” within earshot of the kind of soft, delicate, marshmallowy-type minorities that beat Carter Strange very nearly to death, fracturing his skull and disfiguring him.
“Lynching is a particular type of crime that has been recognized socially and by the state as having certain distinct attributes, and so the [South Carolina lynching law] is a corruption not only of the idea of what a lynching is, but also the historical memory of what a lynching is,” says University of North Carolina history Prof. Fitzhugh Brundage, who has written on black historical memory in the South since the Civil War.
According to race baiters and race traitors alike (Prof. Brundage is white), “lynching” is a crime only white people can commit, just like “racist” is something only white people (and according to some, all white people) are. If South Carolina is so racist as to force innocent black people, at gunpoint, to commit 78 percent of robberies, 57 percent of aggravated assaults, 59 percent of rapes, and 75 percent of murders (or whatever equally fanciful explanation anti-white intellectuals offer for black crime rates), thereby “corrupting” the lynching law (Prof. Brundage goes on to call its modern application “grotesque”), which is supposed to target white people only (gosh darn it), then clearly we must rename the law, and soften the consequences for those poor, innocent, lovable, cuddly little — oh God, there’s one now! Where’s my pepper spray? Where’s my gun? What do you mean, I can’t have a gun? It’s in the Constitution! I DEMAND MA GUN
Returning to reality: according to police, the lynching law “had become an effective tool to fight urban gang crime,” meaning of course black gang crime. And a spokesman for the attorney general confirmed that “the law is colorblind,” as it does not mention race. Still, it had to go, because according to the chairman of the reform commission,
it was brought to our attention that, “Look, this name has a negative connotation and people are being charged with something that really has nothing to do with what people perceive to be lynching.”
When his or her preconceived ideas about race don’t match reality, a race realist (not to say “a sane person”) updates those ideas. The South Carolina Sentencing Reform Commission, on the other hand, decided to rename a crime and go easy on the criminals. One of these policies is conducive to civilizational survival; the other, decidedly not.
Meet Kamau Marcharia, the “black warrior”
We find more race denialist insanity from the Associated Press in “State lynching law now used mostly against blacks,” a story (you may have noticed) about a law being used mostly against blacks, as if to imply their persecution (newsworthy), as opposed to blacks committing most crimes (the opposite of newsworthy). It begins with an anecdote about a black man’s “ancestor” who was allegedly dragged to death by a Model T Ford. Assuming “Kamau Marcharia” is more credible than Rosa Parks, that sounds like a clear case of lynching. But it turns out laws apply to black people when they’re the perpetrators of crime, too! OH NO
… Marcharia was not prepared for the call that came three years ago when his son and three other black boys got into a fight with a white boy at middle school and were summoned to court – to answer charges of lynching.
“I didn’t even know there was a law like that,” the veteran civil rights activist says. “I was outraged. See, a 13-year-old fighting because somebody either pushed him or punched him is not lynching. …
Four black boys beat up a white boy? Clearly there is only one logical explanation (at least, according to the father of one of the black defendants — a man who has been howling at the kid about one incident of historical white racism “[f]rom the time his son was old enough to understand”): the white boy must have either pushed someone or punched someone, or maybe he threw a french fry at them, or whispered a racial slur, or something that sounds like a racial slur (like “shnigger,” which I personally say four or five times a day), or looked at them the wrong way (actual recent example), or something else that would justify the “fighting” (i.e., four-on-one beating).
Today in South Carolina, blacks are most often the ones charged with lynching – defined in the statute as any act of violence by two or more people against another, regardless of race.
According to an Associated Press analysis of crime statistics, black South Carolinians are charged with lynching twice as often as whites. Though they make up just 30 percent of the state’s population, blacks account for 63 percent of the lynching charges.
In all but two of the state’s 46 counties, blacks are charged with lynching out of proportion to their representation in the population. In Oconee County, for instance, blacks comprise 8 percent of the residents but 44 percent of those charged with lynching.
South Carolina is 27.9 percent black and 64.1 percent (non-Hispanic) white. If blacks are charged with 63 percent of lynchings, then they commit about 63 percent of lynchings (possibly more), because the justice system is not biased against blacks. Assuming (non-Hispanic) whites commit (or are charged with) every other lynching (the other 37 percent), blacks commit 1.7 times more lynchings than whites, and a black South Carolinian is 3.9 times as likely to lynch someone as a white. In Oconee County (7.6 percent black, 85.9 percent white), under the same assumptions, a black person is 8.9 times as likely to lynch someone.
Prosecutors and police argue there is no racial profiling behind the law’s application, noting that blacks are charged with other violent crimes more often than whites. But it’s the use of the word lynching that trips Marcharia and others.
“Obviously, the law has outlived its purpose,” says J. Wayne Flynt, a professor of Southern history at Auburn University. “Its intent was to stop extralegal violence, essentially aimed at blacks.”
There you have it: some crazy racist lawman has discovered a loophole in our law designed to protect blacks; namely, that whites can also be the victims of crime, and blacks the perpetrators. Therefore the law has outlived its purpose. Add Professor Flynt (also white) to the list of anti-white intellectuals — race baiters and race traitors, every one.
“It’s ironic at least,” says William Gravely, another anti-white intellectual, on the matter of the black lynching rate — that is, the rate at which blacks commit lynching. “In one sense it’s a kind of denial of the large historical record going back to the late 19th century.” Yes, prosecuting violent black gangs certainly is a denial of the historical record in one sense: the sense that go fuck yourself, Professor Gravely.
Former attorney Tom Broadwater, who tours the country trying to make whites feel guilty with pictures of lynchings (of blacks, obviously), thinks it’s a conspiracy: “an attempt to minimize the seriousness which the word `lynching’ carries with it.” What kind of crimes are minimizing the seriousness of lynching? Well, here’s one from 1999:
in North Charleston, seven black high school students wielding pipes and trash cans were charged with lynching after a 35-year-old white man was beaten into a coma and eventually had to have a portion of his brain removed. One of the attackers was allegedly heard saying: “Yeah, we’re going to get us a white boy.”
Meanwhile, Kamau Marcharia says that “the law as it has come to be used in South Carolina” — that is, the law being used to punish black criminals — “is an affront to blacks.” Oh wow, an affront to blacks? That sounds serious. It’s not like we’ve heard that five or six hundred thousand times before.
“That law was passed, in my judgment, to make sure that African-Americans, two generations from now or two decades from now, will lose the memory of their history, what happened to them,” says Marcharia, whose full name is Swahili for “black warrior.” “That kids born in that period of time will see lynching as a fist fight, when we know that lynching is murder and killing, burning people and evil.”
Kamau Marcharia, the “black warrior,” has his one sad story about how the evil white man killed some unnamed “ancestor,” and he’s been drilling it into his son’s head since he was “old enough to understand.” There’s no chance either of them will lose that memory — which of course isn’t a memory at all, but a selection from black history, with an eye to making white people out to be the villains for their various and variously fictitious historical (meaning IT’S OVER NOW) “injustices,” presumably including the white man’s original sin: dragging those poor, helpless black people (sold by other black people) all the way from wonderful Africa to awful America.
Oh, I’m sure there’s plenty of discrimination in Marcharia’s past — his, and everyone else’s, black or white or otherwise. But there’s a difference between memory and history, on the one hand, and obsession and incitement on the other.
Unsurprisingly, by the time this story came out, Marcharia’s son and three of his black friends had already been charged with battery by mob for beating up a white middle school student. The father’s only concern: that the crime was called “lynching.” But… but… that’s OUR word! WE use it, to make YOU feel guilty for things I claim YOUR ancestors did to MINE! WE use it, to teach OUR children to hate YOU!
Marcharia didn’t care that his son was a violent thug in the making, and is likely in prison by now. And he sure as hell didn’t care about the real victim, who like Carter Strange was probably just another white kid in the wrong place at the wrong time; that is, anywhere near young black men, anytime after the civil rights movement. The lynching, by that or any other name, was more or less exactly what Marcharia had in mind all along: to raise another “black warrior” like himself, a born race rioter waiting for his flash mob, filled with a seething hatred of whites, armed with his angry race-obsessed black father’s limited and almost totally biased (mis)understanding of American history, and protected by the Associated Press, the Christian Science Monitor, the Guardian, FOX6, and the rest of the mainstream media; protected by “politically correct” (i.e., incorrect) language, like “racism,” “discrimination,” “privilege,” and indeed “lynching”; and of course very well protected by Eric “My People” Holder’s Civil Rights (for Everyone but Whites) Division of the (Social) Justice Department of the United States of Post-Racial America.
Eh, a little anger in this post? Race traitors? You sound like one of them there racists. I like it.
It is a low-level race war. It is also completely one-sided. Most whites, who are DWLs, are so demoralized that they enjoy the beating, they savor it. Insane.
There is plenty of black on white crime in my neighborhood, too. When I hear it referenced it is always in terms of respect for the black person who took your belongings and assaulted you on some “code of the streets,” “he’s hood mad respect” bullshit.
But even so-called black intellectual culture encourages a hardly more rarefied version of this in creating its strong, proud warriors, filled with righteous violence. There are no black intellectuals, just black rioters. Violence engrained at every level.
Crom. If that’s true, where’s the mad respect and street cred for real lynchings? I know the “black community” wouldn’t give props if whites hung every black criminal from a tree… or maybe they would. Perhaps our ancestors understood what we do not. Maybe all that blacks respect is strength, the whip.
OT
I know you’ll be very interested in a study that was published on Tuesday in a peer reviewed journal. It finds that at least 51% of fluid (problem solving) IQ is due to the additive effects of lot of different genes. It’s a very large study with a sample size of more than 3500. Although there have been many suggestive hints about genetic variance effects on intelligence this is the first comprensive direct proof. Although Steve Sailer and Mangan talk about it and link it, I’m linking you to the Guardian science section article on it since it can hardly be dismissed by the left as a right wing blog.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2011/aug/09/genetic-differences-intelligence
The article links the research paper.
[Unamused: Very interesting stuff.]
I’m going to a gun store Friday, and getting a concealed carry permit. This is just another reason to do it, as if I need another one!
I applaud you for shedding light on these incidents, and making flyers. This is one possible activism strategy: http://tinyurl.com/3fyfhz8
From the article:
Would not be too hard to adapt that message, and strategy, to, say, free t-shirts at an ACLU meeting or Obama rally (if he runs for re-election). “So much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don’t even know that fire is hot. You’ve been lied to. We’ll help you learn the facts. [url, say, violentflashmobs.com]”
(and someone comments with “It will never work. Kids are too brainwashed etc. etc. etc.” in 4… 3… 2…)
Evil Nazi News:
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2011/08/ludwig-f-clauss-racial-style-racial-character-part-i/
The Office of Racial Policy of the NSDAP (Das Rassenpolitische Amt der NSDAP) has printed pictures and plaques and has distributed them in German schools, where we read in large letters the following words: Each race in itself represents the highest value.
Here’s something: does anyone have the violent crime statistics for the 19th/early 20th centuries? What was the rate of black-on-white crime as opposed to white-on-black? Could it be that the rate of lynchings followed the rates of violent crime? i.e., consider how today blacks have a violent crime rate several times that of whites. Now, the usual statistic for lynchings was 5000 total over an 80 year period (1870-50 or thereabouts). About 70% of this involved black lynchees, the rest white (where did Hispanics fit in here?). Did this trend reflect the rates of crime? i.e., were blacks committing 70% of the violent crime?
To be fair, one might note that a lot of white-on-black crime probably never got reported, or was knocked down to misdemeanors. Still, given recent events, one wonders if the situation in segregation days was as one-sided as the current propaganda picture gives us.
Once again, Unamused, you are truly eloquent!
There is no justice for White men in the courts today. You’ll have to make your own justice with brass kunckles or a gun when 4 feral negros jump you.
On August 11, NPR’s Morning Edition covered the Milwaukee incident along with other mahogany mob events. In fact, they got a nice little quote from none other than Emily Guendelsberger, the woman who’s leg was broken during a mob attack in Philadelphia.
Her quote? “I am afraid of young, black men now. It’s very annoying because there are a lot of young, black men in Philadelphia. I honestly just wish I could go back to how I was before.”
Read or listen to the story here:
http://www.npr.org/2011/08/11/139507252/officials-in-phila-plan-curfews-to-curb-teen-violence
Hey Ryu.
You hang with the wrong crowd, kid. :) Most Whites I know crank up the production of their Dillon press.
Um, do you even realize how racist it is to contend that a risk of racism allegations will prevent anti-racists from speaking out about the racism of racists? Since members of certain non-racist races are slightly overrepresented in the anti-racist community, you cannot but demonstrate significant racism in claiming that anti-racists are disproportionately fearful of racism complaints coming from actual racists, who are thus ‘racist’ in a sense toward non-racists as well as racist members non-racist races.
Emily Guendelsberger, as I’ve pointed out before, is a dumb bitch:
- she finds her instincts to identify danger and avoid harm “very annoying” because they contradict her orthodox beliefs about race
- she wishes she could go back to being wholly ignorant of the realities of race, no matter how much further harm that does her and the people she cares about
- she refuses to consider why young, black men are more dangerous than any other age/race/sex group; anyone who does is engaged in “creepy racist bullshit”
- similarly, she is unwilling or unable to make the connection between “there are a lot of young, black men in Philadelphia” and the current state of the city
- knowing what she does now about black mobs, she continues to spread her dangerously ignorant beliefs to others who are too weak or stupid to challenge racial orthodoxy, and thus challenge reality instead, making my job more difficult
Drudge is linking to this story right now. Read the comments. The times they are a changing…
It’s absolutely mind-boggling how generations of blacks are being raised with incessant propaganda about the evilness of the white man. The mind truly shits itself at the mere thought… it’s not like they aren’t naturally violent to begin with, either!
Recently I’ve had the occasion of arguing with self reported black guys on the internet, the idea is that all the races are the same except that whites are racist and invented racism (I suspect that before the evil deeds of the white race, humanity was living peacefully in complete multi cultural bliss), and they somehow are to be held accountable (to this day) of slavery and the wars of the past.
They also seem to resent white flight… whites are so horrible and racists, but they HATE when they leave their neighborhoods to self segregate.
Unamused,
http://www.myfoxphilly.com/dpp/news/local_news/caught-on-tape%3A-philadelphia-teen-mob-attack-080811
Heh.
On the topic of black flash mobs: the New York Times in 1991 covered them up even when their own people were being targeted.
http://www.thejewishweek.com/news/new_york/telling_it_it_wasnt
Whites are “easy targets.”
http://www.todaystmj4.com/news/local/127539623.html
I had a different take on redefining “lynch.” Lynching, at least to me, means premeditated, targeted, extrajudicial violence aimed at justice. Of course, any extrajudicial justice is a raw justice at best, and often injustice. Still, an attempt at justice by the many in the mob (if not every man in it) is an important aspect of the practice. Nobody, not even progressives, thinks that black mob attacks have this quality.
Also, consider the other qualities of lynching: “premeditated” and “targeted”. Most of these wildings are premeditated but only slightly. They are basically crimes of opportunity. And they are barely targeted at all, outside of racial target selection.
Lynching was, in fact, just as “everyone knows” something that only whites used to do — because whites are organized and care about justice (but not very much about process — then).
I am happy to call these semi-random racist black mob attacks “wildings” or “assault and battery by a mob”. Or some other new label. I am not happy calling them “lynchings” — that’s a word with a serious history, and lynching is a considerably more noble thing than what these black mobs are doing. Calling these modern attacks lynchings degrades the word.
That’s an excellent point, Leonard — although I think these mobs clearly are premeditated and target whites in general, though admittedly not specific whites.
Let’s just say I’m trying to piss off some blacks, shall we? (lols) And I’ll reconsider the terminology.
Pakistanis and Indians Jailed for Starting Birmingham Riots
http://www.birminghammail.net/news/top-stories/2011/08/11/saltley-man-first-to-be-jailed-for-birmingham-riots-full-court-report-from-first-day-of-prosecutions-97319-29216078/
John Derbyshire estimates that blacks comprise about 2% of the British population but 60 – 70% of the rioters.
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/274226/epitaph-britain-john-derbyshire#
Monday, Apr. 21, 1958
National Affairs: THE NEGRO CRIME RATE: A FAILURE IN INTEGRATION
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,810262,00.html
[...] I assume the SPLC will be updating their hate crime watch blog fairly soon… So far, nothing. Unamused, I assure you, will be on the [...]
[...] I approve this message. [...]
What’s interesting is that even during segregation blacks wielded considerable political power. It’s not quite the “narrative” one gets from the mainstream media these days about the USA pre-1954.
RE: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,810262,00.html
This was a very upfront article and it appeared in the epitome of MSM; it’s sobering to me and nothing to be happy about, but it does counter claims that MSM always suppresses this stuff.
this particular graph alleviates a lot of claims made by this and other pro-white blogs re. race and MSM:
So. here, not only does the MSM refuse to gloss over the truth about disproportionate black crime; it actually goes out of its way to deconstruct some of the rhetorical tactics used to do the glossing. Wartman’s words are used in way to represent common black explanations.
I’ve seen this a lot lately in MSM and it’s a good thing. Quite frankly, from my vantage point, the MSM is finally saying a lot of things that i hear in majority-black social settings that I’ve heard for over a decade.
Californian:
RE. pre-1954 black political power; what in particular are you referring to? just curious.
I can’t tell if you’re joking…
The article is from April 21, 1958. (Hence the term “Negro”…) If you’re saying we should go back to the policies (on reporting or otherwise) of the 1950s with regard to race, then I think we have a point of agreement. (lols)
Yes, it was my way of conceding that the reporting style would be refreshing in dealing with the racial here-and-now, and I do think many other NAMs would agree. Wasn’t sure if that was obvious enough — hence, my Q-to-California ending.
has anyone else heard of paul captain? he is being charged with a hate crime for sending this:
to a black wisconsin state fair official. the woman, patrice harris, apparently locked her office door after she read her emails. This guy is being charged with a hate crime and might go to jail, while the 30 or so separate beat downs that occurred days beforehand might not be labeled as such in msm.
[Unamused: Ugh. What an idiot. As Aaronovitch pointed out, there are SO MANY MORE PRODUCTIVE THINGS HE COULD HAVE DONE!]
Moral: perhaps it’s unwise to send a violently threatening email that includes racial spite to the public relations officer of the fair that just dealt with a flood of local and national media re. a racial flash-mob attack . Furthermore, it was probably even more unwise to sign one’s name to such a threat. Names, combined with an I.P. address, tend to catch up with you. Same goes to referring to oneself as “Gerald Loughner the Second” in such letters.
http://www.wisn.com/news/28839276/detail.html
*btw, so far, one of the attackers, a 16-year-old male, has been formally charged in the original attacks; based on his statement during interrogation by police, it was determined that his assault charge would be additionally assessed with a ‘hate crime’ charge/status.
[...] Unamused – “The SPLC’s Crusade Against White Rights: No State Fair There“, “Who Am I Arguing with Now? Assorted Edition“, “Race and Crime in Wisconsin“, “Milwaukee, South Carolina, and America’s New Lynch Mobs” [...]
For fuck’s sake, if that guy really wanted to do some good, there is a million other things he could do that would be productive.
Voting blocs in the North, NAACP, white liberals and radicals as allies. Ref the line: “Fearing loss of Negro votes, few elected officials dare to resist the pressures.”
The TIME article cited was interesting, and I have seen similar from that era which write about black crime with a candor that has not been possible for decades.
By the way, good to see nikcrit posting again.
P.S. to Unamused: I swear, this “NAM” could use some entitlement money to address his character-specific dyslexia when it comes to executing italics-font commands; apologies extended.
I wonder what Pres. Obama, Attorney General Holder and David Axelrod think of all this? Our fearless leader is nowhere to be seen.
Ryu’s post reminded me of some Motörhead lyrics.
Ryu writes,
Motörhead writes,
[...] [...]
Emily, I can feel for her. All the years of ‘education’ that went into making her nice. Now shes been mauled, mugged so………….her real education has begun.