Nazis versus blacks
Jul 17th, 2011 by Unamused
No, it’s not a new show on the Discovery Channel. (Although if it were, I’d watch the shit out of it.) Over at Chimpout, my new favorite source for videos of black people going crazy for no good reason (or “chimping out,” if you will), I found a marvelous clip (from a TV show called “Most Shocking: Wild Riots 2″) by its promising title, “Nazis marching in a black neighborhood.”
“White power!”
VOICEOVER: Toledo, Ohio. Members of the American Nazi Party gather in a black neighborhood to protest hate crimes against whites.
NAZI: White power!
Actually, it was the National Socialist Movement, not the American Nazi Party, that marched in Toledo on October 15, 2005.
Anyway, that certainly sounds like a valid reason to gather in a black neighborhood: the vast majority of inter-racial crimes are committed by blacks against whites, and they are often racially motivated (i.e., hate crimes). Very recent examples include the Carter Strange lynching in Columbia, SC; the black mob violence in Milwaukee, WI; and the Independence Day stabbing death of a white man in Baltimore, MD.
The designated bad guys.
The mainstream media choose to ignore black-on-white hate crimes and censor race whenever it makes black people look bad, which is most of the time (see this post, this post, this series, and this series). The American Nazi Party National Socialist Movement has noticed this, of course, but lately ordinary white people are noticing it too.
For the record, the “core beliefs” of the National Socialist Movement include “defending the rights of white people everywhere, preservation of our European culture and heritage, strengthening family values, economic self-sufficiency, and reform of illegal immigration policies, immediate withdrawal of our national military from an illegal Middle Eastern occupation and promotion of white separation.” Their “primary driving ‘reason for being’” is to attain the “14 words”: “We must secure the existence of our people and a future for White children.”
The American Nazi Party is considerably nicer than the National Socialist Movement. They are the cuddly Nazis. Their primary goal is also to attain the 14 words. Their position on Jews and other non-Aryans is as follows: “The ‘small jew,’ who works for a living like everyone else, and has no [more] ‘say’ over the current situation, than you or I — has nothing to fear from National Socialism. Neither does ANY non-Aryan. [National Socialism] stands FOR [separation], self-determination and autonomy for ALL the peoples of the world. Only those who would do harm to the Aryan Folk, are our enemies.”
Toledo’s finest
VOICEOVER: Police can’t prevent the legal demonstration…
It goes without saying that the police, the blacks, the host, the audience, and the rest of the country want to deny the ANP NSM its First Amendment rights.
The cops are here to protect a group of oppressed people from a group of violent racists. Unfortunately, there is some confusion over which group is which.
As the Clash said: “You have the right to free speech, as long as you’re not dumb enough to actually try it.”
…so they stand by, hoping to dissuade violence.
They tried that in Atlanta. It didn’t work.
They tried it in Baltimore. It didn’t work.
They tried it in Charlotte. It didn’t work. (They’re going to try it again for the 2012 Democratic National Convention.)
They tried it in Miami. It didn’t work.
They tried it in Milwaukee. It didn’t work.
They tried it in Myrtle Beach. It didn’t work.
So how did it go in Toledo?
It doesn’t work.
No way! Well, now they’re trying it in Indianapolis for the Black Expo. Let’s see how that goes.
Blacks get upset, riot; few surprised
Locals swarm the scene, and immediately target the cops who stand in their way.
We’re supposed to believe the blacks only targeted the cops because they were standing between them and the Nazis. Unfortunately, blacks don’t need a reason to kill cops.
The designated victims: helpless, innocent blacks.
It gets worse.
Rocks and bottles are hurled at cruisers. Their windows get smashed. Even medical personnel come under attack by the violent mob.
One fleeing vehicle nearly runs down a kid as it races to safety.
The kid was white. He’s just lucky he wasn’t hit by blacks.
A surprising turn of events. Take that, racist ambulance! Oops, don't get run over by the cops as you're chasing them away.
It gets worse again.
The rioters are held off, but they quickly find new outlets for their rage.
Namely, destroying their own neighborhood.
A local store is targeted. The group breaks in, and is soon destroying everything in sight. A nearby tavern is also set ablaze.
How, exactly, does looting a store and burning a tavern in a black neighborhood stop the terrible crisis of American Nazi Party National Socialist Movement members protesting hate crimes against whites?
Take that, racist fence! Take that, racist store! Take that, racist shelves and food items! Take that, racist tavern! Ha HA!
I wonder if they grabbed any good loot while they were waging this brave battle against intolerance.
Toledo’s other finest
The police finally get reinforcements. It’s time to put an end to the lawlessness.
By this time, the Nazis are long gone. Apart from walking down the street shouting “white power”, thereby giving blacks an excuse to behave like savages, they play no role in this story. Note that whites do not behave this way (i.e., like wild animals from the jungle) when, for example, a black reverend speaking to high school students of both races devotes one quarter of his allotted time to “black power,” leading students to chant “black is back.” (Back from where? When did we get rid of them, and why did we let them return?)
Tear gas fills the air. The people retreat under the choking fumes.
Apparently this took place before police were barred from doing their jobs if their jobs happen to involve addressing black crime.
Tear gas: not quite as smooth as a pack of Newports.
I was surprised to learn that the Nazis won this engagement. Those sneaky Nazis.
The streets are eventually cleared, but authorities don’t consider this a victory. They know that this random chaos is exactly what the Nazis wanted.
I don’t think he realizes how right he is.
The Nazis’ secret plan: to show you how blacks behave
What the American Nazi Party National Socialist Movement wanted was to draw attention to black-on-white crime, which includes most attacks against police; and more generally, the proven violent nature of blacks, especially ghetto blacks, and especially in large numbers — that is, their propensity for creating “random chaos,” more often directed at whites than blacks. Black people themselves admit that you can’t put too many of them in the same place at the same time without someone getting killed.
What else did we learn? When a tiny pro-white group wants to march around and make some speeches about hate crimes against white people, the city has to deploy a small army of police to protect them from rampaging blacks — and it’s not enough. But remember: blacks are an oppressed minority, the constant victims of systemic white racism; besides, there’s no way they could possibly be more violent or criminal than white people, and you’re a Nazi for thinking it!
The residents may have felt justified in their anger, but it’s their neighborhood that ended up paying the price.
The neighborhood, sure — and the police and medical personnel who came under attack, and the mostly white taxpayers who will have to cover the damages, and of course the white victims of black hate crimes, who we didn’t get to hear about from the designated bad guys because the designated victims decided to attack the police and destroy their own neighborhood. The lesson is: when blacks “chimp out,” we all pay the price.
Open question
Here are the Nazis, history’s most terrible villains.
Marching Nazis.
More marching Nazis.
Here are the blacks, history’s most sympathetic victims.
Marching blacks.
More marching blacks.
Open question for discussion: who would you rather live next door to, and why?
Great coverage, I hadn’t heard this about this yet.
The short answer is that I’d live next to the Nazis. One, because they are white and two, because there is virtually no difference between the ANP and WN – most WN are national socialists.
I’ll give you some inside information. WN has existed in some form or another for 50 years. If any of the ANP were carrying weapons, I know and they know they’d be carried off to jail and the blacks would remain. They know what they are doing.
White separatism isn’t about American History X anymore. In any event, I can reason with a skinhead. You have to imagine how much discipline it took for them to walk into a black neighborhood and not get into stupid fights, to stay in formation, to avoid arrest, to go home safely. Groups like WN and ANP will get smarter, while the blacks and their handlers are becoming more unreasonable.
Can’t…stop…laughing! :-)
Seeing Nazis inspires great pride within my heart.
Your blog is becoming more and more stupid and stormfronty. It’s all well and good to acknowledge the biological deficiencies of blacks, but blacks running wild is a symptom of our main problem, not the problem itself. Similarly, some have started to use the ridiculous concept of “Black-run America”, as if black agency was what is ruining the white civilization. Hispanics are a bigger problem than blacks in America, because their numbers are growing rapidly, but of course they’re less entertaining to write about because they’re much less savage. Also, why do you give credence to a lost cause like Nazism?
Unamused,
Great post. I wouldn’t want to live next to either group, since I have Jewish blood the Nazis would sniff me out and send me to the camps. But I do take exception with describing them as “history’s most terrible villains” — I put the Communists in that bucket based on raw numbers killed alone (plus their ongoing ideology is still screwing up countries around the world — the Nazis, not so much).
[Unamused: Ditto on the Jew blood, Fake Herzog. Still, they claim they're okay with us "little (part-)Jews." And you're right about the commies — but try telling that to a leftist.]
Nazis are the Satan of globalist demonology. Wayward anti-egalitarian anti-globalists often wind up in the Nazi camp for the seem reason boys in small towns composed entirely (or so they think) of Christians like to listen to bands that put the devil on the cover of their record albums.
Superficial duopoly is a sign of deep monopoly. Satan replaced a hundred European gods just as National Socialism replaced traditionalism, paleolibertarianism, classical liberalism, Whiggery, Burkean conservatism, royalism, and political Catholicism.
Now, the anti-socialist right has to contend with the fact that popular culture thinks National Socialism is the oldest and therefore the most basic form of opposition to the egalitarian multikult globalist cathedral.
Goodbye nuance! Hello, Two Minute Hate!
“Your blog is becoming more … stormfronty”
No way. The WN sites of ill repute suffer from a bitter, loserish tone (though I don’t know if that applies to Stormfront, which I don’t read.) This blog, in contrast, is written with wit and verve.
Great post. I have no love for national socialists but I suppose they are better than chimps. Chimps can’t be house broken.
Thank you, PA.
To that, I would add that Unamused’s obvious point is that, bigoted or not, the neo-Nazis are, in word and in deed, less virulent than the media’s darling beloved brown mobs.
My favorite refrain during the 2008 campaign was, “Democrats are not as bad as Nazis”. My aim was to damn with faint praise.
The summer of 2011 is not the summer of love and apparently it’s not the autumn of 2008 either.
I wouldn’t want to live next to either group, since I have Jewish blood the Nazis would sniff me out and send me to the camps. – Fake Herzog
Well, now, the question was who would you rather live next to, not who would you rather have controlling the security forces. The neo-Nazis in that video haven’t sniffed anyone out or sent anyone to any camps.
I guess I haven’t really answered the question.
Being white, I’d rather live next to the neo-Nazis. If I had a name like “Howard Metzenbaum” my neighbors would shun me, just as in my actual neighborhood, my neighbors would shun me if they knew I was avidly pro-white, reactionary, etc. In neither case is there physical danger.
As to my opinions of neo-Nazis themselves, my main opinion is “WTF are they thinking? The guy who destroyed Poland and slaughtered millions of whites is pro-white? Did he ever prevent a single black-perpetrated hate crime? He thought Aryans were blond? Listened to the advice of a Grand Mufti on how to solve the Jewish Question?”
Put the fucker to bed, the sooner the better. He’s the biggest loser in history.
JL: I invite you to identify specific places where this blog has lapsed into stupidity and Stormfrontyness, as this is a concern of mine. If I have given credence to (contemporary) Nazism, I believe it is only by citing the official positions and aims of the American Nazi Party. My open question is just that: I do not have an answer for you.
To be clear: “Black-Run America” refers to America being run on behalf of blacks, not by blacks. It is certainly an exaggeration, but it has an important truth in it.
I agree with regard to Hispanics. However, this blog concentrates on black-white race relations.
PS I don’t think Stormfront would have me; I got that Jewish blood in me.
The guy who destroyed Poland and slaughtered millions of whites is pro-white?
The Allies slaughtered millions of whites as well.
Put the fucker to bed, the sooner the better. He’s the biggest loser in history.
Nobody would remember the biggest loser in history. It seems both the neo-Nazis and the anti-Nazis have prevented him from being a loser by keeping his memory alive.
[Note: this is a different "Aaron" from our frequent commenter.]
Thanks, a bit of light relief.
JL says: blacks running wild is a symptom of our main problem, not the problem itself.
Agreed, but we still have to convince the patient that he has a problem. We can only do that by describing the symptoms. And symptomatic treatment of a disease is a valid and necessary approach, too.
Who is more dangerous to blacks – nazis or chimps?
You decide.
The Allies slaughtered millions of whites as well.
An utterly worthless tu quoque, since noöne – neither the neo-Nazis nor the global-egalitarian thought cartel – claims that the Allies were pro-white. Both sides view Roosevelt and Churchill as being, more or less, Tim Wise in a top hat. Quite ahistorical but absolutely vital to the cartel’s control of the past.
Nobody would remember the biggest loser in history.
How about this: Noöne accurately remembers the biggest loser in history. I hear hyper-pro-German eccentrics online working themselves into a lather over FDR declaring war on Germany all the time, never mind that Hitler declared war on the US (revenge for his sinking our ships? revenge for us not intervening against him in Spain? revenge for the Ickes Plan? what?).
If people accurately remembered him, they would remember him as the guy who stole his economic policy from Czechs and his Jewish policy from Arabs (I’ve quoted Leftism Revisited enough times on the web, I don’t feel like pulling it off the shelf again). He took the greatest Army in history and lost to a bunch of reds who were stupid enough to follow a man who thought that, since they were both post-Marxist socialists who believed they could remake human nature with bureaucracy, Hitler must necessarily be his ally. (Anti-white whites take note: just because you’re multikult, left-wing, and pro-black does not mean blacks will treat you as allies.)
It seems both the neo-Nazis and the anti-Nazis have prevented him from being a loser by keeping his memory alive.
Eh, whatever. I meet someone who is serious about studying World War II, or rather, Europe 1918-1945, about once a decade. I meet people who get their feelings hurt by any recounting of the misdeeds of National Socialism without equal-time finger-shaking at the UK and the US about once a week. (Out of curiosity, why doesn’t criticism of Lenin, Stalin and Mao garner the same reaction? Are they supposed to be “more” or “less” socialistic than the National Socialists? I’m honestly curious.)
You’d think by now the sins of Churchill and Roosevelt would be old hat on the right side of the blogosphere. Apparently not. It doesn’t bother me that not everyone has read their share of Mencius Moldbug; what bothers me is that the tacit demand for equal-time condemnation of (dead) Britons and Americans is nothing more or less than egalitarianism. Blekh, egalitarian alt-rightists have the same flavor as chicken ice cream.
Vomit on Roosevelt all you want, but amount of tu quoque will erase the German inventions of city bombing, lethal gas warfare, unrestricted submarine warfare, or the Final Solution.
Ha, this post is hilarious. It is hilarious that it took the kindness of the Nazis to show America (through the few channels that reported it) the true savagery of the blacks.
Ignore the prissy haters. This is a good fruitful direction to touch upon once in a while. There are just as many lessons to be learned and good examples to be found in the unpopular parts of history (if not more) than in the spoon-fed white-washed (lol, that is literally true nowadays) history being tossed at us today.
I just wanted to amend to my previous post that I really meant that you should only touch upon this subject sparingly. This is not because I don’t agree with it. Rather it is because no-one has ever advanced their cause or won anything by following this path. Just look at stormfront: a sad circle-jerk of pathetic ineffective losers. Though this topic is rich in historical examples and still has its uses, I would use it sparingly and stick to your listed three main issues just like SBPDL sticks to exclusively talking about issues stemming from black people and nothing more.
[Note: this is a different "Aaron" from our frequent commenter.]
I can’t tell you how much I appreciate this, and how much I would like other Aaron to call himself something else or just modify his name.
/irrelevance
What’s exactly the point of calling oneself a Nazi nowadays ? If all the American Nazi Party is about is “securing the existence of our people and a future for White children”, then it’s White nationalist, period.
There are plenty of reasonable ways to argue about such an agenda, however distasteful it may be to the current PC ideology.
Why, then, the adolescent provocation of claiming the Nazi label ? Unless the ANP is about something more than just supporting the specific right of white people to exist. For instance, hostility towards Jews and Israel.
I’m not sure what a “small Jew” is, who gets to decide about the bigness of Jews, and what is supposed to happen to big Jews in the ANP book.
However, I know for a fact that the core of actual Nazism was that nothing whatsoever was permitted to stand in the way of what Nazis wanted for themselves, as history has shown. I’m sure I don’t need to elaborate on what that means exactly.
That’s definitely not a type of people you’d like to live next to.
Also, the ANP should make its mind about socialism. Real Nazis claimed to be national-socialists, but one of the main motivations of Hitler was fighting communism and socialism. On which side of the fence is the ANP standing?
Fighting the PC monster is difficult enough without taking neo-Nazis on board. Anyone calling himself a Nazi is an obvious liability and should be handled with a barge pole.
According to the ANP, the Jews that aren’t “small” are essentially whatever Jews are in positions of power and are anti-Aryan/anti-white. This is covered in some detail on their website. They claim that anyone not anti-Aryan has nothing to fear from them. Given that they openly call themselves Nazis, I see no reason to think they’re lying about their stance on non-Aryans.
An utterly worthless tu quoque, since noöne – neither the neo-Nazis nor the global-egalitarian thought cartel – claims that the Allies were pro-white.
Are you suggesting the Allies were worse, since they slaughtered millions of whites and weren’t pro-white?
I hear hyper-pro-German eccentrics online working themselves into a lather over FDR declaring war on Germany all the time, never mind that Hitler declared war on the US
I’m not a “hyper-pro-German eccentric.”
In any case I’m not sure why this matters. FDR wanted to join the war in Europe, and would have declared war on Germany had Hitler not declared war on the US.
I meet people who get their feelings hurt by any recounting of the misdeeds of National Socialism without equal-time finger-shaking at the UK and the US about once a week.
This just means you spend lots of time online. Most people aren’t like this or don’t express it publicly.
I didn’t get my feelings hurt by whatever you said.
I simply pointed out that because the neo-Nazis and anti-Nazis have kept his memory alive as a kind of mythological figure of good or evil, he has achieved a kind of mythological power that precludes him from being the biggest loser in history.
(Out of curiosity, why doesn’t criticism of Lenin, Stalin and Mao garner the same reaction? Are they supposed to be “more” or “less” socialistic than the National Socialists? I’m honestly curious.)
I’m not one of these “people who get their feelings hurt” that you apparently think I am, but I suppose this is for the same reason that criticism of capitalistic Imperial Japan doesn’t garner the same reaction as criticism of the US and UK.
It doesn’t bother me that not everyone has read their share of Mencius Moldbug; what bothers me is that the tacit demand for equal-time condemnation of (dead) Britons and Americans is nothing more or less than egalitarianism.
I’ve read basically all of Moldbug. I don’t why you bring him up other than as an appeal to authority.
As for egalitarianism, who said anything about “equal-time condemnation”? Pointing out that the Allies slaughtered millions of whites is simply pointing out a fact. Everyone acknowledges this fact. Most people don’t consider it an equal condemnation of the Allies – they don’t consider it a condemnation at all since they regard the fact as having been a good, just thing in the service of a particular end.
Vomit on Roosevelt all you want, but amount of to quoque will erase the German inventions of city bombing, lethal gas warfare, unrestricted submarine warfare, or the Final Solution.
Sure, just as it won’t erase the Allied firebombings, rapes, and negative political, cultural, social influences on Europe.
Olave d’Estienne,
I just want to amend my earlier response and say I agree with everything you said in your 7:25 PM comment. Nicely done.
I also got a chuckle out of the image of Churchill as “Tim Wise with a top hat.” One thing we do know for sure about Churchill is that he had some firm opinions about the wogs: “The qualities of mongrels are rarely admirable, and the mixture of the Arab and Negro types has produced a debased and cruel breed, more shocking because they are more intelligent than primitive savages” [from "The River War"].
Forget it, Aaron S., I’m too bored to continue. In a post about Nazis and blacks, you continually bring up the crimes of dead American whites and British whites. Your comments would be on-topic at Unqualified Reservations, but oh! for shame! mentioning Moldbug is an “appeal to authority”.
Vomit yourself silly for all I care.
“Vomit on Roosevelt all you want, but amount of to quoque will erase the German inventions of city bombing, lethal gas warfare, unrestricted submarine warfare, or the Final Solution.”
Of course, it was the British invention of disguising one’s warships as unarmed neutral merchant ships so as to ambush unsuspecting German U-boats that eventually forced Germany to invent unrestricted submarine warfare which in turn was intended to counter yet another British invention in the form of starving Germany’s civilian population into submission via naval blockade. The lesson here is that total war is loads of fun, especially when it comes to the icky business of assigning guilt after the fact.
hitler’s jewish soldiers
In a post about Nazis and blacks, you continually bring up the crimes of dead American whites and British whites.
I mentioned it once. You responded to it, so I replied to your response.
Your comments would be on-topic at Unqualified Reservations, but oh! for shame! mentioning Moldbug is an “appeal to authority”.
Mentioning Moldbug isn’t necessarily an appeal to authority. The way you mentioned him in your comment, however, did smack of an appeal to authority.
Just for the record, the British claim credit for innovating “area bombing” aka strategic bombing specifically intended for the purpose of breaking civilian morale through “dehousing.” Germans earlier bombed cities like Guernica and others in Poland, but those were tactical bombings were in support of advancing armies in the field.
http://www.fff.org/freedom/0995d.asp
Zeppelins with firecrackers aside, it was the British who claimed credit for bombing cities for the sole purpose of terrorizing civilian populations. Some earlier aerial attacks carried out by the Germans (e.g. Guernica, various cities in Poland) were tactical bombings in support of an advancing army in the field.
http://www.fff.org/freedom/0995d.asp
I think many of you are missing the point.
Nazis are the West’s personification of evil yet they maintained a sense of order. The blacks on the other hand are seen as the abused and downtrodden. The idea is to look at their behavior. Which group acted as animals?
I have very little in common with the Nazis but the question remains the same. Who would you rather live next to?
I would rather live next to a hard working man that hated my guts yet kept his yard and life in order than an animal who can barely control its basest desires.
Hate crime alert!! Wait, the victim is White, never mind.
Notice White people are not given the benefit of the doubt when victims of Black violence. Police try to prove the assailants were motivated by race, though when a White attacks a Black, the impetus is on the White to prove he WASN’T motivated by race.
http://oneradical.wordpress.com/2011/07/18/another-white-boy-beaten-down-for-being-white-no-hate-crime-charges/
I’d much rather live next to the Nazis. In an effort to show how non-Anti-Semitic they are, they would treat me very well. I bet I could even get them to mow my lawn, wash my car and protect my house from crime!
There is one problem, most neo-nazis I have seen/heard are little more than white trash. I mean the kind that if Hitler ever came back he’d be pretty damn ashamed of them and exile them to rake out horse stables.
carter strange was a lynching for sure. i would live next to nazis before black people. there’s always reasoning with a nazi. even if he disagrees he respects your right to free speech. you have to fight a black person for respect 9x out of 10.
Holy crap we’ve got 3 Aarons!
[Oh snap, you're right. I thought you were Aaron J. before.]
I’d like to – gently – put the brakes on any suggestion by any person that life under the Nazis was something that can be viewed in a positive light. From enslaving and murdering millions to destroying a national economy in order to wage a race war, the Nazis were a disaster. I am interested in what is being said in this space, but anybody who would want to live next to the white trash sociopaths is just as misguided as anybody who would want to live next to the ghetto chumps. More than anything else, what we need to do is sit up and pay attention to the individuals – regardless of race – who are committing the crimes, wrecking the neighborhoods, and destroying our culture. Race shouldn’t be a shield or an excuse.
Keith is right, except that blacks *do* commit most crimes.
The comments appear to be divided between people who read the question correctly, and answered “the Nazis”; and people who did not, and are outraged.
If we’re talking about Nazis back in the 30s and 40s, yes, I would rather live next to civilized Germans than anyone in a modern ghetto. At least the neighborhood would be nice and you wouldn’t get stabbed for your shoes.
“Race shouldn’t be a shield or an excuse.”
Keith, I don’t think very many people who expose the facts of black criminality are arguing black criminals should be shielded or excused because of those facts.
@keith i’m not saying i would live next to a gas chamber, but the above quote represents the american nazi party’s commitment to free speech. do you understand?
@ouroboros: at least you’re white, right?
muciusscaevola:
Yes I am white and mostly German in ancestry. I’m not sure what you are referring to, though.
I still think American Nazis and skinheads are goofy as hell. Sort of like the KKK. Both organizations are embarrassing.
Many people in the WN community believe that the NSDAP was a racist ideology rather than an ideology that recognized the right of all communities not hostile to Germany to have their own nationalism.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6QeiQh2SjQ4
Wait for the German Army recruiting poster.
Unfortunately, as interesting as European military history is, I think it’s one of those subjects that WNs will have to avoid bringing up at the dinner table among kin. It’s not just the obviously controversial 20th century wars either; I’ve seen Englishmen and Frenchman attack each other viciously over the Hundred Years’ War (though the English did invent the chevauchée ;) ). It’s great that these people feel so much pride in their country and history that they would be so passionate about the subject but it’s depressing watching Frenchmen and Englishmen behave so hatefully towards each other over a conflict that (at least in fact) ended 550 years ago while both parties’ countries are suffering from the same blight of leftist politicians importing droves of nonwhites.
[...] Even American Nazis, a group commonly reviled as hate-mongering and anti-American, is showing more restraint and consideration of law and order than the blacks that oppose them. [...]
Another Mischling checking in here. I have to state, despite my sympathies for sites like this one, that this choice is one of Douche or Turd.
Background: I basically fled my hometown Houston because of “Katrina”, that is, because of unRedeemed blacks fresh from the then-worst region of America. So when I see those guys with machetes pictured here, I see Haiti and I see Nawlins and I see… that 64 year old shot dead a block from my house by “teenagers.” (This was before we ever heard of “flash mobs.”)
But the Nazi pictures don’t make me feel any safer. Seems strange to have to say that, but… srsly gys, they’re not our pals. Sure they will be civil neighbours and maybe civil for some years. But I would have to worry that one night, my windows would be broken and my stuff set on fire and swastikas sprayed to my outside walls. Kristallnacht, boys and girls; you may have heard of it.
American Nazis are loser wannabes no doubt maybe that makes them more dangerous? the fact remains just from what we saw in the pictures, video, and read the Nazis behaved the blacks did not.
If Nazis act the way they did in the article there is no reason why they shouldn’t be the desired neighbor given the choice between the two.
I am sure few here agree with the Nazi ideology but it is the behavior that concerns me the most. Statistically everyone of us are safer living next to Nazis then we are living next to blacks even if you’re a Hasidic Jew.
Judea declares war on Germany.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EdhiHela0WU&feature=related
If the choice is between modern versions of these two groups, that is the so-called members of the ANP who behaved themselves as they protested black-on-white violence versus the raging out of control machete wielding Hutu’s (or whoever those blacks in the photo’s are), I would rather live next to the modern ANP types.
As for the assertion that “the Allies” killed millions of white people in WWII, if by Allies you include the Soviets, then I’ll buy that. If by Allies you mean only the Americans, Canadians, Australians, French & British, then sorry that is just B.S. What millions of white people? Where? In which country? Fire-bombing of Germany killed tens of thousands, not millions.
Sorry, that is just an a-historical falsehood.
I know less than some other commenters about World War II, but according to a 2009 Daily Mail article (cheerleading for the RAF), Lancaster bombers killed 600,000 people in German cities.
Unamused, unamused, uber alles……
This is required reader for every European. Unamused, I demand you read it. http://www.counter-currents.com/2011/02/dresden-a-real-holocaust/
yes ma’am
Article that contains many links to black crimes in Chicago by a man with very confused ideas about dating black females.
http://americangoy.blogspot.com/2011/07/black-people.html
I wonder what would happen if, say, business students were to riot over the presence of Marxist professors or Communist student organizations on campus? How would the PC establishment react? Anything the Nazis did the Communists did, and often worse. Yet out and out commies can indoctrinate students.
Another point: Muslims have, over the centuries, conquered European lands and enslaved millions of Europeans. And today, Muslims often kill Christians and Jews in Islamic countries. Does this mean that non-Muslims have a right to riot against Muslim student groups?
And again, how would the PC establishment react?
Just some random thoughts…
Take that, racist fence! Take that, racist store! Take that, racist shelves and food items! Take that, racist tavern! Ha HA!
Bawahahahahahaha!!!
Unamused, thanks for the great discussion. I love stuff like this because it puts a finger right on a tender nerve and lets us observe some pretty interesting reflex actions. I put a post up about it here.
The Toledo action was carried out by a nazi group called the
NSM-not the ANP:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_White_(neo-Nazi)#Intimidation_and_activism
Oh, thank you, icr. That has been corrected.
There are an awful lot of Nazis in the USA, apparently.
NSM, eh? This article might partially explain the U.S.’s blight of LARP Nazis.
http://www.lewrockwell.com/grigg/grigg-w119.html
[...] “Nazis versus blacks“, “The SPLC’s crusade against white rights: [...]
Roosevelt deserves condemnation whether he was white or not. He did more damage to America than Hitler ever did – http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/pearl/www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/fdr.html
[...] – “Nazis Versus Blacks“, “The SPLC’s Crusade Against White Rights: Theory“, “The [...]
This is a great site! The sarcasm here is hilarious.
[...] on his behalf, or on the White race’s more important rival, Asians. While I’ll give credit to Unamused for his good work on behalf of the White race, there is a tendency for this and [...]
[...] unamusementpark.com When I was reading I was surprised that Benno moved to Canada and didn’t stay in England [...]
You’re taking these guys at their word, which I’m not sure I do.
So: not the Nazis. Which is like saying I’d rather drink diarrheal dog stool than strychnine.
Valid point, SFG, but as I once said: “They claim that anyone not anti-Aryan has nothing to fear from them. Given that they openly call themselves Nazis, I see no reason to think they’re lying about their stance on non-Aryans.”