From Norway with (nonconsensual) love
May 30th, 2011 by Unamused
The word “racism” is now meaningless in Norwegian as well, reports a reader via email from the land of snipers and black metal. (What do you mean, I don’t have a thorough understanding of Norwegian history and culture?)
Norway!
Below is his translation of an article, “Chaudhry accuses FrP of racism,” from the Aftenposten (“Evening Post”), Norway’s largest newspaper. Note that the “FrP” is Norway’s “Progress Party,” which values individual rights, a free-market economy, small government, restricted immigration, and law and order. Since its inception, the FrP has resided on the political fringe because of its stance on immigration, i.e. its failure to recognize the wonderful, unspecified benefits of filling your country with the kind of people who build the kind of countries those same people are desperate to escape from. Since 2005, however, as Europe has begun to realize (and pay) the true cost of “diversity,” the FrP has flourished as Norway’s second largest party (currently the most popular among secondary school students).
[Subtitle:] Member of Parliament Akhtar Chaudhry (Socialist Left Party) accuses the Progress Party of racism after Per-Willy Amundsen said that Muslims have the lowest workforce participation rate.
“This borders on racism,” said Chaudhry to Dagsavisen.
Akhtar Chaudhry is a Pakistani immigrant and 4th Vice President of the Norwegian parliament.
Sniff sniff. "I think I smell some non-Dhimmis around here..."
He is also a whiny little bitch who seeks to undermine Norwegian values (like the separation of Church and State, women’s rights, and not stoning homosexuals) by shutting down debate and suppressing dissent with accusations of discrimination.
Chaudhry is distressed and concerned, and draws parallels to the growth of National Socialism in 1930s Germany. Amundsen’s comment is not in good taste.
Note the appeals to emotion: “distressed and concerned,” “not in good taste” — as if Chaudhry’s (fake) sense of propriety and (fake) distress define the limits of free speech.
“It’s completely borderline. [Note that completely almost racist is still not racist.] If you switch out ‘Muslims’ for ‘Jews’ in the criticism, you understand the importance of what is being said,” says Chaudhry.
He’s absolutely right: if you switch our “Muslims” for “Jews” in the criticism, and see that the result is a false statement, you will understand the importance of addressing Muslim immigration.
He is referring to Amundsen’s comment yesterday that Muslim immigrants have the lowest workforce participation rate. Minister of Labor Hanne Bjurstrøm (Labor Party), and Geir Bekkevold, political immigration speaker for the Christian Democratic Party, distanced themselves from the statement.
Cowards. Traitors.
Hardly in keeping with the proud Norwegian tradition of badassery.
Here’s why Amundsen is right, and also why he’s on Unamusement Park’s List of Cool Norwegians (along with Max Manus, Roald Amundsen (no relation?), all the Vikings, and of course anyone who reads this blog):
Amundsen is standing his ground and insists that he’s not racist.
“I disagree entirely. I am referring to public statistics. It’s clear that the immigrants in Norway with the lowest workforce participation rate are from countries in the Muslim world,” says Amundsen.
Amundsen is backed by the Central Bureau of Statistics. According to CBS, immigrants from Somalia have a workforce participation rate of 31.9 percent. In other words, almost seven of ten Somalians are unemployed. The next lowest countries on the list are Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Morocco, Turkey, Kosovo and Iran.
“The eight countries with the worst workforce participation rate are Muslim countries. That speaks for itself,” says Amundsen.
Remember: pattern recognition is racist.
Here is the article’s ending:
He also says: “Suck it, Chaudhry. If you and I had been born 70 years earlier, you’d be telling us how ‘distressed and concerned’ you are that I said Germans have the highest Holocaust participation rate. ‘It’s completely borderline! It’s not in good taste! Waaaaah!'”
At this point, Amundsen made an unprintably obscene gesture in the direction of Chaudhry’s seat in the Parliament Building, sang the national anthem with the voice of an angel and the raw power of a proud Norwegian muskox (bringing tears to this reporter’s eyes, and the eyes of every other true Norwegian within singing distance), performed a vigorous Norwegian folk dance, and declared the interview terminated.
Full disclosure: this reporter is now deeply and profoundly in love with Mr. Amundsen.
"And then he made us muck out his sheep. His proud Norwegian sheep."
Oh, wait. That’s my fantasy ending. Here is the actual ending:
He also says that Islam’s view of women is a hindrance to their employment.
News of Norway
From OzConservative to The Fourth Checkraise to Sofiastry (and also from Jewamongyou to Human Stupidity) to me to you: a video from Norwegian TV.
Norway is known for its news.
Yes, I follow the Norwegian news. Who doesn’t? (Google’s suggestion, based on my browser history: “Showing results for I hate all the Muslims and wish they would just go back to Johnny Arab land as soon as possible. Search instead for news of Norway.”)
FEMALE ANNOUNCER: In Oslo, all sexual assaults involving rape in the past year have been committed by males of non-Western background [meaning non-white]. This was the conclusion of a police report published today.
MALE ANNOUNCER: This means that in every single sexual assault in the last five years, where the rapist could be identified, he was a man of foreign origin [meaning non-white].
MALE REPORTER: The young girl we are about to meet was raped about two years ago. As she entered her apartment she was assaulted, and endured hours of threats, violence and rape by a [non-white] man unknown to her. She will be struggling with this experience for the rest of her life.
YOUNG GIRL: I have found it difficult to go out shopping on my own because I felt anxious. I was simply too afraid to go out the door, and had problems contacting and speaking to friends and family, and simply to live a normal life.
MALE REPORTER: In April, a few weeks ago four women were assaulted and raped on the same night [by non-white men]. None of the [non-white] perpetrators has yet been found.
Well, you can start with racial profiling. Call it “community policing” or something. Then round up all the young Muslim men for questioning.
Today Oslo police presented the total figures revealing how in the past year all sexual assault involving rape had been committed by men of non-Western background [meaning non-white].
FEMALE POLICE OFFICER: Many of the [non-white] perpetrators who commit these rapes on the edge of [white] society, often unemployed [i.e., too lazy to get a job; would rather live off white Norwegians’ tax dollars], arriving from traumatized countries [which, of course, excuses anything they do to their White oppressors — I mean, it’s not like it’s non-white people are the reason non-white countries are so “traumatized” (read: shitty).] In the past five years, it has often been asylum seekers.
“My country is mean to me! Waaaaah! Let me in to yours! I promise I won’t rape anyone! Waaaaah! Do you have welfare applications in Farsi? Waaaaah!”
MALE REPORTER: This girl was raped by a [non-white] man of Pakistani heritage. She is an ethnic Norwegian [i.e., white], as are almost all victims who are assaulted and then raped.
That sounds almost like discrimination.
YOUNG GIRL: He said that he had the right to do exactly as he wanted to a woman. [“Why?”] Because that is how it was in his religion. Women did not have rights or opinions. He was in charge.
Hey, who are we to judge?
Oh, right: we’re rational, moral human beings, whereas these people are objectively inferior savages. That’s who we are to judge.
FEMALE POLICE OFFICER: The way women are viewed [by non-whites] is at least one of the questions we have to ask in order to understand the motive of the [non-white] perpetrators. …
The motive, incidentally, is sex. It’s just that they’re not decent-enough people to suppress their animal instincts.
… It should not stand on its own, as a stigma [meaning we should never incorporate race and religion into police work, no matter what the cost to real Norwegians], but it is an element we must have the courage to address.
Well, you could start by (a) calling them what they are (Muslims, non-whites), and (b) not excusing them as “asylum seekers” from “traumatized countries.”
Your mission, should you choose to accept it
Here’s what I want you to do, you compassionate reactionaries: bring up this video in conversation. Real live conversation. Not on the Internet. You could wait until someone starts talking about Europe, or the Middle East, or immigration, or women (“speaking of which…”), or just start a conversation about it (“hey, did you know that…”).
"Hey kids, it's time to learn about Norwegian crime statistics!" "Sir, I'm going to have ask you to leave the playground."
After all, it’s just an interesting statistic you heard on the news. You don’t have to “defend” it. It’s not a political philosophy or a policy proposal — but see below.
Suppose you do bring it up, and someone says “so what?” Well, I tried having this conversation with myself, which is
- probably a sign of mental illness, and
- a good way to practice debating.
The following is a dialogue between a compassionate reactionary (CR) and a stupid, liberal, anti-white bigot (SLAWB), which I ranted to myself in real time, cleaned up, and annotated.
Warning: CR is compassionate, so he emphasizes the positive (crime prevention, women’s rights, preserving one’s culture), but of course he’s also a reactionary, so he probably goes much further than you’re comfortable with (outside the Internet). Consider him an upper bound on acceptable debate.
CR: Hey, so I saw this news report that says every rape in the capital of Norway in the last five years was by a non-White immigrant. Check it out.
SLAWB: So what?
CR: Excuse me? [I usually feign innocence and confusion after saying something provocative.]
SLAWB: What’s your point? We should just kick all the immigrants out of Norway?
CR: I didn’t make any suggestions for immigration policy. I just thought you’d like to known, ’cause you’re into, like, women’s rights and stuff. This is pretty much the number one way to identify rapists in Norway: they’re foreigners. Seems like women should be aware of that.
SLAWB: You can’t identify foreigners just by looking at them! How could you tell the difference between a Norwegian and a German?
CR: I wouldn’t be trying to tell the difference between a Norwegian and a German. [I try to shut down straw man arguments as quickly and directly as possible. “That’s not what we were talking about.”] If I were interested in avoiding rape, I would be trying to tell the difference between a Norwegian and a Turk. Or an Iranian. Or an Egyptian.
SLAWB: In other words, you want us to start using racial profiling to target Muslims!
CR: Oh, you’re saying all the rapists are Muslims? [If you deliberately avoid mentioning the problematic group you’re actually talking about, like Muslims in Europe or Blacks and Hispanics in the USA, it guarantees that your opponent will be the first to bring it up. Then it’s their idea, not yours, and you can just run with it, as follows.] Well, I guess that makes sense, considering what countries they come from.
Anyway, is this “racial profiling” anything like “sex profiling,” where you “target” men because they’re so much more likely to commit crime than women? Because that kind of profiling seems pretty reasonable: if one group of people is committing nearly all the crimes, then you should probably pay more attention to that group. Like men (sex profiling), young adults (age profiling), and Muslim immigrants (ethnic profiling). Or do you think we should be just as worried about an 80-year-old Norwegian grandmother committing rape, as we are about a 20-year-old Turkish man?
[Asking questions, even obviously rhetorical questions with only one sane answer, is weak: it gives your opponent the chance to answer you. That is why I never give anyone the chance to answer my rhetorical questions.] I don’t know about your idea of kicking them all out of the country, but maybe we could just deport the illegal immigrants and the ones with criminal records, then stop any new ones from coming in.
SLAWB: Most of those immigrants are poor refugees who just want to escape from injustice and lead a better life, the kind of life you were privileged enough to be born into.
CR: It seems to me that being poor and wanting a better life don’t excuse you from committing sexual assault. I’m no expert on fashion, but I always thought women kept their money in a purse, not in their vaginas. [I actually say stuff like this. Your mileage may vary.]
Anyway, it’s interesting you mentioned that they’re escaping from “injustice” in their home country: a country filled with people just like them. Same race, same ethnicity, same religion, same culture. People just like them are committing injustices against them. So they flee. They flee to a nice country like Norway, with nice people and a nice culture. And what’s the first thing they do there? Rape spree.
I mean, if they’re committing about 100% of the rapes, it stands to reason that the rate of sexual assault has gone up, like, infinity percent since they got there. Maybe the reason their home country is so bad is… it’s full of the same kind of people who are fleeing it and coming to Norway. Everyone wants a better life… especially the ones who don’t deserve it.
Based on this news report, it looks like these immigrants aren’t assimilating into the wonderful, privileged society of Norway. They’re not changing. They’re bringing their third-world problems with them. So as more and more of them pile into Norway, Norway is going to look more and more like a third-world country. Meanwhile, Afghanistan and Pakistan are still going to be third-world countries, so rather than raising up the foreigners to our level, we’re letting them drag us down to theirs.
The Norwegians were leading a “better life” because they weren’t committing all these injustices against one another. Good for them. They’re entitled to keep living their privileged lives the way they’ve always lived them, with each other. They do have that right. Let the Muslim immigrants — especially the poor ones, the ones who get on welfare the moment they arrive, the ones who commit most of the crime — let them stay in their own country, with their own people, and fix it up so it’s as good as Norway. Don’t bring them to Norway, so they can drag it down until it’s as bad as… whatever. Syria, I guess.
SLAWB: [head explodes]
Try it yourself. Write a dialogue, or have a real one.
Imagine yourself as a proud Norwegian muskox, locking horns with an inferior Middle Eastern, er... goat.
For extra credit, re-read this post and identify all the signs of the Dark Triad in my writing. (That’s narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy: self-obsessed; deceitful and exploitative; and thrill-seeking and callous. Huzzah!)
Where I live rapists are beheaded in the town square and slutwalkers would be whipped. After all, women who take rides from strangers are also whipped. If they claim rape the punishment of the men involved is reduced because the women contributed to their misfortune.
The last Norwegians with balls died defending Berlin from America’s allies in 1945.
OT, but here is a kitty video that any cat lover would enjoy.
http://www.slothster.com/2352-Cat-On-Boat-Plays-With-Dolphins.html
i once scored 22 in the narcissistic personality inventory so suck it
Tried here. Got the response that the assailants are 100% men.
http://www.rollonfriday.com/Discussion/MainDiscussion/tabid/79/Default.aspx
Where do the slut-walk protesters stand on this?
I know how to stop rapes by Muslims immediately: threaten to do the same to the Koran. For every dhimmi female raped by a Muslim male, one Koran — nah, make that TWO Korans — will be inappropriately penetrated by lengthy infidel shafts!
Think of it, Muzzies — the very Word of Allah — turned to junk by sticky dhimmi spunk!
I think the slut walk protesters want to march all the way to Pakistan in their teeny bikinis to prove that they have the right to not get raped.
In all seriousness, there was an Italian artist who planned to hitchhike all the way to the Holy Land in a wedding dress to prove that people can get along. She was found by the roadside in Turkey murdered, almost certainly raped. If I remember her name I’ll post it.
Wow. That’s actually so stupid, I couldn’t imagine anyone using it.
(1) “That just proves we should use racial profiling, since we obviously already use sex profiling.”
(2) “Why would we deport the Norwegian men? They’re not raping anyone. Just deport the Muslims. Or are you unable to understand categories more complex than ‘men,’ or ‘Muslims’? Like, for instance, ‘men who are Muslims.’ (Try a Venn diagram!)”
no, the slawb would just say:
“that makes you a racist. SLIPPERY SLOPE, SLIPPERY SLOPE!!” or “everyone is an individual! we shouldn’t target groups of people because of a few bad apples.”
“…hitler…”
The phrase “slippery slope” turns me on just a little bit.
Yeah, I made a reference to an insurance company to try and help them understand how statistical discrimination makes sense.
I guess the key word there is “discrimination” — as Lawrence Auster points out some people believe any form of discrimination is unacceptable. So even if 100% of asylum seekers were committing rape they would still refuse to frame it in a way that could lead to discrimination against that group.
@ kiwi
i liek kitteh
@ Olave
please do
I should probably point out that Norwegian women, from my anecdotal experience, are rather hot. This makes it even more irresponsible of their government to allow in sex-starved, impulsive men who don’t share Western cultural constraints. Each immigration minister should have to personally apologise to the families, as this problem is easily foreseeable.
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/tm/2008/11/21/Norweigian_girls_428x269_to_468x312.jpg
Giuseppina Pasqualino di Marineo, also known as just “Pippa Bacca.” No official Wikipedia page, but here’s a user-created one: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:DaQuirin/Bacca&oldid=428592236
Also news article: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7344381.stm
You keep getting better Unamused. This my new favorite Blog!
I always feel iffy about creating a dialog because when I see people doing it with opinions opposing mine, I always get angry because they pick and choose the arguments they want, and never give the chance for real arguments. Yours is a lot better than most about this, but I always get that iffy feeling.
Writer,
You are becoming no different than the dumb racist conservative muslims
Racist , hatefull , intolerant
just lika a muslim
I would quote the famous abyys quote from nietche but
I think its too late for you
. <– This is the point.
=== <– This is the point going whoosh.
o <– This is Tryin's head that the point is going over.
-|-
/ \
Tryin is hardly tryin' to make an actual argument. He's got an assertion, a bunch of insults, and a misspelled reference to a very important author.
Do you want to play again?
White t-shirt wearing HS students (including one Asian) suspended for being suspected “white supremacists.”
http://www.wbal.com/absolutenm/templates/smith_show.aspx?articleid=73917&zoneid=13
Clarification: suspended SOLELY for wearing white T-shirts
The anti-racist hysteria is reaching the levels of the “Satanic ritual abuse” panic of about a generation ago.
Double clarification: No it wasn’t. Wearing white T-shirts is the sole thing the school has been allowed to say publicly due to privacy restrictions preventing them saying what any specific student did.
Ahem.
Norway DOESN’T HAVE separation of Church and State.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_of_Norway
(That’s what I mean by you not having a thorough understanding of Norwegian history and culture.)
Interesting. I just assumed their constitution matched their attitudes, as about 70 percent are atheists. Let’s make that “the practical separation of Church and State, which the Church of Norway can be trusted to observe, but Islam sure as hell cannot.”
@ Erik
It’s possible, but the video doesn’t give any indication that there were other factors. From the report, it seems the administration heard rumors about a “white supremacist” gang and they saw white t-shirts, and that was enough.
Today, that’s believable (which of course is the problem). Like those students who got kicked off campus for wearing American flags on Cinco de Mayo.
I’m trying to decipher this.
The “dumb racist conservative” Muslims are “racist, hatefull [sic], intolerant” — which makes me racist, hateful, and intolerant for not wanting them in Western countries.
Am I not allowed to hate even hateful people anymore? I thought intolerant people were the last group we were allowed not to tolerate!
PS I don’t really “do” research. I like my coffee black, my women white, and my assertions unsubstantiated, thank you very much.
Nietzsche had something to say about Arby’s? Really? I didn’t even know they had Arby’s in 19th century Germany.
I think this is the relevant quote: “All sciences are now under the obligation to prepare the ground for the future task of the philosopher, which is to solve the problem of taste, to determine the true hierarchy of the Arby’s sauce. Which is really better, the barbecue or the horseradish stuff?”
More classic Nietzsche:
“The press, the machine, the railway, Arby’s Angus Three Cheese & Bacon are premises whose thousand-year conclusion no one has yet dared to draw.”
“The true man wants two things: danger and play. For that reason he wants curly fries, as the most dangerous plaything.”
“For the woman, the man is a means: the end is always Arby’s.”
“It is always consoling to think of suicide: in that way one gets through many a bad Arby’s roast beef sandwich.”
Separation of church and state has exaggerated important to us Yanks. Religious freedom is way more important, and exists in the UK, Denmark, and AFAIK Japan as well as Norway.
It’s pretty hard to separate church and state completely in a monarchy, unless you only allow atheists to reign. Which is why it doesn’t matter. I would much rather be “ruled” by a King* and “told what to think” by a pushy Bishop than knifed in an alley by an ex-camel driver, if you know what I mean. So what is the opposite of anarcho-tyranny?
Monarcho-traditionalism, I guess.
* Especially when the local word for “king” is kong.
You’re forgetting probably the most famous:
“Burgers are dead. Burgers remain dead. And Roast Beef has killed them.”
I ate at Arby’s today for the third time in my life, out of morbid curiosity (just like the other two times). Bleh.
I’ll bring this up, but yesterday I made sure to mention to several people Mr. Drudge’s interesting number of links pointing out black riots and disturbances in cities all across America. These occurred over the Memorial Day weekend. And to think it’s not even July 4th yet! I wonder what kind of barn burnin’ exercises our dusky denizens have planned for the rest of the summer?
[…] – “From Norway with (Nonconsensual) Love“, “More Hot White Girls“, “Who Am I Arguing With Now? Vacation […]
Dack Thrombosis
June 01, 2011 at 9:57 am
We’ll see what happens this Labor day. Also Thanksgiving when some of the chillinz go hurgriez. Christmas might go to hell when some of these urban yoofs don’t get everything they want because mommy decided to spend her welfare money at the salon on nails and a hair weave instead of food and presents.
We’ll see. I don’t know if it’ll be AS bad because at least where I live it’s starting to get cooler and there is a strong correlation between temperature and the murder rate.
CR: Don’t bring them to Norway, so they can drag it down until it’s as bad as… whatever. Syria, I guess.
SLAWB: [head explodes]
As well it might. Remarkably prescient, Un.
Then again, teh joos probably tipped you off in time to get out of Dodge before the false flag car bombs started going off in Damascus…
That was a joke, btw. Keep up the good work. :)
Oh yeah, regarding Muslim unemployment, I’ve heard figures of half (!) of Muslim men and three quarters (three fourths in US speak?) of Muslim women in the UK being unemployed. Wonderful people, all of them. Hard workers, so we’re told, who we should warmly welcome to the West with open arms (and an open cheque book).
And you’ll have no doubt heard about the recent scandals involving gangs of, you’ll never guess, Muslim men raping scores of underage White girls in Britain. For something like the last ten years or more.
Want the punchline? The police wouldn’t investigate, for all those years of abuse, despite multiple witness reports, for fear of being labelled… something beginning with ‘R’.
Yanks, you have the Second Amendment. Hold on to it. You have no idea how lucky you are. And the First. Hold on to that too. I’m probably risking arrest just for typing this (I wish that was a joke). Seriously – in this country, all someone has to do is take ethnic offence at something they thought they heard you say, and the wheels of ‘justice’ can and will start turning. But I digress.
Funnily enough, I was turning the rehearsed dialogue idea over in my head earlier, before reading this post this evening – more prescience on your behalf. Insert Keanu “Whoah!” here. The imaginary conversation involved murder rates in the USA, revolving around possible retorts to the popular stereotype we enjoy over here of Americans, as violent, gun-toting psychopaths. Armed with the information from this blog, and others, there’s a killer comeback:
“Ah! That may be, but did you know who exactly was doing most of that killing?”
Which leads nicely on to an opportunity to point out that if you magically removed a certain segment of the US population, let’s be generous and say 10%, the murder rate would halve overnight. And yes, fellow smug superior Brit, taking that certain segment out of the population, American violent crime figures would probably be lower than ours.
You can see where that’s going I hope. One’s interlocuter would be bound to ask just who are that talented tenth spilling most of the blood…
And all one has to do is present the facts. No exaggeration necessary, shockingly. Anyway, just a segment of what I was toying with today.
Regards from Airstrip One.
Oh, now you have me thinking of all the civilian-owned small arms that the British government has confiscated over the years. Not just any guns, British guns. Beautiful top-break .455 revolvers that could have ridden on some explorers hip as he explored some jungle, and been pulled from its holster at the last minute to dispatch some hungry leopard when the beast was close enough to feel its breath. Lee-Enfield Speed Sporters. Ancient Adams revolvers, slender rook rifles in obscure calibers like .320, Webley semi-automatic revolvers (seriously!)
Okay, I’ve gotten misty-eyed enough for one Friday evening. There’s plenty of room in South Dakota. I’d say easily enough for all the White South Africans, Rhodesians, and non-loony-left Britons. The nearest cod fishery is pretty far away, but you can always learn to like rainbow trout.
ALL ABOARD!!!
Oh, and will you folks kindly pack up Westminster Abbey and Stonehenge? Make sure to number all the pieces first. Worked for London Bridge! And if there are any nice double shotguns left, you can bring those too.
[…] ‘From Norway with (nonconsensual) love’ (Unamusement Park) […]