The SPLC’s crusade against white rights: examples
Jul 21st, 2011 by Unamused
Yesterday I explained that the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) seeks to undermine white racial consciousness; that is, to deny the white race its positive identity, to fabricate a negative identity for it, and thus to discourage white people from identifying as white. The SPLC must therefore be considered anti-white. Their tactics include exaggerating white hate crimes against blacks, Hispanics and Muslims, and ignoring hate crimes against whites. The latter should be considered censorship, since the SPLC is widely considered to be the pre-eminent authority on hate crime in the United States of America.
Today we will look at examples of those tactics.
Hate incidents
The SPLC maintains a list of so-called hate incidents:
Incidents of apparent hate crimes and hate group activities listed here are drawn primarily from media sources. These incidents include only a fraction of the approximately 191,000 reported and unreported hate crimes that a 2005 government report estimated occur annually.
An aside on the government’s hate crime statistics: the New Century Foundation’s definitive study of race and crime in the USA, the second edition of “The Color of Crime” (2005), discusses the FBI’s annual “Hate Crime Statistics” report. It found that
- local officials decide which crimes are hate crimes
- only 0.3 percent of inter-racial crimes reported to the police are considered to be motivated, even “in part,” by racial bias
- in 2002, only 2,168 of the 5,738 so-called hate crimes were violent — insignificant next to the average 1.68 million violent inter-racial crimes committed annually from 2001 to 2003, the vast majority committed by blacks against whites
- Hispanics are a victim category but not a perpetrator category, which may be why the FBI reported that in 2002, 130 “whites” committed racially motivated anti-white hate crimes
- of the six hate crime murders committed in 2002 (three “white”-on-black, one “white”-on-Hispanic, one Indian-on-”white” and one black-on-Hispanic), only three appear to have been racially motivated: one white-on-black, one black-on-Hispanic and one Hispanic-on-black, the latter reported as “white”-on-black
These facts call into question all government hate crime statistics.
The SPLC claims its own list is “drawn primarily from media sources.” In fact, the list is clearly and spectacularly biased against whites. To prove this, I chose at random, from the website of the Council of Conservative Citizens (which, incidentally, the SPLC considers a “hate group”), four violent crimes satisfying the following conditions:
- the perpetrators were non-white and the victims were white
- the crime was clearly motivated, at least in part, by racial bias, making it a hate crime by definition
- the crime was reported by the mainstream media to the extent that a Google search turned up multiple stories
Then I looked up those incidents in the SPLC’s list. This is what I found.
Example 1
On August 18, 2009, in Buffalo, NY, a group of 10–15 black men brutally attacked a white man, Brian Milligan, for dating a black woman. They beat him with pieces of concrete, inflicting damage to his brain, and kicked him in the face, breaking his jaw. Sources: True Crime Report and CNN Justice.
Brian Milligan: victim of anti-white hate crime.
The SPLC did not include this hate crime on their list. However, they did elect to include two incidents from the previous week:
Abilene, TX
Leaflets from the United White Knights of the Ku Klux Klan were left in yards.
Type: Leafletting
Reported: 08/16/2009Shreveport, LA
Three juveniles were arrested for vandalizing a park with racist remarks.
Type: Legal Developments
Reported: 08/13/2009
They also included these incidents in Buffalo:
Buffalo, NY
Dozens of swastikas were painted on a house.
Type: Vandalism
Reported: 07/13/2010Buffalo, NY
A woman was stabbed in the eye by another woman shouting with anti-gay taunts outside a lesbian bar.
Type: Assault
Reported: 01/01/2010
Example 2
In late 2009, in Denver, CO, police arrested 38 blacks for racially motivated assaults against whites and Hispanics. According to the Denver Post,
Police Chief Gerry Whitman said it was perhaps the largest racially motivated crime spree in the city’s history.
Sources: the Denver Post and NBC.
Left: Ashley Celestine (17), charged with aggravated robbery and first-degree assault for knocking out a 25-year-old man from behind and stealing his cell phone. Right: Kavean McCloud (17), charged with first-degree assault and conspiracy to commit first-degree assault for fracturing a 24-year-old man's skull.
The SPLC included these hate crimes on their list as a single entry about only one of the 38 blacks arrested, without any mention of the races involved:
Denver, CO
A juvenile was arrested on charges of aggravated robbery, aggravated assault and bias-motivated crimes in connection with 26 racially motivated assaults in the downtown area.
Type: Legal Developments
Reported: 11/23/2009
The incident (an arrest for 26 hate crimes) is classified as a “legal development” — not an assault, like the following entry about what is clearly a legal development in a case involving a homeless man shouting insults at a black woman:
Boulder, CO
William Bagosy, 49, pled guilty to third- degree assault and was sentenced to 78 days in jail for shouting racial slurs at a black woman outside a homeless shelter in November.
Type: Assault
Reported: 01/27/2009
Almost everything else about this entry is also wrong. Bagosy actually pled guilty to misdemeanor harassment in June 2008, for shouting racial slurs outside a homeless shelter in May of that year. His motive: a lack of hot dog buns. He was sentenced to 60 days in jail after violating a condition of his unsupervised probation; specifically, going back to the convenience store that ran out of hot dog buns. Then Bagosy was arrested in November for sexually assaulting a homeless woman. There was no apparent racial motive. He pled guilty to misdemeanor third-degree assault and was sentenced to 78 days in jail. It took me all of two Google searches to find this information, demonstrating that the SPLC’s researchers are lazy and incompetent, if not dishonest.
In general, whenever the victims are black, the SPLC includes that information:
Denver, CO
High school students chanted racial slurs and derogatory terms at visiting black basketball players during a game.
Type: Intimidation
Reported: 02/11/2009
The “racial slurs and derogatory terms” used in this “intimidation,” according to the Denver Post: “marshmallow,” “buckwheat” and “shrimp boat.”
Example 3
On May 25, 2010, in Seattle, WA, a white man, Shane McClellan, was held hostage and tortured for hours by a black man and an Asian man, simply because he was white. They beat him, robbed him, whipped him with his own belt, threatened him with a gun and a knife, burned him with cigarettes, and urinated on him.
Sources: the West Seattle Herald, the Herald again, the Seattle Times, Sound Politics, KOMO, Seattle pi, ABC, and WorldNetDaily.
Shane McClellan: victim of anti-white hate crime.
The SPLC included this hate crime in their list, but claimed the perpetrators only beat their victim, and classified it as an act of vandalism:
Seattle, WA
A black man and an Asian man beat a 16-year-old boy for being white.
Type: Vandalism
Reported: 05/30/2010
I find it difficult to believe this entry isn’t the SPLC’s idea of a joke.
Example 4
On August 14, 2010, in Des Moines, IA, 30 to 40 black youths roamed the Iowa State Fairgrounds attacking whites at random, an event they called “Beat Whitey Night.” Sources: The Smoking Gun, the Examiner, NBC (with video), and KSDK (accompanied by a picture of a white fist next to the word “Racism”).
Black violence marred the 2010 Iowa State Fair, culminating in "Beat Whitey Night."
The SPLC did not include this hate crime in their list. In fact, they included only one “hate crime” committed in Des Moines in 2010, an act of vandalism — actual vandalism this time, not hours of racially motivated torture:
Des Moines, IA
Vandals painted a swastika and the letters “KKK” on a man’s truck.
Type: Vandalism
Reported: 07/21/2010
Conclusion
Let me emphasize that I chose the four examples of anti-white hate crime at random from the Council of Conservative Citizens’ website and without first checking the SPLC’s (lack of) coverage. Nevertheless, I achieved a 100 percent success rate in identifying anti-white bias. Thus, with very little effort, I have demonstrated that the SPLC ignores, censors, understates, incorrectly classifies (to the point of absurdity), and omits critical details from hate crimes against whites, while overstating hate crimes against other groups. Therefore, the SPLC must itself be considered a racist organization: a hate group.
But they mean well, don’t they?
These pricks have been a thorn in the side of all normal thinking peoples for decades. They have one goal and that is socialism. They don’t care how many people die as long as they get their way. Bunch of sociopaths.
Sorry for the shameless promotion here, but I just posted the below link, speaking of Hispanics being a victim but not a perp. Here in Texas, they released the top 10 most wanted list, 7 of the 10 are “white.” By white, they mean EVERY ONE is Hispanic. ALL TEN.
Now, this doesn’t skew the crime stats at all right?
Also, I got into a debate with a liberal who literally told me “what white culture? There is no white culture”. He called me a racist of course, and I told him the biggest racists of all are those who deny a race of people and culture even exist.
http://oneradical.wordpress.com/2011/07/21/texas-top-10-most-wanted-fugitives/
[Well worth checking out. -Unamused]
Thanks for posting this.
[Yw Aoirthoir. You are totally cool! Everyone Aoirthoir Rocks! -Unamused]
NOTE: The previous statement about Aoirthoir was not actually written by Unamused :D
[Yes it was! -Unaschmoozed]
I think alot of people know that the SPLC is a crock. But it is above criticism, because it is racist to disagree with them. It’s not enough to have “the truth” on your side, other people have to be willing to hear it without enduring these wild accusations.
“In 1971, Morris Dees (Morris Seligman Dees, Jr) and Joseph J. Levin Jr. founded the SPLC as a civil rights law firm based in Montgomery, Alabama. Civil rights leader Julian Bond soon joined Dees and Levin and served as president of the board between 1971 and 1979.”
What flavia said..sic em girl.
Unamused..keep going. You’ll eventually get there.
I thought I was hard to shock… I have no words.
Thank you again, Unamused. You’re doing important work, and by its nature it must be painful and isolating, quite apart from the time commitment. I still have a hard time, emotionally, accepting that there are so many people who are willing to systematically lie. I assume that most people are basically good, that they want the common good. I guess that’s just foolish, though, in light of what you’ve been uncovering.
In defamation law, the “actual malice” standard is “knowing falsehood or reckless disregard for the truth.” (This is relevant for determining whether defamatory speech is protected.) It’s chilling to realize that many prominent people live in a constant state of actual malice against me and my family – that if I were beaten to death for racial reasons, it would be “vandalism,” if national civil rights institutions deigned to acknowledge it at all.
“I still have a hard time, emotionally, accepting that there are so many people who are willing to systematically lie. I assume that most people are basically good, that they want the common good. I guess that’s just foolish, though, in light of what you’ve been uncovering.”
This sums up why, in a nutshell, despite my being a great fan of Unamusement Park, I have to take periodic multi-day breaks from his site. It’s extremely important to know the truth. It’s also, however, extremely important not to get so depressed by the truth that you just want to get it over with and kill yourself.
“I still have a hard time, emotionally, accepting that there are so many people who are willing to systematically lie. I assume that most people are basically good, that they want the common good. I guess that’s just foolish, though, in light of what you’ve been uncovering.”
I don’t normally quote holy scripture, but “for the love of money is the root of evil”, or something like that. There’s much money to be made by screwing white people. The SPLC and other pro-minority, anti-white groups are nothing but shakedown artists. The average imbecile in this country believes that because whites are the “privileged” majority, they cannot be victims of hate crimes, discrimination, etc. When a white makes accusation of hate perpetrated against him, he gets laughed at, because only minorities can be victims.
There’s no money in fighting for white rights because that’s racist. By perpetually labeling minorities as victims of hate and discrimination, said minorities believe it, as do most SWPSs (stupid white people syndrome; the same white people who are victims of black violence or whose daughter is killed in S. Africa that forgive black behavior). As long as they can portray whites as evil oppressors and convince minorities they are victims of white oppression, this shit will continue. The SPLC is one of the most evil groups in America.
Update: the strange case of William Bagosy, the homeless racist.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KLyjR6GfEAU
[Interesting anti-Semitic video, but you forgot the part where you provide an argument to back up your beliefs. By the way, I'm ethnically half-Jewish.]
[...] The SPLC’s crusade against white rights: examples [...]
The comments on the Bagosy article are must-read, by the way, if you want a feel for how Boulder (doesn’t) deal with The Hooooomeless. In my opinion the bums make the southwest/University Hill region uninhabitable for decent folk.
“It’s also, however, extremely important not to get so depressed by the truth that you just want to get it over with and kill yourself.”
Get yourself a copy of “The Original Argument” edited by Glen Beck. The introduction by the author (or preamble or whatever) brought tears to my eyes and choked me up. It’s one of MANY MANY reminders that the Gods placed in us goodness. So I balance the hurtful things I read about men of ill repute, with reading things about good men.
“The SPLC and other pro-minority, anti-white groups are nothing but shakedown artists.”
They aren’t actually pro-minority. If they were they would not strip rights away from human beings. Minorities are indeed getting more money thrown at them, but it is all a waste. The facts are that they’re worse off now than they were before the “pro-minority” criminals started thefting them up their freedoms while CLAIMING to give them more freedoms.
“Update: the strange case of William Bagosy, the homeless racist.”
It seems though that he’s not just facing charges because of using slurs, but that he’s got a record and appears to be violent in his own right. Certainly aggressive and invasive of persons bodies. I’d have to see his record to know more but if he’s done what they claim he did I don’t see him as a victim here.
BTW I used to live in Boulder. I lived in Johnstown? Jonestown?(I was a little kid) when Mork and Mindy came out. I went to school that next day in a suit worn completely backwards.
looks like its not even just whites the splc disgraces: this is very explosive: http://www.finalcall.com/artman/publish/Perspectives_1/article_8007.shtml
Jug O` Punch wrote:
“These pricks have been a thorn in the side of all normal thinking peoples for decades. They have one goal and that is socialism. ”
I am a socialist.
I am a tree hugging liberal, happy go lucky guy who happens to be leaning heavily to the left and also happens to be white.
And now, scared for my safety.
Please do NOT involve “socialism” in black yoofs beating up white people.
Thank You.
So have you tried to contact the SPLC and similar organizations and requested a response? It could be interesting.
“Please do NOT involve “socialism” in black yoofs beating up white people.”
Jug O’ Punch didn’t. Jug O’ Punch was talking about the SPLC, not blacks beating up whites. Considering the types of organizations they keep labeling as hate groups, it’s little surprise that Jug O’ Punch would perceive them to have a socialist agenda.
Maybe [choke] there’s good socialism. When socialism allows for me to voluntarily opt-out, or more specifically becomes opt-in only, then I might believe it’s got some mettle behind it worth listening to. But as long as it continues to theft my natural law rights as a freeborn sovereign, I’ll personally object to it.
Aaron, I left a comment on their Hatewatch blog. They deleted it.
I encourage all readers to spread my hatred far and wide across the Internet. The most effective recruiting tool for race realism is, of course, meeting black people, but Unamusement Park is pretty good too.
[...] Unamused: “Nazis versus blacks“, “The SPLC’s crusade against white rights: examples“ [...]
Excellent commentary as usual.
[...] Versus Blacks“, “The SPLC’s Crusade Against White Rights: Theory“, “The SPLC’s Crusade Against White Rights: Examples“, “Finally, Some Good News“, “Gay Man Stops Black Thugs with the Power of [...]
[...] [...]
You are probably aware that SPLC now declared the main men’s rights web sites hate groups. Any comment? How do you relate these two facts?
I encourage all readers to spread my hatred far and wide across the Internet.
We all hate crime and just because a disproportionate of blacks are criminals it does not mean that we irrationally hate blacks.
hey Human-Stupidity, sup
well i dunno if they’re actually calling them “hate groups” but they’ve certainly jumped the crazy-shark on this
i think they know their credibility is already shot with all reasonable, informed people, so there’s really no longer any reason to control themselves or pretend to be unbiased
PS blogroll’d