Feral blacks on racist rampage at Wisconsin State Fair
Aug 5th, 2011 by Unamused
Today, Unamusement Park indulges its love of satirical racial hatred.
“That’s racist!”
By intrepid racist reporter Unaschmoozed and the BRA News Team
WEST ALLIS, Wis. — Last night, decent white folk attending the Wisconsin State Fair enjoyed a little taste of Africa as hundreds of feral blacks once again fulfilled their genetic destinies and violently “chimped out” on civilized (i.e., white) society.
These so-called “niggers,” innately criminal and unintelligent, preyed on their failed race’s long-suffering stewards at will, knowing that in the absence of any systemic white racism, all “civil rights” and “hate crime” legislation exists solely for the benefit of blacks, and furthermore that their predictable monkeyshines would be ignored by the mainstream media, the government, and so-called “anti-racist” (actually anti-white) organizations such as the SPLC, the ACLU, and the Civil Rights Division of Eric “My People” Holder’s Department of (Social) Justice.
Amazingly, the mainstream media were unable to fully suppress the “race angle,” as they were in Chicago, Baltimore, and Cleveland. No doubt this failure to censor so-called “hate facts,” meaning anything and everything that makes “niggers” look like what they are (e.g., violent, racist, and misogynistic), will occasion much complaining among the “leaders” of the black “community.”
When are we going to hear some more good news, this reporter can’t help but wonder: when is someone finally going to start shooting them?
(That was cathartic.)
Real coverage: in the ‘Sphere…
You can read all about Milwaukee’s latest black-on-white mob attack at Stuff Black People Don’t Like — if you read nothing else on the subject, read this:
- “Beat Whitey Night Goes Viral: Black people at Milwaukee State Fair ‘Rise’ to the Occasion”
- “Milwaukee’s Massive Mahogany Mob Melee at the Wisconsin State Fair in Perspective”
Paul Kersey observes:
You can have nice things and nice events (like Cleveland’s Coventry Art Festival) or you can include Black people. You can have all Black events that require a massive police such as the Indiana Black expo — “it looked like Martial Law had been declared” — or we can decide no more.
View from the Right has more coverage:
- “Rampaging mob of ‘dozens to hundreds’ of blacks assault, beat, terrorize whites at Wisconsin State Fair”
- “Blacks pulled whites from cars and beat them”
Lawrence Auster notes:
This is both the largest black-on-white wilding or flash mob that I’ve heard of so far, and the most detailed in the reporting and the witnesses’ accounts. … The black flash mob intifada may be reaching the critical point where officialdom and media will stop covering it up and start talking about it. But I make no hopeful predictions. More likely, they will treat this incident, as they’ve treated innumerable others, as an isolated happenstance, having no connection to any larger pattern, and no connection to any racial motive.
… and in the news
Here’s everything I could find:
- Today’s TMJ 4 has the whole story: “Witnesses describe mobs, some people claim racially-charged attacks”
- the Milwaukee-Wisconsin Journal Sentinel has more: “State Patrol called in, youth policy imposed after violence at State Fair” (the aftermath), “Free from fear” (an excellent editorial), and (for your daily dose of black apologetics) “Some blame race, but many factors play role in criminal behavior”
- CBS News: “Ald. Donovan, Dudzik release statement about State Fair attacks,” a must-read — the aldermen lay the blame right where it belongs
- FOX News: “Hundreds rampage through neighborhoods surrounding Wisconsin State Fair: Chaos started around closing time of the park”
- ABC News: “Witnesses Describe Mob Attacks Outside Wis. State Fair: Several Law Enforcement Agencies Responded To Area Late Thursday Night” and on the race denialist front, “State Fair Police Say Fights Inside Park Not Racially Motivated” — somehow they never are, when black people attack white people because they’re white
- WTAQ News Talk: “Gov. calls State Patrol to be at State Fair after mob attacks”
- good ol’ Pajamas Media is all over it: “Witnesses: Racist Attacks Against Whites at Wisconsin State Fair”
Just got banned at American Thinker (sic) for trying to explain nature. No “N” word, or anything close.
This is war, and they are not on board. They will be begging for help when this goes to shit.
Can you link to your comments, JoeS? Or if they were deleted, can you reproduce them here?
Banned at American Stinker? Consider that a badge of honor. I gave up on the lamestream conservative blogosphere a long time ago. I’m utterly shocked they ran Jared Taylor’s response to their in-house arrogant subcontinental.
Here’s Jared Taylor writing at American Thinker: “What is ‘White Nationalism’? A Reply to Dean Malik” — worth a read.
What? No guns in WI?
I don’t understand how this type of stuff occurs with no shots fired.
Check out AmRen. A couple of Aldermen have written a piece specifically naming social dysfunction in local blacks as the problem. I mean, these guys have to run for reëlection. Things are really changing.
yup, that article is in the post
Well, let’s not invest too much hope here.
It’s good that whites are waking up. The traditional media, however, will find a way to twist this around so that whitey was responsible, or that it was poverty, or the moon, etc.
We build WN brick by brick. It’s another day of progress. Waking up is just one step. Then you have to get out of bed, get dressed and maybe get something done.
ah yes, the traditional media will turn their faces skyward, to that ancient enemy of all the earthbound colored folk, none other than…
the moon!
i lol’ed greatly
I know your shtick is all about the snark, but sometimes it’s just inappropriate IMHO. I mean, you’re fantastic at the snark, don’t get me wrong.
But these mob attacks are a serious matter; people are being severely injured for being white. I get spit-spewing mad reading these stories, so it just seems very odd to use humor when reporting on these stories.
Wisconsin has a new concealed-carry law, ya know
What on earth are you folks waiting for… shoot them
http://www.jsonline.com/news/milwaukee/126828998.html
So much for all the overheated rhetoric about a ‘conspiracy’ to conceal the incidents and their racial elements; this was the cover story in the print edition!
(I have to say, this also happened in your ‘coverage’ of the july 4 incident at Reservoir Park in Milwaukee; some of the commenters went on and on about this vast silencing conspiracy while the local daily fuly covered the incident as it really happened and NOT sparing the racial dynamics.
["Overheated rhetoric"? Nonsense.
Check out all the other stories I've reported on, especially the ones where the newspapers try to justify their censorship after the fact. Chicago was the worst case. It's not a "conspiracy" anymore, it's their official editorial policy.
That the Journal-Sentinel is finally, after months of racially motivated violence, no longer able to completely ignore the race angle in local black-on-white mob attacks is not cause for celebration, nor does it invalidate any of my own reporting.
Oh, and truly "NOT sparing the racial dynamics" for majority-white readers in a majority-white nation would include rhetoric a lot more "overheated" than mine!]
Check! I see you listed jsonline.com’s link to the state fair story, including in the fourth of fifth graph the distinctly racial elements to the violence.
[Wow, the mainstream media finally declined to completely censor race from a story that made black people look bad. And all it took was hundreds of blacks beating up an indeterminate number of white people, just one month after 50–60 blacks beat up 15–20 white people while shouting racial slurs! Oh, and there have been many similar, unreported incidents in Milwaukee, too.]
OneSTDV,
Black mobs are a serious matter. But you know what else concerns me? The whites themselves! If you’re in a public event with 500+ black kids running around, anywhere, you better be on guard.
They didn’t sense any danger beforehand! Its like wolves being among sheep, and the sheep were alright as long as the blacks didn’t attack. Whites are a majority in Wisconsin, but that danger will always be there as long as the races are integrated.
I don’t mind the Unamused approach. I didn’t like Paul Kersey’s (SBPDL) response. Far too objective. We’re sitting back calling them blacks, Afro Americans, brothers and all manner of flowery, equal sounding language. But if I say there were 200 n*ggers on the loose, BOOM!, you know exactly what I mean and what to expect. That word is so important.
@ Ryu:
Yes I agree. I wrote a post supporting the same view:
http://onestdv.blogspot.com/2011/06/reflections-on-carter-strange-attack.html
Honestly I can see why American Thinker did that, no offense. As it stands most whites are still stuck in a fantasy world of PC thinking, and conservatives are still being labeled as racists just for being conservatives. Whether or not they agree they’re not going to post things that will be used as ammo by Jon Stewart and the still mostly liberal media.
Personally I have opinions now I wouldn’t believe only 3 years ago. What I’ve noticed from many yahoo thread boards (yahoo being more mainstream then sites like this, no offense) is that many people are realizing the great ‘civilized black’ hoax is a lie.
Look at that editor from the Onion, Emily Guendelsberger, who last I heard wasn’t angry at the black mob, and wants to make it appear her attackers merely made a bad decision. She’s so brainwashed, she seems to be more upset with the people upset at black thugs then the black thugs who broke her leg.
We’re dealing with a concentrated propaganda machine created by leftists in the media and Hollywood to cover up the black communities inherent failures and embracing of rape, assault, and murder, even among their own kind. And it’s been in place for years. Thanks to the internet we can discover the truth, plus all the victims of black crime have family members and friends, and they are slowly willing to speak up.
But with Eric Holder in office law enforcement is against us, and pro black murderers. We live in upside down world right now.
Whites haven’t accepted we’re in a race war against blacks, started by blacks. While whites have been feeling guilty and trying to built better communities, blacks have been feeding their anger and sense of entitlement and letting their ghettos and housing projects decay, until you have rampaging blacks attacking whites who are mentally unprepared for what’s happening. Black attacks are not what whites have been trained to believe is real.
I myself can’t help but use ‘gallows humor’ when dealing with our present situation. I too seethe with anger at feral blacks and their Marxist enablers, but if I stood up at my office job and screamed “I hate n*ggers!”, my wife and I would be soon be homeless or living with my elderly mother. I hope to wean myself off of the corporate teat so that someday I can yell “I hate n*ggers” to my heart’s content but in the meantime I have a growing repertoire of cynical and snide remarks seemingly innocent questions, etc. that are my defense mechanism against insanity.
In the case of the violent mobs of Zulus, it is only a matter of time until the savages go too far and commit public murders. While many out there assume that someone carrying a firearm will gun down a few attackers, my prediction is that blacks will certainly murder a few innocent Whites in one of these mob attacks. I would not want to see anyone killed, but a viral video of sub-humans beating, stabbing, or shooting a hapless White will be something that the MSM will have a hard time explaining or excusing. Believe me it is coming. These apes hate us and have expressed the desire to kill children.
Caiden,
“Thanks to the internet we can discover the truth…”
How much longer?
http://centuryofblood.blogspot.com/2011/08/internet-spying-bill-passing-without.html
True, however as more people are realizing the truth, when they hear about attempts to spy or ‘stop’ the internet people will notice. We’re not North Korea yet, although many people are trained by liberals to think a certain way. One thing I’ve noticed when reading and seeing interviews about communists in East Germany, Poland, and North Korea, is eventually people begin to realize the fascists promoting ‘equality’ keep most of the perks for themselves.
I’m not saying we’re all going to be OK, I’m saying their attempts aren’t going to go over so smoothly. The reason liberals keep people blind regarding racism is blacks were more of a minority, and were more segregated. As their population grew and African nationalism plus black criminality grew, most whites were blind to it. As affirmative action laws made incompetent blacks unfirable and section 8 housing allowed blacks to infest better neighborhoods like a diseased tick, more whites realized the truth.
The law enforcement hierarchy and politicians hide it from us, but even if they admitted the problems the liberal media would label them racist and their careers would have ended.
As it is, I don’t see a simply Hollywood style ending to this crap. What I think will happen is during the election blacks will rampage more, liberals will have a harder time hiding the truth. And if Obama loses blacks will be chopping whites in the streets. By that time, the whites intelligent enough will know what’s happening, and will either move away from blacks or learn to get a gun. While a lot of innocent whites will be hurt I’m guessing most victims will be PC-blinded liberals who don’t have enough sense to run from a group of blacks.
A large number of the military and police forces are whites. They deal with low class blacks all day. Police and military have to change standards to have more black officers for ‘diversity’. If a black officers and officials are telling armed police and national guardsmen to stand down while they watch blacks raping and killing whites in the streets, I think things will go a little differently then the blacks expect.
What I personally see happening is the US getting balkanized, like Yugoslavia, or Germany after WW II. To many blacks and liberal enablers to control. What’s happening RIGHT now, is the blacks have realized how fragile civilized society is. The reason I can leave home to go to work or shop or see friends is I’m fairly sure I won’t get attacked outside and that my neighbors won’t burn my house. Of course, while there are whites who are criminals, the blacks have learned they can attack in groups of dozens or even now hundreds, and the cops aren’t willing to shot at them, and whites aren’t willing to fight back.
For now anyway. The reason that I and many other whites are upset is that we realize the blacks are uncontrollable, and that’s a very different message that we’ve been led to believe. While we’ve been trying to afford violence because ‘violence is always wrong’ blacks have turned their neighborhoods into outdoor prison yards. Blacks are far more animal then human at this point. Whites are beginning to see we don’t have as much to lose by speaking up now, and eventually we’ll be in a positions where we either are willing to defend ourselves or end up apologetic victims like Emily from the Onion.
Maybe I’m too new to this way of thinking for my opinion to count for much, but, on the other hand, supposedly a lot of the point of this discussion is to wake up people who are still trapped in the world of leftist brainwashing spin. To that end, I think care needs to be taken in the language being used.
I want whites to wake up to this dangerous reality. I want whites to be willing to defend themselves and each other. I want the stupid charade to stop, but STILL I confess my stomach turns a little at sentences like “Blacks are far more animals than humans at this point.” If you want to get through to people who are just opening their eyes, I strongly believe that is not the way to do it. Talk like that will just “confirm” for people that you are a hateful racist not worth paying any attention to. It is VITAL at this stage, that we conduct ourselves in a way that does not make us easy to dismiss as hatemongers.
Annie L.
I understand your point. But:
We are going to be called hatemongers and racists anyway, whether we call them “African Americans” or “n*ggers.” As Ryu likes to point out the liberating effect of reconquering our language is not to be underestimated. As long as we follow the rules of political correctness we will be unable to fight the status quo and to build a better world for European Americans.
Annie, well, you’re right. To be honest over the last few weeks I’ve been reading alot of online stories, not just websites like this but mainstream media sites when the black flash mobs attack people. What I’ve seen besides alot of whites realize what’s happening I’ve always seen ALOT of blacks defending the actions, and liberals calling us racist for noticing.
Personally I’ve never seen a group of klansmen or neo nazis in the news tha tmakes me think “Yeah I want to move in by those guys, they look like great neighbors and I want to hang out with them”.
Perhaps it’s the whole new convert thing, and I admit I may be over empathizing because of basically realizing society is collapsing slowly. But I’m not just talking about the crimes themselves, I’m talking about online forums where blacks defend the actions. Rarely do you see whites defend white criminals, when you do it’s usually a family members or similar thug.
So… yeah, good thing to remember. Thanks for the comment, Annie, it’s good to realize when I’m going overboard
BritRob
From Prof. Krugman’s blog.
August 2, 2011, 9:51 am
Macroeconomic Folly
“It’s a disaster – and maybe not only an economic disaster.
ATHENS, Greece — They descended by the hundreds — black-shirted, bat-wielding youths chasing down dark-skinned immigrants through the streets of Athens and beating them senseless in an unprecedented show of force by Greece’s far-right extremists.”
So apparently in Greece people of one skin colour are attacking people of another skin colour. Perhaps he’s worried that it might happen in America.
Thank God that sort of thing hasn’t happened yet.
@ Un
This comment got through. The next was just a follow up, trying to explain to another that there is no fix to the problem of black behavior; that black behavior is what it is. That comment was never posted and the pussies banned me (Oh no!!!) This is the article: http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/08/politics_is_not_the_answer_to_black_economic_woes.html
No dreaded “N” word; no “chimp” language. Just a cold shower of reality. Ah well.
@ Annie L
That’s because you have a PC hangover. Keep your eyes open, keep reading reality sites, and it will go away. That same stomach turning feeling will get you killed if you don’t continue with your treatments.
Good luck.
My qualm wasn’t with “African-American” versus “n*gger.” My qualm was with “more animal than human.” I think the idea of the word “n*gger” being off-limits is preposterous because I am a great proponent of free speech, even if that speech is offensive to some people. My problem with “more animal than human” is that that kind of language, if backed up by genuine belief in that statement, means that blacks as an entire group are not deserving of basic human rights and human dignity. And, as far as I’m concerned, every individual person deserves that, unless they throw away that right by violating the basic human rights of others.
Now, I’m immersed enough in this subject matter to know that no one is suggesting every single black person be locked up in a cell or lined up and shot, but I am under the impression that a significant goal is to wake up people who aren’t aware, and who WON’T know that. A year ago, I’d have automatically dismissed anyone who said that any particular race wasn’t really human. Now, I’m able to recognize the hyperbolic language for what it is.
People are angry, and I understand that. Angry people often spout hyperbole. However, the message is going to actually get through to more people if it’s delivered with Jared Taylor steadiness, control and gentility than if it’s delivered with what amounts to little more than name-calling.
[Unamused: Well said!]
My commenters are sooo smart. I have the smartest commenters of all.
(srsly)
OneSTDV: The real joke is, I was half serious. And appropriately furious. I could only write what I felt, then call it “satirical.” The links tell a different story.
@ Annie L
I don’t understand why you would interpret it that way. I just saw it as a metaphor.
@Annie L
I concur. I understand what you’re saying. I’m in the same boat as many commenters in this thread have described… a year or two ago I would have dismissed much of this as being blown way out of proportion. But I gradually awoke and had to acclimate myself to hearing this sort of language. Hopefully, others will be intrepid and open enough to go through a similar wake-up period as the harsh realities become less avoidable or easily rationalized away.
I’ve even considered putting together a ‘deprogramming’ website, that takes someone new by the hand and hits all the high points, condensed into easily consumable points and in less-harsh language that facilitates a smooth exit from this tyrannical establishment PC narrative for the genuinely confused, isolated and unaware citizen. (Unamused’s crime-alert print-out flyers seem to be in that vein.)
Where to start, though? There’s A LOT of ground to cover for the uninitiated. If I were to pick only a couple things to break the ice, I would send them to Tim Wise’s “An Open Letter to the White Right” (so they know we’re not just making this stuff up). Then contrast the ongoing genocidal Black murders of White South African farmers after Apartheid with the rapidly growing epidemic of *explicitly black-on-white* rampaging and mob beatings to hammer the point home that it’s not just talk. It’s real now and happening in our face… and NOT by accident. That ought to at least get someone off the fence, if not immediately ‘awakened’. But I digress…
I agree, though. If you’re trying to wake people up on a mainstream comment section (or at least let them know that they’re not alone and it’s O.K. to think out side the PC box they’re in) and you want be effective, then you would do well to avoid language like ‘sub-human’, ‘n*gger’, ‘less than human’, ‘chimpazoid’, ‘ship them back to Africa where they can swing from trees in their natural habitat’, etc.
There is a time a place for that in the ‘Awake-O-Sphere’ of the Internet and off-line social situations where we understand what each other mean. But to help illuminate the minds of the PC or genuinely unaware law-abiding public on mainstream sites, avoidance of extremely harsh adjectives would probably help a great deal.
In fact, if you really want to go the extra mile, you could engage in “Mantra” tactics (i.e. “Anti-Racism is a code word for Anti-White”). See: http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/the-white-mantra/
They also have a comment thread on their site where people post links to blogs, youtube and other comment sections so others can respond en-mass to confront the Anti-White PC establishment narrative. They call it “BUGS SWARM”. It’s where people can work together in tandem against lefties and PC-types in comment sections. Here’s the link: http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2011/05/30/the-bugs-swarm/
Hope that helps. I’ve done a few myself. It’s quite empowering to work as a team and I find The Mantra to be quite effective, even when used solo.
PS. It’s always good to read about the experiences of other relatively ‘newly awakened’ people… i.e. AnnieL, Caiden, Dutchman, etc. I think we’re really turning a corner in terms of awareness and reaching a critical mass. It seems to be accelerating quite rapidly as more people come online and see that other Whites share their genuine concerns, experiences, though-processes, etc. The ‘rate-of-white-awareness’ must look like Al Gore’s ‘hokey stick’ chart by now… LOL.
‘Interesting times’… as they say.
PPS. — FUN FACT: The word ‘n*gger’ was not in my spell checker, yet the word ‘multiculturalism’ was. We’ve certainly got a long way to go, folks…
@ Unamused:
I’m sorry I didn’t read the first part as carefully as I should have. I saw the opening:
“That’s racist!”
By intrepid racist reporter Unaschmoozed and the BRA News Team
And then sort of skipped to the next part, assuming the initial section was snarkier than it actually was.
Nonetheless though, sometimes I do feel snark is inappropriate.
[that's ok you still super-smart like all UP commenters]
“I don’t understand why you would interpret it that way. I just saw it as a metaphor.”
I didn’t interpret it “that way.” I said later in that very post that I realized it was hyperbole. What I said about it being backed by a belief in blacks not deserving basic human rights is what would logically follow if it were NOT a metaphor or hyperbole. Now, I can’t cite any source here, because this is pure speculation, but I would wager that more than half the people in the USA don’t know the meaning of the words “metaphor” or “hyperbole,” let alone recognize it when they see it, but we are still trying to talk to those people, so care has to be taken with language. That’s all I’m saying.
“I’ve even considered putting together a ‘deprogramming’ website, that takes someone new by the hand and hits all the high points, condensed into easily consumable points and in less-harsh language that facilitates a smooth exit from this tyrannical establishment PC narrative for the genuinely confused, isolated and unaware citizen.”
This was the general tack I was taking on my blog. Unfortunately, I found myself overwhelmed between wanting to write about too many things and not knowing where to start, and having an 8-month-old son (because it’s amazing how little race relations matter to me when my baby is crying…or laughing…or babbling…). And since I figured no one was really reading it anyway, there wasn’t much lost by my lack of effort. All told, I’ve managed a whopping 3 posts total. Woohoo!
[Woohoo!]
[...] Unamused – “White Racism is Dead, Part 2: Absence of Evidence“, “Blacks Won’t Stop Rioting in Philly; When is Someone Going to Start Shooting Them?“, “Pittsburgh Blacks Complain Media Censorship of Their Crimes Not at 100 Percent Yet“, “Part 3“, “Feral Blacks on Racist Rampage at Wisconsin State Fair” [...]
JoeS: I read a lot of your posts on AT and agreed with them all. I’ve been kicked off about 5 times, and they eventually opened my account up again. I was kicked off last during the “Blacks Are Not Responsible for Obama” article, where one of their disingenuous white (or Jewish) editors sounded off against whites who want to “talk straight.” Over the past month they’ve gotten much stricter with their comments. The latest on the Wisconsin Mob had only 17 comments (I’m sure 50–60 were moderated out of existence, I know at least 4 of mine were never posted). Also, I’ve noticed that ANY criticism of their beloved Col. Allen (George Washington) West gets moderated, even if it’s just the normal political criticism.) Anyway, I look forward to seeing you back on again. It’s helpful to have a tag team effort. Lots of unwashed whites over there!
Annie: Our problem really isn’t with any other race of people. They are who they are and they are NEVER going to change, nor should they. They should just not be allowed to live amongst us. Our true battle is with whites for their minds. I believe other races act in a healthy manner in wishing to advance their cultures, races, and interests over others. It’s natural. White as a group, though, are sick. They’ve been damaged by 50–60 years of psychological warfare and WILL NOT stick up for themselves or their children. They are the ones we must go after. We can do this without the name calling, but whites are just going to have to suffer some more, that’s all.
nikcrit said:
Unamusement responded:
The fact is that jsonline.com didn’t hide the fact that the perps were black; in fact, they focused on the fact — re. the july 4 reservoir-park attacks AND these more recent State Fair attacks; along with reporting the racial element in the initial reporting (in the lede and in the nut graphs), they’ve had regular and guest editorials re. the racial elements; racial side-stories featuring quotes from eye-witnessess discussing the racial composite and dialogue of the incidents; peripherally related blog coverage by reporters discussing the racial elements; quotes from local politicos discussing the distinctly racial elements of the melee, etc.
I live in the city, not too far from where the July 4 incidents took place; for me, it’s sad enough to see people whose heritage I share (or half-share?) acting-out in such a shamefully vicious and disheartening way; that alone is self-indicting of ‘my’ community; and it’s right-on to point out the slovenly media coverage re. the racial composition of these attacks, when many poor, civil-behaving blacks (who are the majority of blacks, btw) who have to live beside these thugs 24-7 would be the first to admit the evident truth behind these matters.
So then why the attempts to constantly imply that the MSM is trying to suppress the ethnic-demographics of the event in this case? It’s bad enough as it is; and it’s bad that much of the media DID suppress the truth. But when that’s not the case — AND THE EVIDENCE WITHIN THE VERY LINKS YOU PROVIDE PROVES AS MUCH — then why persist? I think you’ve already succeeded in making the points you feel need to be taken. No need to make stuff up while in the process of ‘piling it on.’
nikcrit, you haven’t got a leg to stand on.
Point #1: when I reported on the July 3 attacks in Milwaukee, in this post, I never claimed the media censored race (in fact, I wrote “You can read more about the incident in the news”), and neither did any of the commenters. You were wrong when you said
Point #2: when I reported on these attacks in Milwaukee, I also did not claim the media censored race. Rather, I said that the black rioters “[knew] that their predictable monkeyshines would be ignored by the mainstream media,” a prediction (by them) which mostly came true. (For comparison, imagine the months of universal front-page headlines if this were a white-on-black attack.) I followed up with: “Amazingly, the mainstream media were unable to fully suppress the ‘race angle’…”
Point #3: you’ve accused me of “overheated rhetoric” about a “conspiracy.” As I’ve pointed out, (a) it’s not really a conspiracy, since the media have been quite open about the censorship recently (see my coverage of the Chicago Tribune), and (b) it isn’t “overheated rhetoric,” because the media provably and admittedly censor race.
Now you’ve managed to find two recent cases where some media outlets didn’t, where they were forced to report the “race angle,” and guess what? I never denied it. Don’t know what you’ve been reading… What I deny is that this refutes (a) or (b) above. What we have here, in the Milwaukee coverage, are either exceptions to a still-standing general rule (i.e., generalization, statistical truth), or indications that the tide is starting to turn in favor of white people.
“So then why the attempts to constantly imply that the MSM is trying to suppress the ethnic-demographics of the event in this case?” Well, because the mainstream media are trying to suppress the demographics of flash mobs. They just don’t succeed 100 percent of the time. That’s when black people start complaining about “racism.”
No, I haven’t yet succeeded in making the points that need to be made. I know this because black flash mobs aren’t being gunned down in the streets by civic-minded white folk. And the only one “making stuff up” is you.
I didn’t say it refutes your points; in fact, I noted and commended your and other instances in which MSM went out of its way to NOT censor the racial element.
I just noted that some MSM is actually (and justifiably) not only ‘noting’ it; they’re making it a specific feature (editorials; guest editorials; etc.) while a few implied it was being suppressed.
I generally agree; I’m just frustrated. Nothing I really disagree with, though I wish there was.
I guess I can’t expect nuance and an extending of the benefit-of-the-doubt at a time when folks are understandably infuriated.
Ok. I stand corrected; having looked closer, there were three instances I overlooked in making general claims and gripes; furthermore, I think I did in fact conflate some post text and comments from this thread with some of that from the “Race & Crime in Wisconsin” thread.
I guess I’m just feeling somewhat rattled and compelled to put a word in for the many-upon-many “NAMs” who are equally disturbed by this behavior; they’re really not spoken for on blogs like these.
Perhaps it doesn’t ultimately make sense for a “NAM” to come to these venting/bonding-type pro-Euro sites (which I concede have their place and purpose) but to more dispassionate blogs that advance HBD theories.
Any suggestions?
I think there’s certainly room for a non-white perspective on the attacks, here and elsewhere in the “pro-Euro” (or whatever) ‘Sphere. Our anger (I think it’s clear) is directed, not at black people (or NAMs) in general, but at the media and the people actually forming these mobs. Therefore I think it is entirely justified.
Compare: none of us are celebrating the recent racially motivated white-on-black murder in Mississippi. Why? Because we’re not pleased about it, because the victim wasn’t a black thug (plus it just makes white activism more difficult). (Incidentally, many important black “activists” and “leaders” openly celebrate black-on-white violence, including murder, as if it were social justice. Score one for the “white supremacists,” in the human decency competition.)
That said, we (white people) are in this mess essentially because, in recent decades, we’ve been much too concerned with the opinions of the disturbed NAMs you mentioned — concerned with hurting their feelings, with “reflecting poorly” on their community, or just with getting their input because they happen to belong to the same race as the problem people. It’s time we stopped affording them undue importance (not to be confused with “any attention at all”).
This is, first and foremost, a matter of white self-defense against black aggression. Black people not involved in the aggression are hardly involved in the issue at all. (Black aggression against black people, or people in general, is a separate issue.) I mean, it would be nice if they could get the thugs (or at least their anti-white aggression) under control themselves, but that’s clearly not going to happen.
Yes, but a lot of the talk and invective on these sites don’t distinguish between ‘those blacks’ and ‘all blacks’; now, I understand that’s neither your obligation or concern, but the difference between those ‘those’ and ‘all’ in this case is not negligible; the great majority of blacks, regardless of class or geographic place, are civil and would never engage in these wilding shite, nor would they silently condone or revel in them, as you AT TIMES seem to imply. I’m just trying to speak for that contingent; and i’m not presuming any moral higher-ground in the process, etc.
This gets into my other point: in fact, those civil blacks are involved; they comprise the vast majority of victims of the kind of blacks comprising these flash mobs of late. Again, that’s neither your immediate concern or obligation; and, again, I merely noted as much to speak for that under-repped contingent — again, without presuming any moral right or ground to do as much…
I really do think it’s not so much what i’m saying, but that this isn’t the appropriate place. I agree that whites get a lot of unwarranted sanctimony thrown in their faces on this issue and I really don’t seek to add any. But I would like to find a site where NAM input is appropriate, which I don’t think is the case at this and other pro-white sites in which bonding and venting is as much part of the appeal as is objective and detached discussion of the issues. I don’t mind the former; just don’t think it makes sense for NAMs to engage at such venues.
Again, any forthcoming suggestions for other, perhaps more appropriate sites would be appreciated.
I don’t believe that blacks are the majority, let alone the vast majority, of the victims of flash mob thugs. Certainly not victims of the flash mobs, and furthermore black violent criminals in general are more likely to attack whites than blacks (“The Color of Crime,” 2005).
I remain unconvinced that “the great majority of blacks, regardless of class… are civil and would never engage” in this kind of behavior. I have learned not to overestimate the civility of the black underclass.
I agree that obsessing over whether or not some reader might misinterpret a statement about flash mobs for a statement about all black people is not an obligation nor a concern of ours. A careful reading will reveal the truth.
The site you’re looking for — where white people discuss their genocide in an objective and detached manner, and are especially interested in hearing minorities explain that (a) “not all black people are like that,” and furthermore (b) they’re quite upset to see white people talking about race without ending every goddamn sentence with that mantra — does not exist.
Perhaps. But blacks are the clear majority victims of ‘black thugs’, who generally make-up these flash mobs. (none of which reduces the white victims, umm ….. victimization.)
This makes me tend to believe that, unlike myself, you probably haven’t spent extended time in black lower-class or lower-middle-class environs (your loss, right?). Perhaps you won’t believe this, but it’s not some perpetual primal dystopia, as is easy to presume from a mediated distance; e.g., while there’s plenty of disproportionate dysfunction, the majority of people work an assortment of lower-paying state or civil-service jobs; blue-collar industrial shifts, etc. Most lower-class black folk i see on day-in, day-out basis via work are barely cognitive of white people and are entirely apolitical and display little if any racial ideology; (if they do, it’s channeled through the likes of Oprah Winfrey or Judge Joe Martin (or whatever his name is) or Wendy Williams or some other daytime-television sage.)
Not what I’m looking for, nor did I ask for as much.
It’s either getting real late or I’m realizing that I’m wasting my time.
Good night!
I don’t believe you when you declare that “blacks are the clear majority victims of ‘black thugs’,” just like I didn’t believe that “civil blacks… comprise the vast majority of victims of the kind of blacks comprising these flash mobs of late.”
Again, crime stats show that black violent criminals (“thugs”) are more likely to attack white people than black people, i.e. they have more white victims than black victims.
Blacks circle the wagons when black criminals are criticized. The families of black mass-murderers call them “good boys”. When a black has the temerity to criticize bad acts or dysfunctional culture, other blacks instantly denounce him as an “Uncle Tom” (e.g. Bill Cosby).
You mean “cognizant, aware.
Using fancy words without understanding to effect a pretense of sophistication shows a lack of cognitive ability.
Don’t you mean “to AFFECT a SUFFIX of sophistication?”
[... no.]
Seriously? True enough, I guess; but a week watching crime shows and cable-news reports and I’d bet you find that families of all races often display misguided support of notorious family members; that’s even understandable to some degree as they’re less than objective… As for “Uncle Tom?” Honestly speaking, I haven’t heard a black person use that term outside of quotation for over ten years. The heart of Cosby’s worthy criticisms involved being pro-active and showing self-reliance.
You commenters here are drawing from real-life — but they’re nonetheless caricatures and vituperatively drawn.
Really? I hear the left (black persons, of course; it would be ray-cist for a white person to say so) call conservative blacks Uncle Toms all the time. Uncle Ruckus, “Uncle Tom,” all those degrading names reserved for black conservative people.
Ex-TSA Agent Pleads Guilty in Assault on Elderly Somali Man
Just applying his TSA skills of racial profiling after work hours…
It’s real simple: wherever there are blacks, there is trouble.